The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit File BLD-2021-0088 3925 Rock Ridge Parkway (6) -, Nlorth west Agricultural Tyler McKee Consultants 2018RAve Anacortes, WA 98221 2545 W Falls Avenue PAP-Accredited Kennewick,WA 99336 509,783.7450 Report:47004-1-1 ®ate: February 28,2019 www.nwag.com Project No: #O✓IMAM lab@nwrag.com Project Name: Rock Ridge Sample l® pH Organic Matter Cation Exchange Capacity 2 6.4 10.81% 21.0 meq/100g Method SM 4500-H+B ASTM D2974 EPA 9081 Jason Sterling Stranberg Construction 2018 R.Avenue Anacortes,WA 98221 January 23, 2019 Subject: Soil Analysis Analytical results with comments are attached for a soil sample submitted on 1/16/2019 with a brief summary following in this report. Sample: Rock Ridge soil stock pile Intended use: Construction backfill and landscape plantings Summary of Results: The pH 5.71 is low and should be in the range if 6.0-6.8 for general use. The plant available calcium is very low for landscape plantings and should be in the range of 75-150 ppm. (The pH and calcium are easily corrected with the application of ag lime) The total nitrogen and plant available potassium are very good for landscape plantings. Phosphorus is deficient and should be in the range of 2-4 ppm plant available for most NW plant varieties. Magnesium is excellent. Overall from the chemical standpoint this soil is of fairly good quality as the deficient calcium and phosphorus are easily corrected with proper fertilization. From the physical standpoint this soil is gravelly sandy clay with very low total organic matter. In addition to fertilizer amendment this soil will require organic matter to improve moisture holding capacity and support the microbiological process. (The ideal would be to have the total organic matter at 6-10%) Also attached to this report is a mechanical analysis showing particle distribution. Recommendations: Amendments after the soil is in place at planting site 1.Apply and work in at least 2 to 3 inches of good quality compost 2. Apply ag lime(calcium carbonate 99%)at the rate of 50 lbs. per 1000 sq.ft. and work in 3. Broadcast the following fertilizer per 1000 sq.ft. prior to planting and lightly work in 12 lbs. 16-20-0 Also with any bare root or balled plants a substantial quantity of peat should be used with planting. If you have any questions please give me a call Respectfully yours, William F. Black,Agronomist WFB:tjb STRANBERG CONSTRUCTION 01/29/19 2018 R.AVENUE ANACORTES, WA 98221 Field acres: Location(name) Irrigation&Type ROCK RIDGE SOIL STOCK PILE Crop to be: Previous Crop Present Conditions LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS Any fertilizer,lime or manure used lately,if so,when and how much: Topography: Level Depressions Rolling Sloping Deep Drainage: Good Fair Poor Subsoiled Tiled Interpretation:PPM=palls per million,Lbs/A=pounds per acre 20 cm(7.87"deep). A dash(-)indicates no result or very insignificant amount. Test Active Test(A) Reserve Test(R) (available) (not readily available) PPM LBS/A PPM LBS/A Comments Soil(pH) 5.711 PH LOW Calcium(Ca) 1 39 417.3 CALCIUM VERY LOW Ammonium(NH4) 2.1 17.43 OK Nitrate(NO3) 33 79.2 OK GOOD Total Nitrogen(N) 96.63 TOTAL NITROGEN VERY GOOD Phosphorus(P205) <0.1 0 14.81 364.08 DEFICIENT Potassium(K20) 14.7 189.631 OK SLIGHTLY HIGH Magnesium(Mg) 47.2 505.04 EXCELLENT MAGNESIUM Manganese(Mn) 0.13 1.391 26.4 282.48 VERY GOOD TOTAL MANGANESE Iron(Fe) 1.33 14.231 148 1583.61 VERY GOOD TOTAL IRON Aluminum(AI) 0 0 NONE WANTED Sulfates(SO4) 0 0 OK Carbonates(CO3) - NEG.Ca CO3 Chlorides(CI) 1.1 11.77 OK GOOD (LOW SALT) Electroconductivity 0.225 MILLIMHOS/CM LOW Organic Matter(%) <2.0% LOW Topsoil(inches) Type: GRAVELLY SANDY CLAY Subsoil(type) WITH PLANT AND WOOD FIBER Soil Structure This report is based on modern scientific quantitative analytical methods,and a scientific knowledge of crop plant nutrient requirements.There are,however,too many factors involved which can effect crop results,which makes it impossible to guarantee specific results,either expressed or implied,and we cannot assume any responsibility other than to give certain soil management instuctions and to perform inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of science. Jason Sterling Stranberg Construction 2018 R Avenue Anacortes, WA 98221 Lab.#9545 22-Jan-19 SUBJECT: SOIL SAMPLE FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: Rock Ridge Soil Stockpile- submitted 1/16/19 Results of Mechanical Analysis: Particle distribution report. Sieve Series Analysis: 100%of material passed a 1/2 inch mesh;this material was then classified by particle size analysis as follows: Note:This sample contained some fiberous wood and plant material which was separated out as good as possible and the following mechanical analysis was conducted. MESH: SIEVE SIZE %PASSING %Retained CLASSIFICATION 1/4INCH 100 0 Gravel #18 1.00 mm 73.75 26.25 Very coarse sand/fine gravel #35 500 microns 51.48 22.27 Coarse sand #60 250 microns 32.65 18.83 Medium sand #140 100 microns 21.15 11.50 Fine sand #270 50 microns 14.03 7.12 Silt #500 25 microns 14.03 clays Recovery on testing: 99.94% With all calculations being on a dry weight basis. This particle distribution report was determined using U.S. Standard Sieve Series. As a reference: (Ideally the gravel and very coarse sand fractions should not exced 12 to 15%.The coarse, medium, and fine sand fractions should be 70 to 85%of the total and the silt/clays at 5 to 15%). William F.Black,Agronomist WVSHING EXTENSION Residential Building Air Leakage Test(Blower Door Test) Results Permit#:_�u I ,h a ti House address or lot number: Z I3i o r✓k �, j'h �r City: /_!'116 �T-eJ Zip: Cond. Floor Area(ft): 3S 47 Age of house: Source(circle one): Pl s Estimated Measured Results shall be reported as Air Changes per Hour at 50 Pascals(ACH50)and shall be calculated as follows: Where: ACHSo=(CFM50 x 60)/Volume CFM50=Blower door fan flow at 50 Pascal pressure difference Volume=Conditioned Floor Area of the housing unit x ceiling height Blower Door Test Result: 2- ACH50 CFM@50Pa Ring(circle one if applicable): Open B C Blower Door Fan Location: rh t Py z w Weather Conditions: f U 17 h y I certify that these blower door results are accurate and determined using standard industry protocol. Company Name:��u►,�y1 lie-c�fj h c, Technician: laon/ Technician Signature: o" Date: b -Z - Z L Phone Number: Z g D 6 2012 Washington State Energy Code reference: R402.4.1.2 Testing.The building or dwelling unit shall be tested and verified as having an air leakage rate of not exceeding 5 air changes per hour in Climate Zones 1 and 2,and-a 5 air changes per hour in Climate Zones 3 through 8. Testing shall be conducted with a blower door at a pressure of 0.2 inches w.g.(50 Pascals).Where required by the code official,testing shall be conducted by an approved third party.A written report of the results of the test shall be signed by the party conducting the test and provided to the code official.Testing shall be performed at any time after creation of all penetrations of the building thermal envelope. Once visual inspection has confirmed the presence of a gasket(see Section 502.4),operable windows and doors manufactured by small business shall be permitted to be sealed off at the frame prior to the test. r S EXTENSION ENERGY PROGRAM Duct Leakage Affidavit (New Construction) Permit#:_Ho 1,e M c,h /e It 0 vj House address or lot number: 3 cl z Ij u C- tD City: /4 klmlot f tj Zip: Cond. Floor Area ft2 : �`� �7 ( ) Source(circle one): Plan Estimated Measured ❑ Duct tightness testing is not required.The total leakage test is not required for ducts and air handlers located entirely within the building thermal envelope. Ducts located in crawl spaces do not qualify for this exception. Air Handler in conditioned space?N yes❑ no Air Handler present during test?4 yes❑ no Circle Test Method: Leakage to Outside Total Leakage Maximum duct leakage. Post Construction,total duct leakage: (floor area x.04)_ L t" CFM@25 Pa Post Construction, leakage to outdoors: (floor area x.04)= CFM@25 Pa Rough-In,total duct leakage with air handler installed: (floor area x.04) = CFM@25 Pa Rough-In,total duct leakage with air handler not installed: (floor area x.03)= CFM 25 Pa Test Result: 3 CFM@25Pa Ring (circle one if applicable): Open 1 2 3 Duct Tester Location: v n c i Pressure Tap Location: Wu"'h /� r I certify that these duct leakage rates are accurate and determined using standard duct testing protocol. Company Name: 14'A146 Ye Uri L, Technician: -1/ Technician Signature: �y�'h✓ Date: 6 -2 Phone Number: 2 0 5 6 1 ' SUPERIOR INSULATION PRODUCTS r INSULATION CERTIFICATION CARD Insulation Contractor Name: SUPERIOR INSULATION PRODUCTS Jobsite Contractor: STRANDBERG CONSTRUCTION Jobsite Name: N/A Jobsite Address: 3925 ROCKRIDGE PARKWAY ANACORTES, WA 98221 Ceiling Insulation Manufactures Name: Knauf Knauf Insulation Type: Fiberglass Batts Fiberglass Batts R-Value of Insulation: R49 R38 Thickness of Insulation Installed: 16.5" 12" Location of Insulation Installed: Ceiling Area Cathedral Vault Wall Insulation Manufactures Name: Knauf Insulation Type: Fiberglass Batts R-Value of Insulation: R21 Thickness of Insulation Installed: 5.5" Location of Insulation Installed: Exterior Walls Floor Insulation Manufactures Name: Knauf Insulation Type: Fiberglass Batts R-Value of Insulation: R38 Thickness of Insulation Installed: 12" Location of Insulation Installed: Cantilevers THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AND RETURNED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BEFORE YOUR FINAL INSPECTION Kelsey SUPERIP833KT Insulation Contractors Signature License# 3.7.2022 Date