Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit File 5603 Sugarloaf Street 0 0 CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. a. PLUMBING $MECHANICAL ,.,,, PERMIT 23 • . ANACORTES, WASH. DATE 2 - 2 € 19 1 PERMISSION IS-1 EREBY GRANTED 0: ',OyyNER r I. L At I x r A�R STREET 5 ,(Ys 45L)c-,A. . LOCATION WHERE WORK IS TO yyypppE DONE .1 \t E CONTRACTOR Ol d a „ce f �I x„..re. , !/e fiv/ma /9S4 c 7, 1 /i TO ERECT lig, INSTALL EC OR RgPAIR. 0 i 4 IN THE FQLLOWING MANNER: "�, / c,./`7 f /� •CeS� j�. 1 FC5 r Pam.9 to 1 I PERMIT EX IRES DUNE YEAR FROM DA ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT SUBMITTED WERE WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER p000NTRACTOR ,I RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: APPROXIMATE VALUE TYPE OF WORK PERMIT FEES ISSUING 2 III 6, * BUILDING y - +_�,# °C) ►w : GAS PIPING - M r7,, PLUMBING AND W.S. , IIII �� 0 " SEWER CONNECTION INSP. -- 19© MECHANICAL p0_ i ® ilre aura 111111nM I PLAN CHECK FEE --CM MISC. -111.1111- TOTAL I W • J i LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1:1-C-e- _...:-!. :ivcW,:-.:-,1515„,,r07A- 1,'-'!",ik-';',, Ilt;tr.,fi --i-.L:"'"!1.--_!--l..17‘,.- .3('41!...;:;,--,--,":,7r--:•- ,.,. ,i3rar, 42",Itgelt•:. ir.-II, --7.- -- ',I., - • . .! -. • E , , ,. .. s' i */ . I • F , - ,,. I I , ,, I _ _ . - ..,- IL I ' I • 1 1 I ii ICki (13.4 1 i i' , .. i 0 r tr ko 1 e CrSiir- ,.44c.j--c•/4 i I 1 i I r . ! 10,0,-8. I 1 t 1 , I • : . : 1 . I • . ,..• ',Sr 1 .-...1:- i1-6-• • 11 I ,I I 1I 11I,I. i,.i• •..,• ki 11 1 I 1 • I s .2-v & ' i I ,43 94"Y e l I I ' ,-I.: I - 1 i I II V) 1 ' I . ; LI- _ s 1U- I ‘ t I 1 ' I 1 t I 1 11 3 N .-... 1 : I -re &AK' ....it '0 L.I I - I eon,/ . .d , \ c a- 1 , ti I 1 ..s. • I . kr) , a 1 , — I I- . . • : 4...strp,v• •‘• , :. . t A e-I • 1 I • A%^ i / S - -AMIN . .1 . 0,?._,, oi_c- I - 1760 . ; x v/I / _. ric(17:9 - - r—wisrei i „tiatx,:,/ Qs ..wv-__c oe 1 - , ,..: : ii,, ,, ,,- --,---i-st-.4re-- - - -- rtl V'e/j and the company 0.r .t:Gt_!? I:J I i] ..t of 1 ,.t.)+ to r VCt i..:t.,.on, - e �t,!'T t ! 1ncot.lt1:-. . f any ,. it: rl i.at,•:.�:. n• -•;1:. it . a*c '- —• .. m v.'alt 9e G e3 „Aific.�s..e�� - a (-eh \e 1 \(.3 `: • • ::U,V.i-f- :i. :.. - . :—.•,o dC ` 1s0 i3 h8 69 .t>..<7 k)-o (,t_ ,vc.,� .k''+ 6000 11f we'r.•. • • <t• s 34 .\eiS ., �� `III40 41 r 4238 a '�� 37 <r :�. I lI :o on .. ,,, R., ') N ,3C sr so 7 �.. 'yy r .b.; 33. • \k —�� STREET • r '-_, Y • -� b<}1 /�- 147 , 46 45 `44:& - 43 I1.92 . 4 A/ h i� 48 4 ♦'� \ c K ,.. , 4 • �, :)', D :' C 11 ; yO, �)\,( S bl^. 5.,Y >o 00 S-O• 45.00 -_.. ._ — 0-o ff ''i!9/. .6�5 1 IBo 00 1 q��pR I. 5! iJb! , ,h4. SO I 52 'o �s� b °' ,bs 69\ '•r� `; ' •`' I 'L j/C I/�] t R) ;' DD `\ _ �„' _- ._-1 1 'til. .i 'y 'y a %\ r I\ 1 I ��• \ crr ' I I �. / / _ ;t \ ` ;c so t.Iif 74 srsi rn o.. n ^ t•.•t8 oirt �S j' \ \. 6 61 yt • ' .% I Ny Co v Y, 0 le 6.�/ 10 1 v e ...• \ 9,4\ tolii..i: NOTE: This nap does not purport to show all highways , roads or ease- ments affecting the property. Ate- Attat - Regular Meeting Anacortes Board of Adjustment July 17, 1980 Chairman Norwood Young called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Norwood Young, Ruth Horn, Bob Hogg, George Mehler, Bill Morningred City Staff: Ray Iversen Minutes of Previous Meeting - Mr. Morningred made at motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of May 1, 1980 as if read. Mrs. Horn seconded the Motion. Vote: Ayes - Horn, Young, Mehler, Morningred, Hogg. Motion Carried. Vaux Variance Mr. Young then stated the first item to be considered was a request by Mr. Bill Vaux to allow construction of a small cantilevered deck into the rear yard set- backs at Lot 44, Division 2, Skyline. Mr. Iversen informed the Board that there were no objections received from City staff, although Mr. Jim Pemberton, Engineering Supervisor, commented if requests of this nature continue to be made then possibly • a modification to the Zoning Code should be looked at. Mr. Vaux addressed the Commission stating that if he were to comply with the setback requirements then it would be necessary to remove a large fir tree from the rear yard. After brief consideration, Mr. Hogg made a motion that the variance be granted t permitting Mr. Vaux to build his deck within 15 feet of the back property line in order to save the tree. Mr. Mehler seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes - Young, Mehler, Morningred,Hogg, Horn. Motion carried. Mr. Mehler commented that the would be considered under special conditions unique to the area. O'Donnell Variance Mr. Young stated the next request was that of Mr. & Mrs. Daniel O'Donnell to allow construction of a ten foot deck to encroach approximately 3 feet into the 20 foot setback off of Doon Way at Lot 47, Skyline Division 8. Mr. Iversen stated no objections had been received from City staff, and no objections had been received from abutting property owners. Mr. Morningred asked if Mr. O'Donnell had planned to build a deck when he purchased the home, and Mr. O'Donnell stated he had planned to and had been assured by the realtor who sold him the home that he would be able to do this. He further stated he had no specific design in mind and had looked around the area and decided on something similar to the homes in the same vicinity. Mr. Hogg commented that it appeared Doon Way would not be widened, therefore, this request would not interfere with any plans to widen the street. Mr. Iversen also explained that decks of this nature had been allowed under the previous code, and there were probably home there now with decks encroaching into the setback area. Mr. O'Donnell stated he had no plans to cover the deck. Mr. Mehler made a motion that the three foot variance as requested be granted. Mr. Morningred seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes - Mehler, Morningred, Hogg,- Horn & Young. Motion carried. Dwight Smith Variance Mr. Young stated the last variance request was by Mr. Dwight J. Smith to extend the corner of the garage and one corner of the home past the 10 foot setabck on the East property line at Lot 1, Division 13, Skyline. Mr. Iversen stated he had received no objections from City staff, although Mr. Mansfield did comment Page 2 it that it did not appear the requirements of the Zoning Code regarding variances were met; that the hardship must be peculiar to the land in, question and must not have been created by applicant. Mr. Young commented that this request again dealt with destroying trees, and it appeared trees needed to be saved in the area. There were two items of correspondence received by Mr. Smith from the abutting property owners stating they had no objections to this variance request. Mr. Hogg asked if Mr. Neil Danard, an abutting property owner, would also be requesting a variance, and Mr. Smith stated he would not. Mr. Smith also commented that his plans had been approved by the Skyline Architectural Committee. In answer to Mr. Hogg's question, Mr. Smith stated that setback on the west side of the property would comply with the Code, which would be a 5 foot setback. Mr. Mehler commented that the shape of the property is certainly a "unique condition". Mr. Morningred made a motion that,due to the short distance on a peculiar shaped lot, this variance be granted as requested. Motion seconded by Mr. Hogg. Vote: Ayes - Mehler, Morningred, Hogg, Horn & Young. It was further commented that this request was granted because of the peculiar conditions of the building F lot involved and to save some trees. There beingno further business to discuss, Mr. Young adjourned the meeting at 8:10 P.M. C. Monahan, Secretary rG1T-Y O . City of Anacortes Permit#: BLD-2012-0218 904 6th Street �< '{ Issue date: 06/21/2012 P.O.Box 547 Expire date: 12/18/2013 jf Anacortes, WA 98221-0547 4411- sr..cp ,� .Y.Y N•.,AM Job Address: 5603 SUGARLOAF ST Permit Type: Reroof Single Family Residence ANACORTES WA 98221-2963 Project: APN: P59091 Remarks: Reroof Owner: WENKER CHARLES F Contractor: Address: PO BOX 1392 Address: ANACORTES WA 98221-6392 Phone: Phone: License#: General Information: Fees: Building Valuation 7600 State Building Code Fee 4.50 Building Permit Fee 123.75 Total Calculated: 128.25 Deposits/Receipts: 0.00 Total Due: 128.25 m I) ti1 r.a :-t O c•.4 m I, Int O O a O 0cN .o • o 0% cn �. r•.� I' I ' THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IP CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. t. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL O PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR o NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL W REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE 0 ON. ,0 SIGNATU O *INNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IS UED BY