HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit File BLD-2020-0171 3921 Rock Ridge Parkway (7)Ei I SUPERI R
INSULATION CERTIFICATION CARD
Insulation Contractor Name: SUPERIOR INSULATION PRODUCTS
Jobsite Contractor: STRANDBERG CONSTRUCTION
Jobsite Name: N/A
Jobsite Address: 3921 ROCKRIDGE PARKWAY ANACORTES, WA 98221
Ceiling Insulation
Manufactures Name: Knauf
Insulation Type: Fiberglass Batts
R-Value of Insulation: R49
Thickness of Insulation Installed: 13.5"
Location of Insulation Installed: Ceiling Area
Manufactures Name:
Insulation Type:
R-Value of Insulation:
of Insulation Installed
(Location of Insulation Installed:
Manufactures Name:
Insulation Type:
e of Insulation:
ass of Insulation Installed
�n of Insulation Installed:
Exterior Wall Insulation
Knauf
Fiberglass Batts
R21
5.5"
Exterior Walls
Floors Over Unconditioned Space Insulation
'IiFtlfi
Fiberglass Batts
R38
12"
Crawl Space
THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AND RETURNED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BEFORE
YOUR FINAL INSPECTION
K04ey Ma.w+/ SUPERIP833KT
Insulation Contractors Signature License #
10912,2020
Date
Resie>leeat<ia6 ��Ieldg�a ��r �.�aE�ae�� 7'Es'r ((31e�w��r ��®¢� �'�s>t) ResuO��
Permit#: ���el •_;��:�:._.�,r„i�
House address or lot number: _-��s �.a �'s:�,;_ae��`�,�, .��I�:,;,�;�
--�
City: (�Hc�c,,�.'f.�r � �+v --
Zip: � �vZ_��
Cond. Floor Area (ft'): "� �; S � �_ Age of house:
Source (circle one): P� Estimated Measured
Results shall be reported as Air Changes per Nour at 50 Pascals (ACFi50) and shall be calculated as follows:
ACH50 = (CFM50 x 60)/ Volume
Where:
CFM50 =Blower door fan flow at 50 Pascal pressure difference
Volume = Conditioned Floor Area of the housing unit x ceiling height
Blower Door Test Result: i � � ACFIso
S�s- t, CFM@50Pa
Ring (circle one if applicable): Open �A
0
Blower Door Fan Location: _l•:�C.,�cc1�. G�co,- Weather Conditions: ��,..;,��:
1 certify that these blov��er door results era accurate and deterrralssed using stae�dard industry profiocol.
Company Name: _F��,t,,;crs I>'z��`i�`5 Technician: �°'v
Technician Signature: �'���`'.r✓
Data: —�'�' �-.� � Phone Number: �Z � � �� � �!
2092 Washington State Energ;� Code reference:
fl2402.4.1.2 'Testing. The building or dwelling unit shall be tested and verified as having an air leakage rate of not
exceeding 5 air changes per hour in Climate Zones 1 and 2, and 3 5 air changes per hour in Climate Zones 3 through 8.
Testing shall be conducted with a blower door at a pressure of 0.2 inches w.g. (50 Pascals). Where required by the
code official, testing shall be conducted by an approved third party. A written report of the results of the test shall be
signed by the party conducting the test and provided to the code official. Testing shall be performed at any time after
creation of a!1 penetrations of the buildi��g t172rn7a1 envelope. Once visual inspection has confirmed the presence of a
gasket (see Section 502.4), operable windows and doors manufactured by sr,�all business shall be permitted to be
sealed off at the frame prior to the test.
[duct Lcc' �aUR; a111Mifit (NeW Construction)
Permit #r: _Ci m' 18
House a1ddress or lot number: _�
City: /hc;�� f 21
Cond. Floor Area (ft`): �n
Source (circle one): ark Estimated Measured
❑ Duct tightness testing is not required. The total leakage test is not required for ducts and air handlers located
entirely within the building thermal envelope. Ducts located in crawl spaces do not qualify for this exception,
Air Handler in conditioned space? � yes [.J no
Circle Test Method: Leakage to Outside
Ma;.imum dueF leakage:
Air Handler present during test? �1 yes � no
CotLeak e'
Post Construction, Total duct leakage: (floor area x .04) = I �� CFM@25 Pa
Post Construction, leakage to outdoors: (floor area x .04) = CFM@25 Pa
Rough4n, total duct leakage with air handler installed: (floor area x .04) = CFM@25 Pa
Rough4n, total duct leakage with air handier not instalied: (floor area x .03) = CFM@25 Pa
Test Result: CFM@25Pa
Ring (circle one if applicable): Open
Duct Tester Location: '>i C; c`
`a
3
Pressure Tap Location: �7� �viy %�`�
I certify that Chase duct leakage rates aee accurate and deterrnined using standard duct tesing protocol,
Company Name: -'i�t J� F%a'fi frJ� Technician: POPL�"
Technician Signature:
Date: - 3, ---(p -- Z j
Phone Number: Y Z�9 " V Gt
bConsNorthwest Agricultural Tyler McKee
,�,/�
ultants 2018RAve
�/ Anacortes, WA 98221
2545 W Falls Avenue PAP Accredited
Kennewick, WA 99336
509.783.7450 c Report: 47004-1-1
Date: February 28, 2019
www.nwag.com Project No:
lab@nwag.com Project Name: Rock Ridge
Sample ID
pH
®rgaraic Matter
Cation Exchange Capacity
2
6A
10.81%
21.0 meq/100g
Method
SM 4500-H+ B
ASTM D2974
EPA 9081
Jason Sterling
Stranberg Construction
2018 R. Avenue
Anacortes, WA 98221
Subject: Soil Analysis
January 23, 2019
Analytical results with comments are attached for a soil sample submitted on 1/16/2019 with a brief
summary following in this report.
Sample: Rock Ridge soil stock pile
Intended use: Construction backfill and landscape plantings
Summary of Results:
The pH 5.71 is low and should be in the range if 6.0-6.8 for general use.
The plant available calcium is very low for landscape plantings and should be in the range of 75-150
ppm.
(The pH and calcium are easily corrected with the application of ag lime)
The total nitrogen and plant available potassium are very good for landscape plantings.
Phosphorus is deficient and should be in the range of 2-4 ppm plant available for most NW plant
varieties.
Magnesium is excellent.
Overall from the chemical standpoint this soil is of fairly good quality as the deficient calcium and
phosphorus are easily corrected with proper fertilization.
From the physical standpoint this soil is gravelly sandy clay with very low total organic matter.
In addition to fertilizer amendment this soil will require organic matter to improve moisture holding
capacity and support the microbiological process. (The ideal would be to have the total organic matter
at 640%)
Also attached to this report is a mechanical analysis showing particle distribution.
Recommendations:
Amendments after the soil is in place at planting site
1. Apply and work in at least 2 to 3 inches of good quality compost
2. Apply ag lime (calcium carbonate 99%) at the rate of 50 lbs. per 1000 sq. ft. and work in
3. Broadcast the following fertilizer per 1000 sq. ft. prior to planting and lightly work in
12 lbs. 16-20-0
Also with any bare root or balled plants a substantial quantity of peat should be used with planting.
If you have any questions please give me a call
Respectfully yours,
William F. Black, Agronomist
WFB:tjb
Field acres:
Crop to be:
LANDSCAPE
PLANTINGS
STRANBERG CONSTRUCTION
2 )18 R. AVENUE
ANACORTES, WA 98221
Location (name)
ROCK RIDGE SOIL
STOCK PILE
Previous Crop
Any fertilizer, lime or manure used lately, if so, when and how much:
Topography: Level Depressions Rolling Sloping
Drainage: Good Fair Poor Subsoiled
Irrigation &Type
Present Conditions
Tiled
Interpretation: PPM =parts per million, Lbs/A =pounds per acre 20 cm (7.87" deep).
indicates no result or very insignificant amount.
Test
Active Test (A) Reserve Test (R)
/available► Innt readily availahlal
01 /29/19
PPM
LBS/A
PPM
LBS/A
Comments
Soil
(pH)
5.71
PH LOW
Calcium
(Ca)
39
417.3
CALCIUM VERY LOW
Ammonium
(NH4)
2.1
17.43
OK
Nitrate (NO3)
33
79.2
OK GOOD
Total Nitrogen
(N)
96,63
TOTAL NITROGEN
VERY GOOD
Phosphorus
(P205)
<0.1
0
14.8
364s081
DEFICIENT
Potassium (K20)
14.7
189.63
OK SLIGHTLY HIGH
Magnesium (Mg)
47.2
505.04
EXCELLENT MAGNESIUM
Manganese (Mn)
0.13
1.391
26.4
282.48
VERY GOOD TOTAL
MANGANESE
Iron (Fe)
1.33
14.231
148
1583.6
VERY GOOD TOTAL
IRON
Aluminum
(Al)
0
0 NONE WANTED
Sulfates (SO4)
0
0 OK
Carbonates (CO3)
-
NEG.Ca CO3
Chlorides
(Cl)
1.1
11.77 OK GOOD (LOW SALT)
Electroconductivity
0.225 MILLIMHOS/CM LOW
Organic Matter
(%)
<2.0 % LOW
Topsoil
(inches)
Type: GRAVELLY SANDY CLAY
Subsoil
(type)
WITH PLANT AND WOOD FIBER
Soil Structure
This report is based on modern scientific quantitative analytical methods, and a scientific knowledge of crop plant nutrient
requirements. There are, however, too many factors involved which can effect crop results, which makes it impossible
to guarantee specific results, either expressed or implied, and we cannot assume any responsibility other than to give
certain soil management instuctions and to perform inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of science.
Jason Sterling
Stranberg Construction
2018 R Avenue
Anacortes, WA 98221
SUBJECT: SOIL SAMPLE FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: Rock Ridge Soil Stockpile - submitted 1/16/19
Results of Mechanical Analysis: Particle distribution report.
Lab.#9545
22-Jan-19
Sieve Series Analysis: 100% of material passed a 1/2 inch mesh; this material was then classified by particle size analysis as follows:
Note: This sample contained some fiberous wood and plant material which was
separated out as good as possible and the following mechanical analysis was conducted.
MESH: SIEVE SIZE %PASSING %Retained CLASSIFICATION
1/41NCH 100 0 Gravel
#18 1.00 mm 73.75 26.25 Very coarse sand/fine gravel
#35 500 microns 51.48 22.27 Coarse sand
#60 250 microns 32.65 18.83 Medium sand
#140 100 microns 21.15 11.50 Fine sand
#270 50 microns 14.03 7.12 Silt
#500 25 microns 14.03 clays
Recovery on testing: 99.94% With all calculations being on a dry weight basis.
This particle distribution report was determined using U.S. Standard Sieve Series.
As a reference: (Ideally the gravel and very coarse sand fractions should not exced 12 to 15 %. The coarse, medium, and fine sand
fractions should be 70 to 85% of the total and the silt/clays at 5 to 15%).
William F. 01ack, Agronomist