Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit File 703 R Avenue 0518904-1 0014 07/08/2005 002 4 Permit Fees 005700 $89.06 Qom., City of Anacortes Permit#: BLD-2005-0415 904 6th Street Issue date: 07/08/2005 ` ►' P.O.Box 547 Expire date: 07/08/2006 f/l i' Anacortes, WA 98221-0547 (360)293-1901.77 Job Address: (R AVE Permit Type: Sign Permit ANACORTES WA 98221-4129 Project: • APN: Remarks: Install new sign approximately 20 square feet. Owner: CITY ANACORTES MUSEUM Contractor: Address: 1305 8TH ST Address: ANACORTES WA 98221-1833 Phone: Phone: License#: General Information: Fees: Building Valuation 1728 Building Permit Fee 51.25 Plan Review Fee 33.31 State Building Code Fee 4.50 Total Calculated: 89.06 Deposits/Receipts: 0.00 Total Due: 89.06 THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. I"1if.�1c lA o ra-2a. rl SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT ISSUED BY City of MSOrtes . , . . Sign Permit Application Owner/Application Information / Site Address: /VS /f Parcel No.: c Ot"n'�7a/n'f (Pon aL Lot: Block: , .9 a� Addition:J-4r /�driar G✓ ,,4n# Owners Name: (9 / /i�fQ�r� /v$e lm Phone No.: £93 `/��-/ tz Address: /Sos �1 ,4h OZeorke State: if Zip: 9,;2 f Contractor Information " 9� J/ c, Sign Contractor: �O/^i?�2Sort c3 y`iS Phone No.: /�7 '-�0/ / Mailing Address: /f9.e /frz, i-�afri, ,7/ State: Lu4- Zip: 9rav3 /frit. W-Vnon State Contractors License No.: RarATGigeW2 Exp. Date: % 0/Or CigVC far t.w09//l29/ General Information . • : " ///a' No. of Existing Signs: —9— Gross Area of Existing Signs: -0--- sq.ft. �7A er ,Rice. Total Lineal Feet of Building Frontage: Side 1 ® ft./Side 2 citi ft. L47:ic Sjii Proposed Sign Area: 020 sq.ft. t Type of Sign and Number of Each: Wall Projecting Free Standing Pole Electric Non-Electric yy �/ Value of Sign(s) (labor and materials) $ /f 7Q -T Note: No Moving Parts or Lights are Allowed ;: t, .,. ""` ...1 pp}lcat 010: ckti'st. Please include the following items with application if applicable. I. 1. A sketch showing building frontage area. 2. A sketch showing sign,lettering, sign area, sign location, and sign height from grade. 3. Detail(s) of the sign support(s) and all structural connections. 4. Indicate setbacks from property line. 5. Electrical work requires a permit and inspection from the Department of Labor and Industries. Please call ltt7heemm at 360-416-3000. Signature: �(_/‘ . 0 - Date: ��d`,/_r Ap ' ant or Owner EEC) -aii - oy,s-- g? 0 ip Phone 360.424.5099 Fax 360.428. 7016 13986 Avon-Allen Road Mount Vernon WA 98273 Anacortes Museum 6-1 -2005 Carnegie Gallery 1.) Free Standing Sign 48"xSO" 1305 Eighth St. Install steel 4"x4"(2) into preexisting Anacortes Wa. 98221 concrete. The posts will be welded together with 2"x4" square tube to hold the Sign face. The Sign will have • sides and a back with a Plywood core. 1T Y 0� j\ \ �. _ 1-1 fr MORTENSON DESIGN CENTER 13986 AVON ALLEN ROAD MOUNT VERNON, WA 98273 360.424.5099 FAX 360.428.7016 ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF MORTENSON SIGNS AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION. Moriensoijtijj , Phone 360.424.5099 Fax 360.428. 7016 13986 Avon-Allen Road Mount Vernon WA 98273 Anacortes Museum 6-1 -2005 Carnegie GalleryEN 1.) Free Standing Sign 48"x6O" 1305 Eighth St. Install steel 4"x4"(2) into preexisting Anacortes Wa. 98221 concrete. The posts will be welded together with 2"x4" square tube to hold the Sign face. The Sign will have • sides and a back with a Plywood core. W. T. PRESTON G11Y 0 ''4 Snagboat Heritage Center Under the STEWARDSHIP OF THE ANACORTES MUSEUM MORTENSON DESIGN CENTER 13986 AVON ALLEN ROAD MOUNT VERNON, WA 98273 360.424.5099 FAX 360.428.7016 ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF MORTENSON SIGNS AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION. Monensoreiq #isiPhone 360.424.5099 Fax 360.428. 701 13986 Avon-Allen Road Mount Vernon WA 98273 Anacortes Museum 6-1 -2005 Carnegie Gallery 1.) Free Standing Sign 48"x6O" 1305 Eighth St. ■ Install steel 4"x4"(2) into preexisting Anacortes Wa. 98221 ■ concrete. The posts will be welded IIItogether with 2"x4" square tube to hold the Sign face. The Sign will have • sides and a back with a Plywood core. Over the face of 1/2"Thick M.D.O 1/2"Thick M.D.0 1/2"Thick M.D.O Plywood Backing. Plywood Backing Plywood Backing Treated 2"x4"addedC added to each Bide. will be D-Bond to each side. This will add\ strength In front of the 1/2'Thick M.RO Plywood Backing,will be D-Bond as a surface(This is a Aluminum over PVC material) (2)Steel Posts 4'k4"Square Tube 1/8"Thick wall,48"Tall (2)Steel 2'k4" Tube 1/8"Thick wall,Welded to the 4x4's IS ffr II iub Holes will be drilled 4"into Preexisting concrete,monied and epoxy This Plywood box will be raised off the concrete base,to allow water a place to pass. MORTENSON DESIGN CENTER 13986 AVON ALLEN ROAD MOUNT VERNON, WA 98273 360•424.5099 FAX 360.428.7016 ARTWORK IS PROPEH I Y OF MORTENSON SIGNS AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION. ��, GC'OTG'ST 741 Marine Drive PHONE rOLL FREE FAX I I ' Bellingham,WA 98225 360733-7318 8882516276 3607337418 I! -415551107 CONCRETE STRENGTH TEST REPORT PROJECT: WT Preston Snagboat Heritage Center JOB#: 4447 ADDRESS: R Avenue between 6th and 7th SAMPLED BY: JK CLIENT: City of Anacortes-Planning and Building Dept DATE MOLDED: 10/1/2004 CONTRACTOR: Roosendaal-Honcoop Construction DATE REC'D: 10/4/2004 SUPPLIER: Concrete Nor'West PAGE: Page 1 of 1 PERMIT#: I LOCATION OF POUR: Walls SAMPLE LOCATION: Mid Load(10 Cubic Yards)1st Truck Field Data for Sample Group#: 43649 " MIX#;;1SSA'.5.5sadkwlAlr;!' ,,;; ;;�' �;� ` ' - � � • ,,. • - MIX PROPORTIONS(lcubic yard): d): Truck#!Ticket# C164 214640 Slump 5.5 In. Water 273 lbs. Strength Required 3000 psi @ 28 day Air Content 4.4 % Cement 512 lbs. Quantity Poured 20 cu.yds. Unit Weight pcf Fly Ash lbs. Air Temp 70 °F Water Added on site gal. Coarse Agg. 1791 lbs. Mix Temp 68 °F Requested by Fine Agg. 1537 lbs. Time Batched 1:32 PM NR-WRA ozJcwt Time Sampled 2:30 PM HR-WRA oz./cwt Air Entr 0.66 ozJcwt W/C= Laboratory Data: LAB :: TEST DATE.:;;: : TOTAL LOAD . AREA COMPRESSIVE REMARKS ..L : #. AGE. : ":: 'TESTED :.:, :,(LBS•)".' ,:'(sq.-In.) STRENGTH (PSI) .. , 6746 7 10/8/2004 104,770 28.27 3710 6747 28 10/29/2004 142,820 28.27 5050 6748 28 10/29/2004 137,460 2827 4860 • Reinforcement Inspection Yes N/A:Not Applicable Specimen Size: 6"x 12"Cylinders Conforms Yes N/T:Not Tested Test Reference: ASTM C31,C39 Attachments No Comments: GeoTest arrived on site as requested by contractor. Concrete was pumped into place and mechanically consolidated. Steel reinforcement was in place according to the plans and specifications. Drawings S1.1,S1.2 and S2.1. Copies: City of Anacortes-Planning and Building Dept. Henry Klein Partnership Martens Chan Roosendaal-Honcoop Construction Submitted by: & / Grant Richardson,Technical Director This report shell not be reproduced except In full,without the written approval of Gooiest Services Inc. i' The above test results relateontyto the sample(or location)tested.Copyright 1993 Gr9 www.geo tee t-in c.corn 1 Page 2 of 3 Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:48 PM To: Lange, Steve Subject: Re: FW: WT Preston At 09:56 AM 2/18/04 -0800, you wrote: Lowell, The Building Department is requesting this calculation.Do you have this readily available?I remember this question had came up before.Please let me know. Thanks Steve Lange Project Manager 360.293.1920 Ext.246 stevel@cityofanacortes.org Original Message From: Measamer,Don Sent: Wednesday,February 18,2004 6:30 AM To: Lange,Steve Subject: WT Preston Steve, We need to know the total site impervious area for determination of the impervious area fee...for the W.T Preston Heritage center...Thanks,Don Lowell Larsen The Henry Klein Partnership,Architects Mount Vernon,Washington http://www.ncia.comt-hkp Steve, I can do this by Friday,should we only be doing this for the improved area or the area that includes the WT Preston since it is all one area and property? Lowell Lowell Larsen The Henry Klein Partnership, Architects Mount Vernon, Washington http://www.ncia.com/—hkp Steve, The calculation of pervious to impervious comes to 46%. There is 10,664 sq. ft. of site area that we are altering and regrading. There is 4,664 sq. ft. that we are making impervious,which includes building, ramps,pads, sidewalks, and parking spaces. If you come in with a code review, I will correct these comments, there is a structural calculation revision for you to pick up and forward to Don M. The specifications are undergoing some revisions and we need to include some current federal wage rates which will push costs up,but the specs. are not ready to pick up. We will follow up with a revised estimate. 2/24/2004 Page 1 of 3 Measamer, Don From: Lange, Steve Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:44 AM To: 'Lowell Larsen' Cc: Measamer, Don Subject: RE: FW: WT Preston Thanks for the information. I will forward this to Don. When I get the review comments from Don, I will drop off at your office. I will be able to do it this afternoon . Since this project is getting some attention by local contractors, do you have a time frame when the specifications will be done for review? I am trying to come up with a tentative schedule for ad and construction. Thanks. Hope to see you this afternoon. Steve Lange Project Manager 360.293.1920 Ext.246 stevel@cityofanacortes.org Original Message From: Lowell Larsen [mailto:llarsen@hkpa.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:32 PM To: Lange, Steve Subject: RE: FW: WT Preston At 07:23 AM 2/19/04 -0800,you wrote: Excellent It would be the new impervious area. The Building Department has completed their review. It should be typed up today. I will get you a copy of the findings. We also need the specifications book to review. Can I pick that up on Friday as well?Along with an updated Estimate of construction? We will be tying the sewer into the sewer line that runs north and south for the Depot and the W.T. Preston itself. Operations says that the line is deep enough to be able to use it. I am out in the field most today. I will call you tomorrow. I would be able to be over there late in the afternoon to pick up and drop off the information. Let me know. Thanks Steve Lange Original Message From: Lowell Larsen [mailto:llarsen@hkpa.com] 2/24/2004 Page 3 of 3 Lowell 2/24/2004 Measamer, Don From: Lange, Steve Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:00 PM To: Measamer, Don; Cline, Garry; Barnett, Gary; Carlson, Maureen; Hyde, Bob; Miller, Jeff; 'llarsen@hkpa.com' Subject: W.T.Preston Heritage Interpretive Center Here is a very intense schedule to meet the May 1 construction start for the W.T. Preston Heritage Interpretive Center. March 25, 2004: Ad for Bid April 15, 2004: Bid opening April 20, 2004: Notice of Award April 26, 2004: Preconstruction Meeting May 3, 2004: Construction Start There are a few issues that worked out: (1)We need to discuss the option of having Henry Klein Partnership doing the Construction and Contract Management. If we do that, I will need help from Jeff and possibly Gary to put that together in a short period of time. (2)Complete set of plans and specifications. Henry Klein Partnership has the review comments from the Building Department and should be working on them. I have a meeting scheduled with Lowell on 03-03-04 at 8:15 am to stream line the plans and specifications on the fast track. (3)We will also have to send a complete set of plans and specifications to WSDOT for approval for construction. This should be a fast turn around time. At least it was with TIB and the 12th Street widening. This project needs to go to construction this Spring.This will put us into the beginning of the rainy season for construction completion and clean-up. I appreciate any help in achieving this schedule. Thanks Steve Lange 1 Srtx _. ® ANACORTES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P.O.BOX 547, RNACORTES,WA 98221 PH (360) 293-1919 ROBERT W.HYDE,P.E.,DIRECTOR FAX (360) 293-1938 ,/y, ; 1891 �� E-MAIL: bobhyde@cityofonocortes.org `1 Cogs December 15, 2004 Roosendaal - Honcoop, Inc. 5977 Guide Meridian Bellingham, WA 98226 Dear Wendell, SUBJECT: W.T. Preston Interpretive Center (Post to Beam Connections COP#10) This letter is to clarify that the City of Anacortes gave you Verbal approval to move forward with the change in the Structural Connections to keep the construction of the W.T. Preston Heritage Interpretive Center moving forward. We have had discussions at the October 26th, November 2nd and November 9th weekly construction meetings and also have documented the concerns in the "Proposed Change, Modifications" log. This verbal approval, followed up with this confirmation letter, will be put into a Change Order Proposal by Roosendaal — Honcoop Construction, Inc. and routed for approval by the City of Anacortes. Per our discussion at the December 14, 2004 weekly meeting, you are still finding areas that need correcting during the construction process. Please update COP#10 and submit for approval at your earliest convenience. It will need to be approved prior to any payment being made. If you have any questions, please contact me at 360.661.3468. Sincerely, CITY OF ANACORTES Steven R. Lange Project Manager CC: Jeff Miller, Bob Hyde, Fred Buckenmeyer, Dave Wa e, Don Measameq • Water •Wastewater •Streets• Storm Drainage •Engineering • Solid Waste •Tronsportotion and Equipment • Capitol Projects • Development Services 'r Y do G = _< . ANACORTES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P.O.BOX 547,RNRCORTES,WA 98221 PH (360) 293-1919 ROBERT W.HYDE,P.E.,DIRECTOR FAX (360) 293-1938 + 1891 Co E-MRII:bobhyde@cityofanacortes.org `q C®RR December 15, 2004 Roosendaal - Honcoop, Inc. 5977 Guide Meridian Bellingham, WA 98226 Dear Wendell, SUBJECT: W.T. Preston Interpretive Center(Wheel Chair Ramp) We discussed at a previous weekly construction meeting regarding the quality of workmanship that was done on the curbs\gutter and wheel chair ramps. We are in agreement with Roosendaal — Honcoop. This letter is to inform you that the City of Anacortes is requesting the removal and replacement of: 1. Portions of the curb and gutter at the wheelchair ramps. There are birdbaths that form after rainstorms that can be iced over in the wintertime creating a safety hazard for pedestrians. Also, causing low spots in the newly placed asphalted parking lot. We request that the subcontractor calls for a form inspection. This will give us an opportunity to check for sub grade compaction as well. 2. The wheel chair ramps. The City of Anacortes requested that the wheel chair pan be stamped to identify a change in grade, as well as the Truncated Domes. They were requested to match the ramps that are currently done along the Commercial Avenue Sidewalk Replacement project. The stamped areas are not very well defined and are messy looking. If you have any questions, please contact me at 360.661.3468. Sincerely, CITY OF ANACORTES Steven R. Lange Project Manager CC: Jeff Miller, Bob Hyde, Fred Buckenmeyer, Dave W e, Don Measamer • Water • Wastewater •Streets• Storm Drainage • Engineering • Solid Waste •Transportation and Equipment •Capital Projects • Development Services 1 oft Y C, , ' '4' ANACORTES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P.O.BOX 547, ANACORTES, WA 98221 PH (360) 293-1919 ROBERT W. HYDE,P.E.,DIRECTOR FAX (360) 293-1938 7� '1891 `�0E-MAIL: bobhyde@cityofanocortes.org October 6, 2004 I Roosendaal - Honcoop, Inc. 5977 Guide Meridian Bellingham, WA 98226 Dear Wendell, SUBJECT: W.T. Preston Interpretive Center (Gang Plank Design) This letter is in response to the discussion and design ideas that were proposed at yesterdays Weekly Construction Meeting. 1. The construction plans show the Gang Plank having a length of 73'-0". The existing condition, when measured, is only 61'-0". With an elevation gain of 59 %", the ramp will not slope 12:1 per the ADA requirements. 2. The Architect did not take into consideration the new proposed door (Not in this Contract), as shown on Sheet A-9. This proposed door is approximately 5-feet North of the existing door, as shown. 3. The Architect did not take into consideration the 5-inch elevation change on the boat deck. This is an additional 5-foot loss in slope. 4. The Architect did not take into consideration the thick pylon cable that angles in front of the existing door. This feature cannot be modified. Due to these design errors, we, the meeting attendants, made a very good effort in trying to redesign this to make it close to the ADA requirements. Keeping in mind that the Snag Boat is an existing condition. i After further review and discussion with the Building and Engineering Staff regarding ADA requirements, we are requesting that the Gang Plank•be designed and built to meet current ADA requirements. Please provide us with a design drawing and a cost estimate for review at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your attention to this. If you have any questions, please contact me at 360.661.3468. Sincerely, CITY OF ANACORTES ..,_>:13t0._ 1 Steven R. Lange Project Manager CC: Jeff Miller, Bob Hyde, Fred Buckenmey , on easamer • Water • Wastewater •Str •Storm Draina e ngineering •Solid Waste •Transportation and Equipment rojects • Development Services FROM :MANTLE Gangways & Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:05PM P1 6i MANTLE INDUSTRIES INC. 1100 Yaw,Street,Blaine, Washington 98230•Telephone:(360)332-5276 DATE: 12-13-04 TO: Roosendaal-Honcoop FAX #: 398-2830 ATTENTION: Wendell FROM: John AT Mantle Ind. Inc. FAX #360-332-5277 No. Pages (including this page) : V E Message Purchase Order 0 Quotation RE; Handrails on Ramp for the WT Preston Snagboat Here are drawings and information on the Mantle Handrailing and,capies from the current ADA Guidelines, specifically copies from Section 4 . 8 RAMPS, and Section 4. 8.5* HANDRAILS, which requires compliance with Section 4 .26 and describes other requirements, including that the handrails shall be continuous, shall have a clear space to the 'wall' of 1-1/2", shall be 34" to 38" above the surface, shall either rounded or returned smoothly to the end post and shall not rotate within the fittings. Section 4 .26 describes the width of the gripping surface at 1-1/4" to 1-1/2" with a 1-1/2" clear space behind. Our shop drawing presently shows the use of Mantle Handrailing. This extrusion complies with the described criteria above, and is shown to be provided along both sides of the ramp. It' s grip width is 1-1/2" (with 1-1/2" clear behind) , it's welded on at 34" above the surface, provides a continuous gripping surface and does not rotate within it 's fittings. (r) l/A/kh-44-- -44;(1k),-1 v Qc p S-Vy ce PeA. FROM :MANTLE Gangways & Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:05PM P2 Page 2 The shop drawings presently show the handrailing transitioning into a 180 degree bent pipe which extends out past the deck 12" and then r ent pipe has a gripping width of 1-5/8" which door not comply with the guidelines. We propose that the bent pipe be eliminated and that the handrailing simply round-over directly into the end posts per 4.8.5 (6) . The 12" extension shall not be required because of 4.8.5 (2) which requires the extension only if the handrailing is NOT continuous. The Mantle handrailing has been reviewed and approved for compliance with ADA guidelines in several other projects including;• "Lake Morced" for the City of San Francisco, several gangway ramps for the Port of Bellingham in both Bellingham and Blaine, WA. , "Jack Dunster Marine Park" in San Diego, CA. , The City of Portland, OR. , The City of Seattle, WA, The City of Renton, WA. , "Broadway and Oceanside Access Ramps" for the Port of San Diego, CA. , The City of Eureka, CA. , The Port of Hoodsport, WA. , The Port of Allyn, WA. The Port of Anacortes, WA. (Port Commissioners Building Access Ramp) . Please submit this for Approval, we will look forward to hearing from you in time to deliver this ramp system by the end of this week. Sincerely, ohn C. Wasilewski, President FROM :MANTLE Gangways & Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:06PM P3 • _ 1 V (3 .040 2 1/2" �_� r.,. FROM :MANTLE Gangways & Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:06PM P4 serv: er: IHANl1YAG MARINAS, INC.; 360 293 8880; JUN-15-04 17:32; PAGE 2 PROJECT: NAM It, � o4ar3 4L. TRANSRAC • SHEET: l OF S.. , IA A R IN A S CAWP 6Y: N`- PATE 3�� 04' PA.Dox 1109•An:work-4 WA U.S.A.08221 ,}.earn 2a.t_AAat•EAK f3l5O)793-8,8bb CHECK 9Y: _ DATE HA i••�G 1411kki 1,+41t, . 1.nIl-G-,r + Lo . Z,% . 0.4,20) is = lists sic, % D4 4aj/ t2•co - I.14,5i._:1 0 •, 40'$2• i" tyy = 0A-2-0 X i I.`5 r t3 .. : Sr.. U.SZ.Q/(1fl5 :- 1.5t3) _ 2• $0.97 1„S Hie. (o.L YAK)/8' a" l.Z kl*-,+- t4v 9r -ss ; I:2/0; 4e*2. a 2•St I4s I, A o aSi-bi.e. trluLtss : 10,11 Vs(.: `"? 2.sue. .- M 2 (o.2)(4tR)f 1G)ZC1o•I 5)(0.42-.4 ) a a, o2" . 1�.,, 1''�2 400 a ` 41, Sv " Fart .. . I , . . , . [ExPI 7fW20rXe I FROM :MANTLE Gangways & Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:0GPM PS ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)-Sections 1-4 b_ the curb ramp, or accessible route shall not exceed 1:20. 0 4.7.3 Width. The minimum width of a curb ramp shall be 36 in (915 mm), exclusive of flared sides. u f-eurb-ramps that' comply with 4.5. 4.7.5 Sides of Curb Ramps. If a curb ramp is located where pedestrians must walk across the ramp, or where it is not protected by handrails or guardrails, it shall have flared sides; the maximum slope of the flare shall be 1:10faee,F1,_12(a)). Curb ramps with returned curbs may be used where pedestrians would not normally walk across the ramp ,(see..Fig. 12(b)). 4.7.6 Built-up Curb Ramps. Built-up curb ramps shall be located so that they do not project into vehicular traffic lanes (see Fig. 13). 4.7.7 Detectable Warnings. A curb ramp shall have a detectable warning complying with 4.29.2. The detectable warning shall extend the full width and depth of the curb ramp. 4.7.8 Obstructions. Curb ramps shall be located or protected to prevent their obstruction by parked vehicles. 4.7.9 Location at Marked Crossings.Curb ramps at marked crossings shall be wholly contained within the markings, excluding any flared sides. (see Fig. 15), 4.7.10 Diagonal Curb Ramps. If diagonal (or corner type) curb ramps have returned curbs or other well-defined edges, such edges shall be parallel to the direction of pedestrian flow. The bottom of diagonal curb ramps shall have 48 in (1220 mm) minimum dear space as shown in Fie. 15(c)and j0. If diagonal curb ramps are provided at marked crossings, the 48 in (1220 mm) clear space shall be within the markings bee Fig,. 15(c) and .(0)). If diagonal curb ramps have flared sides, they shall also have at least a 24 in (610 mm) long segment of straight curb located on each side of the curb ramp and within the marked crossing (see Fig,_.1.-5(0)).• . 4.7.11 islands. Any raised islands in crossings shall be cut through level with the street or have curb ramps at both sides and a level area at least 48 in (1220 mm) long between the curb •- •art of the island intersected by the crossings (see,Fig,_15(a) and(bl). 4.8.1* General. Any part of an accessible route with a slope greater than 1:20 shall be considered a ramp and shall comply with 4.8. 4.8.2* Slope and Rise. The least possible slope shall be used for any ramp. The maximum slope of a ramp In new construction shall be 1:12. The maximum rise for any run shall be 30 In (760 mm) (see Fig. 16). Curb ramps and ramps to be constructed on existing sites or in existing buildings or facilities may have slopes and rises as allowed in 4.1$.(3)(a) if space limitations prohibit the use of a 1:12 slope or less. 4.8.3 Clear Width. The minimum clear width of a ramp shall be 36 in (915 mm). 4.8.4* Landings. Ramps shall have level landings at bottom and top of each ramp and each �.+tn.//www arresc-hoard.sov/adaae/html/adaag.htm 10/21/2002 FROM :MANTLE Gangways a Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:07PM P6 ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ALAA(.1) -Sections 1-4 Page 36 of 62 ramp run. Landings shall have the following features: In 1 (1) The landing shall be at least as wide as the ramp run leading to it. (2) The landing length shall be a minimum of 60 in (1525 mm) clear. (3) If ramps change direction at landings, the minimum landing size shall be 60 in by 60 in (1525 mm by 1525 mm). (4) If a doorway is located at a landing, then the area in front of the doorway shall comply with 4,13,6. 4.8.5* Handrails. If a ramp run has a rise greater than 6 in (150 mm) or a horizontal projection greater than 72 in (1830 mm), then it shall have handrails on both sides. Handrails are not required on curb ramps or adjacent to seating in assembly areas. Handrails shall comply with 4,26 and shall have the following features: 7 (1) Handrails shall be provided along both sides of ramp segments. The inside handrail on switchback or dogleg ramps shall always be continuous. • (2) If handrails are not continuous, they shall extend at least 12 in (305 mm) beyond the top and bottom of the ramp segment and shall be parallel with the floor or ground surface(see Fig,_17). (3) The clear space between the handrail and the wall shall be 1 - 1/2 in (38 mm). (4) Gripping surfaces shall be continuous. (5) Top of handrail gripping surfaces shall be mounted between 34 in and 38 in (865 mm and 965 mm) above ramp surfaces. (6) Ends of handrails shall be either rounded or returned smoothly to floor, wall, or its post. i. (7) Handrails shall not rotate within their fittings. 4.8.6 Cross Slope and Surfaces. The cross slope of ramp surfaces shall be no greater than 1:50. Ramp surfaces shall comply with 4.5.. 4.8.7 Edge Protection. Ramps and landings with drop-offs shall have curbs, walls, railings, or projecting surfaces that prevent people from slipping off the ramp. Curbs shall be a minimum of 2 in (50 mm) high(sea Fig_11). 4.6.8 Outdoor Conditions. Outdoor ramps and their approaches shall be designed so that water.will not accumulate on walking surfaces. 4.9 Stairs. 4.9.1* Minimum Number. Stairs required to be accessible by 4.1 shall comply with 4.9. 1 roil i innn� hftn:/Iwww.aecess-hnani.wnviada/aahtml/ndaaa htm FROM :MANTLE Gangways & Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:07PM P7 ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)- Sections 1-4 Page 49 01 b2 with 4.2.4 is provided 4.24.4 Depth. Each sink shall be a maximum of 6-1/2 in (165 mm) deep. 4.24.5 Clear Floor Space. A clear floor space at least 30 in by 48 in (760 mm by 1220 mm) forwardapproac . e c ear floor space shall be on an accessible route and shall extend a maximum of 19 in (485 mm) underneath the sink (see_Fig..32). 4.24.6 Exposed Pipes and Surfaces. Hot water and drain pipes exposed under sinks shall be insulated or otherwise configured so as to protect against contact. There shall be no sharp or abrasive surfaces under sinks. 4.24.7 Faucets. Faucets shall comply with 4.27.4. Lever-operated, push-type, touch-type, or electronically controlled mechanisms are acceptable designs. 4.25 Storage. • 4.25.1 General. Fixed storage facilities such as cabinets, shelves, closets, and drawers required to be accessible by 4_1 shall comply with 4.25. 4.25.2 Clear Floor Space. A clear floor space at least 30 in by 48 in (760 mm by 1220 mm) complying with 4.2_,4 that allows either a forward or parallel approach by a person using a wheelchair shall be provided at accessible storage facilities. 4.25.3* Height, Accessible storage spaces shall be within at least one of the reach ranges specified in 4.2.5.and 4.2.6 (see Fig:,5 and Fig.6). Clothes rods or shelves shall be a maximum of 54 in (1370 mm)above the finish floor for a side approach. Where the distance from the wheelchair to the clothes rod or shelf exceeds 10 in (255 mm) (as in closets without accessible doors) the height and depth to the rod or shelf shall comply with Fig..36ia) and Fig,.38(b). 4.25.4 Hardware, Hardware for accessible storage facilities shall comply with 4..27.4. Touch latches and U-shaped pulls are acceptable. 4.26 Handrails, Grab Bars, and Tub and Shower Seats. 4.26.1" General. All handrails, grab bars, and tub and shower seats required to be accessible by 4_1, 4_8, 4,9, 4.16, 4.17, 4.20 or 4_21 shall comply with 4.26. 4.26.2` Size and Spacing of Grab Bars and Handrails. The diameter or width of the gripping surfaces of a handrail or grab bar shall be 1-1/4 in to 1-1/2 in (32 mm to 38 mm), or the shape shall provide an equivalent gapping surface. If handrails or grab bars are mounted adjacent to a wall, the space between the wall and the grab bar shall be 1-1/2 in (38 mm) (see Fig. 39(a), (b), (_c)., and (e)). Handrails may be located In a recess if the recess is a maximum of 3 in (75 mm) deep and extends at least 18 in (455 mm) above the top of the rail (see Fig. 39(d)), 4.28.3 Structural Strength.The structural strength of grab bars, tub and shower seats, fasteners, and mounting devices shall meet the following specification: (1) Bending stress in a grab bar or seat induced by the maximum bending moment httn•//www sunrrca-tuwrri vnv/adaae/httnl/adaae.htm 10/21/2002. FROM :MANTLE Gangways & Ramps FAX NO. :13603325277 Dec. 13 2004 05:07PM P8 ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG)-Sections 1-4 Page 50 of 62 from the application of 250 lbf(1112N) shall be less than the allowable stress for the material of the grab bar or seat. (2) Shear stress induced in a grab bar or seat by the application of 250 lbf (1112N) shall be less than the allowable shear stress for the material of the grab bar or seat. I e er support is considered to be fully restrained, then direct and torsional shear stresses shall be totaled for the combined shear stress, which shall not exceed the allowable shear stress. (3) Shear force induced in a fastener or mounting device from the application of 250 Ibf (1112N) shall be less than the allowable lateral load of either the fastener or mounting device or the supporting structure, whichever is the smaller allowable load. (4) Tensile force induced in a fastener by a direct tension force of 250 lbf(1112N) plus the maximum moment from the application of 250 lbf (1112N) shall be less than the allowable withdrawal load between the fastener and the supporting structure. (5) Grab bars shall not rotate within their fittings. 4.26.4 Eliminating Hazards. A handrail or grab bar and any wall or other surface adjacent to it shall be free of any sharp or abrasive elements. Edges shall have a minimum radius of 1/8 in (3.2mm . 4.27 Controls and Operating Mechanisms. 4.27.1 General. Controls and operating mechanisms required to be accessible by 4.1 shall comply with 4.27. 4.27.2 Clear Floor Space. Clear floor space complying with 4,z,4 that allows a forward or a parallel approach by a person using a wheelchair shall be provided at controls, dispensers, receptacles, and other operable equipment. 4.27.3* Height. The highest operable part of controls, dispensers, receptacles, and other operable equipment shall be placed within at least one of the reach ranges specified in 4.2.5 and 4.2.6. Electrical and communications system receptacles on walls shall be mounted no less than 15 in (380 mm) above the floor. EXCEPTION: These requirements do not apply where the use of special equipment dictates otherwise or where electrical and communications systems receptacles are not normally intended for use by building occupants. 4.27.4 Operation. Controls and operating mechanisms shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist. The force required to activate controls shall be no greater than 5 lbf(22.2 N). 4.28 Alarms. 4.28.1 General. Alarm systems required to be accessible by 4.1.shall comply with 4.28. At a httn•//unuw arrrcc-hnarrl uni,/a/Iaao/hfn1I/U.i*ah hr.., IA19I/'111M N.ft— O o.,r- ' ;yr, ANACORTES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P.O.BOX 547,RNRCORTES, WA 98221 PH (360) 293-1919 ROBERT W.HYDE,P.E.,DIRECTOR FAX (360) 293-1938 �./jj, 1891 '.�re E-MAIL:bobhyde@cityofanocortes.org 4CORD October 6, 2004 Roosendaal - Honcoop, Inc. 5977 Guide Meridian Bellingham, WA 98226 Dear Wendell, SUBJECT: W.T. Preston Interpretive Center(Building Setbacks) This letter is to inform you that due to the design errors in the plans, the building layout is still within the setback requirements allowed by code. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. Sincerely, CITY OF ANACORTES Steven R. Lange Project Manager CC: Jeff Miller, Bob Hyde, Fred Buckenmey , on Measame> • Water • Wastewater •Streets•Storm Drainage •Engineering •Solid Waste •Transportation and Equipment • Capitol Projects • Development Services Y PA, ANACORTES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 547, ANACORTES, WA 98221 PH (360) 293-1919 ; . ROBERT W.HYDE,P.E.,DIRECTOR FAX (360) 293-1938 `�CO E-MAIL: bobhyde@cityofonacortes.org {j, 1891 COO it October 6, 2004 Roosendaal - Honcoop, Inc. 5977 Guide Meridian Bellingham, WA 98226 Dear Wendell, SUBJECT: W.T. Preston Interpretive Center(Reduced Vents—Proposed Change) Thank you for your inquiry regarding the amount of foundation vents that are required. Per our conversation with Ed Frank, the Building Official, the vent in the foundation access was not considered in the overall calculation, see sheet A2 for the calculation. The foundation vent is calculated to be 4 SF. If you deduct that from the 12.14 SF as shown, you get 8.14 SF. This will meet the required openings for the foundation using a .74 Square Inch vent to get 16 vents. This letter is to informyou thatyour proposed p p change is approved. Sincerely, CITY OF ANACORTES Steven R. Lange Project Manager • CC: Jeff Miller, Bob Hyde, Fred Buckenmey , Don Measamer • Water • Wastewater •Streets•Storm Drainage •Engineering • Solid Waste •Transportation and Equipment •Capitol Projects • Development Services 1TY 0 44 ANACORTES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • P.O. BOX 547, ANACORTES, WA 98221 PH (360) 293-1919 ROBERT W.HYDE,P.E.,DIRECTOR FAX (360) 293-1938 1891 dirtiCO E-MAIL: bobhyde@cityofonocortes.org October 6, 2004 Roosendaal - Honcoop, Inc. 5977 Guide Meridian Bellingham, WA 98226 Dear Wendell, SUBJECT: W.T. Preston Interpretive Center (Wheel Chair Ramp Design) 111 The proposed design for the wheelchair ramp is 1:48 slope on the ramp. This was a design oversight and drawn incorrectly by the Henry Klein Partnership and does not meet the current ADA requirements. Per our discussion at the Weekly Construction Meeting, we propose a no cost, in field, change to the plans. The new design would be for(2) 1:12 ADA ramp that matches the design for the City's Central Business District Sidewalk Replacement projects along Commercial Avenue. Again, thank you for bringing this to our attention early on so that this can be resolved ahead of time. Please let me know your thoughts on this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 360.661.3468. Sincerely, CITY OF ANACORTES Steven R. Lange Project Manager CC: Jeff Miller, Bob Hyde, Fred Buckenmeyer, on Measamer • Water • Wastewater •Streets•Storm Drainage •Engineering •Solid Waste •Transportation and Equipment • Capital Projects • Development Services Building Department Memo To: Gary Barnett From: Michelle Deaton M O Date: 2/24/2004 Re: 703"R"Avenue—W.T. Preston Interpretative Center Please review the following storm water general facilities charge per City Ordinance No. 2419 and let me know if you concur. Newly created impervious area is 4,664 square feet+2,000=2.33 x$1,126.00=$2,623.58 Total Fee is$2,623.58 Ga I Barnett,Assistant City Engineer Date Y • Page 1 . 01/22/04 THU 17:53 FAX 3602931938 EXECUTIVE /^\ l 003 r 0 , y a Local Agency Environmental ;,,�� Washington State VW Department of Transportation Classification Summary Part 1 project Description Federal Aid Project Number Route Date Created Local Agency Project Number P-STPE-TA96(365) NA 11/3/2003 LA 4335 Agency Federal Program Title • CITY OF ANACORTES ®20.205 ❑20.209 ❑Other Project Title W.T. PRESTON SNAGBOAT INTERPRETIVE CENTER Begin End Townships 35 MP MP Mlles Ranges 02E KP KP ., KM Sections 18 County Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)No.&Name SKAGIT COUNTY 3 T.bWERSKAGTT'/SAIv7TSH '"'— WlThin Pa`t'$sanias,4 - - Project Description CONSTRUCTION OF A 2000 SF INTERPRETIVE CENTER RELATING TO THE HISTORY OF THE W.T. PRESTON STERNWHEEL SNAGBOAT AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO TRANSPORTATION. IOCATED IN THE 700 BLOCK OF R AVENUE. a• ',Part 2, Environmental.Classlficati on NEPA SEPA LII Class I•Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) ❑ Categorically exempt per WAC 197-11-800 ® Class II-Categorically Excluded(CE) CE Type(from SEPA Checklist) CE Type(from 23 CFR 771.117) ❑ Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) ❑Projects Requiring Documentation (Documented CE)(LAG 24.22) ❑ Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) ❑ Class III-Environmental Assessment(EA) ❑ Adoption ❑Addendum ❑Supplemental NEPA Approval Signatures -1{7al--,--2- itiiq/ 0,3 Local Agency Ap ro ' g Authority Date i //A-4 i Regional Local Programs Engineer Assistant Secretary Date I Prag ✓a Mthnol tic. CE 1 - 13 -2-oo9 Federal Highway Administration------ 'y' �J�6 r— Date r , Completed By(Print Official's Name) Telephone(Include area code) Fax(Include area code) JEFFREY M MILLER 360-299-1980 360-293-1938 DOT Form 140-100 EF Page 1 of 7 Revised B/02 10/30/03 THU 16:43 FAX 3602931938 EXECUTIVE Rj 002 k 0 :.,.:u.o L;,�.;:.....,_..�:,.n•.:rug-'I6"'Ir..,....:.asrh:F=.;:ITcr.::.:_.:,::i::.e;„p�-eo�es.=.:.:co::�ei:?Pi vn:prr.;:al;=a:::::",I:�^.:evxl}n,.:,lrrr.:ary r;=�1:;-1'];'rnr h.-,,.:...:.:,f::-:a,..r.:.y�, "5 ,'I Iltpwil€I1 'f�I1�I1 �r"�aPIR Il,tl'°�u'"�•�I�dl lw,lrtk il�t4nl�,r,61r CFI sUtl ll'I`Ir lll 'I,I -�I,/rlt" 1 1III I'tIL fps t �Illr II I!Ilyl r! < ' rgs,ydi iq ' v 'I , ' ': rtlx I 11IP 1'rt�xtle�I IIII;I V�I i irl 'TB',S�".�7CC'OsP�I'�OT�l�ld'ran'�"AV II(II:hI' ly y'Il rlitl[II r7o ' I I wi pl li III I ' 1141 h I it I'III I'Si'-i JI rtIirrf L�€lyrll hl illl � I Ala 1ryJll4il �y♦Il4 it lH I`Iillirli'"�`,I �L��t�IlINIO((' il't 0040 I?I Itr1.0.4rli LI_rlr$hII plrl.,` I II horeq..L,L11 �n1�4116 . '11F^I Itt it i f 1 1� 1 E., 0048 � fliallm i I1 l[ � l i{i'I R Ij r lilh l l i n1 Chili l lhl l hl L Lti ita h l!I I'1 PPi girth AIR1111I i i fir 2 ' it rA .! ' II , J'f t! ,I I r ' I „ I IA - - 4 I I I ,pith r i '.i1(4061e'[I -1111 10/27/2003Ii�Pei1sIUs0d 1iI' IgdrantIII rIIII 00491 0000 I t'14! I FI II III IIFII11111II II llL 1111:1rL1 ILI,rh111I9 L:11WI'r' �I 91,1)_I IIxI III II I l 1911 1 Et 1 jI.I 'I-I , h - 1 r: 1 r I'I'XRS'I' 1161{`helCi 11 rlb ifl6"1 'f14" Ilil l`I lI II 96f'FIOWIA'1: et5�11 21/2 iFN/A 111,11±1I w1 @,htiyl Glk¢1n:F7,l l r - rLH"I I II r`I r �i rI ltz rnl r r y l iI _Y,1 P !aL l d _ __ I r L Tes ' r1c�'nl!'I!l;17Tl`:iR.�r LsSy_l lIe lrI'lr4r In itfly I#M1r 1B�IrI�d IIi'fI,eI}IriI hhI'/IY L�l�IIIii Ilri',O Ir1ltiesrI1",Ix,nI L_C1L�II 4ItiI r II'I� hPL1 lIrF"th tu F1l r''s1dvid lltlpit I a'Li1l1FIak'°`1I,'I16u$�li1i'Ei IuL`l I r�Ltl I 1r'1Irr�1 1 8I n 5n I�ILKIj I�u';6ffI!ik�tIrl`LI1 R`1ir W�f1�IeFLId`ILniJi,InnI t�hg J1sItLili i ujar'FSrl it'L-ItI INu Lt8It-u pL3 1 II1Ltl.gi r-1 ie-Ii�rr'I II i','1 IFl 0 ll{,1 wI''iiFl1lu l "Ir l"'l1 I 'i iI rrl 01117nri : 11r V11 ITestp gioji iT 1Filpri6 npF. 0.64004p 5 F041k1 I 20+0 l ' 1529 0 I '' xr 15291 ai99[151:1911'IQ0.sglldaYMe0 1.,.rij21s1d1a 4342 rIII ll ' ia41 L'i1:31I11 rri 11,t Ilm 01111f r 11 17bEE,LI `1I 1Thig31kiuluil 1 I Iail I L] , 4.yj Iri I F rI'Plg1II: '1rI I1 IItAry 1 v! li ti !I I 1 1::1lJII:1111,i91 1IL a'41 a ry: rh44: :41ItiI r r9l Il 11%11r 1rI II :3.1: r4 9:-4 ',.I" 1III rLI '1,11� IIu1i 'n tlili lxl Elrlir£41rzIr rh ltfillGpl"1llhll Irl sllrinal ll` olirrh i�. ill I� , li' I rlt, lli Hill ii'1( I Page 1 of 1 10/27/2003 • 01/22/04 THU 17:52 FAX 3602931938 EXECUTIVE IM 002 Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Douglas B. MacDonald P.O.Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 January 20, 2004 206-440-4000 TTY: 1-800-833.6388 www.wsdotwa.gov Mr. Jeffrey Miller City of Anacortes Engineering and Development Services PO Box 547 Anacortes, WA 98221 JAN 21 am Subject: W.T. Preston Snagboat Dear Mr. Miller: Attached for your records is the approved Environmental Classification summary for the subject project, which was granted Programmatic CE (categorical Exclusion) approval by WSDOT Headquarters on January 13, 2004. This completes your NEPA environmental documentation requirements. Be aware that although documented CE approval was granted, you are still required to update species Listings for the biological •• assessment every six months from the date of approval until the project is completed. If any species change, the biological assessment must be updated and/or revised accordingly. If you have ant questions, please contact Harry Haslam at 206- 440-4737. sincerely, egg /:1---- TERRENCE G. PAANANEN, P.E. Local Programs Engineer Attachment: -�- Public Works orks Engineering and Development Services Memo Date:April 15, 2003 To: Lowell Larsen From: Steven Lange Subject: W.T. Preston Snagboat Interpretive Center cc: Gary Barnett, Don Measamer The follow review has been completed on April 14, 2003 based on the information provided to date. 1. March 2003: First submittal of the 95% completed plans. 2. March 2003: Structural plans 3. April 2003: Energy calculations Provide is a summary of the review of W.T. Preston Snagboat Interpretive Center. All notes are presented on enclosed sheets. Please refer to the plans for additional notes and comments. Please review all information provided and make the needed changes. The City of Anacortes requests the return of the redline plans with the next submittal for review. Please contact me to let me know the schedule. If you have any questions or concerns, please schedule a meeting with us to discuss. You can do that by contacting Maureen Carlson at 360.293.1920. nk you, Steven Lange Project Manager • h i pu R\active projects\wt preston interpretive center\review summary-1 doc 1 4.. J , / ' ,., 4_. aL f . i&%.?(_ /.ti " ` l 7 dy , °,,.�. :tea o=" ' ,•° �y '- ' - - - - - - , 17.. f 4- ----------4-?ems}.a- - = big zit> inco _ _47.x, .7_ ii V ix I- 42 .Lisb rime-- �L� - _ = 5- G ----- --ice,-�� /_0 Measamer, Don From: Measamer, Don Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 8:13 AM To: Lange, Steve Subject: RE: interp center meeting Steve and Gary, The east exit ramp and landing needs to be a minimum of ten feet(10 ft)from the property line, exterior wall construction does not change this requirement. Group A division 3 occupancies require a minimum interior wall finish rating of class 3, UBC Table 8-B, Exception 3, tis would need to be verified by the manufacturer. Double doors are of but will need hardware which unlocks both doors with one motion, no surface or edge bolts. Thanks, Don City of Anacortes Don Measamer Plans Examiner don @ cityofanacortes.org 360-293-1901 Original Message From: Lange, Steve Sent: Monday,April 28, 2003 7:26 AM To: Barnett,Gary; Measamer, Don Cc: 'Ilarsen@hkpa.com' Subject: FW: interp center meeting Original Message From: Cline,Garry Sent: Friday,April 25,2003 3:48 PM To: Lange, Steve Subject: interp center meeting Steve, I'm looking at my notes from the meeting and trying to recall what significant questions/answers arose. One question I'm still not clear on is does the need to move the building four feet west still apply?This was what Don M. said regarding the emergency exit distance from the property line/building. Maybe the type of wall construction eliminates the need? I will take responsibility for having the standard gauge tracks removed from the footprint of the building. Several small questions were answered. The exterior will preferably be stained cedar. The roof a dark composition shingle. But the roof should be guaranteed for 30 plus years and 100 mph plus winds, and I should have specified that again. The southeasters come ripping across the marina and the gusts can be very strong. No cheapy shingles. Also for wind reasons the doors should open outward. Interior walls in the exhibit area are to receive 1/2" plywood rather than the blocking the exhibit designers asked for. Would Don ok this for the exhibit railing to tie into?We asked for fir or hemlock for window trim, not oak. Rain gutters will be as designed by the architect. We would like a quick recovery water heater. Linoleum in aisle, storage rooms, giftshop. Tile in restrooms. Carpet in exhibit area. The Foundation Board members should check out the giftshop counters at MONA and see what they would like for our facility. The sidewalk should continue around the handicapped parking area. Rounded corners are preferred. I'm still not clear on what doors were wanted where. It seems to me that double doors for both entry and exit would be good. Someone said a button controlled entry door will be required. Most of all, besides taking exhibit cases in and out, I am thinking of a wheelchair or walker-bound person fighting a heavy door in a wind, and the need to have easy to handle doors. The ticket window is to have double sliding panels. One low for wheelchairs and children. Your old decrepit museum director, Garry 1 THE HENRY KLEIN PARTNERfIP,ARCHITECTS 'PTER TRANSMITTAL 314 Pine Street, Suite 205 Mount Vernon,Washington 98273 PH (360) 336-2155 tl��� , 2 6 � 3 FAX (360) 336-3657 TO: S7eVE/J R , L. ANc a DATE: 3// 9 /0 3 JOB NO. p. o. BOX 5'47 ATTN: 5 TEvaN a. L4A/6a Mt Fr_ IN. PR.E5TvkJ SNA6130MT AMAGog,TES1 IAJA . 70221- 0547 RE: Fig./7.46a cam-Ex_ State Project No.: Facsimile: WE ARE SENDING YOU �-yAttached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: LJ❑ Drawings Prints ❑ Change Order ❑ Plans ❑ Specifications ❑Diskettes ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Samples 47R14GTG/,2AL aNG/NEERJAl(o (*Ativ,NGS COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1.,EA. 3 /17103 9TRuc7t4Ia4t ENG/n/EEJ2. (Nc• Qg4v INCoS /, O ) 5 /,AA Sl.2A 5Z .(/ 5 2.22 S3 . 1 — THESE ARE PRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For Approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval 0 For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution d�yAs requested ❑ Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints Ca For review and comment ❑ REMARKS: YCu 5A0U1--- D L-}AL) o N F/ta Neu/ 2G19'1TFcrLt A[_ D/ZMAJ/AJc S) 5724cTL4 AL 4)2MWIMbS A-NO CAL LtGA-7/0JJ'5 , MEG/-ANIc4L A CLEc7J2)C- FL PZtin 13/A14 O,RAJ,u/N4 5 WIL !— OE FOR711c0MJN4 . Lc, eel)) b. From: \J014/V KAaz/2,49 CC: t?reN w, I - - ->A xooF ov�.p-HANco a -> b �z t -'m zc I- - - w i■■G __ l7 6- 1 �= --- yr- ---�r-- -fir '— a —_.—rr- --aF- - - ---ar- - " � --d 0_ I I 1 O I t � `� =T I .1= .E.. 7 . fzT. e. 7 1 V E.. I Q "� cf 01 I1 13 S. F.5. F I '21 • , . c f `tl Ii ) M - - - - - --- - B M. +l_- m ` 1 — —\) I •6EAM AbOV d x- P /� tic 1 4 - - n - -� � � � _ _ I ti -G G 1 $ T0 fr U __I — F. - - - in5.F- W I�== -7►�c - � M w, Il==7� I w I I _ 1 1 // I \\ ()Cr 1 N I_, I // II \ — f.__ II iYr C N co L ii t r, NoR7II iA i E t..,, 4111 \ 4. ` 10 0 4 P L o o >� F L A N1 '61 1 IP i/8 " = I'• a 1 CI I a S. F. .. a THE HENRY KLEIN PARTNERShIP, ARCHITECTS 0 }-I N A & D C A T m W. T. P 1z 5 T 205 Matheson Building 336-2155 C E. H E.Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 U E. I 7A C� E. I , 0 illkiStilk tlie, tIn ' \t\-stittgolLittil,:.L\t‘t„ o \ e� 1 ,1 • \pi ENR oe 1N aPsAnAlnS IIERSNP, p43yS 205t nanton 98273 IA _e.. 12:1 rt. e-4-te..° c. t. t-1.1: e.:12-. 1...:. „2.(# f 01. — Nyount Vernon — - II 41) `W vim` (/r::4� G/ iI W E. 5 T E L E V A T 1 a N l / 5 c II_ 0n THE HENRY KLEIN PARTNERSHIP, ARCHITECTS W T. P R S T o S N A G o A T 205 Matheson 9uiWing 336.2155 Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 _.__:__ _-� �- T A G a. G E N T rz. - _ 2 •- "up • D2 . 1 ' 111IA@I�tO1O _ 111 111 -11 AV I \ V la 16111�1lI�I �C�1616I��di6i�i��i�i�l��'�1�111 _.....�F.�• N o F-. T E I_ E. VAT I o N /81' I I o i1 THE HENRY KLEINPARTNERSHIP, ARCHITECTS W, T P P� e S T o N 5 N A Cv lb o A T 205 Matheson Building lJing 336.2155 t� T AE G G N T Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 - `l 2 • Q/y • 02. l 1P7 ' - li11 _Lim 1111h��� iIII! � \r . - A ks\riralbl-it_.------±-------L-7.----111\till lila -PIP E A :S "f L. - WT. ".P. RESTO N 5 N P� C� ?' op• HER ► TALE GENTS- R • 26,. t THE HENRY KLEIN PARTNERSHIP, ARCHITECTS 2 •' 205 336.2155 -Mount Matheson Building asnin 98___ _� Mount Vernon. Washington _ - --� ' I I ItaaSialla alliallaillarr itailtaltal , 1 1 _ si.IWO§ isi ire G1 , __________ iniri\"eit 0 r__ ___\t___ ,s ,;,_o-_ c::, ,...___, .7__‘‘ \,__) - - -,a—, i--, 4- -.1 1----- \ e, G o N i _ IV_Q n 1 /8' S r► t,� G � oP''T wT PR, e. ST0 N T �- � .E � 1 . .I, ..ACo � GEN 2 • 2to • OZ THE HENRYtVernon, PARTNERSHIP, ARCHITECTS 336.2155 205 Matheson Building -2155 Mount Yeon.Washington w --_ • \ \ 104.2' \ PLATTED MEAN �� I HIGH TIDE LINE z p5.0. \ 104 6• Op \ W l x q�, /104.O' , IF ca ta ix 1 \ > BOAT RESTING ON x \ TOP OF I—BEAMS El — — —,i ]- , ; : 1 . ! i i i i I i i l IJ I a ' I 1 I I ; 1� -T l tt in�5\� ��� I ; I )_._ I ; I i I till 1 , -R 1 t ,ACIE I , :U5.6' 105.1' 11 105 4.8' TOP I-PEA M 104.5. �/ EL.r O7.3' oh '_n t 106 S C40'01 W 195.75' 1 -_----- I �pit'32'S9' ■ift I ' i ♦1.: O ;S ♦c 1'j - `sssers n`arin nian ��inrmim mannium onno ����•l��______ —��t� R=804.02' -• Lt IN ♦ �N■■�r� .as ——— —♦OAL ;{���i ��maa 182.08' WOOD WAL iir6° ,������� �����'♦06'. _�{ �_ ..������..._ -`�1� ®i ,ie�/11��. ' ::: as `o11I N' .♦ +.\;�.. 3- ) S ;���� ���� � ♦ TOP CORNER ONTDECK. I_ CONIFERj ♦06'jja1r I ' . 4�' • TO DRAIN a o • qp 4D' ® ' G EL- 13.17FLOOELEV.` • � lir• . 0' C3i1\W�i 1► 113.52' o of '1O I I 104.0' in ,c • '�:" 11 aril: 410 �`- �(� a • a RE ' PO •• Aq9 3 ♦ y' 1 PLUGGED 8' CONCRETE w '_ �.- 1CO " ■ sii27111011h il I RISE- 1 In ♦ ♦ ' 1 ♦O NO' m �_$ _ - � 1� ri' R I \ k • o , 103.2 , l G? STORM DRAIN PER CITYN�:I Ls.-7 �r■.11■ 1 _ � � I� , s a- �• e. \ a. ° 3.51 GM ND•) 104 t OF ANACDRTES ENGINEERING ;n �. �� �� ) 10 GR 105—y�rti tann i - ISO1irl . an) PERM , N ilrm r muer■1!:iA �� x in M1 , rs�i�"4r'I■I -��� i _� ■�13j �• \. : ` ♦0 OEPES 10 7• 1C4 BcRM N �,' r l� ,..� . b 1� O' ♦ 4. _ 105.5' t04.5 . 10 w MO I .� C6 an& ',�� 105 A.2 _, t• it I "�` c mayy, =�1�ii: '� I�-t•, i 1 ��� _— < ACATED> _ -I a ` SANITARY 40 (VACATED) c j 3 47 11 I .`_.414 lldigi r., - - ♦O�' t LEANUUT 7 ,�O r--1'., '=-1 _ lialli —terra-- to' - • , 1/2' AC Ni , - ;t+,. ` a : 6 • - "' S `Q'33'46 yY. .. .' I �' - • -� 295.75' ' 3/4' N--_- « ( . i ♦C . 'r -. �. _ WM WM SIDEWALK - k;' V V.. o Cc� C._.2'-� I c�?' - NO PARKING NO PARKING i 6 - ` NO PARKING♦"} L I ' I II I ••. W ♦O SIGN W 12' DI ( � ♦Ow SIGN �\ ♦C't W SIGN I Iy c%4 _ ! 'n — i i_II— _ S C33'4o W — N _ ` 295.75' — — _, — — _I I_ _ • SD , - - 18" CONCRETE SD SD • col 9- S I T E #� L A F.) SDMH 2 • -.W,--T. t' P-, E S: TO N 5 N Ae BOAT "R" AVENUE " - - H -ERv TALE. G1= NTEF . I. • 2G • o2 s I :0 1 lot 201 ',& 401 80 I THE HENRY KLEIN FARM SHIP, ARCHITECTS . : 205 Matheson Building 336.2155 -- - - - - -- P 7-- t-- 1 t - II -A II Mount Vernon, Washington \ 98273 E-7 N —1 W r— �� N4 A°Ckak0FS;HETONE« ,TT 0 FIRST AND COMMERCIAL AVENUE • P.O BOX297 • ANACORTES, WA982 1 Upec CO, (360) 293-3134 • FAX (360) 293-9608 • WWW.PORTOFANACORTES.CO Est. 19/6 October 16, 2002 • City of Anacortes PO Box 547 Anacortes, WA 98221 Attn: Ian Munce, Director of Planning and Community Development Re: Wetland Delineation Depot Property, Port of Anacortes, Anacortes, WA Dear Ian Munce, A wetland delineation of the Port of Anacortes' Depot property was completed in the summer of 2002. The report, written by Grette Asscociates, LLC for the Port, summarizes the findings of the delineation and is attached for your records and information. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (360) 299-1827, or Bob Elsner at (360) 299-1822, with any questions or comments you have regarding the attached report. Sincerely, PORT ACORTES ^ ' Margaret Schwertner Environmental Administrator Cc w/attachments: Bob Elsner, Director of Planning and Projects, Port of Anacortes Susan Meyer, Wetland Specialist, Department of Ecology Randel Perry, Project Manager, Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Attachments: Depot Property Delineation for the Port of Anacortes PORT OF ANACORTES DEPOT PROPERTY WETLANDS DELINEATION OCTOBER 11,2002 PREPARED FOR: PORT OF ANACORTES P.O. Box 297 ANACORTES,WASHINGTON 98221 PREPARED BY: GRETTE ASSOCIATES''" 2111 NoRTH 30TH TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98403 Is Grette Associatesuc Nir ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Introduction The Port of Anacortes (Port) Depot property is located north of Cap Sante Boat Haven and adjacent to the City of Anacortes Wastewater Treatment Facility in Skagit County, Washington. On June 7, 2002, a Pacific International Engineering staff biologist conducted a site visit and performed a wetland delineation on the Port Depot property. This technical memorandum summarizes the results of the site investigation and wetland delineation. Background Information According to a draft report by Rosario Geoscience Associates (RGA), the Depot property wetlands appear to be remnants of an extensive high tidal marsh that occupied the lowland areas between Cap Sante Boat Haven and the Geumes Channel (RGA, 2000). The marsh area was progressively filled in until 1986, when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) stopped unregulated filling of wetlands in this area. The wetlands that remained were essentially isolated from further tidal influences; although a ditch and culvert system between the wetlands and marine waters is present, the wetlands have progressed from a marine to a fresh water system due to the elevation gradient. However, according to the report by RGA, the Corps maintains that these wetlands are "associated" with navigable waters because of their historical status as high tidal marsh and the culvert and ditch system which minimally connects them to marine waters (Attachment C). Due to the prevalence of cattail and lesser duckweed in the southern portion of the wetland near the ditch exiting the system as well as the present condition of the ditch and culvert, it is believed that the wetland system is no longer tidally influenced. Both of these species have minimal tolerances for elevated salinity levels and were observed to be thriving in the areas nearest the culvert. In 1989 Jones and Stokes performed a wetland delineation on the Depot property. According to this delineation, the marsh area surrounding the pond extended south beyond 6` Street between the railroad tracks to the east and the Depot to the west (RGA, 2000). RGA performed a delineation in 1992 in the same area(the southern end of the pond) and found that the wetland no longer extended south beyond 6`h Street. This 1992 delineation was never fully completed however, and was therefore not adopted by the Corps or the City of Anacortes. In 1992, groundwater from the newly constructed City of Anacortes Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) was pumped from the plant back into the then-dewatered wetlands to compensate for the depressed water table (RGA, 2000) (Figure 1). The groundwater was assumed at the time to be of satisfactory quality as to be pumped directly into the wetlands without treatment. However, shortly after effluent discharge began, it was discovered that the effluent contained high levels of dissolved hydrogen sulfide, as evidenced by the "sulfide" smell traced directly to the pumped discharge. Several other chemical contaminants were also expected to be present, as was evidenced by the dominance of blue-green algae throughout the interior of the pond (RGA, 2000). On September 30, 2002, water samples were collected from the discharge hose and analyzed by Landau Associates. According to the results, detected concentrations of chemicals in the water sample taken from the groundwater discharge were below national recommended water quality criteria (Landau, 2002; Attachment D). However, while there is no criterion available for phosphorus, concentrations of phosphorus were detected which could accelerate the growth of blue-green algae and other nuisance aquatic vegetation. Dakota Creek Industries (DCI) constructed a manufacturing facility adjacent to the wetlands to the west in 1995 (Figure 1). Fill for the access road and landscaping activities impacted the western wetland buffer according to both the Jones and Stokes and RGA delineations. Additionally, a culvert transports rainwater runoff from the facility under the access road into the wetland (RGA, 2000). The abandoned rail grade which runs through the property from north to south was previously owned by Burlington Northern Railroad (Figure 1). In 1997, the City of Anacortes purchased the track easements and franchises from Burlington Northern (RGA, 2000). Buffer recommendations that apply to the site are made by the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology). The Ecology buffer recommendation for the site, based on a Category III wetland surrounded by high intensity land use, is 100 feet (pers. comm., 2002). However, the buffer on the site is regulated by the City of Anacortes' Zoning Ordinance. According to City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Chapter 17.65.050, no regulated activity can occur in or within 25 feet of a non-tidal wetland without a permit(City of Anacortes,2000). Methodology To perform the wetland delineation, the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology, 1997) was used. The State Manual is a revised version of the Corps' Wetlands Delineation Manual (Corps, 1987). The methodology in this manual recognizes that the three parameters of hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation are generally found in wetlands and that these parameters are important in the establishment and maintenance of wetland communities. The methodology evaluates each of the three parameters to determine if a wetland is present and to establish wetland boundaries: I. Hydrophytic Vegetation - The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has established a rating system that has been applied to commonly occurring plant species on the basis of their frequency of occurrence in wetlands (Table 1). Species indicator status expresses the range in which plants may occur in wetlands and non-wetlands (uplands). Under this system, vegetation is considered hydrophytic when there is an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW) or obligate wetland(OBL) (Table 1). Modifiers are used with the Facultative Indicator categories to more specifically define the frequency of occurrence. A positive (+) sign indicates plants are more frequently found in wetlands than the category indicates, whereas a negative (-) sign indicates that plants are less frequently found in wetlands than the indicator signifies. A status of FAC- does not meet the hydrophytic plant community criterion. The hydrophytic vegetation criterion for wetland determination is met when the plant community is comprised of more than 50 percent of the dominant species, which are FAC or wetter. USFWS's National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands (Reed, 1988) was used to determine vegetation indicator status. 2. Hydrology - Evidence of permanent or periodic inundation (water marks, drift lines, drainage patterns), or soil saturation to the surface for 12 consecutive days or more during the growing season(soil temperatures above 41°F at 19.7 ft below the surface) meets the hydrology criterion. Oxidized root channels above 12 inches, water-stained leaves, and local soil survey data are secondary indicators of wetland hydrology. 3. Hydric soils - Soils that are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper soil horizons are considered hydric soils. Visible indicators include Histosols, the presence of a histic epipedon, a sulfidic odor, low soil chroma (Munsell matrix chroma of 2 with mottles or less than 2 without mottles (Kollmorgan, 1994)), or gleying. Table 1. USFWS Plant Indicator Status Plant Indicator Status Indicator Status Definition(Estimated Probability of Occurrence) Category Abbreviation Obligate Upland UPL Occur rarely(<1 percent)in wetlands,and almost always (>99 percent)in uplands Facultative Upland FACU Occur sometimes(1 percent to<33 percent)in wetlands, but occur more often(>67 percent to 99 percent)in uplands Facultative FAC Similar likelihood(33 percent to 67 percent)of occuring in both wetlands and uplands Facultative Wetland FACW Occur usually in wetlands(>67 percent to 99 percent),but also occur in uplands(1 percent to 33 percent) Obligate Wetland OBL Occur almost always(>99 percent)in wetlands,but rarely occur in uplands(<1 percent) Not Listed NL Not listed due to insufficient information to determine status The presence of dominant hydrophytic vegetation is used to delineate the boundary between wetland and upland areas. Wetland boundaries are confirmed by checking the soil color and organic content to verify presence of hydric soils. Wetlands are classified using USFWS's Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al., 1979), and are categorized using Washington State Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (1993). Investigation Results An initial investigation of the site was performed and an overall vegetation species catalog was prepared. The vegetation species observed during this initial investigation are presented in Table 2. Photos of the site are presented in Attachment A; field data sheets are presented in Appendix B. Table 2. List of Vegetation Identified During the Port of Anacortes Depot Property Delineation Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- Spike bentgrass Agrostis exarata FACW Madrone Arbutus menziesii UPL Field mustard Brassica campestris UPL Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius UPL Orchard grass Dactylis glomerata FACU Creeping spike rush Eleocharis palustris OBL Common horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC Sweet fennel Foenciulwn vulgare FACU Salal Gaultheria shallop FACU Common velvet-grass Holcus lanatus FAC Lesser duckweed Lemna minor OBL Pineapple weed Matricaria discoidea FACU Reed canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW English plantain Plantago lanceolata FACU+ Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis FAC Various grasses Poa sp. N/A Meadow buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU Willow Salix sp. N/A European bittersweet Solanum dulcamara FAC+ Common dandelion Taraxacum officinale FACU Springbank clover Trifolium wormskjoldii FACW+ Cattail Typha latifolia OBL American vetch Vicia americana FAC The southern half of the property does not contain any areas with wetland characteristics (Figure 1). Several areas identified in the previous delineations of the property (RGA, 2000) as potential wetland areas were investigated and determined not to contain wetlands (Photo 1). The area exhibits signs of regular maintenance mowing, and the vegetation present in the area reflects this recent and recurring disturbance (Photo 2). The canopy in this area is predominantly madrone, with several willow specimens also present. Understory species are almost entirely absent, save for several young salal shrubs which have escaped mowing. Several grass species are present, including Kentucky bluegrass and common velvet-grass. Other abundant groundcover species include pineapple weed, field mustard, springbank clover, and sweet fennel. An abandoned rail grade runs along the eastern boundary, and a small gravel road is present in the southern portion of the site (Figure 1). Several areas along the western boundary in the northern portion of the site are regularly mowed. Additionally, along the fence adjacent to the treatment plant on the eastern boundary, an approximately 3 ft buffer of vegetation has been removed by both cutting and spraying of vegetation. Separating the southern and northern halves of the site is a large bank of Himalayan blackberry and Nootka rose. This large thicket is approximately 6-8 ft tall, and is extremely dense. Two separate wetlands were delineated during the site visit. The first wetland, Wetland A, surrounds the large pond in the central portion of the site north of the Himalayan blackberry/Nootka rose thicket. The second wetland, Wetland B, is a small ponded area northeast of Wetland A. The abandoned rail grade separates the two wetlands. Wetland A Wetland A is composed of the large pond in the central portion of the property and it's surrounding wetland fringes, and is approximately 0.84 acres in size (Photo 3, Figure 1). It includes a small channel in the southeast corner of the pond, as well as a small vegetated area in the northeast corner. A small culvert leads east from the channel under Market Street to a ditch on the other side. At the time of the survey the ditch was dry. Several areas along the northern and western edges of the pond contain concrete rubble down to the water's edge. A small 3 in. diameter rubber outfall hose leading from the WWTP empties into Wetland A in the northeast corner (Photos 4 and 5, Figure 1). The hose is part of the groundwater collection and pumping system used by the wastewater treatment plant (RGA, 2000); it is pressurized every 10-15 minutes for a duration of approximately 10-15 minutes. The approximately 150-200 ft long hose was replaced in 1999 with a new hose,presumably with no leaks. However, at several locations clear effluent could be seen spouting from holes in the hose, entering Wetland A at several locations. Several areas near the fence on the eastern boundary are wet, and exhibit some characteristics of wetlands. However, these areas are near the groundwater hose, and the hose was determined to be the hydrologic source for these wet areas. The vegetation in these areas is regularly mowed, and with the hose being the hydrologic support, these areas were determined not to be jurisdictional wetlands. Upon entering the first few feet of the pond, a sulfide-type smell was observed emanating from the immediate area. According to Cowardin (1979) and the Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System (1993), Wetland A is classified as a Palustrine Emergent Non-persistent, Category III wetland. Vegetation The predominant vegetation species within Wetland A is cattail. Cattails occupy the entire border of the pond, in addition to the vegetated area in the northeast. Additionally, reed canary grass and common horsetail are intermixed toward the upland boundary of the wetland. The upland boundary is marked by thick Himalayan blackberry surrounding most of the pond, with Nootka rose marking the boundary of the southern portion of the wetland. Scotch broom is also abundant in the upland areas to the northeast. Several willows are present along the western border of the pond. Within the pond itself, red, brown, and blue-green algal masses dominate, with various other submerged aquatics also present. Lesser duckweed and spike rush are abundant around the perimeter of the pond in most places. Soils Two soil plots were performed within Wetland A; Plot A to the southeast, and Plot C to the north. Plot B was performed, and was determined to be outside of the wetland boundary (Figure 1). According to The Soil Conservation Service's Soil Survey of Skagit County Area (SCS, 1989), the hydric soils located in the vicinity of the Depot property are the Bow Loam series. This series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils on glaciated terraces and till plains from sea level to 400 feet elevation. The soils are fine, mixed, mesic Aquic Palexeralfs. The Bow Loam soil series is listed as a hydric soil on the Natural Resources Conservation Service Hydric Soils List. Plot A contained soils of a fairly uniform texture and color. The soils were a very gravelly loam down to a depth of-16 inches, with a Munsell matrix designation of 10YR 3/2. Additionally, there were many fine roots present within the upper portions of the soil. Based on the soil characteristics observed,the Bow Loam soil series was confirmed to be present within Plot A. Plot C also contained soils of a uniform texture and color. The soils were a very gravelly loam, with a Munsell matrix designation of 10YR 2/1 down to a depth of-16 inches. Additionally, there was a very thin layer of surface organics present. Within Plot C, the Bow Loam soil series was also confirmed to be present. Hydrology The soils in Plot A were saturated to the surface, and free water was observed in the pit to a depth of-6 inches from the surface. Faint wetland drainage patterns were present on the surface of the surrounding soil. Surface saturation and free water at a depth of less than 12 inches from the surface are both primary indicators of wetland hydrology. Based on the characteristics observed,it was determined that wetland hydrology is sufficiently present in Plot A. The soils in Plot C were saturated to the surface, and the soil pit contained free water to a depth of-14 inches from the surface. However,judging by the rate of infiltration of the free water, it is assumed that if the pit were left for a sufficient amount of time the water would have filled in to a depth of-12 inches from the surface. This fact, coupled with the soil saturation to the surface, indicates that wetland hydrology is present in Plot C. The hydrology of Wetland A, and of the pond itself, is augmented by the presence of the groundwater discharge hose. Given the fact that there are no outward signs of flooding around the pond, it appears that the level of the pond is stable. With the presence of the discharge hose, and the amount of groundwater being pumped into the pond, it would seem that rainfall and surface runoff alone would not provide sufficient hydrologic support to maintain the current size of the pond and wetland. Additionally, a 24 in. diameter culvert conveys runoff from the adjacent DCI manufacturing facility into the western portion of Wetland A(Figure 1). Buffer The buffer surrounding Wetland A is of poor overall habitat value. It consists of Himalayan blackberry and Nootka rose, with some reed canary grass also present. The average buffer width is approximately 15 feet and is composed almost entirely of Himalayan blackberry. Beyond the initial buffer, mowed grasses are typically encountered, with the exception of one portion of the northeast corner which is adjacent to Wetland B (Figure 1). Taller grasses such as bentgrass and Kentucky bluegrass, in addition to several young madrones,are present in this area. Along the western edge of Wetland A, the buffer is approximately 5 feet wide and contains Himalayan blackberry and concrete rubble. A concrete bulkhead is present at the top of the slope, and a gravel access road is present above the bulkhead. To the south, the buffer is approximately 50 feet wide, consisting almost entirely of Nootka rose. Wetland B Wetland B is a long, slender depressional wetland located immediately northeast of Wetland A and is approximately 0.14 acres in size (Figure 1, Photo 6). Separating the two wetlands is an abandoned rail grade running southeast to northwest. Wetland B is located adjacent to the fenceline of the wastewater treatment facility to the east, extending northward toward Fourth Street. A small, dry channel is present in the northern end leading from the wetland boundary through a culvert under Fourth Street. The channel shows no recent signs of saturation or inundation and is for the most part obscured by grasses. This channel would most likely convey flows only during heavy rainfall events during the wet season. According to Cowardin (1979) and the Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System(1993),Wetland B is classified as a Palustrine Emergent Non-persistent, Category III wetland. Vegetation The predominant vegetation species within Wetland B are cattails and lesser duckweed. Common horsetail and reed canary grass dominate around the perimeter of the wetland, while Himalayan blackberry dominates the upland fringes. European bittersweet is also present surrounding the upland fringes of Wetland B. The vegetative communities on the fringes of Wetland B are predominantly upland in nature. This is primarily due to the disturbed nature of the site, particularly the eastern portion adjacent to the wastewater treatment plant. The frequent mowing of this area has removed most of the hydrophytic vegetation. Soils Two soil plots were performed to delineate Wetland B; Plot A in the southern tip of the wetland, and Plot B near the northern boundary. Plot A contained two distinct soil horizons. From the surface to a depth of -5 inches, the A Horizon is composed of very dark grayish brown sandy/gravelly loam with a Munsell matrix designation of 10YR 3/2. There is a high content of surface organic debris and fine roots in this layer. The E Horizon occurs from -5 inches down to -16 inches from the surface. This horizon is composed of very dark grayish brown gravelly loam with a Munsell matrix designation of 10YR 3/2. The E Horizon contained noticeably less organic matter. Based on the above characteristics,the Bow soil series was confirmed to be present in Plot A. Plot B also contained two distinct soil horizons. An A Horizon is present from the surface down to a depth of-5 inches. It is composed of very dark grayish brown sandy loam with a Munsell designation of 10YR 3/2. There were many fine roots present in this layer. The E Horizon occurs from a depth of -5 inches to a depth of-16 inches from the surface. This horizon is composed of gleyed, greenish gray sandy-clay loam with a Munsell matrix designation of 10Y 5/1. The E Horizon contained noticeably less organic matter. Based on the above characteristics, the Bow soil series was not confirmed and the soils were determined not to be hydric. Hydrology The soils in Plot A were saturated to the surface,with free standing water at a depth of-15 inches from the surface of the soil pit. Given the rate of infiltration of the free water into the soil pit, it is assumed that free water would fill the soil pit to a depth of-12 inches from the surface if given sufficient time. Additionally, previous to the survey date there had not been heavy amounts of precipitation in the study area. Based on the characteristics observed, wetland hydrology is sufficiently present in Plot A. The soils in Plot B were dry to a depth of-16 inches from the surface. No other primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators were present. Based on these observations, wetland hydrology is not present in Plot B. The hydrology of Wetland B is augmented by the presence of the same groundwater hose that is augmenting the hydrology of Wetland A, however not to the same extent. While the primary outfall of the hose is located in Wetland A, several large leaks in the hose supply pumped groundwater to Wetland B,therefore augmenting hydrology to some degree. Buffer The buffer condition surrounding Wetland B is of poor habitat value. Wetland B is surrounded primarily by a band of Himalayan blackberry and reed canary grass, with the exception of the western boundary along the rail grade. This area consists of sparse grasses. The band of blackberry is approximately 5-15 ft. thick in most areas. Beyond this initial buffer the land is primarily disturbed, with the wastewater treatment plant to the east, mowed areas to the west, and Fourth Street to the north. References City of Anacortes. 2000. 2000 Zoning Ordinance. pp. 128. Anacortes,Washington. Cowardin,L. M., V. Carter,F. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish&Wildlife Service. Washington D.C. 1979. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-I, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,Miss. Kollmorgen Corporation 1994. Munsell soil color charts. New Windsor,New York. Landau Associates. 2002. Groundwater Discharge Sampling Results. Technical Memorandum submitted to Port of Anacortes. Dated October 8, 2002. Personal Communication. Susan Meyer. Department of Ecology. September 24, 2002. Reed, Jr.,P. B. 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: National Summary. U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service. Biol. Rep. 88 (24). 244 pp. Rosario Geoscience Associates (RGA). 2000. Depot Wetland Restoration—Concept Proposal: Hydrology and Water Quality Issues(DRAFT). Anacortes, WA. pp 3-4. Soil Conservation Service(SCS). 1989. Soil Survey of Skagit County Area,Washington. United States Depai talent of Agriculture. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Washington State Department of Ecology, publication#96-94. Olympia, Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1993. Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington: Second Edition. Publication#93-74. Olympia,Washington. $.4bieinstisottimiiminimumprommoomia"poo . ...; , - - , . . , . - - ...- r • PT- .--, :r. t : (I) .' Q) `'-: -4---) L.. . • 0 . ; * _ . .. . 0 ., ..;. 0 :• ..z. - - - . . , • -... - ' - Building footprint C ---1-ji- : • . . , at ground , .. , Li-- •.., : ::,'•-,4'''.1.1. —' 0 RR Tr . ..... .1. * l' to " ..... L--. 441. 0 :' Storm . 2:7,,'''' .••11.,_, ; , ,,_ , - • . . / . • . I Drain ; • '';',-,•• r_. r • , I e. . ' • r., , • •••t-_-,., . • - , ' .: •-. `---- ' .: 1111 `,.' • . •• : . -,',, •. •'-',.. , . , , • •... , lit- , ' -7,- . ..- - i . I .m. -. 40040 . ,..,,..,. . ''', • ' .- rs • • • . ,- i ...•.•*9/4411111104154i:,,.°V.Vikl,,Win Ecology Block :Retaining Walt -• - ... - - ' ..„. - ., Wetla . ::: , ,.. .. ' . 7,.., .• : , . ,. . : . . .. • .., . ..„. . , :„.„. . . ..„,_, : .. • . ,„ :. .. _ .,,. •. .... . . • , •i .!. . ight4414b4 _ 4_ .':-;.`.-.,t_."._-:—:...1 .I.? . — • • . _ P ..--- ATTACHMENT A WETLAND DELINEATION PHOTOGRAPHS ATTACHMENT A DEPOT PROPERTY WETLAND DELINEATION ' ' , '..-- ' -ow ,, .-.,,,,,,,,..., .., , , - .., • �,." ._, ri t ., . ' • 11UL ion®lutud Itr ( --_ 01 . • Photo 1. Southern portion of property,looking north at DCI facility. I or idr914 -411#' .•- Photo 2. Southern portion of property,looking south. ATTACHMENT A DEPOT PROPERTY WETLAND DELINEATION • Rp e, fi- ` dr• Photo 3. Wetland A,looking northeast. 41, t • • Photo 4. Groundwater discharge hose from the City of Anacortes Wastewater Treatment Facility. ATTACHMENT A DEPOT PROPERTY WETLAND DELINEATION -Tali1 • •. - ' • t` , r . \ . . ' *J.-",.' *- . •-,,-.0,..- . 1,. ..,,,- t..f..-„' ;zp.,..4,r,-k:,,,e,-..-:, ....: r � -r Photo 5. Outlet of groundwater discharge hose in northeast corner of Wetland A. it • • i I Photo 6. Wetland B,looking north-northwest. ATTACHMENT B FIELD DATA SHEETS PIE WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM Plot No. ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD Transect ID Weather: Cowardin PrA/2 Project/Site: MA —OCR- well c_cL Date: (p -"7- -0-7 Field Investigator: 'z-YL Size(ac): <0.5 it 1-2 2-5 >5 Normal Conds? )N Disturbance? Yo Problem Area? V& Cover Class 1=0.54 2.5 2=5.25415 3=25-50437.5 4=50-75362.5 5=75-95.85 6=>954, W/L Cvr Indicator W/L UP Cvr Indicator Dominant Plant Spp Cls Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Cls Status Stratum Pk,Qr- k 21774 L.cr tat.. -S 7 . 3 8 4 9 5 10 areg'n'1 knowl W/L pint list 0 phys/repr adapt 0 morph adapt 0 tech lit 0 W/L plant data base %OBL.FACW or FAC /CO herb+ /GO shrub+ -- tree= /CO total Hydrophytic Veg m N Rationalle: $>50% 0c50%1OBL,FACW or FAC(no FAG)] ❑other HYDROLOGY Inund? Yt9 Surf H2O depth: 'Sar12'(6'in sandy soils)?et N Depth�,( of free H2O in pit/hole: - (o Other 1°Indicators: 0 water marks 0 drift lines 0 sediment deposit W W/L drainage patterns Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Secondary Indicators: 0 oxidized root channels^12' 0 water-stained leaves 0 local soil survey data OFAC-Neutral Test(in vague hydrol) 0 other Recorded Data: 0 stream,lake or tide gale 0 aerial photo 0 other 0 none Growing Season?(� N Based on:IA date obsv growthp,soil temp 2}9.7'>41°F 0 Wetland hydrology? DN Rationale: O a ✓''?.rtntwr't/ jy5rl r c --)-a are}wfZt+C.-1_ F r.A"' �pj 7 SOILS to/at least 16' Series/Phase: k-Y.n..+3 L tti " Taxonomy r c- Drainage Class SJD Confirm Mapgt N Depth Matrix Color' Mottle?/Color leaf >< rstlf GIev? Texture / 6-l(A /oKt-3/Z y0 / Y Nv very�s..2. ie4, /Ocrr,_ Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N 'below A horizon or 10'(whichever shallower) �1 Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Histic epipedon 0 Sulfidic Odor Y'Aquic Moisture Regime ❑Reducing conditions ISl Gleyed/Low Chroma 0 High Surface Organic Content In Sandy Soils 0 Concretions ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Hydric Soils List: °Local (National Other hydric soil) ndicators: Hydric Soil? eb N • Rationale: fcvrtVf-'aA �tr rC So/ JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Wetland? N Rationale: CUMMIMI no veg no soils no hydro) Sample point within wetland? N Other information/Remarks: PIE WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM Plot No. 13 ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD Transect ID L��vz Weather � Y owardi_C n �'yl 2 Project/Site: L}r, <t� �, f �f�.+� Date: Le— 7-az Field Investigator: Size(ac): <0.5d 1-2 2-5 >5 Normal Conds? Disturbance? Y o) Problem Area? Yin) Cover Class 1=0-59 2.5 2=5-25415 3=25-50.37.5 4=50.75.62.5 5=75-95+85 5=>95. WA_ Cvr Indicator W/L UP Cvr Indicator Dominant Plant Spp Cls Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Cls Status SLei0.n - 141-nE�/�x A) If 6 2 gv[VJ% I tee, k) ` 7 3 roVtA - a U _5 a 4RoGy Q_ S 9 5 10 .reg'n'I knowl QA W/L pint list O phys/repr adapt O morph adapt ❑tech lit 0 WA.plant data base OBI,FACW or RAC /bo herb+ Q shrub+ — tree= sue total Hydrophytic Veg Y Rationafle: 0>50% 0<50%(OBL, FACW or FAC(no FAC-)l ❑other HYDROLOGY Inund? Y Surf H2O depth: 'Satnl 2' (6'in sandy soils)? Y dp Depth of free H2O in pit/hole: Other 1°Indicators: 0 water marks 0 drift lines ❑sediment deposit 0 W/L drainage patterns Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Secondary Indicators:r]oxidized root channelsAl2' ❑water-stained leaves 0 local soil survey data IFAC-Neutral Test (in vague hydrol) 0 other Recorded Data: CI stream,lake or tide gauge aerial photo CI other 0 none Growing Season?6) N &Lased on:gdate$obsv growth.O soil le p 019 • >41°F 0 • Wetland hydrology? Y &Rationa e: r)r1 rkr n-' /It QQ,_, 11 __ SOILS to at least 16' Series/Phase: YXSw Wo.✓"1 Taxonomy wic_ Drainage Class SQt\ Confirm Mapg' IN Depth Matrix Color' Mottle?/Color m Glev? Texture () /:,,,: /O f 5 11" Y Y j �J r r oapsi ti Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N 'below A horizon or 10'(whichever shallower) Hydric Soil Indicators:❑Histosol ❑ Histic epipedon 0 Sullidic Odor U Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Reducing conditions 0 Gleyed/Low Chrome ❑High Surface Organic Content In Sandy Soils ❑ Concretions ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Hydric Soils List: OLocal ANalional Other hydric soil Indicatt Oars: Hydric Soil? t Rationale: con-}?r7-12- S_o Pe JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Wetland? Y J Rationale: all param o ve• no soils Qno hydrol)Sample point within wetland? Other information/Remarks: • PIE WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM Plot No. ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD Transect ID Weather: 56,/Pi,K)q Cowardin PE.44 Z Project/Site: An .,FT-(4e: s/ D Date: (r#— - Field Investigator: Size(ac): <0.5 J 1-2 2-5 >5 Normal Conds? Y N Disturbance? Y N Problem Area? Y N Cover Class 1= 0.54 2.5 2=5-25415 3=25-50437.5 4=50.75462.5 5=75-95485 6=>954 "' ' W/L Cvr Indicator W/L UP Cvr Indicator Dominant Plant Spp GIs Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species CIs Status Stratum 1 .P,Qhf/r- 'to H 6 2 �F�' 4la/ e[T`�}.. � S 7 3 �i 62r- r'I7L- F7 8 s to ❑reg'n'I know) ❑WA.pint list 0 phys/repr adapt 0 morph adapt ❑tech lit ❑W/L plant data base %OBL, FACW or FAC 1CC) herb+ 50 shrub+ — tree= 'total Hydrophytic Veg®N Rational:a: 0>50% M<50%(081.,FACW or FAC(no FAC-)) 0 other HYDROLOGY u 11 a Inund? Y Surf H2O depth:b'Sat^12' (6'in sandy soils)?9 N Depth of free H2O in pit/hole:—,^--7 Other 1°In icalors: 0 water marks ❑drift lines ❑sediment deposit ❑W/L drainage patterns Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation <,xs7-1L, , 3c-r r=f r,r-.c Secondary Indicators: 0 oxidized root channelsAl2' 0 water-stained leaves ❑local soil survey data OFAC-Neutral Test (in vague hydrol) ❑other Recorded Data: ❑ stream,lake or tide gauge 0 aerial photo ❑other 0 none Growing Season? eft�p,Based on: date ,Ly..obsv rov{th❑ soil to 019.T>41°F ❑ Wetland hydrology? la N Rationale: Se-fr `/-0 Sr (�e do SOILS to at least 16' ��jj� Series/Phase: �(� L I i] -D4 Taxonom .9 ; Drainage Class ?D-Confirm Mapg(N j�D�eppltjjhj,, Matrix Color Mottle?/Color c l Gley? Texture lT rLl fOf tl 1/1 Y 9 Yet ' t/ci .�efFrvcily fCa1''dI YN YN r! 7 Y N Y N Y N Y N 'below A horizon or 10' (whichever shallower)Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Histic epipedon ❑Sulfidic Odor of AquicMoisture Regime Reducing conditions 0,Gleyed/Low Chroma ❑High Surface Organic Content In Sandy Soils ❑Concretions ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Hydric Soils List: ❑Local ESN ational Other hydric soil i dicators:}, Y1'-\Gt Hydric Soil?® N i Rationale: � A) CV tD )\A Slid-Cote le, r-j cam, ) Lri c. n.Qkrfur- ^^-' - - r JURISDI TIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Wetland? Y@ N Rationale: a par.- no veg no soils no hydrol Sample point within wetland?C" Other information/Remarks: PIE WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM Plot No. a ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD Transect ID Weather: Cowardin PgM 2 Project/Site: /�l7.c.c0-4'-f-cVAAC,. Date: 6— 3 a 2 Field Investigatory Size(ac,) <0.50) 1-2 2-5 >5 Normal Conds?(10 taaa-�Er it:Fe 'T f: frL0-n'T' --(({{r/l/L'2'Syr.. p. /Irdt : Disturbance? ®Ncr.YtrPA act-4. e F /� ,;,mow" +� r/r,1� an l�sivtFs Any-ei r�r<• Problem Area? (S�t N �c". rtutcnIy n4D4rtwe4 Cover Class 1=0-54 2.5 2=5-25415 3=25-50437.5 4= 50-75462.5 5=75•95485 6=>954 97.5 ! W/L Cvr Indicator W/L UP Cvr Indicator Dominant Plant Spp Cls ��Staattus/ Stratum Dominant Plant Species Cls Status St::.:::- . • 2 �y L- fL f 1/ 7 3 �� eu F 8 4 Le Ail; °EL N 9 5 10 j rey'n'I knowl $t W/L pintyst ❑phys/repr adapt ❑morph adapjj tech lit 0 W/L plant data base %OBL.FACW or FAC {4to herb+ C shrub+ -, tree= S total Hydrophytic Vag Y i Rationalle: 0>50% g<50%[OBL,FACW or FAC(no FAC-)) 0 other HYDROLOGY �/ Inund? Y 2Surf H2O depth: 'SaN12'(6'in sandy soils)?(Y� N Depth of free H2O in pit/hole: -/J' Other 1°Indicators: 0 water marks 0 drift lines 0 sediment deposit 0 W/L drainage patterns Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation Secondary Indicators:0 oxidized root channelsAl2' 0 water-stained leaves 0 local soil survey data OFAC-Neutral Test (in vague hydrol) 0 other Recorded Data: 0 stream,lake or lie gauge 521 aerial photo 0 other 0 none ;Growing Season? hj Based on: date fo.obsv growth 0 soil temp @ 19.7'>41°F 0 • Wetland hydrology?/J�N Rationale: nQ EA SOILS ty at least 16' Series/Phase: DL_) Doan? Taxonorpv, eilieg6- Drainage Class SPb Confirm Mapg®N Depth Matrix �1Color: Mottle?/Color YaIa.X�12,tF- �Gley? Texture �j/A,o,[,� o�pp,�, /o f k �'j/sL Y Y ) ✓ l/ l'e ()l-?!is'') 51 to / oYR -'i'E. Y 1 Y (a t�-rC:U.¢'�f�Y( � J'r✓'1 !! oV / ti Y N Y N ' Y N , Y N 'below A horizon or 10'(whichever shallower) ' Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Histic epipedon 0 Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Reducing conditions 0 Gleyed/Low Chroma 0 High Surface Organic Content In Sandy Soils 0 Concretions ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Hydric Soils List: t7Local National Other hydric soil indicators: Hydric Soil? lY N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Wetland? 1 Rationale: call param2 no veg no soils no hydro! Sample point within wetland?e Other information/Remarks: (� 1,� ` / )f1)/QSI'UE_.117. re.f.244 a.LI..s.¢, CC.'1 i chart-�-rb�a.-,ce/ Ft'Z'conce. at-At R Aid &,1 s a t e7.)y .-41 V ey/. d 7S4tEcL vs cc i4 A i cajk-eS .,Drnei-,ce kl4.r �. PIE WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM Plot No. k ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD Transect ID Weather: Cowardin PEM2 Project/Site: / Date: Field Investigator: I,---" Size(ac): <0.5 1-2 2-5 >5 Normal Goods? Y® p4jc.ce.-f-�o rt-e-c-e.slII frpsfi�� s�+A-zct Disturbance? ®N amA��Vl4uxt h ��1A-NP 4 '10a/)- aF voTf tnw,s F 1. Problem Area? WIN vc-q , rvIc c4-tit v V Cover Class 1= 0• 54 2.5 2=5•25415 3=25-50437.5 4=50-75462.5 5=75•95485 6=>95-31. £-._ W/L Cvr Indicator W/L UP Cvr Indicator Dominant Plant Spp Cis Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Cis Status Stratum 2 T ✓`/7r /- iff 7 3 ► oil/ fiU) s 8 4 9 5 10 itt reg'n'I knowl (Irt WA.pint list 0 phys/repr adapt 0 morph adapt 0 tech lit 0 W/L plant data base %OBL,FACW or FAC /00 herb+, F) shrub+ O tree= 33 total Hydrophytic Veg Y rp Rationalle: 0>50% *50%(OBL,FACW or FAC(no FAC-)) 0 other HYDROLOGY Inund? Ye5Surf H2O depth: "SatAl2- (6'in sandy soils)? Y &Depth of free H2O in pit hole: Other 1°Indicators: 0 water marks 0 drift tines 0 sediment deposit 0 W/L drainage patterns Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation f7OY2 e.. Secondary Indicators:0 oxidized root channel5Al2' ❑water-stained leaves 0 local soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral Test(in vague hydro') 0 other Recorded Data: 0 stream,lake or tide gauge 0 aerial photo ❑other 0 none Growing Season? 19 N B sed on:yl date tCobsv growth 0 soil temp 019.7'>41°F 0 Wetland hydrology? Y latienate: yr, ew,a,,. a�•5.-Lie-c }3%w"'G SOILS to at least 16" Series/Phase: (k�1'?V-] I Cc+v11 Taxonomy k011/i Drainage ClassrP1) Confirm Mapg Y® Depth Matrix Color Mottle?/Color a $X&-favF Gley? Texture j / -.-' lGl;��i� '/-z Y( Yg c7-^t•l/1C!/J//:') v7 -1 - f lr� i�>k} "�l Y N N +?dy/ [-/o y Y N Y N Y N Y N 'below A horizon or 10' (whichever shallower) Hydric Soil Indicators:0 Histosol 0 Histic epipedon 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Reducing conditions C Gieyed/Low Chrome 0 High Surface Organic Content In Sandy Soils 0 Concretions 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Hydric Soils List: OLocal National K._ Other hydric soil indicators: Hydric Soil? Y ' • Rationale: V1'0 fit t.,c?r !vtrl if 6i t?iC< JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Wetland? Y 9Rationale:. all param at po' -SSfe o ya Sample point within wetland? Other inform Sion/Remarks: • ATTACHMENT C MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING O Grette Associatest« ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING October 9, 2002 Mr. Bob Elsner Port of Anacortes P.O. Box 297 Anacortes,WA 98221 Dear Mr. Elsner: This memorandum describes our understanding of the regulatory positions of the interested parties (Port of Anacortes, City of Anacortes, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Washington Department of Ecology) regarding Port of Anacortes' Depot Property wetlands. It also addresses the issue of designating the wetlands as "isolated" versus "associated". The Depot Property wetlands consist of two wetlands (Wetlands A and B) located west of the City of Anacortes Wastewater Treatment Facility and east of Dakota Creek Industry's fabrication facility. Both wetlands are classified as Palustrine Emergent Non-persistent, Category III wetlands. Wetland A is approximately 36,751 ft2 in size and Wetland B is approximately 6,299 ft2 in size. Through conversations with you and Margaret Schwertner, it is our understanding that the City of Anacortes contends the wetlands are considered associated with Waters of the U.S. due to the existence of a small culvert and ditch located at the southern tip of wetland A and leading to Cap Sante Boat Haven. Following are the respective agency positions regarding the project as we understand them: Based on the actions proposed by the Port, no fill will be deposited into the wetland. Therefore, there will be no fill entering Waters of the U.S. As a result, the Corps of Engineers has no jurisdiction over the proposed project. A call was placed to the Corps of Engineers on September 20, 2002 regarding the issue of jurisdiction, and based on the proposed actions as described, the "no jurisdiction" position was verified. Therefore the Corps would not commit to a position of isolated or associated because they do not have jurisdiction over the proposed project. Typically, agencies will not commit to a regulatory stance on a project without permit applications for that project having been previously submitted. In addition, a call was placed to the Department of Ecology on September 24, 2002 regarding the issue of"isolated" versus "associated" with respect to Ecology's wetland buffer recommendations. Their response was that the issue is irrelevant because they regulate buffers based on the categorical designation of the wetland (i.e. Category III) as well surrounding land use activities,not whether the wetlands are isolated or associated. According to City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Chapter 17.65.030, all lands in or within 25 feet of a nontidal wetland of more than 10,000 square feet are within the jurisdiction of the City. However, Wetland B is a nontidal wetland which is less than 10,000 square feet, therefore Wetland B is not within the City's jurisdiction. Chapter 17.65.050 states that no activity in or within 25 feet of a nontidal wetland can occur without a permit from the City. Within the City's Zoning Ordinance, no mention is made of isolated or associated wetlands. The only wetland designation in the ordinance is a designation of"non-tidal". Through observations made as part of the wetland delineation, it was determined that the wetlands are non-tidal. According to the Corps' definition, a non-tidal wetland is a wetland that is not subject to the ebb and flow of tidal waters during the spring high tides and is not inundated by tidal waters. These wetlands are not inundated by tidal waters, and are therefore non-tidal. The argument of "isolated" versus "associated", as it relates to this project, makes no difference in the regulatory stances of the Corps, Ecology, and the City. The Corps has no jurisdiction because no fill will be discharged into the wetland; Ecology does not make buffer recommendations based on a wetland being either isolated or associated; and the City only regulates "non-tidal"wetlands,not isolated or associated wetlands. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that any new project development stay outside the current boundaries of the wetland. This will ensure that the Corps does not have jurisdiction over the project, regardless of whether the wetlands are associated or isolated. We also recommend that any language in the delineation report regarding "isolated" or "associated" be removed, as this issue has no bearing on the regulatory aspects of this project. If you have any questions or comments regarding our understanding of this issue, or our recommendations, please feel free to contact me at (253) 573-9314, or Matthew Boyle at (253) 573-9303. Sincerely, Scott Maharry Biologist Grette Associates, LLC Cc: Margaret Schwertner, Port of Anacortes ATTACHMENT D GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE SAMPLING RESULTS I4 LANDAU ASSOCIATES October 8, 2002 Port of Anacortes First and Commercial Avenue P.O. Box 297 Anacortes, WA 98221 Attn: Mr. Robert Elsner. Director of Projects&Planning RE: GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE SAMPLING RESULTS DEPOT PROPERTY PORT OF ANACORTES, ANACORTES, WASHINGTON Dear Bob: This letter presents the results of a sample collected to characterize groundwater discharged from the basement of the City of Anacortes wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) to the wetlands on the adjacent Depot property (site) owned by the Port of Anacortes. Our understanding of site background information is based on telephone conversations with Ms. Margaret Schwertner, Port of Anacortes, on September 27, 2002, and on a review of the Depot Property Wetland Delineation prepared for the Port of Anacortes by Grette Associates on September 24, 2002. As described in the following sections, chemical concentrations detected in the discharge sample were less than the national recommended water quality criteria. Although no criterion was available tier total phosphates as phosphorus, the detected concentration indicates that the discharge water could accelerate nuisance aquatic growths in the onsite wetlands. BACKGROUND INFORM AT ION Beginning in 1992, groundwater seeping into the basement of the WWTP was pumped into the then-dewatered wetlands to compensate for the depressed water table. This practice of discharging groundwater from the WWTP to wetlands on the Depot property has continued to the present date. Sulfide odors have reportedly been traced to the outfall in the wetlands where the WWTP groundwater is discharged. Additionally, the reported dominance of blue-green algae throughout the interior of the pond may be indicative of elevated phosphorus concentrations. Based on the above information and the proximity of the site to industrial operations, the following chemicals were identified for analysis in a water sample collected from the point of discharge into the wetlands: nitrates and nitrites,ammonia, total phosphorus.sulfide, and total metals. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL NATURAL RESOURCES 1302nd A•em:e South • Edmonds, NP 98020 • 0I?.5)1/B-0907 • fax f125)778fi409 • www lendni^r corn SEATTLE SPOKANE • TACOMA • PORTLAND SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS One water sample, identified as SW-1, was collected on September 30, 2002 from the outfall where groundwater from the WWTP is discharged into the wetlands at the site. At the time of sample collection (11:10 A.M.), the turbidity of the discharge water was low (7 NTU) and no sulfide odors were detected by the sampler. The sample was delivered to the Analytical Resources, Inc. (ARI) laboratory for analysis of nitrates and nitrites (EPA Method 353.2), ammonia (EPA Method 350.1M), total phosphorus (EPA Method 365.2), sulfide (EPA Method 376.2), and total metals (EPA Methods 6010/7470). Analytical results are summarized in Table 1. Detected concentrations were compared to the lower of state (WAC 173-201A-040)and federal(40 CFR 131.36)surface water quality criteria. Where state and federal water quality criteria were not available, national recommended water quality criteria (EPA Publication No. 822-Z-99-001)were used for comparison. All of the nitrogen-containing analytes (nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) were detected at concentrations below the water quality criteria. Nitrate as nitrogen was detected at a concentration of 0.046 mg-N/L, which is two orders of magnitude less than the national recommended water quality criterion for domestic water supplies (10 mg-N/L). The detected concentration is also protective of aquatic life; lethal concentrations (LC50)of nitrate as nitrogen for salmonid species have been identified at or above 900 mg-N/L. Nitrite was not detected in the discharge sample. The detected concentration of ammonia as nitrogen(0.65 mg-N/L)was converted to an un-ionized ammonia concentration (1.0 µg-N/L) and compared to the pH- and temperature-dependent state and federal criterion(3.4 µg-N/L). Total phosphates as phosphorus were detected at a concentration of 0.53 mg-P/L. Although a total phosphorus criterion to control nuisance aquatic growths is not available, the detected concentration was compared to concentrations described in EPA's Gold Book for water quality criteria (EPA Publication No. 440/5-86-1). The Gold Book suggests that water streams discharging to a lake or reservoir should not contain total phosphates as phosphorus at concentrations exceeding 0.05 mg-P/L to control accelerated eutrophication. The phosphate as phosphorus concentration detected in the discharge sample is representative of conditions that could promote nuisance aquatic growths in the wetlands. Sulfides were not detected at the reporting limit of 0.05 mg/L in the discharge water sample, which was consistent with the field observation of no sulfide odors at the time of sample collection. Arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver were not detected at the analytical reporting limits for these analytes. Barium was the only detected metal in the water discharge sample. The detected concentration (0.065 mg/L) was an order of magnitude less than the national recommended water quality criteria(1 mg/L). 10/08/02 S:\WPROQ529\00B\GWDischarge Br.doc 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES SUMMARY In summary. detected concentrations of chemicals in the discharge water sample at the Depot property were below national recommended water quality criteria. Although no criterion was available for total phosphates as phosphorus, the detected concentration represents discharge conditions that could accelerate the growth of nuisance aquatic growths in the onsite wetlands. We are pleased to be of assistance in characterizing the conditions of the groundwater discharging to the Depot property from the adjacent WWTP. Please call me at 425-778-0907 if you have any questions about the findings summarized in this report. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Charles P. Halbert,RE. Senior Project Engineer CPU/tam Attachment 10r08102 slwpRec‘529\008\cwoischargeUr doc 3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES TABLE 1 Page 1 of 1 GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE SAMPLE DEPOT PROPERTY ANACORTES, WASHINGTON SW-1 EV59A 9/30/02 CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS(mg/L) N-Ammonia 0.65 N-Nitrate 0.046 N-Nitrite 0.010 U Nitrate+Nitrite 0.046 Total Phosphorus 0.53 Sulfide 0.05 U TOTAL METALS(mg/L) Arsenic 005 U Barium 0.065 Cadmium 0.002 U Chromium 0.005 U Lead 0.02 U Mercury 0.0001 U Selenium 0.05 U Silver 0.003 U 10/8/02 5'\WPROC\529\008\GWDischarge5ample Sheetl Landau Associates re,N'rtY Off' ANRCORTES PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. (INCLUDING BUILDING DEPARTMENT) (360) 299-1943 P.O. BOX 547,ANACORTES, WA 98221 (360) 293-1938 FAX yCO IAN MUNCE, DIRECTOR ,/!j, 1891 4C01t September 30, 2002 PARKING VARIANCE —W.T. PRESTON Dear Neighbor: The Anacortes Museum has planned for the construction of a snagboat interpretive center north and east of the W.T. Preston. As part of the development process the Anacortes Zoning Ordinance requires 15 off-street parking spaces. Based on current conditions the Museum Department has asked that the Planning Commission waive the parking requirement from fifteen (15) to zero (0). The Planning Commission will review this request at the October 9, 2002 meeting, 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Building Council Chambers, 6th Street and "Q" Avenue. Comments either before the October 9`h meeting or at the meeting itself would be greatly appreciated. 7/30/oz. Ian S. Munce, Planning Director Date City of Anacortes P.O. Box 547 Anacortes, WA 98221 (360) 299-1942 ' i I Parking Variance —W.T. Preston Commissioner Hasty mentioned that he does some work for the Museum but feels this would not interfere with his decision on the proposed parking variance. Mr. Hasty remained for the item after hearing no objections from the audience. Mr. Munce introduced the parking variance request by the Anacortes Museum. The Museum is requesting a parking variance to reduce the required minimum 15 off-street parking spaces to zero for the construction of a new interpretive center at the W.T. Preston on "R" Avenue. The Chair,Erica Pickett, opened the public hearing. Gary Cline,Museum Director, explained to the Commission that this project should not attract more visitors but will provide a better service to visitors that already visit the W.T. Preston. Addressing Mr. Pyke's letter of concern regarding the Marina needing on-street parking on R Avenue,Mr. Cline explained that the Marina has off- street parking and does not use "R"Avenue. There were no comments from the audience. The public hearing was closed. After discussion, the Commission voted to approve the Parking Variance request subject to two conditions: 1) "Four additional off-street parking spaces shall be added within five years", and 2) "One on-street handicap space and a bike rack shall be provided at time of building occupancy. This action was taken on a motion by Commissioner Kuehn, seconded by Commissioner Greathouse,and passed unanimously. io—oq— 0a s "a STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • }'.' ) ss. ;. County of Ramsey ) . i • On this 27th day of January , 19 81 , before me • the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Minnesota, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared J, C, Itenadv , >i' '1 and R. J. Morin , to me known to be the Vice President and • . Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Burlington Northern Inc.. • the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the 5 said Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, ' , 1 for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the i corporate seal of said corporation. i Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first i above written. i 1 '},A.,,,,A,A41UAAaM.UtWAIU3AY 0V214-f,,C. M\ NOTAR,.tutu••ih'ESOEA .I • R° Y�[rnm'wnf.pCOUNT NNTY/1,19AS Notary Public in and r the State of tt kt�.x.rr m�rrvmrvwk residing at .,.,-� f T. Minnesota, s y �. � 3 i . i • i . i I t r 8102270020 aHdd Raco(4a VOL 431 rn`rE53U Ci q5nnfb02 -2- ..yy 1 '.1. "; -;:.rw i #' �h'�RtlitIN'/�'}?.t;'ir': .. " 'cif t ' 3 4. rf*i" i `asl' 41—.1 R+/4... 1 a9r' •at, .v9•ir, .> -• 1 iu° • I. ! ,61 J — .. , v. 8102270020 ,}q i 3-i. i QUITCLAIM DEED fir,. I -' i 5 The Grantor, BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC., a Delaware Corporation, for I ;-4 1 and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, '"' ,1 receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, conveys and quitclaims to CITY OF ti ' ANACORTES, a municipal corporation, all of its right, title and interest in and to the following described real estate situated in the City of Anacortes, t5 . 4: 1 County of Skagit, State of Washington, including any after acquired title: r i t,�, Those portions'of Blocks 23 and 26 of "Bowman's Central il,I,: Ship Harbor Waterfront" Addition to the City of ' a Anacortes, according to the plat recorded 1n Volume 2 w of Plats, page 33, records of Skagit County, 4:4;,./4 - .:'.•r;; ': • Washington. Together with its vacated alleys and the �j_p , I 1-- a 9 9e y 'd?j f e Z vacated rights-of-way of 7th and 8th Streets, and ? •':` O Tracts 22 and 31 of "Plate No. 9" of "Tide & Shore '81 FEB 27 A9 :43 „i L-1 y O Lands" all in Section 18, Township 35N, Range 2 E.W.M. r 4 " z Anacortes Harbor, according to the official map thereof t; : 1 f-Z ibio N in the office of the State Land Commissioner at ^L'•�''•-• ---'11r" '- C r...qr cr �• .:•: Q Olympia, Washington. .- I •' Li O 3 Inc.'s „ o 0 ,; ", Lying: es[ of the existing centerline of Burlington , t o Narthern railway main track, Northerly of the • a; tom— O Northerly line of "Market Street", East of the East line y -- Z of "R" Avenues South of the South line of 6th Street d z extended east!except the East 15.00 feet thereof. i _s 1 Said parcel more particularly described as follows: °''-1 Commencing at a point on the North line of said Block 23 - with its intersection with the centerline of isaid railway . main track; ' Thence: N89'25'16"W - along the South line of said 6th 1 Street - 15.000 feet to the true point of beginning of - .., this description; , . 1 Thence: Continuing N89'25'16"W - 59.751 feet to the ,}/� 1r' ' + East line of said "R" Avenue; S AO1T auRir■ 11 Reel DMA Eetb To Thence: S0'35'19"W - along said East line - 679.646 PAID ' ;,'. I feet more or less, to the Northerly line of said F(8 27 1981. '1 "Market Street"; i amanl POI err—Alt 4-1 Thence: N33'21'31"E - along said Northerly line - Ruts a+. Tna 1- I' , 78.100 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; a• Or' a'""s i Thence: Northerly - 162.492 feet along the arc of said �� 0 - curve, having a radius of 804.02 feet and a central . • ' ;.4 I X%°4' angle of 11'34'46" to the-Pig—of tangency; j S' Thence: NO'41'35"E - parallel with the centerline of . , • said railway Track - 452.627 feet more or less to the true point of beginning, containing 0.846 acre, more or ;4 I less. i.'. ; 'this conveyance is subject to the following: , I All easements, encumbrances, restrictions and reservations of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officer and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this 27th day of _yTanuary , 1981 • •.....,% BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. . •, c.TVIce rro ,i•9efi1 F ) {t. . Gift Street 1 J 14.--jw.b3r [afi'u [] ' 'i1 et•c - i a.]n' f :.1i b: I . i lb " old al" BLOCK .[^ old ' ii iv Iv N . IF i b i N 7tft sweet I: O )00.0)0 400o' 1't 4 alA •, t1-4:4.jr 'sl, ti 1 -Ix l a • i ro " S el It i Owl I Stmet• 1I • P 0 . / ' i `: 0� $(Pi r o Y III ' This sketch is furnished for information purposes only to assist in property location with reference to streets and other parcels. No representation is made as to accuracy and the Company assumes no liabilty for any loss occurring by reason of reliance thereon. 300 ' of Pr&sL PNUMBER SITE. SITE ROAD N/OWNER OWNER ADD CITY STATE ZIP P56864 801 6TH ST DEAR GARY R 801 6TH ST ANACORTES WA 98221 P56865 805 6TH ST PYKE LAWRENCE K P 0 BOX 454 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56866 807 6TH ST REED EDDY R 807 6TH ST ANACORTES WA 98221 P56867 811 6TH ST WILLIAMS ANNETTE P O BOX 1356 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56868 DOROTICH CATHERINE L P O BOX 185 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56869 810 7TH ST MCKEE FAMILY LTD PTNSHP II PO BOX 473 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56870 808 7TH ST MCKEE FAMILY LTD PTNSHP II PO BOX 473 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56872 802 7TH ST JOHNSON SHAUN M 802 7TH ST ANACORTES WA 98221 P56873 805 7TH ST COOK RICHARD L 1719 8TH ST ANACORTES WA 98221 P56874 809 7TH ST FLETCHER MATTHEWS PO BOX 464 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56875 813 7TH ST MENDUM WILLIAM J P 0 BOX 1656 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56876 CITY OF ANACORTES P 0 BOX 547 ANACORTES WA 98221 P54945 815 6TH ST DOROTICH CATHERINE L P O BOX 185 ANACORTES WA 98221 P54946 609 Q AV ADAMS WILLIAM E 609 Q AVE ANACORTES WA 98221 P54947 Q AV SOINE MARK T PO BOX 1211 EVERETT WA 98206 P54948 814 7TH ST SOINE MARKT PO BOX 1211 EVERETT WA 98206 P54949 701 Q AV YOUNG YADIRA 5165 EDENS RD ANACORTES WA 98221 P54950 pry Q AV PARKER CLARENCE R P 0 BOX 1722 ANACORTES WA 98221 P54951 719 Q AV HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ANACORTES P O BOX 547 ANACORTES WA 98221 P54952 CITY OF ANACORTES P 0 BOX 547 ANACORTES WA 98221 P54953 + LAY REV LVG TRUST P O BOX 473 ANACORTES WA 98221 ( P54954 IBERIO ALIC . 7 1429 NW 202ND LN SHORELINE WA 98177 K P56898 • , •' ';I! 0 P56899 CITY OF ANACORTES P 0 BOX 547 ANACORTES WA 98221 P56877 CITY OF ANACORTES ANACORTES WA 98221 P56862 611 R AV PORT OF ANACORTES C ify ANACORTES WA 98221 P56863 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR CO FORT WORTH TX 76161 P32861 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR CO FORT WORTH TX 76161 P32877 CITY OF ANACORTES ANACORTES WA 98221 P32878 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR CO FORT WORTH TX 76161 P32879 PORT OF ANACORTES ANACORTES WA 98221 P32881 PORT OF ANACORTES ANACORTES WA 98221 P32882 PORT OF ANACORTES ANACORTES WA 98221 t saes1 199$ aston .116(eItK+ger Z1th .� `�G Corti AS thr°u9 , , 4- \- d End of$ePten t>er - • n9 MaY aoPeration7> _ °fPe\oP\el 120 k* PPn\,pe9�weeke ' on\y 1 --// \\ 100 ‘ _- SO " O 0, o gp , 0 , 1 \V\\\IHtt o i ____________ _ ,—______ _____ , pr ‘ti A 1 44 \ - \‘' - -i ' -'\ lic\iii\t‘i\CA. , ,1::;°)cb(vele 2.0 - -\ t 4\ti\\iiitikt „ (t) 03 tb 0, \ cti \ (1) 1\ii1/2i t ‘‘ !dee 4- � g� aweti`� N ,\\ Date 0 m ai: n3' (o\� co u i 19g9 k Sales' ISG- teamandn '`1G a ber19 5 1W T, Press°„rough SPe{ems Heritage�a� 7 En9�neAP^I __ 066Pe°Pie� 0a15 �—, \ _ - "____ _ 100 -.V - 019Pe°Pel4h of Ju g01: \ / _ R os \ ' I \ \ \yen \ o o _\_ ' A '‘' . \ - ‘ 1\A\A 1 %\ A AO ‘' - ‘t- J 1\!\\ \ k ' \ 4, ‘t A k t \ _-:- \-- . - '1/4 A \ \tii \‘ s,4 *k‘,. \ \ \,,, 4,1\1\\Att, ,,,,.. _ — , ,_, 0) 0213 ki0p‘) ,,,\.b-e\ 0 g� Rc �° Agg �0) ems\ i\ 4 4 '� 0 g 40 ti" 4°j paw nth 0.---..� W.T.Preston Ticket Sales, 2002 June 1st through Augest 31st 120 100 80 c co s. m a 6 60 - A 111i1 I 20 \°10 6�°\°6�\°6°\°6��cle �°6\`O°��°j\°6 °�h\°� \°ek\N ek\°`\°1\le \ \NC) ��cjie A\NC°�'�°j 4114,,) �\��\°g�5 4C) Qi°j\°�'��°�'�`'\°�^ 41;\ie �° \°� O�11 \°� Date NAMES & ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROPOSED INTERPRETIVE CENTER PROJECT SITE Address Property Name Property Owner 611 R Avenue Depot Arts Center City of Anacortes President, Don Black, PO Box 296, Anacortes 801 6th St. Residence Gary R. Dear 805 6th St. Residence Lawrence K. Pike PO Box 454 807 6th St. Residence Eddy R. Reed 811 6th St. Residence Annette Williams PO Box 1356 815 6th St. Residence Catherine Dorotich PO Box 185 810 7th St. Residence McKee Family Ltd partnership. PO Box 473 808 7th St. Residence McKee Family, as above 802 7th St. Residence Shaun M. Johnson 805 7th St. Office Bldg Richard L. Cook 1719 8th St. 809 7th St. Residence Matthews Fletcher PO Box 464 813 7th St. Residence William J. Mendum PO Box 1656 814 7th St. Residence Mark T. Soine PO Box 1211 Everett 98206 820 7th St. Residence Mark Soine \ I l 609 Q Ave. Residence William E. Adams 701 Q Ave. Residence Yadira Young 5165 Edens Rd 709 Q Ave. Residence Clarence Parker PO Box 1722 719 Q Ave. Apartment Bldg. Housing Authority of Anacortes. POB 547 611,615,617,619 Q Ave. Mark Soine No address Small parcel of land beween City Alice Liberio and McKee property off Q between 1429 NW 202nd Lane 9`h, north side, and alley Shoreline, WA 98177 Land east of the PRESTON Port of Anacortes Ii � APPLICATION TO II PLANNING COMMISSION I Art. w REQUEST FOR VARIANCE APPLICANT: /`I`meeles /Ocean -� PHONE:O09 / 7/1 NAILING ADDRESS: / 5- , z. oy�// 1 CITY: 4J14Ge89/'6/ STATE: 7444 SIP: ?nag/ ADDRESS OF PROPERTY WHERE VARIANCE IS REQUESTED: Ie 4'owe LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT: `? /0 BLOCK: PLAT: 227;44 . .Z G ASSESSORS ACCOUNT NUMBER: a 77 - Z2G na9-000 og.o2/e- '- w-000/ Description of variance being requested and purpose of variance. (Use additional pages if necessary) _ RP/vitt o�'�`st &erpath t rre fro zero. Provision of Zoning Ordinance from which 4ariance is requested. Include section and page number. Justification for variance as outlined in Part 17.10.040B of the Zoning Ordinance. (Use additional pages if necessary.) , haz cctC aftgditiotcynyee Applicant shall attach names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the property. Variances shall be limited to the area and dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Construction must commence within 90 days if a variance is granted. Attach maps, diagrams, or other material which explain or support the varianceance request. _4) hf)- 6,,,/ Signz !ure of Applicant(s) Da Receipt No. : Date: Appl.No. : Hearing Date: REVISED 2/96 Gil Y 0 ANACORTES MUSEUM Promoting and inspiring an understanding and appreciation of the History of Fidalgo and Guemes Islands. �100111* 1305 8th STREET, ANACORTES, WA 98221-1833 Phone: (360) 293-1915 Fax: (360) 293-1915 www.anacorteshistorymuseum.org W.T. PRESTON Sternwheel Snagboat Gallery& Research Library National Historic Landmark 8th& M 7th & R Ian Munce, Director 9/17/02 Planning Department City of Anacortes Anacortes, WA 98221 Re: parking variance Dear Mr. Munce: The Anacortes Museum has planned to construct a snagboat interpretive center north and east of the W.T. PRESTON. This facility is to be located on the parcel of land that will be transferred from Port ownership to the City. For this project I would like to request a parking variance to remove the need for the Museum to provide off street parking for the snagboat interpretive center. Per section 17.46.020 of the zoning code, tourism uses are allowed in an area zoned Commercial Marine. The interpretive center may therefore be regarded as an exhibit hall, which will require 15 off street parking spaces, one-third of these for compacts. The building is designed to have an occupant load of 49 persons. Actual visitation over the last 3 years ('98, '99, '02) the boat has been opened to the public shows an average of less than 4 persons per hour during the peak visitation months of June, July and August. Because of the existing parking available along R Avenue next to the property that the W.T. PRESTON sits on, I would like to obtain a variance for this project that will reduce the need for off street parking spaces to zero. I ask you to consider the following items as justification for this request. A. The interpretive center is intended to be an introduction to an existing condition, a flow-through facility that does not add to congestion but provides restrooms, a gift shop, exhibits and a ramp system that will provide ADA compliant visitor access to the W.T. PRESTON. The PRESTON is a National Historic Landmark vessel, owned by the City of Anacortes and under the stewardship of the Anacortes Museum. It is situated on land designated as Jim Rice Park. It is a non- profit, cultural heritage site on a continuous length of City land that also includes the railroad depot. Please see attachment A. B. Visitors to other nearby attractions use the existing parking available along R Avenue and adjacent streets. C. The W.T. PRESTON was installed at its present location in March 1983, before R Avenue was improved. Please see attachment C. Subsequently, provision for off street parking was not made when R Avenue was improved. This condition did not result from the actions of this applicant. D. Because the interpretive center is not intended to add to congestion, but to better accommodate the usual flow of visitors to the historic site it will serve, it is felt that granting of this parking variance request will not confer on the Museum a special privilege denied to other lands, structures or buildings in this same district. In addition, based on the average of less than 4 persons per hour touring the boat during peak visitation periods, actual parking requirements have been minimal and would remain so, even with visitation figures that doubled. The Museum is willing to submit an improved parking diagram for the existing setback area in front of the railroad depot, including provision for 2 handicapped spaces shared with the Depot Arts Center. This plan would include improved curb cuts and striping for perpendicular parking spaces. Approximately 30 vehicles can park on the east side of R Avenue, between the depot and 9` Street. Please see attachment D. Other parking is available on adjacent City properties. More parking could become available if the Port property east of the PRESTON were ever to be transferred to the City. For the reasons noted above, I believe that no additional spaces are needed and ask your approval and the approval of the Planning Commission to accept the available parking condition as it presently exists. Respectfully yours, ZigiKnei Garry Cline, Museum Director K I U I 815 801 ��' 801 �l I 1 \\ 11 Ig�,40ill i F / ', 820 y 810$ 61 10 SL 702 0©�704 c ., 1708 • 719 1 , i i ,- , , i/ I III i i ...... ......\_...--•---"\\\ ...., � _ \ r ; .10' , ...:., . . \ , . ':t \ i \ \\k, , It \ .1rr p ';) ICktIS \ \ % e' ' .... •• 0 \ Hla-----( . 'I;• .....< , , i \ 7ch.s. :i. , \ It a. r ...\--r 0 \ r• o NW . \ r>. '£ •i�1 � -SiIt\ ) - \' N 6�r '^'t: /J�! mil ~ ry. \, "i ./ A "! 1t 1\ \ ,....1-- --- --- --"\-- 7 v ! 1 , ,,\ ,„ „, I ,,,,, ,,„,,,,,, .., 1- . \ `'1' v`-�"�� ` - a�t ---\ s- (-\ L _ F ` 1` ljpY S./�� ' .r ` - " 0 i\ \ �rr� 1��1'►1 \ '7' ',,-:A-c:c _ k • , :--' 4‘.. 1 J1- '\ L t `\ j. 1, \ 4 �' zc Z • q 11, \,, 1 1 c,v ` it �c3 U r - \ \ k' \, 't '. \\ t � 4 � I , , -\` 4 tA 1` `t l 11, V \ i \ \ 1 � ✓ 0 % October 7 2002 City of Anacortes Anacortes Planning&Community Development Dept. Parking Variance--W.T.Preston This letter is in response to the Museum Department request for a wavier of the parking requirements from 15 to 0. What are the current conditions that justify not requiring off street parking? With the planned sale of adjacent property to Westport and the major reduction in marina parking, where does the Museum propose that museum visitors park?Where are the marina users going to find parking?In the sale of property to Westport is there a requirement that all Westport employees park on Westport property? In looking at parking requirements the Museum wants to look at current conditions for a future project. The Planning Council should consider future parking conditions for future projects. It is known that there will be heavy parking loads resulting in near future plans and projects with the Port and City. In conclusion I request the Planning Commission not waive the off street parking requirement for the Museum. Lawrence Pyke 805 6th Street PO Box 454 Anacortes WA 98221 360-293-6817 /D17 oZ �,I —J Munce, Ian From: Richardson, Cynthia Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:29 PM To: Munce, lan Subject: Preston Interpretive Center Parking Since I will be unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting where this will be discussed, please distribute these comments to the Commissioners prior to the meeting. Thank you, Cynthia Richardson While I have no objection to the proposal to allow on-street parking to meet the parking requirements for the new Interpretive Center, I suggest adding a requirement for one handicapped van-accessible parking space to serve this new facility. There is only one such space currently provided on this side of the street. It is quite a distance away, and that space must serve the Depot Arts Center, Farmers' Market, and other related needs. The architects for the new facility have gone to great lengths to provide a sloping sidewalk up to the floor level of the Interpretive Center, and a properly-sloped ramp from there up to the deck of the snagboat, specifically to allow wheelchair access to the boat. This accessible route should be linked directly to an accessible parking space. In fact, I believe that both the state building code and requirements for federally funded projects would require this. The added cost to the project could be minimized by striping and signing an on-street space, and modifying the sidewalk alongside the marked space to provide a level unloading area with proper slope back up to the sidewalk level on each side. Please add this requirement to the conditions for approving the parking for this project. 1 has r �� Building Department Memo To: Bob Hyde, Public Works Director From: Michelle Deatonf' i Date: 2/24/2004 Re: W.T Preston Interpretative Center—703"R"Avenue Plans have been submitted for a new interpretative center at 703 "R" Avenue. Please calculate the sanitary sewer general facilities fee. No of Fixtures Fixture Units Water Closets 2x4= 8 53 ,c 2 I • toL I Lavatories 2 x 1 = 2 O 5 X 2— Kitchen Sinks 1 x 2= 2 to b 'c I _ G • Drinking Fountain 1 x.5= .5 S X - c 5 u Slop Sink 1 x 2= 2 25X 1 .U � Utility Sink 1 x 2= 2 I O B K I G g 6)5 ERG Total Fixture Units 16.5 r i Plans are available in the Building Department, if needed. Thank You. / 65X ' j ( 7 yi„, •Page 1 62-- � l / W.T. Preston Interpretive Center Project Data 713 Q Avenue Use zone Cm Lot Area 5,000 SF Lot Cover 38% Code Used 1997 UBC Occupancy Group A3 Construction Type 5N Floor Area 1,925 SF Occupant Load 88 Use Exhibition Hall/Interpretive center d• 0 • RESOLUTION NO. 700 l :r A RESOLUTION fixing a time when a Petition for \'nc..tion may be heard and determined by the Council and setting a public hearing date. WHEREAS, a Petition for the vacation of the ljeloo-. described property has been filed with the City Council of the City of Anacurtus and the City of Anacortes Planning Commission has studied said Petition , and WHEREAS, it is necessary to fix -a t :m: for a Public Roaring on said matter, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE C I'f1 CUtiNC I L o: ill!. Cl I) ul \',\t'( I;I I : lc\' !I I "(ll(S, follows : Section 1 . That certain Petition askun; for t 'h0 \::cation of the follosing described property shall he heard and detCnLU nd IS the City Coun,.i1 and .t Public Hearing shall. he heard thereon on thy 'AIL day of July, 19S3. That portion of R Avenue as described in the following : Beginning at a point tcitich i : the LOtuer of Block 2o , of the Bowman s Central Ship Harbor Lotcr Front Plat of Anacortes, being also the_ intersection of the mouth line of 7th Street and the coat li:,r of n \vent• , lLi ;ice hest 4() feet , thence south along the center lute of R .V,nue 200 feet , thence • cast 40 feet to a point , hei ,.,, the nun'th•‘cst corner of tn,et 31 , 'thence north 20( feet to the' paint of Ie,•,innuig. &DOI'T1',ll this 0th ,Lt ,• of Jain: '1., C1 fl (If 'h \i'iflffl .ti , P\siflhjlt , ATTEST: it titAe ati George .htatan , City Clerk-Treasorer (CORPOIi:\TP SF.\L) co e 1 RESOLUTION NO. 760 A RESOLUTION fixing a time when a Petition for Vacation may be heard and determined by the Council and setting a public hearing date. I WHEREAS, a Petition for the vacation of the below described property has been filed with the City Council of the City of Anacortes and the City of Anacortes Planning Commission has studied said Petition, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to fix •a time for a Public Hearing on said matter, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIII. CITY COUNCIL OF 'ill!. Ct'I'1 or \NACOFITS, WASIIING'I'ON as follows: Section 1. That certain Petition asking for the vacation of the following described property shall be heard and determined by the City Council and a Public Hearing shall he heard thereon on the ;th day of July, 1933. That portion of R Avenue as described to the following : Beginning at a point which i; the N.W. corner of Block 26, of the Bowman' s Central Ship Harbor Water front Plat of Anacortes, being also the intersection of the south line of 7th Street and the oast line of is Avenue, thence west 40 feet , thence south along the center line of I: Avenue 296 feet, thence cast 40 feet to a point , being the northwest corner of tract 31 , - thence north 296 feet to the point of beginning. ADOPTED this 6th day of Juim . , CM. OF \N\t'ORI'LS, W'ASIIINGION 11:2?c142ee? 47X-e- ATTEST: George htaian, City Clerk-Treasurer (CORPORATP SEAL) CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. IV PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PERMIT 3639 ANACORTES, WASH. DATE ID - ".1.C 19t3 PERM ISSIO CIS HEREBY GRATED TO: / OWNER ' 1l+YNA acQ4, � STREET a4 6m —/T ADDSS LOCATION WHERE WORK IS TO BE DONE CONTRACTOR t"`1IAY""^'1 "H �'4 Ku -P TO ERECT fd INSTAC_ IX/ OR REPAIR ❑ IN WE FOLLOWING MANNER: fL s .t.�P.{'tt'4 1" c/ 42.44- C GAL., 1. ++4,,),._AC rt�. N. `tesl PERMXPIR S ON�YEPIR RDATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT'❑ SUBMITTED WERE WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ail CONTRACTOR ❑ RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDG'D AS FOLLOWS: 1 w ` a' (MATE VALUE TYPE �' •�' 'F WORK PERMIT FEES ISSUING I ' .fl. BUILDING Ylin Q IIII GAS PIPING MIMS - PLUMBING AND W.S. -Me. SEWER CONNECTION INSP. —. MD El MECHANICAL .n- PLAN CHECK FEE .MUM MISC. . . TOTAL IIIPMEN . LEGAL DESCRIPTION a l_ . :iaf r riff. K u A\ 11\ -4 i....AA . CITY INSPECTOR ` ' BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO.: BLD2002-00154 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 5/15/02 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 5/15/02 (360)293-1901 EXPIRES: 5/15/03 SITE ADDRESS: 703 R AV ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 3805-000-020-0007 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install temporary stairs to the WT Preston. OWNER CONTRACTOR CITY OF ANACORTES P.O. BOX 547 BERENTSON CONSTRUCTION ANACORTES, WA 98221 14059TH STREET ANACORTES, WA 98221 Primary Phone: Primary Phone: 293-8544 Phone 1: Phone 1: License#: LIC BERENC110K 1 TYPE OF WORK: ? AREA VALUE: $ 1,800.00 I TYPE OF USE: LOT: sf REQUIRED SETBACKS: CENSUS CATEGORY: 1ST FLR: sf ZONING: ? FRONT: ft 2ND FLR: sf Occupancy Groups BASEMENT: sf SIDE 1: ft GAR/CARPORT: sf SIDE 2: ft 1: 2: REAR: ft OTHER: sf 3: 4: REQUIRED PARKING Construction Types NUMBER OF UNITS: T"T"' - * t^W 4-3 47 W Y-} * fk I47 L,7 6 1 =* 47 iJ M1M r- * *r'-r- ES:41: 2: STORIES: „ .r-* 4.; A L.,;: * t.u-' oil 3: 4: BUILDING HEIGHT: ' W 10 314 *:>'. 1 4.0"a*k w = y 1 a iu *x * �v*LLI 0 C * = * * *- 1 S4 ak ti'I ® O * r3 * * * T.0 aK o �2 S al[ = * * * NL*U 4 *. .. IY u }.* *. FEES N **1ra v1r, a *.� 01 * :�* � .vfi*a tiW a * ,C a * a* * Type By Date Receipt Amount °Ci ;a LL KKa o * r3 >.*J _ 11 *-Y` 11 *rn* 1111 11 * PRMT MRD 5/15/02 $51.25 R* * a) * * * � .. *I * �1 *+ * * a *� E * a * m* * STBC MRD 5/15/02 $4.50 -� _* a. * ' - *•OA* * K Tr'O*LLI Ltl * - * 41* * l G] Cl*1- a *c,. `w m * u:« * 2 *c2 * s MI * C*'C * u C Si- 1T * 144 s=m «cc* Cl-', * Total: $55.75 —r .4 .•*" 46* x u-, * * 0 to * pc}+ S T•=t q 0** .. .. -- * **CO CIS *U' y 1-* 'A. O.k * * 1- 0.i* tk 71-*O * W04- * * N au* Nd\*1-- = 4-3* .--1 h. N * *1- V- * GC.1*Ca Le C* _. 2.V iC4a * * O- c,* :r 0-V*\ .. \ .. * u_ CJ G * *ti-v-, * - 6 •l1*SLS Lt 61* 3L ]_ * * 2N C* C1* OJ t- U* -f-a O * *.4+ 0 it* *54 p1 C1 61* E .2 1 * * 0 w -t* I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that *r"Y "': cc* "- C * *`-C with all ordinances and state and federal laws regulating activities covered by this permit. _ `_ : f-� i / ‘Nitt LA, Issued by Applicant or Owner's Signature I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections i► �-41 P asp. 5%s,zc tie‘ w \ ` . - i'S - Jac. -P. [R . I v &/L a/-f siDE161 A I � 1 �' �✓N/rE �iuyc .1 itf .�--- viz 0, Off �Oi I i ' L �` i i i ____sbi Zx ,pi- `/ ! CRC _ '` `� oastb{A j I Y �"""'"lob, '-'-- S LI } -k .. _ \ 2- peg ?2Mbc V 7.146 \ Ref �E &NtS sw�CF4cP lar115 -1t62.a �1�11it t - 4 q1�t"� J, / / O/ Qy..flIbe -In1NUttK5 C Frank, Ed From: Frank, Ed Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:07 PM To: Cline, Garry Subject: RE: PRESTON visitor facility Gary, I am sending, by hard copy, a copy of the zoning requirements for the CM zone for your use. I am also including parking and landscape requirements. In the CM zone the following zoning requirements will apply 1. Minimum set back from a street right-of-way property line is 20 feet. 2. The maximum lot coverage is 50% of the actual lot area. 3. The maximum building height is 35 feet. 4. Set back is measured to any part of the structure from the property line. 5. Off street parking is required. If no or reduced off street parking is proposed, a variance from the planning commission is necessary. This preliminary information to start the planning process. If you have any questions concerning code issues please contact us early on so we can help reduce last minute changes when you come to the permit stage. Edwin Frank, Building Official City of Anacortes P.O. Box 547 Anacortes, WA 98221-0547 360.293.1901 ----Original Message From: Cline, Garry Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:22 PM To: Frank, Ed Subject: PRESTON visitor facility Ed, I would like to move ahead with the proposed PRESTON visitor facility project, and would like to build the facility on the ground behind the sternwheel of the boat. This is where the bandstand stood. My rough calculations put the main lot that the PRESTON is on at 80' by 167', or 13,360 sq feet. The bandstand lot, at 80' by 46' = 3,680 sq ft. All for a total of 17,040. The footprint of the boat, as near as I can figure it, is 5,590 sq ft. If I consider the proposed facility to be up to 2,800 sq ft, add that to the PRESTON footprint, I get 8,390. Fifty percent of the total ground sq footage is 8,520. Am I OK? Next, would a setback from the sidewalk be required? I may want it, anyway, but need to know what to tell the architects they have to work with when I ask them for design proposals. And may we go up two stories?We need to rise 10 feet to ramp over to the boat's deck. If a walkway could project from the building along the left side of the boat it would be the best way to go. The walkway would need to start out at 10 or 12 feet up so it should come out of a second story, at least at that part of the building. ADA ramps would rise to the height from inside the building. The building itself could be three feet or so above ground to cut down on the run of internal ramps needed. A viewing deck above the first story might be an option, also. I guess I can sum this up by asking what can we build there, how big, how high? Garry, museum i f rl URS Greiner Woodward Clyde 1500 Century Square Y 1501 4th Avenue,Suite 1500 A Division of URS Corporation Seattle,WA 9 81 01-1 6 62 Tel.206.343.7933 Fax.206 343 0513 Offices Worldwide October 21, 1999 Ms. Karen Marshall Museum Director 1305 8th Street City of Anacortes Anacortes,Washington 98221 Subject: Pile Foundation Consultation W.T. Preston Museum Anacortes,Washington Project No. 54-09900044.00 Dear Ms. Marshall: This letter summarizes the results of our engineering analyses and field observations of pile installations for the W.T. Preston snag boat. URS Greiner Woodward Clyde completed a geotechnical investigation for this project and presented the results in a report, "Geotechnical Engineering Study, W.T. Preston Restoration Project, Anacortes, Washington," dated March 5, 1998. The current services were provided in accordance with our proposal dated September 28, • 1999. The foundation system consists of 12 driven steel pipe piles with a design capacity of 45 tons. Six of the piles are along the east side of the boat and six along the west side. Figure 1 schematically illustrates the pile configuration. Hurlen Construction Company began installing pipe piles on October 12, 1999. They drove piles E-2 through E-6 to a depth of about 10 feet. On October 13, 1999, they continued driving piles E-2 through E-6 and installed the remaining pipe piles. URS Greiner Woodward Clyde observed the pile installations on October 13, 1999. The piles consisted of 23.5-foot long, 12-3/4-inch O.D. by 3/8-inch thick, closed end steel pipe piles. The piles were driven with a Berminghammer B300 diesel hammer with a manufacturer's rated energy of about 34,000 foot-pounds at a maximum ram stroke of 10.75 feet. The drive cap assembly consisted of a 1,390-pound helmet with a 2-1/2-inch thick steel striker plate and a 4-3/4-inch thick aluminum-micarta cushion. Fuel injection was controlled during pile driving to produce a ram stroke of 6 to 8 feet at the final penetration depth. O.\W CIA\9900044\ANACORTES LTR DOC\21-OCT-99\CODE f 0 y t ) WM Greiner Woodward Clyde Ms. Karen Marshall City of Anacortes October 21, 1999 Page 2 The contractor drove the piles from 15 to 21-1/2 feet below the existing ground surface and at least 5 feet into the denser soil-bearing layer. The plumbness and internal condition of each pile was i checked after driving. All of the piles appeared round and undamaged by driving. Piles E-1 and E-5 were slightly tilted northward at about 2 percent. We generally recorded pile driving resistances of 46 to 75 blows per foot and ram strokes that varied from about 6.8 to 7.8 feet which corresponds to an estimated rated energy of about 22,000 to 25,000 foot-pounds. Table 1 summarizes the pile installation data. I We modeled the pile-hammer-soil system with the WEAP (wave equation analysis of pile driving) computer program to evaluate driving resistances required to achieve ultimate pile capacities at least 2.5 times the design load. Our analyses, and the driving resistances and ram heights observed during pile installation indicate that the piles achieved the desired vertical load capacities. We trust that the information provided in this letter suits your current needs. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, .....e•.%t,'a 4%)et *ASIZeIN re isjSf�2 "oJ.t •• • i � • t •• Vincent J. Perrone, Ph.D., P.E. • {W • t Senior Geotechnical Engineer i• 4: 019526 VJP:wp •• •'"pssn'1�C�4r4'e Attachment: Pile Locations •� ........... .�� cc: Luke Zankich, Columbia-Sentinel Engineers, Inc. O.\W CIA\9900044\ANACORTES LTR DOC\2\ 1-OCT-99\CODE �> l CITY OF ANACORTES BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: BLD1999-00251 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 10/5/99 ANACORTES,WA 98221 ISSUED: 10/19/99 (360)293-1901 EXPIRES: 10/19/00 SITE ADDRESS: 703 R AV ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 3805-000-020-0007 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new cradle(foundation)for W. T. Preston OWNER CONTRACTOR CITY OF ANACORTES HURLEN P.O. BOX 547 7 CO 0 SOUTH R VERSICTION E DRIVE ANACORTES, WA 98221 SEATTLE,WA 98108 Primary Phone: Primary Phone: Phone 1: Phone 1: 206-763-1230 License#: LIC HURLEC*307B6 TYPE OF WORK: ALT AREA VALUE: $ 99,866.00 TYPE OF USE: PUB LOT: sf REQUIRED SETBACKS: CENSUS CATEGORY: 1ST FLR: sf ZONING: ? 2ND FLR: sf FRONT: ft Occupancy Groups BASEMENT: sf SIDE 1: ft 1: 2: GAR/CARPORT: sf SIDE 2: ft 3: 4: OTHER: sf REAR: ft REQUIRED PARKING Construction Types NUMBER OF UNITS: TOTAL: 1: 2: STORIES: HANDICAPPED: 3: 4: BUILDING HEIGHT: ft COMPACT: IMPRV SURF: sf FEES NOTES: Type By Date Receipt Amount PRMT MRD 10/19/99 0103936 $802.50 PLCK MRD 10/19/99 0103936 $521.63 STBC MRD 10/19/99 0103936 $4.50 Total: $1,328.63 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply wit all ordinances and st and federal laws regulating activities covered by this permit. Issued by Applicant or Owner's Signature CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections Table 1 SUMMARY OF PILE INSTALLATIONS Pile Approximate Pile Penetration Hammer Pile Pile Length Penetration Resistance Pam Stroke Location (feet) (feet) (blows/foot) (feet) E-1 23.5 17.0 55 7.3 E-2 23.5 16.0 56 7.3 E-3 23.5 16.0 55 7.3 E-4 23.5 15.0 , 65 7.3 i E-5 23.5 15.0 61 7.8 E-6 23.5 18.0 62 7.8 W-1 23.5 21.5 60 7.8 W-2 23.5 20.0 46 7.8 W-3 23.5 21.5 75 6.8 W-4 23.5 18.3 48 7.8 W-5 23.5 16.0 47 7.5 W-6 23.5 15.0 50 7.8 O:\W CIA\9900044W NACORTES LTR.DOC@1-OCT-99\CODE en 50 son Et tooy�4'L Zpp SN nis / n�piO ZZ.144 va#3`/ —tail _J o! "f . -t^" BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : BLD97-0134 I P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 04/11/97 I ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 04/11/97 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 04/11/98 SITE ADDRESS: 703 R AVE ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NO. : R AVENUE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REMOVE PORTION OF PANELLING ON BANDSTAND BACK WALL. — OWNER — CONTRACTOR — LENDER III CITY OF ANACORTES 1305 8TH STREET ANACORTES WA 98221 293-1915 TYPE OF WORK •ALT AREA (sf) VALU. . . $: 0 TYPE OF USE •COM LOT • 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS---- CENSUS CATEGORY • 999 1ST FLR • 0 FRONT 0 ft ZONING 2ND FLR • 0 SIDE • 0 ft :CM BASEMENT • 0 REAR • 0 ft OCCUPANCY GROUP GAR/CARPORT. . . : 0 REQUIRED PARKING-- :A3 : 2 :2 : ? OTHER • 0 TOTAL • 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HANDICAPPED: 0 :5N :? :? :? NUMBER OF UNITS • 0 COMPACT • 0 OCCUPANT LOAD STORIES • 0 IMPRV SURF. : 0 sf . 0: 0: 0: 0: BUILDING HEIGHT. : 0 ft — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt ESPL $ 0.00 EF 04/11/97 NONE 1 TOTAL $ 0.00 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws regulating activities covered by this permit. -r Issue by pli4v or O ner' s .gnature I 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections bldfirmt, Rev: 06/11/92 i MECHANICAL PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : MEC94-0159 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 11/18/94 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 11/18/94 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 11/18/95 SITE ADDRESS: 701 R AVE ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NO. : 701 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Gas furnace and gas piping — OWNER — CONTRACTOR AUSTIN'S PLUMBING AND HEATING AUSTIN'S PLUMBING & HEATING 701 R AVENUE 720 30TH STREET ANACORTES WA 98221 ANACORTES WA 98221 293-4785 AUSTIPH081B7 TYPE OF WORK. . . :ADD BOILERS/COMPRESSORS- DOMES. INCIN • 0 TYPE OF USE •COM 0-3 HP . 0 COMML. INCIN • 0 3-15 HP • 0 RELOC/REPAIR. . . : 0 FUEL TYPES 15-30 HP • 0 CLOTHES DRYERS. : 0 : /GAS/ / / : 30-50 HP • 0 GAS WTR HEATERS: 0 FURN < 100K BTU: 1 50+ HP • 0 STOVE, APPLI. . . : 0 FURN >=100K BTU: 0 AIR HANDLING UNITS-- FIRE LOG/LITE. . : 0 FURN - FLOOR. . . : 0 <= 10000 cfm. : 0 WOODSTOVES • 0 UNIT HEATERS. . . : 0 > 10000 cfm. : 0 OTHER UNITS • 0 VENT FANS • 0 EVAP COOLERS. . . : 0 GAS OUTLETS • 1 VENT SYSTEMS. . . : 0 HOODS • 0 VENT W/O APPLI. : 0 — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 27. 00 MD 11/18/94 3241 TOTAL $ 27. 00 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws regulating activities covered by this permit. in(LeCM-121,ef D20/1257-) I :N) C9A-2- Issued by Atplior Owner' s Signature 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections mec_prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 1 A MECHANICAL PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : MEC93-0046 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 03/03/93 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 03/03/93 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 03/03/94 SITE ADDRESS: 703 R AVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. : 6TH & Q AVENUE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Air conditioning unit — OWNER — CONTRACTOR CITY OF ANACORTES P.O. BOX 547 ANACORTES WA 98221 293-1900 TYPE OF WORK. . . :ADD BOILERS/COMPRESSORS- DOMES. INCIN • 0 TYPE OF USE •COM 0-3 HP • 0 COMML. INCIN • 0 3-15 HP • 0 RELOC/REPAIR. . . : 0 FUEL TYPES 15-30 HP • 0 CLOTHES DRYERS. : 0 : /GAS/ / / : 30-50 HP • 0 GAS WTR HEATERS: 0 FURN < 100K BTU: 0 50+ HP • 0 STOVE, APPLI. . . : 0 FURN >=100K BTU: 0 AIR HANDLING UNITS-- FIRE LOG/LITE. . : 0 FURN - FLOOR. . . : 0 <= 10000 cfm. : 1 WOODSTOVES • 0 UNIT HEATERS. . . : 0 > 10000 cfm. : 0 OTHER UNITS • 0 VENT FANS • 0 EVAP COOLERS. . . : 0 GAS OUTLETS • 0 VENT SYSTEMS. . . : 0 HOODS • 0 VENT W/O APPLI. : 0 — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 21.50 MD 03/03/93 46142 TOTAL $ 21.50 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and Laws reguLating activities covered by this permit. ft D' r DUp DDo t " Issued by Applicant or Ow er'saignature 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections mec,prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 '' r BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : BLD92-0081 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 07/22/92 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 07/22/92 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 07/22/93 SITE ADDRESS: 703 R AVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. : R AVENUE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace existing guardrail with a new design and use stainless caable for fence. — OWNER — CONTRACTOR — LENDER CITY OF ANACORTES/WT PRESTON 703 R AVENUE ANACORTES WA 98221 293-1916 TYPE OF WORK •ADD AREA (sf) VALU. . . $: 1000 TYPE OF USE 'COM LOT 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS---- CENSUS CATEGORY . / 1ST FLR • 0 FRONT 0 ft ZONING 2ND FLR • 0 SIDE • 0 ft :? BASEMENT • 0 REAR • 0 ft OCCUPANCY GROUP GAR/CARPORT. . . : 0 REQUIRED PARKING-- ;B2 : 7 : 7 : 7 OTHER • 0 TOTAL • 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HANDICAPPED: 0 :5N :7 :7 :7 NUMBER OF UNITS • 0 COMPACT • 0 OCCUPANT LOAD STORIES • 0 IMPRV SURF. : 0 sf 0: 0: 0: 0: BUILDING HEIGHT. : 0 ft — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 25. 00 MG 07/22/92 43915 STBC $ 4.50 MG 07/22/92 43915 TOTAL $ 29.50 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws regulating activities covered by this permit. /b"?.rfa'Le (j-yc4( 4 Issued by Applicant or Owner 's Signature 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections bld_prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 r Ti • • I I I I I i - = --®-- ,T i --f@@''��++�� � \ em\ _ ,\ • -.Rci7Ei'ir _� yet ,�i�as'i��''�,et'� -';.�.rc�v-:J➢,O�r--.. �_ � W.T. PRESTON NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DRY BERTH IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANACORTES, WASHINGTON A collaborative endeavor between the Anacortes Museum, City of Anacortes, Anacortes Museum Foundation, National Trust For Historic Preservation, Washington State Heritage Fund, private foundations, corporations and individuals. Project Justification: The W.T. PRESTON Dry Berth Improvement Project is the most critical preservation project for the Anacortes Museum. Resting on a sand pad in dry berth for 15 years, the vessel's losing structural stability. This project will lift the W.T. PRESTON to attach a cradle system to maintain the structural stability, enable the vessel to drain water as designed, and to preserve the hull. The result will greatly reduce the deterioration of this National Historic Landmark and enable staff to progress to other preservation projects that await completion of the new dry berth. Project Scope: We have a comprehensive plan for the improved dry berth. The W.T. PRESTON Geotechnical and Site Exploration Report by Woodward-Clyde was completed in January 1998, and the design and engineering work has been completed by Paul Zankich, P.E., of Columbia Sentinel Engineers, thanks to a grant from the National Trust for Historic Preservation Johanna Favrot Fund. The work to be performed involves supporting the W.T. PRESTON on six beams 36" deep x 230#/Feet which extend beyond the vessel. The beams will be supported on a close-ended steel pipe pile foundation. The piles will be driven into the hard sandy silt and silty sand layer to support the snagboat, under the supervision of Woodward-Clyde engineers and Paul Zankich. Once the vessel is jacked up and secure, the steel hull will be thoroughly examined and treated. The vessel will then be jacked down to rest 3 ft. above the ground, making continued maintenance of the hull possible. The final stage of the project includes building a new visitor orientation area with exhibits, restrooms, museum store, an all-purpose room, and providing proper landscaping and access to the W.T. PRESTON. SYR I DESCRIPTION y iBY/DATE A IF AQDED NECTION SHEE.T T.DETAILS or BGv/PIPE 5/15/9B CON I D O I�J-iJ OO ± f i f = GENERAL NOTES J I REFERENCES L I - - I i I I C I D I—ll1—iLHl!L�—� 111 LLl ill lll—lil rri— i i —i i i—�— � ' 1=L= ILIATATJ— IJ-- — —� 01-11—�' =1 I -�I-W=1_-1 I i I I—I_I 1— 11=11— b Rm. H� D - COWNSIR-SENRH0.ENGINEERS,NC. 1I I I—I I I—I I 1 111 I ICI I I—I� 111— i—M---- I I17I I ITV I I I 1 II I ICI I I I II I I I I III(=17 I I I—III— 4. — .-- -I - — —III—I I —T—IL—L-1- 11 --_}1—1I I—I 11— y , 7. PR--- yi7 BERTHING yy -I')vj _ a 13 !- L- -w1 n uc . 9730-001-11nv.1 >31AM-�,1'A i'" I Imo t``, 11 1I 1_ y ii I , i 11 - - - - - - -fl i-F-i'dz Fe}-4-i-F-i-�"F"F i-51 i 50 -.3H-:-f 44 i+1 C'm 1-1.i- -1-Ut-�-t i-t i-1-4-4 +t i-16 F-r-F i--Fe i+i-�l+t i--f'i-r"' 69 63 66 . 6 e0 el 6 N N ]O ] .. 3 0 ] ] ]6 3. ] 30 I3 le N 1 10 0 __ 1 1 i 1 1 J l J L J l lL LL YF J.L l r Y r lr Y r Y r 1 1 � -- --®�i"nI-e. ei wi ea �.}i-I-w .irEli'F ..�i i-, -.1}-u ii . 3e4ii 22r4 2i4-2i-hit' i li it ii Imo 111- .t i r- J L J.L J L J.L J L Y-r F rr r 7 1 l r l'r I 1 1 11__ 4 Y— ____ — 11 1 i 1 _ i 1 20 I 2. I 2e I 24 9<.a 9730-001-1 nag2 et3 l w'-KIL-' 4 1 III sic no( N�j ipitt on 5'5P"Emc ital libm- 11x1Y wo Ifn_ Ey15 0 1 s+ce.sPucEs tiit��l�ii!! LLfltP CUI iF •COUPON LMl Wffx130 IEO IIII- I_III I IL ' 5/•' VP I I - -1 \ I tY ' _I III�1I]0'PIIF�pE�REO,oEPAC Y R� • I I� Li, File:9730 30 July 1999 SPECIVICATION FOR WORK 1.0 Installation of 4.ew dry berth/foundation for W.T PRESTON on site at the W.T. . PRESTON in,i,nacottes,WA. • 1.1 Volunteers wik remove and store at north end of the site the boardwalks from East and West sides of Vessel(fasteners will be removed) 1.2 Contractor to purchase 12(wheelabrated and primed with 3/4 to 1 mil Jotun WB14 primer) closed bottom ended piling (12" x 3/8" wall minimum)and coat piling with two coats of Jotun 45 epoxy to 6 to 8 mil DFT each coat or equal. Used steel will be. acceptable if¶inspection shows 5%or less thickness degradation. 1.3 Contractor to drive 12 closed,bottom ended pilings to an average depth of 20 feet below ground level,him the hard sandy silt and silty sand layer,at the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer(Woodward-Clyde). Pilings to be filled with concrete. I 1.4 Contractor to jdck up vessel vertically approximately 5 feet above ground level and support on cribbing. There are jacking brackets on the side of the vessel which were used previously to j i k the vessel down where it is. 1.5 Examination ofthe steel hull will be done by museum staff and a marine surveycir. I . 1.6 Contractor shall, while vessel is supported on cribbing,pressure wash the vessel's hull to the deck edge and apply one coat of Jotun 65 epoxy to 6 to 8 mil DFT. (The areal where the cribbing is will have to be treated the same after the vessel is lowered onto its foundation. 1.7 Contractor to purchase 6(wheelabrated and primed with 3/4 to 1 mil Jotun WB 14 primer) steel beams 36" deep x 230#/ft and coat beams with one coat of Jotun 65 epoxy to 6 to 8 mil.DFT or eq Used steel will be acceptable if UT inspection shows 5% or less thickness degra tion. i 1.8 Contractor will install the 36" transverse beams on top of the pilings and touch up the disturbed coati+with the same coating system. 1.9 Contractor will jack down the vessel so it is supported on the transverse beams whose tops will be approximately 3 ft above the ground making continued maintenance of the hull possible. 1.10 On site work to commence during the month of September 1999 and continue until completion. NOTE: Pressure washing and coating tasks will need to comply with all environmental pollution regulations. L Pee to}v c 2 awe-` t, \--9-9 7 �( �v eesr ermos sly 1 \ks- Z w-7 40c uT 9 DO„ ooa Dos Alatzt Ca.36to \ 5-0 ° 'eram 13 S ?«¢ _- 4692. �c, Z3 f, 6OO =tZ 4-0 = Co4 LT T c4 C- - T- 4004- loct sea LT' /, /30,ovv L oo s Sorpa -b U PiA-C o,,-c _ be-osen5 88, f coo Ui- 1Zv \- u p to [0O, oco Los 0-51, ¶ cn cam.k Pc 107 . AlP B M = Yet.0 L �S 690„ 000,Y4O3 lE 1 , A,o0, o00_ 1i., —LAd fc Pr 3(0 s-'-te-Q v e\-tr yr 2 Lag) eo o tps -c77 3\ -73& Tr- \ t 4O0,000 S0 S` 0o k -r-er us tom, P W3c., xZ3o g 83 7 tiO ns spfl0 1h.) \ s `N Q . (s 1 11,Z D .�� t+J Woodward-Clyde e Engineering&sciences applied to the earth&its environment March 2, 1998 Mr. L. Paul Zankich, P.E. Columbia-Sentinel Engineers, Inc. 3840 West Marginal Way, S.W. Seattle, Washington 98106 Subject: Geotechnical and Site Exploration Report W.T. Preston Restoration Project, Anacortes, Washington Project No. 981023NA Dear Mr. Zankich: Woodward-Clyde (WC) is pleased to present this report of our geotechnical engineering study for the proposed W. T. Preston Restoration Project in Anacortes, Washington. The study was performed in accordance with the WC's June 2, 1997 proposal and our signed agreement of January 7, 1998. The accompanying report presents the findings, conclusions and recommendations of our study. The design information and recommendations presented herein are for foundation support of the W. T. Preston. The results of the cone penetration testing (CPT) subsurface exploration program, which form the basis of our conclusions and recommendations, are also included. Based on the results of our geotechnical study, we conclude that the snagboat may be supported on close-ended steel pipe piles. The piles will derive load carrying capacity through end-bearing support on the underlying dense silty sand and sandy silt layer (bearing layer). An average pile length of about 20 feet is estimated including a 5-foot minimum penetration into the bearing layer. Detailed recommendations and foundation design criteria are presented in the attached report. The geotechnical study was conducted with the assistance of Dr. Sujan Punyamurthula who observed the CPT field exploration program, analyzed the CPT data, performed engineering analyses to develop foundation design criteria, and assisted in the preparation of this report. Mr. Mark Freitas peer-reviewed the geotechnical report. It has been a pleasure to be of service to Columbia-Sentinel Engineers, Inc. on this project. If you have any questions regarding the geotechnical report, please call us. Sincerely, 4CIS Sujan Punyamurthula, Ph.D. K. Francis Chan, P.E. Senior Staff Engineer Associate ��o �r�i5f�iti9 ` .'' KFC\wp ,rE J570NAL E +z .. • Enclosure !WIRES: q���� Woodward-Clyde Consultants 1 1500 Century Square•1501 Fourth Avenue•Seattle,Washington 98101-1662 206-343-7933•Fax 206-343-0513 C\MSWORD\PRESTON DOC\2-MARCH-98\SEA FINAL REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY W.T. Preston Restoration Project Anacortes, Washington Prepared for Columbia-Sentinel Engineers 3840 West Marginal Way SW Seattle,Washington 98106 March 5, 1998 Woodward-Clyde 0 1500 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1662 981023NA TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Project Description 1-1 1.3 Scope of Work 1-1 Section 2 Field Exploration 2-1 2.1 General 2-1 2.2 Cone Pentration Testing 2-1 Section 3 Site and Subsurface Conditions 3-1 3.1 Regional Geology 3-1 3.2 Site Conditions 3-1 3.3 Subsurface Conditions 3-1 Section 4 Discussion and Recommendations 4-1 4.1 General 4-1 4.2 Pile Foundations 4-1 4.2.1 Steel Piles/H Piles 4-1 4.2.2 Bored Piles 4-1 4.3 Design Criteria 4-1 4.4 Settlement 4-2 4.5 Construction Considerations 4-2 Section 5 Limitations 5-1 Section 6 References 6-1 Woodward-Clyde 0 \\SEA2\WORDPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Rpt doc\5-MAR-98\\SEA List of Tables,Figures and Appendices Tables Table 1 Cone Penetration Testing Figures Figure 1 Site and Exploration Plan Appendices Appendix A Cone Penetration Testing Data WOOdWardClyde © \\SEA2\WORDPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Rpt.doc\5-MAR-98\\SEA iii SECTIONONE Introduction 1.1 GENERAL This geotechnical report has been prepared by Woodward-Clyde based on the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the W. T. Preston Restoration Project in Anacortes, Washington. The purpose of the geotechnical engineering study described in this report was to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the project site and to provide foundation design recommendations. This project was performed by Woodward-Clyde for Columbia-Sentinel Engineers in accordance with our proposal dated June 2, 1997 and our Contract Agreement dated January 9, 1998. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our understanding of the project is based on the information obtained from the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form and project-specific discussions with Mr. Paul Zankich of Columbia-Sentinel Engineers. W. T. Preston is a steel-hulled, flat-bottomed, sternwheel snagboat operated by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers from 1939 to 1981. The snagboat was decommissioned in 1981 and transferred to the City of Anacortes. The snagboat is maintained as a museum vessel in a dry-berth exhibit on the shoreline of Anacortes, near the intersection of 7th Street and R Avenue. The snagboat is about 34 feet wide and 164 feet long, and displaces about 494 tons. W. T. Preston was listed in the National Register of Historic Places on March 16, 1972. The W. T. Preston Restoration Project involves placing the snagboat on a set of six grade beams located below the hull of the boat. The grade beams will be supported by piles at each end. Each pile will need to support a load of 40 to 45 tons (dead + live). 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK The geotechnical study explored the subsurface conditions at the site, evaluated the engineering properties of the subsurface materials, and developed recommendations and criteria to be used for design of pile foundations and for construction of the project. In accordance with our proposal dated June 2, 1997, the scope of our geotechnical engineering study included the following items of work: • Perform cone penetration tests (CPTs) to the depth of bearing layer at the site • Analyze the CPT data for soil classification, soil index properties, and strength assessments • Prepare an engineering report summarizing the findings and presenting the following recommendations: — Information about depth of bearing layer — Recommended foundation systems — Foundation design recommendations and construction considerations — Estimates of immediate and long-term foundation settlement — Construction considerations and identification of potential construction issues YJoodveard.C'Yde © \\SEA2\WORDPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Rpt doc\5-MAR-98\\SEA 1-1 SECTIONTWO Field Exploration 2.1 GENERAL Subsurface field exploration was conducted to characterize subsurface soil conditions and to obtain strength and compressibility information. The subsurface exploration was conducted using the CPT method, which involved pushing a cylindrical rod with a conical point into the soil and measuring the end bearing and friction components of penetration resistance as well as pore pressure generated during the testing. The data was recorded and transmitted to a data recording system at the surface, permitting continuous monitoring over the interval tested. The testing was conducted in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D3441. 2.2 CONE PENTRATION TESTING Cone penetration tests were conducted in 7 selected locations as part of the field investigation program. All CPTs were conducted on January 15, 1998 by Northwest Cone Exploration of Kirkland, Washington under the observation of Dr. Sujan Punyamurthula of Woodward-Clyde. The CPT was conducted until refusal of the penetrometer was reached. The depth of testing varied from 10 to 32 feet. The approximate location of the CPTs are shown in Figure 1 and listed in Table 1. CPT-1 and CPT-2 were conducted near the northeast and southeast corners of the site to depths of 28 feet and 10 feet, respectively. CPT-3 was conducted about 20 feet north of CPT-2 to verify possible location of shallow boulders near CPT-2. CPT-4 was conducted on the west side of the site to a depth of 25 feet. Due to access constraints near the snagboat, the remaining CPTs (CPT- 5, CPT-6, and CPT-7) were conducted on the east side of the site to provide information about the subsurface profile along the length of the snagboat. The depths of penetration for CPT-5, CPT-6, and CPT-7 were 12, 32, and 25 feet, respectively. Results of the CPTs are presented in Appendix A. WOOdwardClyde \\SEA2\WORDPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Riot doc\5-MAR-9B\\SEA 2-1 SECTIONTWO Field Exploration Table 1 CONE PENETRATION TESTING -•_;: - ' .;APPROXIMATE ::;;; ' ' ',. ;, ,;, .µ ',,.,.,TOTAL.DEPTH,,• ;. :GROUNDWATER DEPTH,,, (feet) '`J x CPT-1 28 9 CPT-2 10 9 CPT-3 17 9 CPT-4 25 9 CPT-5 12 9 CPT-6 32 9 CPT-7 25 9 • WOOdward-arde 0 \\SEA2\WORDPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Rpt doo\5-MAR-98\\SEA SECTIONTHREE Site and Subsurface Conditions 3.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY The Anacortes area is generally underlain by glacial sediments deposited during the latest advance, the Vashon Stage of the Fraser Glaciation. The lower glacial unit is composed of advance outwash, consisting of interbedded sands and gravels. Glacial till in the middle unit is a concrete-like mixture of clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles, and boulders. The upper glacial unit consists of recessional outwash, made primarily of sands and gravels. 3.2 SITE CONDITIONS The site is located in a relatively flat area near the east shore of the City of Anacortes. The snagboat is located between 7th and 8th Streets, and R Avenue is the western boundary of the site. Abandoned rail tracks traverse along the eastern side of the site. A marina is located about 500 feet from the southeast corner of the site. 3.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soil profile described in this section is based on a generalized interpretation of the CPT data. More detailed subsurface information can be obtained by reviewing the CPT data and the available geotechnical information in the vicinity of the site. In general, the soils encountered by the CPTs consist of a layer of fill material at the surface overlying clays and silty clays. Beneath the clay layer is a layer of dense silty sands and sandy silts. Most of the CPTs met refusal in the dense silty sand and sandy silt layer. The CPT logs displayed low tip resistance and varying frictional resistance ratio in the fill, indicating a mixture of soft clay and silt with occasional sands and gravels. A possible boulder was encountered in CPT-2 at about 10 feet below the ground surface. The estimated thickness of the fill material varied from 2 to 4 feet. Low tip resistance was encountered below the fill layer in CPT-1, CPT-4, CPT-5, and CPT-6, indicating clay soil. The clay layer in CPT-2, CPT-3, and CPT-7 became silty with sands and gravels. The thickness of this clay layer varied from 4 to 16 feet. All CPTs except CPT-2 met refusal in the dense silty sand and sandy silt layer below the clay layer with high tip resistance and moderately high frictional resistance ratio. The depth to this layer varied from 8 to 16 feet. Since all CPTs met refusal in or above the silty sand and sandy silt layer, the thickness of this layer was not apparent from the current field investigations. Available subsurface information suggests that the thickness of this silty sand and sandy silt layer is about 10 to 20 feet. The depth to the dense silty sand and sandy silt layer appears to increase from north to south. Since all the CPTs except CPT-4 were located along the east side of the site, limited information was available about the variation in subsurface profile in an east-west direction. Comparing CPT-4 with CPT-1 suggests that the depth to the dense silty sand and sandy silt layer increases from east to west. Woodward-Clyde \\SEA2\WORDPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Rpt Cocl5-MAR-98\\SEA 3-1 Site and Subsurface Conditions SECTIONTHREE Groundwater was encountered at about 9 feet below the ground surface. This depth to groundwater seemed to correspond with the elevation of the water surface near the adjacent marina. 3-2 waoawam-c C \\sEA2\WOROPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Apt doe\5-MAR-98\\SEA �� SECTIONFOUR Discussion and Recommendations 4.1 GENERAL The subsurface investigations revealed a layer of dense silty sand and sandy silt about 8 to 16 feet below the ground surface. The thickness of this dense silty sand and sandy silt layer is unknown. Available subsurface soil information in the area indicates that the thickness of this sandy layer can vary from 10 to 20 feet. Cone tip resistance and the frictional resistance ratio indicate that the layer is dense and capable of supporting end-bearing pile foundations. This interpretation is based on the information obtained from the CPT; there may be soil conditions substantially different from those encountered. Such conditions should be considered during construction of foundations as described in this report. 4.2 PILE FOUNDATIONS 4.2.1 Steel Piles/H Piles Either driven steel pipe piles or H piles can be used to support the foundation for the snagboat. Steel piles will derive their load carrying capacity primarily from end-bearing support. The length of steel piles can easily be increased during construction by welding a new section of steel pile. H piles are easier to install and can be driven to larger depths than steel pipe piles. However, H piles have a smaller cross-sectional area than steel pipe piles. Steel pipe piles have a larger cross-sectional area than H piles and can develop higher end- bearing load capacities. Close-ended pipe piles (pipe pile with a welded end plate at the pile tip) may be used to further increase the effective cross-sectional area of the pile and the end-bearing capacities. 4.2.2 Bored Piles Auger-bored cast-in-place piles are also commonly used as deep foundation systems. Due to the high groundwater level, auger-bored piles can only mobilize skin-frictional resistance. In addition, casing will likely be required in the silty sand and sandy silt layer to prevent the bored hole from caving in prior to placing concrete. Therefore, it is our opinion that they are more expensive than driven steel piles, especially at low load capacities. 4.3 DESIGN CRITERIA Based on the evaluation of different types of piles, close-ended steel pipe piles are considered to be the most suitable foundation type for supporting the W.T. Preston. The results of the field investigations indicated that an average depth of 20 feet for the pile would provide adequate penetration (5 feet minimum) into the hard sandy silt and silty sand layer. The capacity of 20 foot deep steel pipe piles were analyzed using the Eslami and Fellinius procedures (1997). A series of analyses were performed with four different CPT data and the results indicated that a 12-inch diameter 20-foot long pipe pile will be capable of supporting 45 tons dead-plus-live loads. The outer surface of steel piles should be protected against corrosion from the seawater Woodwardchide 0 \\Sea2\wordproc\981023na\Preston Geo Rpt doo\5-MAR.98\\SEA 4-1 Discussion and Recommendations SECTIONFOUR environment. The structural engineer should determine the minimum thickness of the steel pipe pile to withstand the driving stress without damaging the piles. The variability in subsurface conditions and development of high pore pressures during construction can change the required embedment depth into the dense silty sand and sandy silt layer. As a minimum, a 5-foot penetration into the bearing layer is recommended. We recommend that a geotechnical engineer from Woodward-Clyde monitor the pile driving resistance during construction to provide recommendations about specific depth of penetration for each pile location. Minimum blow count requirements to achieve the design pile capacity will be established by Woodward-Clyde once the pile and driving hammer is selected by the contractor. 4.4 SETTLEMENT The settlement of steel pipe pile foundations were estimated using the Meyerhof(1976) procedures. The results of the calculations indicated that an immediate settlement of about 0.1 inch can be expected for each pile. Long-term settlement of the pile foundations is expected to be less than 1/4-inch. Discussions with members of the W. T. Preston museum indicated that the south side of the snagboat has settled about 9 inches over the past few years. This settlement is probably due to the consolidation of the soft clay layer below the fill. While the pile foundations should not be directly influenced by the settlement of the soft clay layer, a downdrag force can be induced on the pile by the fill material. This downward drag force will increase the load on the piles. However, the thickness of the fill and soft clay is relatively thin (less than about 8 feet). It is our opinion that the downdrag force can be ignored in the pile foundation design. 4.5 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Based on our experience, we recommend that a pile driving hammer with a minimum rated energy of 50,000 foot-pounds be used. The piles should be inspected after driving for damage resulting from the installation. Damaged piles not capable of repair should be rejected. The piles should be filled with concrete to increase the pile capacity and to further protect the pile from being corroded. When groups of piles are driven to provide increased capacity at each location, they should be spot-checked to identify whether pile heave is occurring during driving. Piles in groups should be driven from the center outward toward the edges of the group. If heave is detected and considered to be a problem, redriving the piles will be required. 4-2 \\Sea2\wordproc\991023na\Preston Geo Rptdoc\5.MAR.9B\\SEA Woodward-Clyde SECTIONFIVE limitations The geotechnical study has been conducted in accordance with the standard of care commonly used as state-of-the-practice in the profession. No other warranties are either expressed or implied. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions do not deviate appreciably from those disclosed in the CPT. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, we should be notified so that additional recommendations can be made, if necessary. We recommend that Woodward-Clyde has the opportunity to review those portions of the project plans and specifications which are affected by the recommendations made in this report to verify that the intent of our recommendations are properly incorporated into the construction documents. We also recommend that a geotechnical engineer from Woodward-Clyde observe the pile foundation installation. Woodward-Clyde © \\SEA2\WORDPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Apt doc\5-MAR-98\\SEA 5-1 SECTIONSIX References Eslami, Abolfazl and Bengt M. Fellenius. 1997. "Direct CPT Methods for Pile Capacity Estimation Applied to 24 Pile Case Histories." Fourth International Conference on Civil Engineering. Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. Meyerhof, G.G. 1976. "Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations." Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division. ASCE,Vol. 102, No. GT3. March. Pp. 195-228. Woodward-Clyde 0 \\SEA2\WOROPROC\981023na\Preston Geo Rpt.doc\5-MAA.96\\SEA 6-1 Appendix Cone Penetration Testing Data 0e1t % ag"StE 1 3 1*I �I�� Gs Teb,e4 water egg • 0tiilein • Vete�Oxa��Inha Cam` ,o<%don iio L 5t.Raf�o3°�0} A 5 1��* SCSAitsiot Te9 . gestezetion Detc..Lant'� 0 Qt tt5�0 320 A00 1� 0 0 8p 56 �.�,.- 00 SO 4 400 o' SOOil lif 1i S 10110 S 3010 0.0 OS 020 p III. 2d aodOa`d"°{59931 Oil SI 00 Olitr 00 0 00 IN Iat�"f0 2H00 00 0 001 1 00 0 0 1 I 0 ':: 1 IN",* r lyre a 5 Clyde t.su`' . an.°` roaa'dneaW Otafd32e SS° ""1 ` ��iaa:;i O pma'^a6 2sc 36 40 NO.95*1p'ed�.a<ffetl< ae9vat<nb NBY.KaFh&o+°1+ O�� 59 t9g8 OA.�,fanuary PRO'��NO.985029NA .00� ��dgacC^$tc+.• 9. p��2 w �Tflbteoea`"' ,c est C Bo100t�ati'�°�°Pastor O `vetaitic F�•R 3 15,t9`38 R� °Aa� p P(45 3 4 ° soi to /'TeatOate. Testofl ts , , �pGflUOfl ° 1i iliss2ii --..* .40.0 0 Tifitatrititsstistiti C 20riseastritsits*toss .,_ , L "' °sts so 0 011 � (tasll p ,j4 �]eRencea+� 1 Iss sts° ***** °yM<8(t()<Itt 1 in es* * 00 ** 28 p{teje t Z''�">�m*�°`9hv^U d.C+�`1�8 tc<j90' ,„„ 1a9 d ar 0 sita sjit too 0,* t.25<lc<1.Y'gil�v�cas'yYc W�� w 32 flµtic 6,��q 154 j0 <321mac ma 291Ac a.... -- 36 40 d(° ���caette� RpeY µeKn O(W4` O Ct£dan°all 0,10 PR�IL�T NQ gg1tl13Np Cone Penetration Test - CPT-3 Test Date:Jan 15,1998 Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Ground Surf.Elev.:0.00 Location :W.T.Preston Restoration Water Table Depth:9.00 Qt(tsf) PWP (tst) Fr. Ratio (%) lc N1(60) (blows/ft) 00 80 160 240 320 400 -1 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 0 1.5 2 0 2.5 3 0 3 5 0 20 40 60 80 100 ,--C— eaa e Sz L T. r : 12 c 1s .o •c 20 L 0. a 0 24 28 - 32 36 _ 40 - - Qtnozmeliaed for Fr Ratio=100'F/(QtSigmav) After leferiee and Davies(1991) After leferiee and Davies(1993) unequal end area effects Gamma 105 pef Ic<1.25-Gravelly erode 1.25<lc<1.90-Clean to silty sand 1.90<lc<2.54-Silly sand to sandy silt 2.54<lc<2.82-Clayey tilt to silty clay 2.82<lc<3.22-Clays PROJECT NO.981023NA (DATE'January 19,1998 DRAWN BY:Keith Brawn Woodward-Clyde 4 Cp,�f lest - rat• q0 ion e�x4\°tstirn 20 �e�et 3e h"°stG° \G.,Cp�e' ,41.10110.60 3 A \ yceati� . ��� ti. I 00 0 1 tle it : 32p 400 ate 2ao * Oil 0 300 - _ . i ea 0 i60 100 00 SO IS 4010 1100 1100.... .... „6,..... .... ... .,..... ..... gaa neoCt � 400 ?Stet k{{erea0 +� atts099U g 00 10 010 100 1100 0 1110 — ca®a0 .�° 2 ,es`rt}5-a>��,°aa 0Y G\yd6 t nc�3�-sa�v°`"at° �ty°�r a,�2td. 1 Ow "100 ICQpS+9^Nl 1:::a 1 _0: �1tw .nIQO32 °f 35e 1< .-3.11-Ct9Y V 100 1010 0011 010 110111 0 IP 00 tre 36 a0 e 1,,,0:ndscN n pRpYdN ettr`gtw'a` ,°,.ate Vt.K OAtE'.!a°v�Y 59 1930 PRO�GZ N0.98to23NA �Sev.' � -Vr .Test s �� ; ..°St lnl p eret eow,, ¢c ,esiv3otsti°° 20 ao36 0Cage ��� 20� 25 30 �5 I 5� �3 fr)3°(°1 A 5 / 1�z �_► San15'l�o%Ve. "op �P�t5� 3 A "-%- Ii 11 0 . �..�. 0 1 o I': Aoo �'r 0 Qt(Ls� 0 vet V 0 1 440 4 Set -11 A Ar SI 11.1 1WWW r a .0 00 01 ttail- - st 1 100 I 1 w 0 00 0 0 0 C20 1.**11 01 0 1 I IS 0*** 04 - 1 ets *00 SO s O. Ow 0 23 AO v 0 0 1 e 100 1 ABe e' 36010 0 t:aWQS@ i9s02o � Qtom+ dEo ill"'''' t " C a ' \N ppdEl d , xS"il end aze' Eobe oNie lanuanB' 90 DRPOIg(KYSBaN^ d6 Ppo1Ecc so WW1* Cone Penetration Test - CPT-6 Test Date:Jan 15,1998 Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Ground Surf.Elev.:0.00 Location :W.T.Preston Restoration Water Table Depth:9.00 Qt(tsf) PWP(tsf) Fr. Ratio (%) lc N1(60) (blows/ft) 00 80 160 240 320 400 -1 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 0 1.5 2 0 2 5 3.0 3 5 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 4 L...............cat............ , 8 12 } r 16 en a v ru 1 / c 20 .G o. m ip 24 E E 32 a_ i —1*a.'.-.. .. e? --. 36 - 40 Qt normalized for Fr Ratio=t00*F/(QtSigmev) After Jefedee and Davies(1991) After Jefferie,and Davies(1993) unequal end area effects Gamma=105 per Ic<1.25-Gravelly sends 1.25<Ic<1.90-Clean to silty send 1.90<Ic<2.54-Silty sand to sandy silt 2.54<lc<2.82-Clayey nit to silty clay 2.82<Ic<3.22-Clays PROJECT NO 981023NA DATE:January 19,1998 DRAWN BY:Keith Brown Woodward-Clyde . C lb\cj o+�Iitep ,*30 atton test \ 011� 60 spteAvi 4,‘„ 1 o,.3e&_s.,0__,0,.,,i,,...... ,-„_„„, .01._.,__ :_0-.--,„-A,:-s fPPdOSIC0a0-s.0P.._03Ak s. w 4t4\b011111c Venen � Wes,c°n`W \C 30, 35 0 Cone data 20 3 ,0 5 Fc.Pa`O3%1 4 e �a 2 r \S \99g Rcycoratioti• 4 0 _ ' p (1s11 3 Tes ,aa,..`N c'Ptrn, , �. Qt \5�0 320 d00 _, _st -'IS II 0 60li -fes Stil III 0 1111 g0taill tik,Will �//4too � ilt a I k tes ill ill ic*.a10 still I i_Ms B t oast I iillw so Atit-11- 0 ii lin tie* sill 00 00 0 0 9 1 20 ii al 0 1 310 0 1 10 I.0 011 0 24 0 001 I I I 01 I li 1 I 100 Nita kilmei9a eeP9)) llpi qqD 23 �)��5�yS1e+e` .e.d c1t u `4j9o•Q°, ,,sa.,„ 0,4 d a<d-Gide p+) t.25d ex5,400 noald ?JOa 32S00% o\CA410-5190 1.9a 414 do 1 �sre V" 0101P .105 Vot 1 tc S�y�.GM11 36 Op oluaM 0,1998 if; PµOIEct Nd Se N"" toRoo i \\ \ Cpj..3e 5o' ,`/� CPt`5 � os 20. co-' 25 - ® I \ I — 55' co-6t III 34. 40 - I ` . : ___..e, s 0 C "\\` '1 i : 12 tt 5q Cr -s )ta"i R O��ON tESt (CPtE NEaN eONEP gyp . ?WADED TV C00.3"8 SENttNEt- 1) E MAP NC. E PppROX\OE. ° t� BEANSCtNEERS S SN004 ” MENTS ON 2.) �SEooO iINPpEo M 9Ute 10N 9E,SZ0�'SON 60 FEE1 w, 1, pFtES � 1\ON 01 �5 30 Sit. ANS 0 ppROX 30 sv^Ha Pys'OssNn SCN-E P cE�s tNC. o waodWs�d-G1Yde 9_0 4 MUSEUM MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Frank, Building Official Dan Harju, Assistant Chief, Fire Prevention FROM: Karen Marshall, Museum Director DATE: 31 August 1999 RE: W.T. PRESTON Dry Berth Improvement Project Issues As tourist season draws to a close, the Museum is nearing the beginning of our W.T. PRESTON Dry Berth Improvement Project. To put it simply, our goal is to raise the vessel and place the hull in a cradle. In order to accomplish this, we will be dismantling the current ramp/decking system. After the hull is resting in this new cradle system, we will need to reconstruct some of the ramp/deck system to regain access. We hope this reconstruction project will have two phases. The first phase (diagram #1) will be simply to reconstruct up to our current entry point, turning the entry door into the main entry and exit point. Most visitors enter and exit from this door. Visitors will still have access to the foredeck, which is outside of the interior of the vessel. However, if for code reasons we need to reconstruct the ramp system as it now is (diagram #2, addition shown by dotted line), I need to know soon. How we dismantle the ramp/decking will depend upon what needs to be reinstalled. The second phase of this project will depend upon grant funding. We hope to eventually have visitors enter and exit from the foredeck. Perhaps we would need an emergency exit ramp at the aft port or starboard door, but we are trying to eliminate ways for vandals to board the vessel, or destroy the wood ramps. I have attached two illustrations (diagrams # 1 & # 2) to show the ramp/deck system changes. Please ignore the information about the bow shift that is not going to occur. I am also familiar with ADA slope standards, but I have not translated our figures for section A, B, C. Please confirm if these are acceptable or not. Please call me if you have any questions. If you'd like to drop in and take a look at the W.T. PRESTON, Curator Garry Cline is onboard most weekdays. Thanks for your time! ® Ramp r•iscs s)/i i>7 s'i ' ( '&°*) Harz W-yts7erra_ { CC,-kS /mm - /�pott ® Rarnp to rise 2 ' in 442! (3°--0 4- POS`zrtr Lci .SUMlj1G ® Romp To rise .21 in 1-71Y (2`*)1 : e . 4/7 ' 9YJ '7 ESC - /ct7 pa zza•• xZ/fc _ f.:zo 2t5C G- &a,Ye i ' '-4. wheelehriir teen, 9 I (web enfr dedrs�/l . NI Z TauFr \ \\��2'Rise! S 9 / / • 83 To u — %'� ° c�e°�S `t /� .� 60'genii." --?I F�N o `I' • [�' • edge °f do'o, P,vor oinr Stern Preston y2' � s+-eito AS'fro. M°' { ' ?#' To 1�e�oor brad. Elee; W t �' + r Ss, . ,i✓iW; ii''L x gat/Wily Xan,p ? Xisying RR `re ` { c > 1 r - /}ve SdewaLk G' v f duLL ali9nedi kill-It R: Ave, Bow shi f'-i`ed, AitYz° (6/eer±)_ 4- -7 Wa1 kwa'y Flices �ro�vsaL1 hull roieed 41 - i— 'PdM9 &-1t 7A-U.-A'C 'N , ® Rant rises 51/2. in 5y ' C'/i t) FOR W-Iithe2- P.ctc ets /m .) = /Mott . ID Ramp To rite .2 ' in hi Zs (3°t� 05:� teS .SuMl41��Z © Romp To rise 2' in 4I' C2°IY sv"-1 . i2i_i' : : ,, : , . „ , , 417- 14 CiQ7e o K 1 ' 47/ /6' w�ieeteAttir ramp C�itJ( SpsvV1E QAMOt n l ore', enr doorsill 3 'Risel Tn ' I ' ,t3�,�n/ III I\ . edrs/rS? e" 83 ^ ` • �^ 60:STernTd —• —�? --_ o edge °f duo"I jai esTon > �/2� \� S+2�Y1 88' PbvoT pOy�iiT� l D a/ Stern of Y�/ C C------I -- ; mp lee; W.$.i I` 7� (de 3 • _ It �f0 > 1 /7/ 36% AuJL I R ,4ve SidewaLkl 6' i I I , T i r,ed. w,Th, 1 Ave. Boui, 8hi reEL_. n p� ' T �z� ..�rOTye � �+ulL _ all9 -4--Z . Watkwat Ae.ees's 17roro Sat,, hull raised )4' 14-1 p, 5: / /,� sue ' �� LG r T; ( i 4,0 e a r >1 �/ 7 - stiree " �„S %xc,. r0) �a;2« !L e[! r e.,f-Ec27r-t A u 0 tr=••,v,:7 4,-.1 >hc, CO_ , 1/74.ehi" 442 S 24 ic13 S G oZ 4--z,p c f_.G g e2v":‘-reel c)2a/' . 1?,,. H wcu I I r urR uu cS C-ee( -d G c - be ._ cl ',y :,..,. 4.o,tce Ad r u vv✓2 ���a•,[� C-o...� tVS _.a-7` ,r,.7)/�.�' � S - .� ' ow/dr isu aJ - fititsv f i0, Al.az1 3 7 ' p 7 1° t 2 ,-�,..2 e. 7 ' -,-; I s e /e groP _ ` / IAc-M .ti ,Ca fJ ,C A �' - -^' ,C J/, s c,,,. c� g_.?ur,,s A. r 4/10-vh, ci, L n :'C ` f: i `�- �. c d:a� , 0,/V. I re-Q?v t�0 1L-z5 1 0- /71 e. 7 ,L1xy Cv-cVeJ ALS O J I i �,L W / c?c aik 4itL-I t *ae i r y ec,cc c•-t of cn /:g.cram+ c p rJ ill. cc (ide<c u ? ?c r-`r ic-ra✓2/- 3 UA-7 rAl2 rrP (( 6-3 (3 r-a 57c5' .� (u0 — S7 o C ti(J p?Pt C)ao/ S1 ln ,T ry _/ - r� b r- (LIP' /z 7 a' Ti,� C),4i l a.� C e'.a 7),:_ _ ,'_ -“, o:' 7'�__ , _ ra.:), . 7 tear }GU -I F-2Lit q 7 o'uc.+ i fG � � ? 27 `_ �;/2r xi vv /4 icee.5c 10 c.- oco Lp,...=rc//cc,: -Rec`�rG Y' Yc. P / / / / (-c/� �y c- /- cc�/ eu ISr/.s 7 - ccs•.�' JrGu c.-41‘,z 7 L.- 03L.) 6cj - 6/oeo n 20o . Y/ cccc/G, <: 1 7sacl dr/ici, clo„4 pra-e-c r ,_.‘ 144. .1.E (lUc.,u- a,(.4 7,rc r c c -, S_cc . 0_ 1- e-c r A nlg U /2. g_ Tic u_n_. /< Lo / T^—,:,- cce_ /a /�/ - c,.d : •1 e:s-0a- r-' „� Jd // �/� 1 (.e <.,,i G„:i'- vG. 9k- ,1 )),C re.`rGernee„c:,, y"E, ;_r ,l L`f ?G :J2 .1 / ? S �5/ Vs (oe..,excrz-- Lrti, dies A7 r--_ ` ) i, i,;.,c'•/.ifa IC /`;C L.e,z07/l.- !27/z. ..//.� u� / ' .t-,' CJe/]4 C/�-4 5, c/..n�@/LC jI J r 1 I / 4-2-=e, -1 r!;if i r re" C-1 .1 j_ `L Cr -7 ±2 4 /J 7,*y 5 7L✓ec--/ S, ./,' ram,-//;- / vlemorandum e To: Karen Marshall,Museum Director From: Ed Frank Date: 09/01/99 Re: W.T. Preston Access Ramp Modification I have reviewed the ramp proposal for this project. The following comments address barrier free access issues. Ramp A rises 66 inches in 54 feet. This section should only rise 54 inches and should have 2intermediate 5-foot landings. Code requires not more than 30 inches of rise between landings. - Ramp B rises 24 inches in 42 feet. This ramp could be steeper or rise a total of 42 inches if room is _r - available to pick up an additional 5 feet for a landing or 37 inches if no additional space is available Pis w= for a landing. tkaesffrf, • _ ____,-_ - _ Ramp C rises 2 feet in 47 feet. This ramp could be steeper if its lower landing does not have to match up with another deck or walking surface. - Ramps B and C are OK as shown. The existing Ramp A exceeds the maximum 1:12 slope allowed for ramps and needs to be rebuilt to today's standards. Since the rise exceeds 60 inches,2 intermediate landings are required. The other concern we would have is the potential irregular surface that the railroad ties could provide. We will look at this later and get with you. If you have any questions,please call me. e i : F J •V Y ' i F 7 1 Ci • ACORN v, ANACORTES PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. PERMIT CENTER n N P.O. BOX 547, ANACORTES, WA 98221 tb. ►'ti� IAN MUNCE, DIRECTOR TE N� June 14, 1991 W.J . Preston 703 R Avenue Upon a walk thru inspection of purposed plumbing changes and up grades I find that Sa_maintain the historical nature of this boat that handics not practical due to the size of ex for doors and interior hallways, a complete remodel of e fisting bathrooms would be necessary but not appropriate. Lyle ornish Building Inspector 0 0 FOR INSPECTIONS CALL: CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT ?tr"` g$64 29S'I9O1 BUILDING PERMIT 24 Mrs. Notice NRequested Site Address 703 R Avenue yt0o1 AnagOos BUSINESS) PL[JMSIIV). 1 ts.t7. h4Opl S, No. TYPE OF FIXTURE OE ITEM FEE errYa TELEPHONE NUMBER Water Closet S ancortes, WA 98221 293- 1900 Bathtub . ' NAME Lavatory , Shower ADDRESS Kitchen Sink Dishwasher CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Laundry Tray _ Clothes Washer NAME Water Heater Urinal . i ADDRESS ; I Drinking Fountain Floor Sink or Drain • CITY TELEPHONE NUR Slop Sink o • `4 Water Piping STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER ❑Residential I1 Non-Residential PERMIT S ❑ New ❑Add '. a,Ater ` ❑ Repair TOTAL FEE S ❑ Building ' 0 Plumbing b Mechanical MECHANICAL ❑ Sign 0,Demolition U Other ❑ GAS ❑ OIL ❑ ELECT. 0 OTHER Legal Description of Property or Tax Account Number Na TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE Lot Block of Air Cond. Unit S Refrigeration Unit— HP Boiler— HP ' Forced Air System— BTU/KW Describe Work Floor Furnace as a dl aster for existing Wall Heater ' f iextu. car Farr water heater and Unit Heater venting Clothes Dryer Occupancy Use Ventilation Fan ❑ Single Family Residence ❑ Multi-Family Residence Range Hood ❑ Office 0 Retail 0 Storage 0 Church Air Handling Unit— CFM k 0 Restaurant 0 Other Pre-manufactured Stove or Fireplace NOTICE Gas Piping This permit is issued by the Building Official and,udder the provisions of the Uniform Building Code,shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not com- PERMIT $ menced within 180 days from the date of permit issuance,or if the building TOTAL PEE $ or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. TOTAL FEES VALUATION FEE By affixing my signature, I hereby certify that I am the owner of the Building S property for which this permit is issued or am an authorized represen- plan Check 0.00 tative of the owner. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will Plumbing be complied with whether specified herein or not,including routine calls Mechanical for inspections. Sign Demolition Energy Surcharge Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent (Date) State Surcharge Street Setback side Yard Setback 'Rear Yard Setback Other TOTAL S oR i : zees zone occupancy Croup Type ep of Cana. Re wastes water to existing ' fixtures. 1 ) Install Hot water tank. Lot Area Site Dwewngunka 0 Yes °No 2 ) Gas piping to Hot Water Tank. 3) 1b` Vent Hot Water thru roof. 4) Install Fite Spnnkka inquired No of Stories' Bedrooms Occupant Load new closet. PROPERTY OF THE CITY OF 0 14e °No ANACORTESNO CHARGE FOR PERMIT FEE. Size of Bldg. Plans Checked By: WHEN tabiEDAND imp now,nes te Yon`miir Pasaissim latissreligilgieetto dwtWfdrieedleteelbsd work ageojdias to the coodifiros hereto sod swath*Webs DI-' Setiao(ps4oioj then*.subject to m aaopB with the eat iniaSs d the OM OF ANACORTEB.' _ 06/14/91 Permit Issued By\ \ 1( c i c V `- q '-,' f. s,( 4,,__ Building Official (Date) Edwin Frank • PERMIT N! 11/144 1•mor%'4 CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. C1_ PLUMBINQ ❑ MECHANICAL El PERMIT , = I"4 . 2 - Talephtine AneooMes,.WA PERMISSION IS HEREBY GI,ANTED TO: OWNER tr , /y raft 7c: >-- F STREET ADDRESS / J ...' • V — Location where work is to be done • CONTRACTOR ---C tre.,( _`.it TO ERECT INSTALL ❑ OR REPAIR ❑ IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: ^ k „cc- z„, PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT WERE 0 UBMITTED WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER .W CONTRACTOR 0 RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: • TYPE APPROOF WORK XIMATE VALUE PERMIT FEES fI' State Building Code Surcharge State Energy Study Surcharge • Building Plumbing and W.S. • Mechanical Plan Check Fee cy • TOTAL -"�.. ),,t% iJ<.3 `- f LEGAL DESCIIPTION kit; //. 7-2 /3 we LCd= r`t f i • y CITY INSPECTOR Page 1 of 1 . 444 AdkitAtftg. (\ 1'ylG�s fi I _ y f`J lj111...,T,,_---- r i 3 i i i at LJ t — , 1 :4." -_--.. c_1 Ott, 11 a ": '- ., _ ' +A file://D:\DCP 0770.JPG 10/2/01 Page 1 of 1 i ( e . / 0 . •ip . • ......,... • • I ., ;ur • :- . 4 /C..* • . • A • ,. . ,-i' Aro. • , .. • + ..r •0 .: V t. .k, , . • , s '$'• , .. ,AIK r- it-— " ' ".•N. 11. , • I•. 411 ,. ..• r •,r . - 4 ii.:1.,! li -1 -RA • .•,iNarhy - $ . ..,"„. „, , .... , •.7„. . • . v . 4,, , .a• — ' . xa . .s•;. i N1D , . .3. ,• qt, .,::. —.0, .... ,... • .. . •, 41.4„. , . :117-. . -.. plARRIIILIENRG — • -...e.. 3 . - • ,.. . • ‘Mbi=561111.-- - 41 fiN92 ; --- ......... ...----itia•-•-f•••••a......- t _ ..c., . .. • 1 I.1 I I I I I I ilL' g .... 1.4. 4 ---"- .. . , ...,. ' ..... IA 1 • .. • file://D:\DCP 0762.JPG 10/2/01 • ..,„......... , • 144, i • a *z-.?. ..., . , . .s:.., ., ":„.?:,... ..it,,,..... . ,,c, t • \_ + ,,__ fr" Oil. ' iF, I bib i . . • • , : % k,..• . . .. .... , . _,,. . ir ri . \:. • ,. . . .... . , %.1, . . ..,.. , i , •••% ,. .iimi . ..„._ _i . . . . 4. .. , 1 M . .:i .. . ...„ ., ,. , ,4,..!, ...........f. ,c1.1..:, ...... .„,...; , . f * V. i r l • r f i Si i • 4 1. 11 W. t 4 _ 0-lic•:.: I . . . y4 - (: It a 11 I r 1 . ,i i 1 . i 0111 . i t .. . , . , it t 'i ...NV"• \ Om Witiss... ir s . t A i ' V i Pt -Ft- , ilii . i i 1 lj 1 I _ i gir ' . '....wit. 'I• , L , a—w SR ".1 e MI IP ‘ 't'air i I . ,,, , , . 41 It it . t _ ... .-- ' wAP------- . , ,t • , . . . ' . ... ... . • 1 • . . . J j'-':-.,:"'"..., t... ......... - r t � •.• wry. .. � y .' '• ,.' s: ,. 0 �,, .dk � �3 Ra '' r" Fes'. :.'"y{ j r,,,;,4 < Kr.r 17 . [ d' ua_. .,r«e�r. "�. - �t' r 'fie a?' !x• � 3-• , tL► i� �.ry(�..s. ,.s` t�q I l V f' •IuTit �4�.. • - iIWY'�yy_^ wAh,� yF ", J�'e�„4 �r ..1 a1,R,ty 4^tl'2f .'. • 8::. (, r '� ! ::•,81• y- �j t s rw�� 7, q to _p{�.,., 1 s •y'.• j4� B s. , i� 6y et ..... ,-�-wb 3 - ..•, e M"4,i. d. v gC�''"a'' S 3 .yt'1a • • -.k u - I^t,,,r.,��yr,�8 0::A°G�• R.x'.. -"••', s�M t.” '' •4' s . 'fie' 7.= • • • s.R R'T :f^n" y: ik '..„-44',X;iti,,,-.' 8 `�6 "3f d y, i 8�f S � '8!".+,•—+ �.a kit,t:-1 1 Fw. 'i 3 ,4 4 •• �i'xtF F { • ]( < ! ttry .7f ,. �'� � . • : ' • P S d - �.• R• xRu, G � a T T / fig 4 yj'x`-N':1t •l y `ty da ' • ».- ... 'i.:4<ti r i.s rp} ' S}►ala/i >it 11 1 8 ti `,t y f to at i' d ; t. r.. g sti ll �'?: `dalP "�,AC h :I: • • "• ., { i 5 �(W a al` .i'a�r W .. .:" •` f a. .,.4. At. •''","Ti r. 'rm`TM!v«:p, q-.:,. ¢ •,... 1 ' �+' .x,: i�'k as'" °`'�'tr� i V'+ -.'' ,qeF„ s r,, - r . „� -• •'}'••;'''.�!•, __.i a �' - '*Sa°R r;"!.' ` :l l, a .4:. s .fix .8'fl.l' , t u�l •i '$, ;,. r'�_ k °---, 1,i .:• -'-:::: '� ", ci r'k'. G`3 • w,i C ,• k'`xs� ",,p, - - ,` t :�' .,. '` V e"R V. r �, P�,^.•"T` "'„ ,r y.'- , t r Y .rr7 ".. "4 ".R s' „.., t C' arm ��t?�+ t ,�44 ; : - ,,N,:: 'i" �` �. " [ er $� ,a.: ti M 4•s'• e},Z f{ P tom' ~'•* i `CCt Ai: �Y Jt gy '"^ .SRrr ffi,► 1 `h.._ t ',...A. n`''n, "'."tk * 7 ".L;is • $�•:lsva" 1 i • , .. ", i� !;61h?4, , ar i� • lr .f'sr ',"•t zla • Y • w 'K . :I, *a10, 's+r74"kr". 1 : t • ,� •y°..c� ~`v. 1 }. '=i� d _.ry r:; - >' t""r fit. i • fl�.�tY . ., �' _ • CAi . t ,', eh r 5 .,4.:. ' - J i'8. r "• < t �• t .w f. L' AP r f w -"`q'"• t Yip ,a :•t'>3, ,3'< ��. � . Nit.- "�. ^+n.„-�ro;§; c .;i', .' `�-r�. r ,^za, ,�, .: 1/2 �`.. .r * .gip " I �i,i, 'id� to • i, • R ?y? a:,, n k `� y ¢ '�. -.r'� e- 1, 9 + V •�,Pw�'y• .148 tiK��* 7V1 �� pew ,ate � r ' y"t d 'f 1'i I lc+' ;y :t Y;i; $ e ; 8 bT f r .<� i i7Ykt"`:r' • . k' x • •g ... R a `s �2 �'*:,€�a'Z, ..°5_:. k�'7 ,. .,"''r.`.., u . s. ..t _ ( ; j rr ND O _ ? VE EX'!.r l�1rE/ k. P%4VEJ..:� ,G "i" < . ' �, ''s7 `" a I/LG '../G +"OR NCr/[. _.�•.-,_,�' +s} 'l G A'YJrx't_� ''r / _ _`".-""`"`---` J ''E PIACE =4-PTEP GONG•+ ��E N4 7E'�i` ,D y9Fpi {• f.'. j, , i , p CtJ£8 JS PLACED „ ✓L��D er �i4S� !y � � /�/ , 'd 1� ' J/ ril f� ►2D aXPANS/0A! ..10/N r -�- /"'i .+s i3,'E 1 P/1�J�ah' } t ' R I"; + Jlo l7V '�rfr4' toe " ! . ---; �1 • , '. 3 Q ,¢ aG 5 •• W Rt !+!D 1v�GW' iN�. i, bI , 1 ., IIEt' O' y r tti f `?', , I `e - 6 "F tf td 1�.r4Y, '�..+ - i ! /�L�'"�+>' �., fi �T' /e "l" ) ,` ,`,.', 4`. ? - ( ' •.-�'-3 3 r. i r G+r. yy�� o�rl l�r � -„ I I it • J! )` ,f , f '#. r i �+ ,1t''t5 U q 'p 4 � 'F .. S'O . ,. r I r <� {.€ o �' ' ♦ . 0 �('rfL�715 iElyi 3 o ' • j� { j ` �- bCe e L L v, friCe (� oi. - COMPAC rE•, sits-3,0..+tl p Ong, o III C N / ll • 't ht. "t>J',. . G,. � t�'f s''SE : `. :i, ! ♦,{' i,i- t;t„ Sr r , j { ( Q - , } 1 - e r� L� (IIII ti • 4.74" it / lib m 1 :fr... •I d5 • •' • i ` 4 }. v o 't i 1:a` "1 c !• r3 �s • � ''!i t- f + i s ue, H. • _ •sr' ,.> I f " �J• +}-" "_I ♦ . < .. q� • . /71 n' - . X w*.--�'--.•X .1 _ - , \i • :t • • Oa t F `s' 1 � T 7/ >r r L 7 F ++ � +Y f• f� /t. 1, 0 8 r�'�',..!_ L'',p lC' �� }' ,�•� y�C':r ' ,t a 41, �r•--/ f p � �r � •� ,c , rl I ;{ /\ � Ilk/ C ,.J JL. L. rJ/�G� t `I L 4' f 99 IAI N is+µ { �»•• clad{a-- .4' , 'i.aL+�r.S": .;K. "°2'1.=:; f' r = , �-,i.+ ... ♦n� �. emu. .w. r ... ... '♦" -,. (fit Y'. ' r r :t,.. j IkeA .t-.4 ,etE e,. i j> g. ..Y Q7 �... i.....+. ..„ .� -,.- .,+ ,��11"." 6 .'i I (7� 11 . ''y t •;`i`;: _ i ''''a . , t' a.,7;7 j 1 ✓J i !r=, 9x , V 710 ._ / +r.,.t, ,� w _ bCri ♦ �I I CV 4eT }y y� y' if;64 .Li •:x , i + `lr , #,• i ,y + '{IJ+, +' "+ C -1 ! < , .. .: I'�d E Or , L /!/ • ,� '1 "L_ J J :'I 1�! •tr V/t't P'r7t+Teti Sao; ri,., .i7lt�cn ' �y.� j ^`1 ,rn M'x' '�' ..'xii S'i- e;`:' `?°•' nt;,; iF y s.'H ti rf�� - •"` �` N, t � v �` .: }# 2' i'` t i _./ X. ; t; - .����a /'�'''e>r2. rY/9NJyJ�Ji1L . - , ^ y j 's Tlt - .x,,•, ✓ t - , , i. 11LR' �}�,Y,, »� .'" ' •r' . _. .._ _ lYb `l "` %�f` :i ,,�,1t,>F� Fir - , n ;w . h II - '141' ,7 ^ ::•Y'? 77>Py JN ufr A , 2 ��,1dy/�� `�1'� "rz/iJ�b�I��1:., rl/1. - `�, `�y /,�G�Y,�y'�,/�`�y� "',i1, ' r r - e ` F' t.^��`, i • - • D�7, G'G•'-'t-'l'Y S It.+l fig • �f� .r� All �"jll+ ' Q Gi, '� �.t{i�1 1'C , l✓4 r'I'rr LI'W . +.+. .... w 4� I..T.'r.F ♦r._. .w.r +-•1.r..l.ra w.+e ter.rbt •' w.. .y. wi ASS; Ml •ra .il..tr•+r. il.. , r i '`' a : + , ' -- `t` ;4 tx Per f ? ;,::.' •• 1�`A>'7c F'J'Y, iG JVt7"'i • } ii .r.. ...� �"'t"f". ,'rlw+ ..w,r.l.'.. ....+ , - CO*, Cr y • .qv \..1 t ,f 3NLlS/NS3 i�311R,.'�"S`t - • `�'- I1 `�k ,i.n,;� t 1,.,-�• 1�G: p lrr Ci' K. '"�`7�ddF 0{'�i '+�" 1/r11�4" .. � j /fyt 6�+ �4 'COME* f+ �,�y _ ,/ �`r�.} y� ' ; +• ,'+, C r► ` � ' :.- . _trt r�r . ,z _� , - ` . "'+w I ► i , ' ez.. /08 , �i •', ' , \h3 1 t �i'-7 •/ /� i.. . i.... '4./>!•,/J J'Sw..r' w'YT .4.Y`i `+4 M1/A' 1 �f1� „ .t, `( », � I � E� NotFRS, d► tair Wx.'p- • f'' s E ) r$ t,. d n, S1I '\�`,. :p. re* rS,E-17Yi{K .t , - • / / � � / Pr I , •� � / \ jr t 1 - • • /51X , < 20r /Yf�+ . '" 4t J() tf kllf"!F ar- �`' C�'1�Nlety # R PGACB &�f t!, ,dfl `~ r"er w �([ I ills , n 't , .�i.. "� <+ "i' r' I fT L�"1 , '*.{ :ftis r'', P g , „� i' I - ,r' ` • )' ..-' + ` /,,T,/� ■♦ • y1�' r' , , P4VL'iC9 AFTER` CoNNC, GoRes w/ 2E� "� Z '''t: r .c , rt X/r•t� !w1RCE � I .. t y - - y e,-. %^� X F :Nall .. y P+Yr5�4 f" f�AY//Y�i ` 13 LLI Cf1G /'2 +1 / L drlr „-„., •,, M I a �'�1 , _ , rc ��.eL/� Weis/ t f t 1�. l t.. /�' _� r b "-_ 2ry it4eas , AS444i:1- ' • y ° '{ IiC/✓4Yewe,. { . 1 � II •i 1 a "'� M C eG/w.HL�J= 'trove .8.45 o , e N r' �•. ,` .-I, * c+, i► � r!Dc v?' iyfPlf �© t • `l d I� `M cw, t q I i(rr ` ._ ;_. _. s! .y, �X P 4N 5�/AN ,4�/N7 v �y� i, + '' i{ :.a tk• « i : �DE - { Y E ( �L. 1�.'3A /° lJ I *As Div iri/I�J��, f�'r / y,� /r�� }/'-'' p(�) i fir. ! ,yp - • a : : A•3'• , .• y ;+ V ' ? Ii i 1 4+ 41 7'. / !► >r/ G 1`li i.�1Ck O .'' '--''fL. 'r: ( ,T/,/..r,,.�' • ♦ t ovt''! NCI Kti / �.Ft • ;t, • s:- " `;, , `,t 1 e 417rKGiAt Yc M° N ..W�Ld j1� Y, • • ° 'C)dit t y+s� R %i► rifJ� ti+ 4) rr r n ` ray' ' �i. .r r • - 'i� 'i ' - '� V Fr...r •.,,� ,t 4 s „ice-4 d'�!' , - .. . . - . TL/ J • 'Nib , •.YYt•t� � , n ,• 4 ' 1 !: 1 ) yin:'.p t, "� ,?h' , r S I '�' 'I,_Yr e.o ;, r I l! 'r': , - i w • f • • • • /b''?Z rlP' rJf/ Ss'r • E/ ir9 ta.. s is r i t \ v' us n • +• '4 x ! 'APII . , i , ,.,.,r• Jc w' 1 1 yl�y,l �y 1 dyF e3 ;41 / i 4� { , 't .t +9G t ✓ r ocKMot� �? 7ik'' M 1! .;� , 2 � •ll• M P � i , dEU 14 1' L r' " f • tt •3 '1 , C`' N j i y. "t',_ Y 7 1 ! t � _ ,11.111 �t" z ;' E 4,r, t 1 r v, Jz / red �- :�#' ,1- r1>i :a l'ik P i I � � i, 1. 4� F U>z Nk5 hyt` {- y r/ •see rfr ?fr 't ii x PAG' �.i , 4''r 1Etit 1 • • b �, L 1 f }� 7 't, a tr + E AT !r. M 0 r ' . , V i I 1�, i yy IIE 1 4 7 �5 - n+ I '/ C i S' • c- » +i„ r 72417 a, Ff` i �!;L .t`r • . v 4'� .�, • ( OH {J IR, Lei.• �{ • 1 ...yyam�.�. ` ft� /' 1>� • •>„- I'is { "l ,7. . & t1Y 66, n `{ ,� f`. itFiC.,`" zy,^ ,`t r�• } f b LSL�iI'aL Xi7L` �!// 1 ` ' t,,�a �444 ' •i i' > t- i Jay 17 f fi L..as. 1 v. :5' o ' ' I 'F .tG' Milt �E'-� ob1� .I� i, Ti + n.l.l. ;;^6 yr :r :s 1f }. �< JY 'ter'}- Ma "+W'aw ... .�.. 't �' w ,! •:F. -� wV .i x�'G i• ..rS.Jy.. .Y...0 r•1' - + .� . � �. , '� F �`' n t. ,) , 'p ,o- ,. 'i t♦ ; • I r '.Fk'• s••' r: ,r; • .t,FF��,. • 1�/- A•' a , 'dry„ • .. , . � .''J' • 'S r ;Y i .r. ,�: '•}:: • I ' , r�{ ' 1 "roe etItry.4-4.L 04• /07, f�J f�i- _ 1 '- . _j 41 7 f f{, '� ' ` ' �^i ., y . ,J <'�',' ,i't,n „y ,' 1" 'SSA I r / L 'I- e , ' , " I' ,i;.• , , 1 / !T �f k : i 11 .. , , . 2 ' ,,1 """- ': ', . ^5. ) r' ., n't,," � i ) ` l / + I __ ,-__ """__-.._.L..,. .{ / "r• 't` ,.,,' ,.....it,, -+, ;r`„ ,,', i a,' '"' +� ,;-•.< _ . i » r iA3 - ,t • i +mot .-1•- . .�..:.-.s„--t- }. AI.INT. • 'Alai F . "':r. ,•. 'Y '. .f k. s"r� 1 1s ,1�[' 8'- 1 + 'F •'trt ' • I •-•,TY" vM,'i. i i 148 .�..+.+.,i'.,-'" r ., M'` • J'lNfIC( M1NfED �7 b 1y • �w� w 2 :,,: w,:.. 4:' `as ;;_ ' RESERVEt3ri r ro • - .;>.,,;: r.41. -' y/� 1 i {; TOO' jy' • • ` • .� t ' I'-�- i. ` w✓ r c 1J • 011- ♦ "—.4 .y , r ,• / 0 CLI WQr• 3 taste , I� ' .� < • M ;'I. PARKING `_ 1�\ \ (t \ ` v jYl�'" i Y 't +) y'', �i' ..t P' R E 4C'7'fErt rz::, \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ l - . ,. - • "yy�. '• rt 4 •t,+ tYME iontoeotao 4;F`,. '.d::.& e u.'. J /�E t'yk� • r 1 -/ j� (y, , c �� • �„.�)' �i 4/ er 1j , fn. 1 , ' ' ' S , '- "- rr."a,t aj't, • _ t ,r t 1"r• v 3 A, • ++ �N ,// i ^r.'�"" `� „ Y r 1 • .. �. a.. Ji.' ., _ ' T ' Fs— w , e to ii:_." i Y J rIII // , SFr > ' -'t;," ,i,P-;ti, 'ti " 7+. „s _ { �,,,.++ � ~ , ; '� i I 11 t f ,7C, I p y` - �„, t F' <' `f i r ` i{ +1'-t 7'or` G, /o7. ' 7 d9" N i. } " { • .. a a', rf s( r f R x>iN ,1 ti �.. -.J 'f..ve•";t:. ,> 1 t � +? x3'1 'VVAS/ k'Y'ti' ' • ...,.....♦ ,. •-.•s'�",.,,..�LS. . ''` 7,� _." _.la Mi •t.,,.,•='•� ?. •X•d►1►1'>t'r r-)/•o' l,•i!'" .j+ '��f, .,,_-•"4 -�y,(Z rQill;'F' t 1f+ r 1 ,{. .el. w:.n., .i. ' suit toots -wow :`'rt ' d 3 "-'�to ny - S „ a ' r?Abl(!, rl r�GS., -.-- ,ii.ri..FF.l.u.wr' ""'" t, �•,; \ \ \ t � ivy, '=3 �" + rw„ `'!`c < i 1 '4' . _ KRYR REOVREO , ti .y t / Y -• ., r + y' ., f / /F ✓ �-'�—�, �--� ,.�'(; �� " , {} f` Q. ' '; °',: '' ; ?%i 1" 'C 1�.7+E.S ,,, r• , •, , 8 +. r 1 ! 9- �J •� { ,}( -.i. a,-r . '0 c 2 ,, ,. i• �k - - # k.u CaR!✓1E (1F--• 11,:f ,#,.,Vf R Q .. ,: / f; ' i' 1..£ ,.ice. - .( +� N' -4 fa - M J £ 'Y' .,SL/ ' • J..�i1l.� 1r •� x ,kvE t ! 1- Q to• E�kr y ` )�,1�} v .�♦cilc fto M bxciclK V!7!l� J. E At i v ♦. fY r • • / 7 y fi'C,+1T T l�R 4/N 7YLrE 4-He" + Z 111 i <4 :H'.':+a ' '` S + + 1I'+�1r1 '1 t i' 7 O, v' •� .i ,s• 7- i ' _ e , , -1 �t '�y:' • Y J ,�y1r f t i='/r`�/�' Y 'T+-, /!'�' / !( J j //✓.lj!. ` C ' -?, :'ii. .Q , ` t :;` 1 �: rr X ',....it F/TTr/, �s x ,/+"J3, nti� F LL N { "' .�i% , >��Y Tito . / 1 1 ' Q n , t - n - I • fJ ) , t ' ,>+/ P _ •'J , .1 .,1;>.., i +.' - i ,.� Fry•y �' O 4 • • t� \ • U f t{t t I • i X/5T/fi , sua.,„Cew• ,� 'i 1 A 4' t a JJ^^ 4 G C`tiwt • /0 1 E,� 1/ M l • F r I S / t i " • • y• •• • .\^E 0. ,L • v, ' > I i :r''+ ra r'i'`= ,Y, ra a •'i W A St / jil , �L s';4 4 r .. 'rt' J a sn: Pk iY '� l M fi , ' • • i : , r �, a Y ._ 5 x♦vnEo " :" ,WC i IL ��' VAN � k 1 t 3 , t 111.11. ti `J , , yE , *cm Ciouxo a / i, `d Lt,f f C O t� i / :J ACCESSIBLE.C l , 'I fi �r B t' , t 4 f P , i' I, I „t ,t i •4 - ,� J. _ ,_ S. , irE� �x'f;4" 'l �I,� y!y� y� g�+�- '�4 - ''k r S`5�,. WE, - " s . _ _ a` Yt t IhFCRs .t, • i .1 t } ..'-"7 f' f •f C.l t-�S..,I! i J f rk f It il■ }S' xr/aI't. � i� .o:- i ' t• 1�/,� S iY t' :re ,',y1 I - C aTGMR,rtrdR 1,01/ aas if r�rv • i Ft • 1 ! C\\‘' yj?� Y rt 4. {` P • I Jw r yr f ( Y� '1 41t 1 J 'irto „i ns ' G �' 1 ft • { a •f r' !f1 r -.r . t 41« �r , f J' T' t , ,Y! ram/ �! V'"•+ / • , sl Y' , Y S N t s. it., :j -o' ��t �' /IP 1 F ` 4 y �• 1 Fe e t ',e` k: )h1'• a• (l. Al e i• ){ •�h '1 ''CJ•'r �t f ,�A q .5 ' n ." i... 1 t i r / tj: AC rV tea.,- .. s♦ , t t • {{ s�try '} 4 � L _ 'IYb R � 'Y;. �, t a I .t 1 js 1,N`� >N ' �ii r , u � VI i� 'F _ .'� .`fit"� f ( , • • C $g C I, a '.* I:II'I - Y: 1 ri,` S S X ] r a' J ! r t,v • t :.''!„ • { f L a !V tsfi :s s • • ,,E� L.x T � 1 r� t j r 'I // I I � 4x qqyy { ID ` r `� 7 'i' I ,wtAtc• ,.Ipf' /N Y', •'L' • bn 'r 'l,µ 4` 1:::,:‘,: r'• s1 `V' + ^ ice{.� li'< 1 �'� I `r t„ C S t> Ai a r' r K ,` •r,:Y: ti . 1h • t" '�,. P art. .,r."�' 1 j i, 4 ) l L _ I k ' Q 1K� 11‘ ,. <i . n'� i HH W l r'> l l wr' F' �� 'i� <Y .:� 4,1 � ArJ s 1 �r' • • • t �s4G `'S t 1 t - -,i` k kY, 'f _ ri•. -,1- ! tit/ �^"' y' W , 4.4644,...6,4,4,04,,,4„,„,„J '; s. - t:. i :S , * ,1 — F ) Nf. U, l iv { • I. I `t � , �fJ{F w� l"�' l r. < ' �J A I / •y , , - r`X/ r G C / J[ /hC C//✓tea t )b i3,J; • ., { - � S , c `' ' • IN TA rl3r, �-''_i .t._._ /7� I _ ,tfr ' - • '"+. !� , , , '+' o ✓ , Z I /i F3 dR 'S7 M Ai -Mt A D f h;41t J t • i r �i , C o ;t� T R T� i.t m • , f'y tlj K., ,a n i. J. G4 `y- a - k 't C 'HI' �'i ' '` E x " I A � r, £ 1 i i 7 t i f. F D/v t C /� 5 ,NOD � r ._. 1 _ 'r ',Ar, , SI I ant x i - r t�• K 89 t7• f\� 2� I.} y , > yT SS f { ' nt 1 ��< _t R t n r .i' r A' t r� S ::‘_, / V tl' 7e } / A ,.P11 a-L F / '' K / ' f + b ! `r si�4 ,} ,V � w �t <✓r ri j /frit it: 1:4.. 1::117 0:11b1•': ,' < .f`n , yy \"1:) 1 ,J >, K rti,Mali • rr SQ' lCt�' t ,N 1 flat Y jI i' U a.4 4 / "�" ;ar�"f /� 'In/l`�J,� 'a ..�7"r' , ,•y I l .j U' fih 'F .. .. . `, .. } �. , " • ' Ww' „- • F r _ Y •� ' •- / , . Yw - s as1' i 'I ,5M G♦Gt7"H Jci N/$M>+ J'S-[ ,Eii�`1q',r' •r,- ,/ i', •i `iL 4YG /»'i$MAX. ! „.{r7>i © , `,I[` , yC,r.,:t+ i , , id#, G , ,u e '.]. ,. "' • ] • r + �. _'_"» „-•w"2" �I w.._,.---- fG /Y ,/I�! ��(( y� ,l' <y t` ••• • • •• .�. i Li.-Y, •': `.l+. `6 'f'°' , . , . .. .. .z ,t. > " r47 .1 , \ y Yi+'tr• +V Y"� rE : it: -•+ ' ' 1 6 6 . . r -•..�,- � t `�1• ,� _c,. 1 rN'1' , "{ Wry , . i.w�"+� ' .:''' i. • ' :.'"-- ---"-"„- -:-- Y'!1 ' .d ° - + , i S /. .. ., - ✓' - • + ... r -r. TIE ° ,x Ja a SCnPt c4Fd Wit/CAnSt /UT> , R \ ur' fll�llr k #• , Joy 0C �o• a *co , , , ;oAlc, uteri e.,„4, /0,ker"' ''. p. ilfi" p R �torrl5 /:fSrlflx, SGtTro 1'/L MAX. + >• a » � ' a r - „ :: d t17. 77TT�Ctd �' • '�`}�: >.a', : y.'•"`' X < - ' ,\ ' t ` i 1Gi"Y .'� t /'�� ✓t'♦.,'1}.(c kl,'/ VKt/ k• • 'F T '``• +' ' i.>r •. ',: 1,' �,+r rC';�./t'I/ifE�1tPFII+ErkJ• i'` L� - '+••' r�.'! •+N• '.,'`, j► t', 't "r { . o - s '.:•'+` ! r .'\r�r 5/fjrtl r�NY(.+ ,1 r • ' ., t r W r' . 1 /— t �' __� '�iry'?/r/�r wry Gk '`7� � ye. ��a"p ; a . /4 t8 ttt7 LtD -4-C /rVr` e > b r/Nr t� f .. I ✓ !j/»C, r/i /t llSry /4/VO " tR GC/f-5 • j • u ' fr _ �4,7{ ,•44 , I.. r,` ,. �G7 J4<5� >rY v , :t e ) (� 3, t ',1.4 yt� ,/�^7t iyJ�Ii rcr+/1 •4 f 'Y• 't' .1 +'r. I r' = 1•' rr • .; /r {yam r/ �} )y-y r11 }) ]y^� '♦'R"' , ,P ,ti, 4' -• - . . ., ' t �/r/,;.: , V ,a,. _ . s,.. r ' - r `t)'` a - .A'. t{f;. - 1 t ( + , I. ra.t \ .rn - ` r .. i•.'. w F= W,=c• / i• i' r k ' i• t t ,Y 0f` !:izt_ .vr..ati•' u _. I - -:" - ,1 , Y ' x „ •-0i r '-Y q: y 1 t'i (, } 44 p c r F • f F •,p, •y�L., ,fi'., rLt •r y L`" C 2 T,t.,,.� r V �jM •„i /y . i I i • j n 1" P YT S <� rKJ1� ry c u 'd F3 !. "'" '� t o ' ,l Y r' �T S • 1