The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit File 1916 J Avenue G\ " CITY OF ANACORTES ak COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERMIT CENTER — 904-6TH STREET 1001 ke CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY C O R" This is to certify that the occupancy listed hereon has been inspected and is hereby approved for use. Address of Building/Premises Building Permit No. Ancortes BBi th atthoni Occupant Suite No. Business Registration No. .-`iMM c°:-, t . -, zc' ool fifre. ,cfr. Mara Si7 Es Owner Typo of Construction Type of Occupancy i,i0 M . .yn niid+ MUM.je Address of Owner Zoning District Maximum Occupancy Load 12 1 Square Feet Statement of Restrictions Inspection Apprival: 1 j Issued By: (, a Fire Marshal Date DwltlirigOf icrah '" i Date THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE DISPLAYED IN PUBLIC AREA Revised 5-89 TO BE REMOVED ONLY BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL r, Gas Y o,�, CITY OF ANACORTES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'D,EP,ARTMENT PERMIT CENTER— 904-eTrb STREET • C 1' A�'E: F ( U CY ti�C D a�� This is to cerSSy thOt the occupiricy Estee hereon has been Inspected and is hereby approved for Use. . jgth 1 Avamta C0M99-00012 Address of Building/Premises Building Permit No. Anacortes High School occup.nt Suite No. main..R Anacortes School Distric Owner Tft4pe P-1 Hour E1. A2.1 2200 M Avenue Typeo onetrucd°^ TYPe q/Oeerq.rwy ir Address of Owner P District st 1 AddressZadrrg il Maximum Occupancy Load F1 26 �'29 aqua re feat Squ.r• .s Statement of Restrictions A2.1 4,468 Square feet Type V-1 Hour Construction using Automatic Sprinkler System Sbbstitution. i , Inspection Apprivel: ,s \ \ ��/�\ '�/��`�\`R�//�^I'ssssued Sy: Fire arslP� M1al 4t t/- // v D D \Buuildinggofficial t ,J Date 11 Ott THIS c R, ICA E:TO BE.DISP.LAYED IS.PUBLIC AREA Revised 5-89 TOBE'R CV"MIe7- BY init,BUILDg7V' PAtiAL- P BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO.: BLD2000-00253 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 00-08-15 ANACORTES,WA 98221 ISSUED: 00-08-16 (360)293-1901 EXPIRES: 01-08-16 SITE ADDRESS: 1916 J ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 3772-148-020-0003 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Relocate portable. OWNER CONTRACTOR ANACORTES SCHOOLS Primary Phone: Primary Phone: Phone 1: Phone 1: License#: TYPE OF WORK: ALT AREA VALUE: $ 13000.00 TYPE OF USE: PUB LOT: sf REQUIRED SETBACKS: CENSUS CATEGORY: 1ST FLR: sf ZONING: ? 2ND FLR: sf FRONT: ft Occupancy Groups BASEMENT: sf SIDE 1: ft GAR/CARPORT: sf SIDE 2: ft 1. 2. OTHER: sf REAR: ft 3: 4: REQUIRED PARKING Construction Types NUMBER OF UNITS: TOTAL: 1: 5N 2: STORIES: 3: 4: BUILDING HEIGHT: ft ,,,,, ] '1 I .4. • FEES NOTES: I ' ' _.'S h•LCS 11 W i' I • Type By Date Receipt Amount "'-Si,1.�L.Tip�'�� I u---I LJ tra:- 1:= 11 PRMT MRD 00-08-16 0105311 $180.00 = `" 1' I-JWI . 1 "' ", STBC MRD 00-08-16 0105311 $4.50 �m'=L''- '? 11 """f -- - ' -i ' PLCK MRD 00-08-16 0105311 $117.00 ` -"' f.: "`J `-s— . III., 1-- = Total: $301.50 1 `J II•J�J:,o� 1 :...J i lJL_ It . - Lure. J it w.orHCa ::,0 11-`.t: II —ILy I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above ii ;1�;1.Y.Z �J"" with all ordinances and state and federal laws regulating activities covered b - Issued by Applietrit-orO )r"_-Signature CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: / 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections NACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT #103 July 19, 2000 Mr. Ed Frank City of Anacortes Building Department Anacortes, WA 98221 Dear Mr. Frank, The Anacortes School District has entered a lease agreement with Evergreen Mobile for two portable office trailers. The trailers are to be used to house the district technology support staff and the district print shop staff on a temporary basis. We will occupy each mobile unit from approximately August 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. We would appreciate any assistance that you could give in expediting this project. Regards, 2 ---Aef h)--jeri erry Lynch Director of Personnel and Operations This is Your Future. Don't Leave it Blank.- _ DR. TOM MARRS SUPERINTENDENT 2200 M AVENUE •ANACORTES, WASHINGTON 98221 •TELEPHONE (360) 293-1214• FAX (360) 293-1222 ANACORTES PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. • I PERMIT CENTER rP.O.BOX 547,ANACORTES, WA 98221 (360) 293-1901 •FAX (360) 293-1938 IAN MUNCE, DIRECTOR CO- t ._ EDWIN FRANK, BUILDING OFFICIAL•Email: ed@cityofanacortes.org • July 26, 2000 Jerry Lynch C � p Director of Personnel and Operations Anacortes School District#103 {/ 2200 M Avenue Anacortes,WA 98221 RE: Portable Office Trailers at the High School Dear Mr. Lynch: The minimum standards for occupied structures in the City of Anacortes is the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the State of Washington and the City of Anacortes. As such these trailers will be required to meet those requirements of the Uniform Building Code,Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code and Electrical Code as required by the City and the State. At this time we have received no drawings as to location or information as to how the trailers and access to the trailers will meet code requirements. To help us help you we will need, at a minimum, the following: 1. A site plan indicating existing structures and the proposed location of the two trailers. 2. The manufacturers installation requirements for the trailers for support and tiedown for earthquake and wind forces. 3. Details for construction of the accessible route of travel from the existing building to the access of the trailers. 4. To avoid fire sprinklers,the office trailers would need to be separated from the existing structures by at least 40 feet. 5. Since this is essentially an expansion of the existing area of the school facility, review by the Planning Department is necessary. I am forwarding a copy of your letter to Ian Munce for comment. With regards to timing for assistance on projects such as this we would appreciate your help by contacting us much earlier to verify any code requirements that may need to be incorporated into your contracts. Please contact us with any further information at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, CITY OF ACORTES Building Official EF:md cc. Ian Munce,Planning Director LOG-IN STAFF RESPONSE t`t Y O fr �1 z .• . 1891 � • 1.424-101F113 T_TS3116 Anacortes School District - Portable School Building Dan Harju — Fire Department Fire Alarm System—(Manual)—and should be tied into main building system. Because most of the structure is more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access point, i.e., existing parking lot, an automatic sprinkler system is required. Ed Frank - Building Department The zoning map indicates the area north of 18th street as R 3 —conditional use. Site development and construction shall comply with zoning and construction codes adopted by the City. How will fire protection and access be provided? Provide copy of easement for access to the sewer manhole—shown to be on private property. Dave Lervik - Engineering Department Does a gravel path qualify as an ADA accessible route? Are there ramps, or just stairs? Downspouts and run-off must be conveyed to storm drain system, or other approved dispersion method. Mike King - Public Safety No comment. Jim Pemberton - Public Works Project requires small parcel stormwater plan to address surface water issues. Seems to be allocating existing parking for new use. Is available parking in excess of requirements? Did not address actual trip generation except to say 4 staff — are there no new or additional trips expected from use of this facility? Proposed use is very vague. Is this added classroom space, day care, what? Why portable — is this a temporary use? Gary Robinson - Park Department S G1TY 0 ttS 939co¢9 City of Anacortes I LAND USE PERMITS PROJECT NAME: Anacortes School District — Portable School Building ADDRESS 18`h between "J" and "K" Avenues DATE RECEIVED July 17, 2000 DATE DISTRIBUTED/STAFF July 20, 2000 DISTRIBUTION LIST: Public Works Jim Pemberton Engineering Dave Lervik Police Mike King Fire Dan Harju Parks Gary Robinson Building Ed Frank Please find attached Conditional Use Application, SEPA Checklist and attachments. Please let me know right away if there is additional information you require; also, we will meet on Wednesday, July 26, 2000 at 9: 45 in Ian Munce s office to discuss project conditions. Thank you for your attention to this. Zoioils alive 41DiCA C s T� AAA a/27kiV /6 TYs�, A 4 fc d -" LO jQe Do✓a L G-15— 07. 5/76r /7s vcr eo f a aZ7 44 ' Cc e ,S7�iGc r ou �he 7/C�1> 4� wj Ti.! Zo' * A./l(� ''4,11,57/L d r 7ccn Ccc%oi f< clot J �1/ 6 y 1 "� CAL{J' 3. l�o 4, (u<`/ /1;7224- & 7crc- iodo Au/% ha ccasS ��77 13 cf U',lC<ixdri ? 1ZG ✓ �/Cc — 5LJ0wa '7, o,gp i7/2<oiaz 2/Zctzos_ CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION a C-A p1=eta ISigi ....... A r 1 vp, m m 1891 g0OR6 1...AlvI3 LTSE ri- Date application submitted to Planning Department 6/29/00 . �p ec-e -t-Drf' >° . -4 -7A/00 El Application Fee [$750.00] Receipt Number . i_ Applicant's Name, Mailing Address AND Phone Number: Anacortes School District 2200 MAvenue Anacortes, WA 98221 Received authorization to 360-293-1221 move ahead with application 7-10-00 Bryan Young a4-3" gR30 (-Sh ❑ Name and Address of Property Owner if Not Applicant: lJ A 6' Address of Property for Conditional Use: 1717le Street Legal Description of Property: ((( Generally as follows: The south 90 feet of lots 99-97inc/usivq, Block 126, original plat of the City of Anacortes, Skagit County, Washington, according to the recorded plat thereof in the office of the Auditor of Skagit County, Washington. ❑ Conditional use being applied for (Include Zoning Code Section Number): Additions to public school facility If the use is not listed, the Administrator shall make a determination on similarity of the use with listed uses and forward his recommendation to the Planning Commission. .st Zone Designation of Property: c.L -C'z�_/ State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) Checklist required? Yes x_No If yes, please attach Checklist to Application together with $200.00 Filing Fee City of Anacortesi)P.O. Box 54742Anacortes, WA 982216)(360)299-194342 p--.. Reason for Applying for Conditional Use Permit: Required by city planning office as of a change of decision made on 6/26/00. Attach list of Property owners within 300 feet of property involved. ❑ m naeortes-Engineering-Department. Attach any maps, diagrams, or other material which supports Conditional Use Application. l/ e_e e-.,u 7 Syr p o-c: t LaeC —67 ,1;D to3 All information is said to be true under penalty of perjury by the Laws of the State of Washington. / zey-to-�_ // (c) c, Signature Date City of AnacorteseP.O. Box 547eAnacortes, WA 982216)(360)299-1943 2 CITY OF ANACORTES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Anacortes High School Portable Installation 2. Name of applicant: Anacortes School District 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Jerry Lynch 2200 M Avenue Anacortes, WA 98221 360-293-1221 4. Date checklist prepared: June 29, 2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Anacortes 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): July-October 1, 2000 7. Do you have any plan for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None known at this time 8. List any environmental information you know that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this project. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of other proposals directly affecting the affected geographic area covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City building permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat these answers on this page. Prepare site and install portable school building at north end of high school football field. Portable building is approximately 68'X42'. Site area including walkways, site for portable and ancillary support spaces is approximately 20,000 square feet and site is entirely located on school district-owned property. Portable building is to be used for educational purposes which support the needs of the community and mission of the school district. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and Section, Township and Range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site is located adjacent to Anacortes High School at a location described approximately as 18th Street between 'J' and `K' Avenues. Site and vicinity plan is part of this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the affected geographic area(circle one). Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other_Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? None c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific classification unknown. 2 d. Are there any surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None at all. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling to take place. Only site preparations required are stripping sod in preparation for walkways and site on which portable is to be located. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Not at all. g. About what percent of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces after proposal construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? Paved walkways and proposed building will cover approximately 29% of the site designated for this project. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No erosion expected. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be a short period of time when heavy equipment will prepare site and utility connections and install the portable building. One might expect some dust and equipment exhaust during this period of time. The project itself will not adversely impact current air conditions presently experienced in and around the high school or neighboring areas. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None necessary. 3. Water 3 a. Surface (1) Is there any surface water body or on in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, describe and attach available plans. NA (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. None (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the affected geographic area plan. No (6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. No (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be 4 served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rain waters will run off building roof surface and be discharged into city storm water system. (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will be generated by this project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: No impacts planned or expected. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous trees: alder, maple, aspen, other x evergreen trees: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Sod will be removed to the extent necessary to prepare the specific site for the building,walkways and play area. Some scrub vegetation may be removed to clean up site and make the area more park-like and attractive. No major trees existing on site will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the affected geographic area. None 5 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the affected geographic area, if any: Evergreen shrubs and trees will be planted to provide for buffers as described on site plan attached. 5. Animals a. List any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the affected geographic area or are known to be on or near the affected geographic area: Birds: Sparrow, robin Mammals: None observed Fish: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the affected geographic area: None apparent. c. Is the affected geographic area part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Existing major trees that exist on the site remain for use by wildlife. Additional tree plantings will enhance use of site by birds. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood, stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Electricity all for heating and lighting the facility. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. None apparent in area. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NA 6 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special or unusual requirements. (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No hazards are a part of or will be generated by this project. b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment during site preparations during the hours of 8AM and 6PM—very limited time period for this activity not exceeding 10 days total between July 1 and October 1,2000. There are no long-term noise created by this project. Noise associated with this project includes students and parents coming and going from the facility on school days and by students playing in designated play area several short periods each school day. Noise associated with this project will not add to or exceed the noises and activity that presently exists in and around the high school site and neighboring areas. (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NA 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 7 Current use of school site is vegetation and mowed grass. The area is an school and community athletic facility. The adjacent areas to the south and west is school gymnasium and parking and athletic stadium. The adjacent area to the east is one single family, owner occupied residence. The adjacent areas to the north exist as duplex housing, rental residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Public f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NA h. Has any part of the site been classified an"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 50 students and employees will use the designated facility on a daily basis on days that school is in session. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any? 8 NA 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Schools are a public use and the area is designated Public Zoning. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NA b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NA 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal building material(s)proposed? The building proposed is wood construction and tallest portion of the building will be approximately 16 feet off finished grade. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Vegetative visual barriers planned in the project and existing major vegetation to remain as identified on the site plan. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None in excess of what presently exists on the site. 9 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any? NA 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? School and community recreation and athletic areas. b. Would the proposed proposal displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the proposal or applicant, if any? NA 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None apparent. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 10 Site plan attached as part of this checklist. The site is served by 17th Street off of`K' Avenue. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Fifteen parking spaces directly allocated to this project. A total of 300 parking spaces are available in the immediate high school area. New staff generated by this project and who are in addition to staff presently serving the high school campus total 4 individuals. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets; or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed proposal? If know, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes will occur between 7AM and 8AM in the mornings on school days and between 2PM and 3PM in the afternoons. This lithe normal and current peak traffic times for the high school and this pattern is not expected to change as a result of this project. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NA 15. Public Services a. Would the proposal result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No unusual or additional public services will be required for this project. 11 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NA 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, city water/sewer, telephone, etc., are all readily available to the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. This project will require the school district to connect to City of Anacortes sanitary sewer,water. The school will work with Puget Power for electrical connection. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. f / Signature Date Submitted 12 3 TA8 ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF IXG FASCIA 12 t BARITE 21 — 7/ 1X4 CORNER t MJL TRIM —J T1 nri i ==1 I ! 1 LP SI01NG W I i ■ I � GROQVES O I { !� f a,oc 1 1 I ! I iI I it 7! ! — — t 11 i . 71i _ — FRONT ENO ELEVATION i . , LI ' 1MII ' i i J! 1 I ! I!f i ?1 .1 . _ — — — - - - -- ; 1f . lit , ;, 3 0 0 O C7 O Cl 0 REAR END ELEVATION =VATIONS SKAG I T DAYCARE 54 — DATE 05l23I00 JOB Noy 3423 24x66' MODULAR DAYCARE STD _ EERIOR ELEVATIONS "�"'� 0.15TOI32 APPROVAL FILE 3423-4-0 4.0 MIOT BE REPRODUCED Y41}cuf TIE MITTEN(U.aEif OF PHTLEY EVER6REEN RG.J APPROVAL DATE __L_ j n FSHI 3 T)8 A e1 Lr N'iLE ROOF _ 1%6 FASCIA 17 ,_S 21— I a ❑ d ITl tlfilliCT — l 't ❑ _ 1 � Ildi _ LP SIMS w ■ p 8 f( is I ! ► li I ° I ° / i � L _ _ — I , I i ! I - 1 1 11 In- 1 1 I I �l 1 i u ' l l I : T i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 10 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT END ELEVATION 1-- • , i _ i ,±,___, _ _ _ _ ____ rs. — - - '_ 4__ ._ 'i i lil T a a i i " I o' \; V '3/4; N7, 1 1 1 1 li I ii , 1 1 i 1 I 1 LiI--- TT 1 .-r7 DI — }- - -- i r i I- 1 O O O 0 O = C] = 0 = = = Q O = O O RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR END aEVAT1Oiy EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale: I/a = I'-0' i / , I MARK REVISION ��u ENS SKAGIT DAYCARE ` CUSTOMER'aa1ITTAL WWI 1 LE I EVERGREEN INC. — DATE: 0503100 -S_23— m 5/30/� 142f9 SMOKEY POINT BLVD. xewre 42'X66' MODULAR DAYCARE zroruvin _ _ MARYSVILLE, HA 98271 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS cnniet (360) 653-5-190 s r TITLE OsraER AFMNH, rat; 3423.4-o 4.0 (360) 659-7735 FAX. THz CRANKS currir CE r�r+oarm wnlon me to-net eee r of nin er EveRsrr�r ac NFINN.WE � sir. cF 7i1t F �" ANACORTES FIRE DEPARTMENT 4t` •_ 1016 13TH STREET, ANACOATES, WA 98221 (360) 293-1925 A. RICHARD CURTIS, CHIEF FAX(360) 299-1965 ;Y December 2, 1999 Warren Newton Brodniak Hall Manager Anacortes High School 20th and J Ave Anacortes,WA. 98221 Re: Increases in Occupant Load for Special Events Dear Warren, Thank you for your inquiry about fire department approval for increasing occupant loads for special events. The 1997 Uniform Fire Code, section 2501.16.2,authorizes the fire chief to allow for increases in the occupant load by up to 10%,depending on the available exit door and aisle width. As discussed during the walk through performed on December I, 1999 the minimum aisle widths required for the main cross aisles in Brodniak Hall are six(6)feet for the lower level and five and one half(5 %)feet for the upper levels.Based on the available versus required aisle space,this allows for 36 temporary chairs to be placed behind the rear row of fixed seats in the lower level,with the balance of extra seating being located along the steps adjoining the two upper levels and the main lower level. In summary,the maximum total number for extra seating in Brodniak Hall shall be eighty(80). It should be noted that this code provision is intended for special events only and is not intended for use as regular seating capacity.In order to monitor and evaluate the use of this special provision,we are requesting the Brodniak Hall management to notify the fire department when a request for increased seating occurs. This may be done on a case-by-case basis or via a list of scheduled events where increased seating capacity is being requested.Please include a letter of explanation and justification for each event requested. Thank you for your diligence and attention to maintaining adequate like safety for your facility. Resp Ily, ,-C-if Chief Richard Cu is Ed Frank Anacortes Fire Department Anacortes Building Official MECHANICAL PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : MEC98-0123 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED : 12/22/98 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 12/22/98 (206) 293 -1901 EXPIRES : 12/22/99 SITE ADDRESS : 1916 J AVE ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NO. : 3772-148-020-0003 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Gas Furnace and Piping. Final Inspection Prior to Gas Connection. — OWNER CONTRACTOR ANACORTES SCHOOLS HANDY'S HEATING 2200 M AVENUE 1575 MEMORIAL HWY ANACORTES WA 98221 MT VERNON WA 98273 293-1221 428-0969 HANDYHI088JW TYPE OF WORK. . . :ADD BOILERS/COMPRESSORS- DOMES . INCIN • 0 TYPE OF USE •RES 0-3 HP • 0 COMML. INCIN • 0 3-15 HP • 0 RELOC/REPAIR. . . : 0 FUEL TYPES 15-30 HP • 0 CLOTHES DRYERS . : 0 : /GAS/ / / : 30-50 HP • 0 GAS WTR HEATERS : 0 FURN < 100K BTU: 1 50+ HP • 0 STOVE, APPLI . . . : 0 FURN >=100K BTU: 0 AIR HANDLING UNITS-- FIRE LOG/LITE. . : 0 FURN - FLOOR. . . : 0 <= 10000 cfm. : 0 WOODSTOVES • 0 UNIT HEATERS . . . : 0 > 10000 cfm. : 0 OTHER UNITS • 0 VENT FANS • 0 EVAP COOLERS . . . : 0 GAS OUTLETS • 1 VENT SYSTEMS . . . : 0 HOODS • 0 VENT W/O APPLI . : 0 — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 46 .45 MD 12/22/98 9550 TOTAL $ 46 .45 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and Laws regulating activities covered by this permit. Issued by Applicant or Owner' s Signature 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections mec_prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 12-22-1998 I :32PM FROM HANDY S HEATING. INC 360 428 1993 p_ 1 'C6 AC �. & 1 v 25. N i L BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : BLD97-0416 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 10/06/97 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 10/09/97 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 10/09/98 SITE ADDRESS: 20TH & J AVE ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NO. : 20TH & J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend gravel road to ball field. — OWNER — CONTRACTOR — LENDER ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE ERIE TRUCKING 2200 M AVENUE 251 ROSARIO ROAD ANACORTES WA 98221 ANACORTES WA 98221 293-1200 293-7332 LAKEET*1810N TYPE OF WORK *ADD AREA (sf) VALU. . . $: 0 TYPE OF USE •PUB LOT • 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS---- CENSUS CATEGORY • 434 1ST FLR • 0 FRONT 0 ft ZONING 2ND FLR • 0 SIDE • 0 ft :P BASEMENT • 0 REAR • 0 ft OCCUPANCY GROUP GAR/CARPORT. . . : 0 REQUIRED PARKING-- : ? :? :2 : 7 OTHER 0 TOTAL • 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HANDICAPPED: 0 : 7 :? :2 : ? NUMBER OF UNITS • 0 COMPACT • 0 OCCUPANT LOAD STORIES • 0 IMPRV SURF. : 0 sf . 0: 0: 0: 0: BUILDING HEIGHT. : 0 ft — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PLCR $ 45.00 DM 10/09/97 7576 PAST $ 234 .00 DM 10/09/97 7576 STBC $ 4.50 DM 10/09/97 7576 TOTAL $ 283.50 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws regulating activities covered by this permit. Issued by Applicant or,9aner's Sicjture 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections bld_prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : BLD97-0184 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 05/14/97 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 05/19/97 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 05/19/98 SITE ADDRESS: 1916 J AVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. : 1916 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Small room Remodel 150 square foot — OWNER - — CONTRACTOR — LENDER ANACORTES SCHOOLS BAKER CONSTRUCTION 2200 M AVENUE 457 BAKERVIEW LANE ANACORTES WA 98221 ANACORTES WA 98221 293-1221 293-2462 BAKERC*235MD TYPE OF WORK •REP AREA (sf) VALU. . . $: 7500 TYPE OF USE -PUB LOT • 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS---- CENSUS CATEGORY • 999 1ST FLR • 0 FRONT • 0 ft ZONING 2ND FLR • 0 SIDE • 0 ft :7 BASEMENT • 0 REAR • 0 ft OCCUPANCY GROUP GAR/CARPORT. . . : 0 REQUIRED PARKING-- :? :7 :? :2 OTHER • 0 TOTAL • 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HANDICAPPED: 0 :7 :2 :2 : 2 NUMBER OF UNITS • 0 COMPACT • 0 OCCUPANT LOAD STORIES • 0 IMPRV SURF. : 0 sf 0: 0: 0: 0: BUILDING HEIGHT. : 0 ft — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 99 .00 MD 05/19/97 6948 STBC $ 4.50 MD 05/19/97 6948 TOTAL $ 103. 50 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws regulating activities covered by this permit. Issued by plicant �oYF/Owner' s/Signatu 24 Hour Notice Required Fdr All Inspections bldprmt, Rev: 06/11/92 _05/29/97 THU 12:58_ PAY 3602931222 Anacortes School Dist al002 Memorandum DATE: May 29, 1997 TO: David Shaw-Artbeat FROM: Gary Wargo-Anacortes Schools RE: August 2 concert CC: Mayor Maxwell, Chief King Mr. Shaw,please be advised that formal approval has not yet been granted for the use of our football field for your planned concert. My memorandum to you dated May 21 indicated there were some requirements which must be met prior to any approval for the use of our facilities. The correspondence I received from you today does not meet all of the required docum'hntation which is needed. I would advise you not to begin selling ticket nor advertising for this event at this time. Please also know that I have received some unfavorable feedback from our local community with regards to some promotions you conducted in Anacortes just last summer. It is my understanding that you promoted and organized some musical activities in conjunction with the festival and Port of Anacortes and that things are not yet settled with some local businesses. Until I know more about this issue and know that all outstanding problems are resolved,the Anacortes School District will not agree to allow you to use any of our school facilities. In fact,I note that you did not list your event here last year in your list of references which causes me some concern. Again, I would advise you not to promote, advertise nor sell tickets for this event under the assumption that you may use Anacortes School District facilities. Approval is not granted, as yet, to use school district facilities. Delivered via facimile to Artbeat,May 29, 1997 titcieComr.r., May 27, 1997 "oset Mr. Greg Wargo rat, Anacortes Schools 2200 M Avenue Anacortes, Washington 98221 Dear Mr. Wargo: Thank you for agreeing to rent your Football Facility for the Tower of Power concert. I have filled out the form you provided. There is one area that is not clear in the case of our organization: Fund Raising. We always hope to bring in more dollars than we spend, but at the same time, our purpose is to put on concerts for the enjoyment of the public. So, fund raising is not our primary purpose. We are also interested in developing cultural facilities, including outdoor venues. Perhaps this experiment could be indicate the way for future outdoor events in Anacortes. I have enclosed a one-sheet mission statement of our organization. I am going to send a copy of our correspondence to the police and fire departments. I contacted them immediately upon the conclusion of our conversation last week but have not yet heard from anyone. We are requesting information about the possible need for permits. As for a letter from the Anacortes Arts and Crafts Festival, I am not sure they will make any formal statement. The fact is our events are taking place in conjunction with one another. This does not mean an endorsement by them. It is a nice complimentary event for those coming to town. We will request a letter, but cannot guarantee a formal response. I hope this will not adversely affect our use. We would like to visit the site towards the end of June for a walk through with your staff. We plan to begin selling tickets to the event on or about June 2. Please let me know if you can see any reason not to commence publication of the event. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, David Shaw, President cr My Misr-- A Washington Not for Profit Company 410 Fourth Avenue N., Edmonds, WA 98020-Telephone and Fax(206)514-0408 or 775-8813-dshaw@wamedes corn Memorandum DATE: May 21, 1997 TO: David Shaw-Artbeat 7125 Rainier Dr. #1 Everett, WA 98203 FROM: Gary Wargo -Anacortes Schools A-) RE: Rental of Football Facility -August 2, 1997 CC: . Marcia T., C Moore, Val R., Mike L. Per our conversation on May 19,the following are our requirements for using our football facility during the Arts and Crafts weekend. As I understand your event: Your organization is a not-for-profit group which organizes and administers concerts. Your organization is scheduling a concert for Saturday evening,August 2 in conjunction with the city's Arts and Crafts event. You wish to use the football field to stage the concert and use our grandstand facility for spectators. You also would like to use our concession stand for concession sales. Your organization does have liability insurance for your coverage during this event. You need field lights for the event and need some power accessibility for sound and misc. equipment. You will provide adequate outdoor portable restroom facilities for your event at your cost. Attached is a cost estimate for the use of our facilities and a list of items we will need to have in place prior to approval of the use of our facility. Insurance Certificate: A certificate of insurance naming the Anacortes School District as additionally insured. Liability insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 is necessary. Completed facility use agreement. A resume or information sheet which tells us a little bit about your organization and your past experience with organizing and conducting concert events similar to the one you are planning for Anacortes. Reference contact names and phone numbers of schools or municipalities with which you have worked or used facilities to conduct concerts. A letter or correspondence from Anacortes Arts and Crafts indicating that your event is associated with our local community festival activities. Confirmation that you have communicated with the Anacortes Public Safety and Fire Departments to make them aware of your activity,anticipated numbers of people expected so that they might be aware of the scope of the event. This may be helpful for traffic control and for first aid planning. A garbage container may be needed if you expect alot of litter; you can arrange for a small garbage dumpster by contacting the city as well. Any permits for the event and/or concessions are the responsibility of your organization. We need to verify you have any necessary permits prior to the event. At some point,we will need to meet on site and discuss particulars of the event. My maintenance staff and custodial staff need to know your needs so that we can make adequate preparations and to assure we have power and other things you may need for a successful event. As we discussed,state and federal rules,our school facilities are designated smoke/drug/alcohol- free and thus uses of these sorts of things are prohibited. Estimated Rental Costs for Anacortes School Facilities: Field use during actual conduct of event $50 per hour (I am assuming a 2 hour concert plus or minus) Field use during setup of staging to take-down $20 per hour (we can discuss the anticipated need and agree upon a total value) Concessions 10%gross revenue District staff for on-site supervision/assistance and after approx. $180 concert cleanup Any special electrical or utility or other arrangements actual time and materials required for the event 7 N.11Y O� ANACORTES PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. (INCLUDING BUILDING DEPARTMENT) (360)299-1943 P.O. BOX 547, ANACORTES, WA 98221 (360)293-1928 FAX ./tj, 1891 - , CO IAN MUNCE,DIRECTOR q CORD February 27, 1997 Mr. Dick Threet 2801 17th Anacortes, WA. 98221 RE: Your February 24, 1997 Letter Dear Dick: Thank you for the above referenced letter regarding your steep slope and landslide concerns for the slope north of 20th Street. We very much appreciate your detailed comments and your circulating these to the school district. Thanks to your comments some fencing has been installed. Additionally, the Building Department will be working with the school district relative to additional measures regarding taping off or otherwise describing the area of concern and the signing. I also understand that the school district has geotechnical work underway at this time. Again, it is my understanding that this issue is being addressed by the school district and that the school district is working with the Building Department at every step of the way. If you would like to have ongoing progress reports, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ed Frank, Building Inspector, at 293- 1901. Again, thank you for highlighting your detailed concerns on this matter and bringing them directly to our attention. Sincerely, CITY OF ANACORTES Ian S. Munce, AICP Director of Planning& Community Development ISM:11 cc: Dr. Sharon Hill, Anacortes School District Mr. Ed Frank, Building Inspector Al Rosario Geoscience Associates 104 Harbor Lane • Anacortes, WA 98221 • (360) 293-7023 February 24 , 1997 Mr. Ian Munce, Director Planning and Community Development City of Anacortes P.O. Box 547 Anacortes, WA 98221 Dear Ian: On September 16 and 18, 1996, we independently wrote to you with serious concerns about the Anacortes School District 's handling of the professional investigation, evaluation and stabilization of the steep constructed slope between the 20th. St . ROW (as extended west ) and the new athletic complex under construction west of the high school . During the 1995-96 winter season this slope had begun to fail by rotational slumping triggered by undercutting and oversteepening of the hillside during excavation for the new ballfield . At the core of our concern was the clearly inadequate and inaccurate geotechnical evaluation submitted to the City by the School District , an evaluation that put public safety, public facilities and public funds at risk. Amazingly, the City ' s response was to instruct the School District to follow the recommendations of this professionally inadequate report. Further, the School District said they had the situation completely under control , and District officials were irritated that members of the public actually had the temerity to comment on their project during the only time when the geotechnical investigation was made available for public review. This letter is an urgent follow-up to our September, 1996, comments. During the current winter season, the landslide that started during ' 95- ' 96 has continued to expand in all directions. The headscarp has migrated southward to the top of the slope, across the top of the pile of fill in the 20th. St. ROW, south of the south side of the existing 20th. St. as extended west. The area of slumping earth expands almost daily and is now extending southeast towards the west end of the existing 20th . St. As the headscarp of the landslide progressed into the fill material in the ROW, the added weight of the fill has decreased ground stability. The volume of the slide may now be 10 times or so greater than the volume of the ' 95- ' 96 slide. We point out that no one can predict if or where the current slide expansion will stop. The instability may well threaten the existing 20th . St . driving surface and the high school access road west of the school . We are particularly concerned about the possibility of sudden catastrophic failure of the slope at the northeast end of the landslide. To date, the northeast end of the slide has been Anacortes High School landslide 2/24/97 page 2 partially stabilized and contained by the Hilfiker wire mesh "retaining wall " at the ballfield backstop. However, this retaining wall system was designed to retain moderate undercuts of otherwise stable slopes. It was not designed to hold up a whole hillside of unstable, saturated soil . The wire structure is clearly bent and stressed now. There is a possibility that the backstop wire retainer will fail suddenly, leading to rapid failure of the slope above the retainer and rapid flow of soil. and wire debris into the area below the backstop. Such conditions present a serious and immediate public safety hazard , and yet there is no warning to the public about this hazard even though a frequently used pathway across the hillside crosses immediately upslope from the backstop retainer . If the backstop retainer fails, the landslide may expand rapidly to the east and place the high school access road in jeopardy. We note that no one can say that the backstop retainer will not fail under current and progressing conditions at the site . We request that the City immediately place hazard warning tape around the potential hazard area above and below the current and potential landslide area. Since the slide is continuing to expand we suggest that pedestrian traffic be warned and discouraged (1 ) west of the existing 20th. St . driving surface, ( 2 ) on the hillslope east and southeast of the ballfield backstop, and ( 3) on the ballfield within 50 ' (minimum) of the backstop retainer. Some of the new earth fractures developing above the slide headscarp and across well worn and frequented pathways are hidden by tall grass and shrubs and present danger of injury if a foot or leg drops suddenly and unexpectedly into the crevasse that was not there a few days ago. We are contacting the City on this issue because the School District last year assured the City that they had the situation under control . Au contraire -- they do not seem concerned about the public safety hazard or the potential hazard to existing City streets or school facilities should the backstop retainer fail . The current need is not attempting to map or model a rapidly expanding landslide that renders the work obsolete as soon as the survey crew leaves the site ; the current need is taking immediate measures to limit further landslide expansion and thus similarly limit remediation costs and possible damage to existing public resources . These measures would include immediate ( 1) removal of fill material west of the 20th . St . driving surface to relieve stress on the hillside and ( 2) downslope buttressing of the backstop retainer with carefully placed and keyed riprap. These operations should be supervised by a licensed and qualified f Anacortes High School landslide 2/24/97 page 3 geotechnical engineer because inappropriate activities could trigger rather than prevent slope and retainer failure. Last September we strongly suggested that the School District not pursue " foolish economy" in this matter , that "a stitch in time saves 9 (or 900) " , and "a dollar saved today --- a $1000 spent tomorrow" . The stitch was not taken in time, the dollar was saved, and we are now well beyond the nine stitch stage heading for 900 and $1000. We made no derogatory comments about people , but dealt with issues in a professional manner expressing the strong and serious concern that was appropriate for the situation. Every professional can expect examination of his/her work in the light of appropriate performance standards, especially in the forum of public agencies and public business , and when the public is given extremely limited and late opportunity to review and comment . In return for taking a public-spirited and informed concern in the welfare and safety of the public and public resources , we were vilified and bad-mouthed , on the record to the local press , by school district officials who had no knowledge whereof they spoke. I believe subsequent events have more than demonstrated and justified our prior statements of concern. We wonder how serious the school district can be in teaching good citizenship and objective thinking to students. Almost anything can be accomplished if cost is no object ; however , the economic viability of the ballfield project is already in question because of the order of magnitude or more increase in hillside stabilization costs. How much more economic damage or possible injury to unsuspecting persons will be required before the City and the School District take this matter seriously? Sincerely, n Ross O. Barnes , Ph.D. Richard L . Threet , Ph. D. Consulting geologists and hydrogeologists , scholars , former teachers and educators and educational administrators. cc: Ed Frank Jeanne Robinette Bill Carlisle Sharon Hill Gary Wargo School Board BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : BLD95-0336 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 08/24/95 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 08/24/95 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 08/24/96 SITE ADDRESS: 1916 J AVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. : 1916 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: a Chimney LUtLcY - OWNER — CONTRACTOR — LENDER ANACORTES SCHOOLS WRIGHT'S RESTORATION REMODELIN 2200 M AVENUE 623 HILLDREST DRIVE ANACORTES WA 98221 ANACORTES WA 98221 293-1221 293-0579 WRIGHRR066PR TYPE OF WORK •DEM AREA (sf) VALU. . . $: 3500 TYPE OF USE *PUB LOT • 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS---- CENSUS CATEGORY •999 1ST FLR • 0 FRONT • 0 ft ZONING 2ND FLR • 0 SIDE • 0 ft :? • BASEMENT 0 REAR • 0 ft OCCUPANCY GROUP GAR/CARPORT. . . : 0 REQUIRED PARKING-- :? : ? :? OTHER 0 TOTAL • 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HANDICAPPED: 0 :5N : ? :? :? NUMBER OF UNITS • 0 COMPACT • 0 OCCUPANT LOAD STORIES • 0 IMPRV SURF. : 0 sf 0: 0: 0: 0: BUILDING HEIGHT. : 0 ft — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 63. 00 MD 08/24/95 4327 STBC $ 4.50 MD 08/24/95 4327 TOTAL $ 67.50 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the bove information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws regulating activities covered by this permit. n 1 Issued by cant or Owner's Si ure 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections bld_prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 MECHANICAL PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : MEC97-0030 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 02/20/97 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 02/20/97 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 02/20/98 SITE ADDRESS: 1916 J AVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. : 1916 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Gas furnace and piping — OWNER — CONTRACTOR ANACORTES SCHOOLS HANDY'S HEATING 2200 M AVENUE 1575 MEMORIAL HWY ANACORTES WA 98221 MT VERNON WA 98273 293-1221 428-0969 HANDYHI088JW TYPE OF WORK. . . :ADD BOILERS/COMPRESSORS- DOMES. INCIN • 0 TYPE OF USE •RES 0-3 HP • 0 COMML. INCIN • 0 3-15 HP • 0 RELOC/REPAIR. . . : 0 FUEL TYPES 15-30 HP • 0 CLOTHES DRYERS. : 0 : /GAS/ / / : 30-50 HP • 0 GAS WTR HEATERS: 0 FURN < 100K BTU: 1 50+ HP • 0 STOVE, APPLI. . . : 0 FURN >=100K BTU: 0 AIR HANDLING UNITS-- FIRE LOG/LITE. . : 0 FURN - FLOOR. . . : 0 <= 10000 cfm. : 0 WOODSTOVES • 0 UNIT HEATERS. . . : 0 > 10000 cfm. : 0 OTHER UNITS • 0 VENT FANS • 0 EVAP COOLERS. . . : 0 GAS OUTLETS • 1 VENT SYSTEMS. . . : 0 HOODS • 0 VENT W/O APPLI. : 0 — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 40.75 MD 02/20/97 6567 TOTAL $ 40.75 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws reguLating activities covered by this permit. Issued by Applicant or Owner' s Signature 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections mec prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : BLD96-0318 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 08/21/96 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 09/16/96 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 09/16/97 SITE ADDRESS: 1916 J AVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. : 1916 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install portable classroom — OWNER — CONTRACTOR — LENDER ANACORTES SCHOOLS 2200 M AVENUE ANACORTES WA 98221 293-1221 TYPE OF WORK •ADD AREA (sf) VALU. . . $: 38000 TYPE OF USE 'PUB LOT • 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS---- CENSUS CATEGORY • 999 1ST FLR • 0 FRONT • 0 ft ZONING 2ND FLR • 0 SIDE • 0 ft :P BASEMENT • 0 REAR • 0 ft OCCUPANCY GROUP GAR/CARPORT. . . : 0 REQUIRED PARKING-- :? :? :? : ? OTHER • 0 TOTAL • 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HANDICAPPED: 0 :5N :? :? :? NUMBER OF UNITS • 0 COMPACT • 0 OCCUPANT LOAD STORIES • 0 IMPRV SURF. : 0 sf . 0: 0: 0: 0: BUILDING HEIGHT. : 0 ft — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By— Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 336.50 MD 09/16/96 5929 STBC $ 4.50 MD 09/16/96 5929 PLCK $ 218.73 MD 09/16/96 5929 TOTAL $ 559.73 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and Laws regulating activities covered by this permit. Issued by Applicant or Owner' s Signature 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections bld_prmt, Rev: 06/11/92 1 F-, s-, BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT NO. : BLD92-0018 P.O. BOX 547 APPLIED: 06/30/92 ANACORTES, WA 98221 ISSUED: 07/01/92 (206) 293-1901 EXPIRES: 07/01/93 SITE ADDRESS: 24TH & L AVENUE ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NO. : ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 24'x28' storage building concrete floor, stick frame, trussed roof, plywood siding, composition roof. — OWNER - — CONTRACTOR - - — LENDER ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT 2200 M AVENUE ANACORTES WA 98221 292-1200 TYPE OF WORK NEW AREA (sf) VALU. . . $: 10752 TYPE OF USE *PUB LOT • 0 REQUIRED SETBACKS---- CENSUS CATEGORY •'' 1ST FLR • 0 FRONT 0 ft ZONING 2ND FLR • 0 SIDE • 0 ft :PUBLIC BASEMENT • 0 REAR • 0 ft OCCUPANCY GROUP GAR/CARPORT. . . : 0 REQUIRED PARKING-- :M1 OTHER • 0 TOTAL • 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HANDICAPPED: 0 : ? : ? : ? :? NUMBER OF UNITS • 0 COMPACT • 0 OCCUPANT LOAD STORIES • 0 IMPRV SURF. : 0 sf . 0 : 0: 0: 0: BUILDING HEIGHT. : 0 ft — FEES — NOTES Code Amount---- By- Date---- Receipt PRMT $ 86. 50 MG 07/01/92 43804 STBC $ 4.50 MG 07/01/92 43804 TOTAL $ 91. 00 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and state that the above information is correct, and agree to comply with all ordinances and laws regulating activities covered by this permit. Issued by Ap scant or Owner's Signature 24 Hour Notice Required For All Inspections bldjrmt, Rev: 06/11/92 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ANACORTES ATHLETIC COMPLEX 2 . Name of applicant: ' Anacortes School District No. 103 3 . Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Dr. D. Sharon Hill, Superintendent Gary Wargo, Business Manager 2200 M Avenue Anacortes, Washington 98221 (206) 293-1221 4 . Date checklist prepared: February 13, 1992 5 . Agency requesting checklist: City of Anacortes 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : Construction to begin within 30 days of approval. Construction to be undertaken in several phases, not now defined. Completion in five years from beginning. 7 . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8 . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis of the Smiley's Bottom Property, December 31, 1991, I.E.S. Associates. '—ItTTKRAtAvr" A — 9 . Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals or other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known PAGE 2 10 . List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Anacortes: Conditional Use Permit, Building Permits, Wetland Encroachment Permit, Grading/Filling Permit, Land Clearing Permit U.S. Army Corp of Engineers: Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. 11., Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The development of a new athletic complex by the construction of football, soccer, baseball and softball fields. Included will be covered grandstand seating, open bleachers, concession building restroom/locker building, walkways, access drives, lighting, and other elements of a community and high school recreational facility. 12 . Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) . Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Immediately adjacent to, and West of, the existing Anacortes High School. 20th Street forms the Southern boundary, 17th Street the Northern. F'AGE 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) : Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate slope) ? 60% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils are predominately Everett Gravelly Sandy Loam, some Semiahmoo Muck occupy the low areas d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None observed e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The project will be graded by excavating and filling with material existing on the site. Approximately 150,000 cubic yards of material will be graded. Some gravels, sands and soils will be imported. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary erosion control measures, that may include berms, silt fences and matting will be used to limit or prevent run-off and erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings) ? Approximately 20% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction temporary erosion control measures will be implemented. Construction will result in all disturbed areas planted to vegetation or covered with impervious surfaces. PAGE 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2 . AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. , dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction emissions from heavy equipment will result. Operations will not produce emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: No measures to reduce or control emissions are planned 3 . WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round) and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetland) ? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The area immediately adjacent to the proposal is a large basin that serves as a collection and natural treatment area for the surrounding storm water drainage and seepages. Water collects in several man-made ditches and ponds prior to exiting the property through a ditch and culvert. SEE ca,cePrg4c. A1rfl6,fl6N PL.NU ArrAGM1 err" $ — 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. ) ' 1 The proposal requires the filing of a small portion of the wetlands associated with 'la- the adjacent drainage basin. The project site is located greater than 200 feet from the principle drainage courses. 3) Estimate, the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Approximately 35,000 cubic yard of material will be placed on the wetlands. This material will be excavated from the adjacent lands on the proposed project site. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No withdrawals or diversions are planned PAGE 5 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of water materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of water and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. Ground water will not be withdrawn. Although it is not the intention of the project to discharge to groundwaters, the large turf grass areas will allow for percolation of rainwaters and excess irrigation waters. A septic tank/drainfield sanitary sewer system may be installed for the public restrooms. These waters may reach the groundwater. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . , agricultural; etc. ) . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. A septic tank and drainfield sanitary sewer system may be installed rather than connecting to the City's sanitary sewer system. The system would be sized to accommodate the public restrooms to be built on the proposed facility. The treated discharge would meet all local and state regulations. It would be domestic sewerage, discharged relative to the seasonal use of the facility. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 4 � 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and E �t(cN .p method of collection and disposal, if any (include 56 �ca /stii quantities, if known) . Where will this water flow? Will p,'t( (J't oil this water flow into other water? If so describe. �, . 0' / No runoff from the project site is anticipated. The impervious surfaced areas will ot,b i�E drain into the sports fields and will be dispersed through the turf grass areas. gd" 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials other than the septic tank/drainfield effluent will be discharged on the project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None planned, no impacts anticipated ?AGE 6 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 4 . PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: XX deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other XX evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other XX shrubs XX grass XX pasture crop or grain XX wet soil plants cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A variety of deciduous and evergreen trees will be removed throughout the almost nine acre site c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None know to exist on or near the site d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The majority of the landscaping will be athletic turf grass, the cut and fill slopes and not recreational buffer areas will re vegetated with a variety of native and ornamental plant materials s ss c o vctff4 tL ��^� 6NFF4/Z F vNA �1 4rTRu/NFiur c_ 5 . ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds , other' mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other' fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Refer to Wetland Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis of the Smiley's Bottom Property by IES Associates, December 1991. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known to be on or near the site c. Is the site part of a migratory route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None planned PAGE 7 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6 . ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy only is planned to be used b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The athletic field lighting will be "state-of-art" low energy, long light fixtures and bulbs 7 . ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other?) There are no known existing noises in the area that would affect the proposal 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other) ? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction heavy equipment noise is expected during normal work hours. Use of the facility may generate large crowd noise during major events such as high school football games or community recreation tournaments. PAGE 8 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3 ) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None proposed 8 . LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Most of the proposed project site is currently unused, a portion is an existing parking lot for the high school. The adjacent properties are residential, undeveloped and community recreation facilities. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so describe. The wetlands to be filled are planted to Reed Canary Grass, an introduced agriculture crop c. Describe any structures on the site. No structures exist on the site, two concrete slabs from previous structures exist and will be removed d. Will any structures be demolished? If so what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Public Use f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public Use g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not designated as shoreline h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i . Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed protect? No people will reside or work at the completed project. Many thousands will use the facility as either recreation/sports athletes or as spectators j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required PAGE 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 1 . Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposal is the intended use of the existing and projected land uses and plans. It will provide considerable public use through community recreation, public school education, and high school athletics 9 . HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. No housing units planned b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle, or low income housing. No housing units eliminated c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed 10 . AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) , not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed. The tallest structure is the grandstand roof, to top is proposed to be approximately 40 feet above the finished running track. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts if any: All disturbed areas, not constructed for recreational uses will be landscaped with vegetation appropriate to the location 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Hooded athletic field lighting is planned. The lights direct a majority of their light onto the fields with little off-site impact. Uses will be seasonal consistent with the athletic uses. PAGE 10 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with view? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Modern hooded and directional sports lighting is planned 12 . RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The proposal is part of an existing high school and community recreation facility. In the immediate vicinity are baseball, softball, soccer, track and field, and football fields. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The proposal greatly expands the community recreational opportunities and high school physical education facilities of the community. A new soccer field and multi-use baseball and softball field are added for the community's use 13 . HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known to exist on or near the site c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed PAGE 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 14 . TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans if any. The principle street accessing the site is 17th Street; 20th Street provides limited access. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No, transit is not available c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 120 existing and new parking stalls in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project are planned. All existing parking stalls at the high school are available for public use. No stalls will be eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing road or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . No improvements to existing streets are anticipated e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally • describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Average Daily Traffic is negligible. Peak usage will be at start and completion of Anacortes High School varsity football games, five to six events in September to November of each year. Other peak usages will be during track meets, baseball or soccer tournaments. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None proposed 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, school, other) ? If so, generally describe. No increased need will be generated, the project is proposed to reduce or resolve a community need PAGE 12 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16 . UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Domestic water and possibly sanitary sewer service by the City of Anacortes Electrical service by Puget Sound Power and Light Telephone service by GTE Systems of the Northwest C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: I)` Date submitted. 1 ANACORTES HIGH SCHOOL J N pis Illi •_ N • jis if i I Ili . 1 , I 1 Trill III 0 Ilillllll { II1 { I1N { IilII— IIIiIIIIIIIIIIIV [. Puling .c...044 evYM COVERED GRANDSTAND ;; ,A,,,' ,i V /�c� ,a o �'\``� ,wo' isw ,.eeErl / J Cra1vNP•Jewn W 1:YMShowen beEt vok e O O 1 400 METER ALL WEATHER TRACK y �'is r l00 C11CYnmI Wallqw• . \\ fluid llm Mad 1.044 WETLAND BOUNDARY...Th BASEBALL/SOFTBALL gr i r r r .$ / II-^^-_ FOOTBALL r SOCCER ' 'Th.. ...... / l / / l / MASTER PLAN \ Y _ M' M' or IM' ISM NEW ATHLETIC COMPLEX _ , North Scale 1"n 40' DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED Description of proposal Sports Stadium: Conditional Uses for (1) location in a public zone and (2) wetland encroachment and replacement (with a two to one ratio) Proponent Anacortes School District Location of proposal, including street address, if any Immediately adjacent to, and west of, Anacortes High School, between 17th and 20th Streets Lead Agency City of Anacortes This lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment provided that the conditions set-out below are satisfied. Accordingly, an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C,030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a com- pleted environmental checklist and other information on file with' the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. See attached There is no comment period for this DNS. X This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2) ; the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by March 10, 1992 . Responsible official Ian S. Munce Position/Title Planning Director Phone 293-1900 Address P.O. Box 547, Anacortes, WA 98221 y Date 2/24/92 Signatures // -f(K < There is no agency appeal. CONDITIONS ON MITIGATED DNS - Sports Stadium 1. Temporary/construction erosion control measures such as berms, silt fences and matting shall be installed as required by the Director of Engineering and Development Services. 2. The "Conceptual Mitigation Plan" included as Attachment B to the SEPA Checklist shall be implemented such that: a. the 1.5 acres to be filled shall be replaced by a minimum of 3.25 acres of "rehabilitated wetland area"; b. the asphalt, concrete and other structural materials as well as non-native soils be removed from the area proposed for rehabili- tation; c. approximately 3.0 of the 3.25 acres to be rehabilitated will be excavated into a linear pond/channel configuration to provide an intermittent to permanently wet pond area interspersed with linear peninsulas and more rounded islands; d. a meandered biofiltration channel to clear off-site waters prior to their entry into the wetland system shall be installed. 3. All restroom facilities to be built on the proposed facility shall be connected to the City sanitary sewer system. 4. The drainage plan shall be approved by the City Director of Engineering and Development Services. 5. The Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan included at Attachment C to the SEPA Checklist shall be implemented such that: a. an enhanced buffer be created between the edge of the fill and the edge of the wetland that increases biological diversity and habitat values; b. this buffer will be a forested shrub wetland. 6. A three year monitoring and replacement plan shall be approved by the City Planning Director prior to approval of the final construction drawings. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION THEREON ON THE ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A SPORTS COMPLEX Adopted y City Council FINDINGS OF FACT 1.0 General Background 1. 1 The City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance specifies that public schools are a conditional use in the Public Zone. Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 26. 040 (A) . 1.2 On February 13, 1992 the Anacortes School District applied for a Conditional Use Permit which would allow for a sports complex to be located adjacent to, and west of, the Anacortes High School, between 17th and 20th Streets. 1. 3 The Sports Complex is to be constructed in an area designated in the City of Anacortes Comprehensive Land Use Plan as Public. 1.4 The Sports Complex is to be constructed in an area designated in the City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance as Public. 2 . 0 Description of Facility 2 . 1 The Sports Complex is described in the SEPA Checklist - Attachment A. 3.0 Consideration of Alternatives 3 . 1 The Anacortes School District explored a number of alternative ways of meeting active recreational demands. 4 .0 State Environmental Protection Act 4 . 1 A SEPA Checklist was submitted on this project on February 13, 1992 and is attached hereto as Attachment A and is incorporated herein by this reference. 4 . 2 A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (hereinafter "DNS") was issued by the City Planning Director on this project on February 24, 1992 . This DNS was issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) and stipulated that comments must be submitted by March 10, 1992 . 4 .3 The following comments were received within this DNS comment period: comments were received - (Exhibits I and II) . 1 4 . 4 The Mitigated DNS Conditions are listed as Conditions 1 - 6 on Page 7. 5.0 Notice 5. 1 The Anacortes City Zoning Ordinance, contains public notice requirements for Conditional Use Permit Applications. The Ordinance requires the Planning Commission to hold public hearings on Conditional Use Permit Applications, Section 17 . 04. 12.2.d.ii, with public notice being given as follows: "Except where specified otherwise in the Ordinance Notice of Public Hearing shall be given at least eight days in advance of the hearing by posting copies of the Notice of Hearing at the Anacortes Municipal Building, at the United States Post Office in Anacortes, and, if applicable, on the property proposed to be changed. Notice shall also be published once in the official City newspaper at least six days in advance of the hearing. If the Public Hearing is on a. . .Conditional Use Permit, Notice of Hearing shall be sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Expense of such posting and publication shall be borne by the applicant. Where public hearings are scheduled before both Planning Commission and City Council, a period of not less than seven (7) days shall elapse between the two hearings. " Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17. 04. 18. 5 .2 On February 26, 1992 , a Notice of Application for the Conditional Use Permit Application and a Notice of Public Hearing before the Anacortes Planning Commission for a hearing on March 11, 1992 , were posted at the Anacortes City Hall and the Anacortes Post Office. The property was posted with both notices on February 27, 1992 . All of the posting was done at least eight days in advance of the public hearing date. 5.3 On February 26 , 1992 and March 4 , 1992 the Anacortes American published a copy of each of the notices. This publication took place more than six days in advance of the hearing. 5 .4 Because the public hearing involved a Conditional Use Permit, copies of both notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property on February 26, 1992 . 5. 5 A Public Hearing was held before the Anacortes Planning Commission on March 11, 1992 and continued to March 25, 1992 . The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to the City Council based on the Findings 2 and Conclusions as set-out in this Report and subject to the conditions set-out on page 7 and 8. 5. 6 After the Planning Commission's hearing, the City Council scheduled a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit Application for April 6, 1992 . 5.7 On March 17, 1992 a Notice of Application for the Sports Complex and a Notice of Public Hearing before the Anacortes City Council for a hearing on April 6, 1992 were posted at the Anacortes City Hall and the Anacortes Post Office. This posting occurred more than eight days before the hearing. 5.8 Copies of both notices were posted on the property on March 18, 1992, more than eight days before the hearing date. 5. 9 On March 25, 1992 and April 1, 1992 , the Anacortes American published copies of both notices. The first publication occurred more than six days before the hearing. 5. 10 Because the public hearing was for a Conditional Use Permit, copies of both notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property on March 17, 1992 . 5. 11 A public hearing was held before the Anacortes City Council on April 6, 1992, pursuant to the notices. This hearing was more than seven days from the public hearing before the Planning Commission, as required by Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04. 18. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Anacortes City Council voted unanimously to approve the Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions set out on pages 7 and 8. 6. 0 Zoning Ordinance 6. 1 The City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance specifies that public schools are a conditional use in the Public Zone. Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 .26.040 (A) . 6.2 The specific requirements for Conditional Use Permits are as follows: "ii. Certain uses may be allowed in those designated use districts by a conditional use permit granted by the City Council after Planning Commission recommendation provided such use is specified under the Conditional Use subsection of the appropriate use district and is clearly shown by the applicant that it is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. Prior to granting such a Permit the Commission shall hold a public hearing and prior to approval of such a permit it must be shown that the use will not be a liability to the neighboring uses. 3 The Commission and Council may impose conditions upon a particular use if it is deemed necessary for the protection of the surrounding properties and for the general welfare of the public. iii. Any Conditional Use Permit that is issued, as approved by the Council, shall certify the location, nature, and extent of the use, together with all conditions that are imposed and any other information deemed necessary for the issuance of said permit. A copy of the permit shall be kept on file and reviewed annually by the Administrator, and if at any time it is found that the use no longer complies with the conditions specified therein, the owner shall be declared in violation of this ordinance and shall be subject to its penalties. " Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04. 12. 1.d. ii and iii 6.2 . 1 Under Section 17. 04. 12 .2.d. ii, a showing that the Conditional Use is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood is required. It has been clearly shown that the School Addition will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood or a liability to the neighboring uses. 6 . 2 . 1 . 1 Surface water run-off will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood with the addition of Condition #4 (on page 7) . 6 . 2 . 1. 2 Additional vehicular and pedestrian traffic will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. 6.2.2 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the School Addition Conditional Use Permit Application on March 11, 1992 and March 25, 1992 and the City Council held a public hearing on April 6, 1992 . 6.2 . 3 In the last portion of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Planning Director is authorized to issue a Conditional Use Permit for the School Addition subject only to the conditions set forth herein. The location, nature, and extent of the use, together with all conditions that are imposed are set forth in 7 and 8 . Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04. 12.2 .d. iii is satisfied. 6.3 The Zoning Ordinance contains the following considerations that must be reviewed in all Conditional Use Permit Applications: "The following steps are required for consideration of applications for Conditional Use Permit: 1) The proposed use must be determined to be one of the uses specified under the Conditional Use subsection of the appropriate use district. 4 2) The required application form must be completed and fees, as established by this Ordinance, paid. 3) Notice of public hearing shall be given. 4) Reports from City staff shall be requested and forwarded to Planning Commission prior to the public hearing. 5) The public hearing shall be held. 6) The Planning Commission shall record their recommendations, their reasons for recommendation, and any conditions placed on the application. This record to be sent to City Council. 7) The City Council shall, at their discretion, with or without public hearing, act upon the recommendations of the Commission. " Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 12 .2 .d.v 6. 3 . 1 The first step, showing the use is allowed as a conditional use, is met as Zoning Ordinance Section 17. 26. 040 (A) specifically allows public schools as Conditional Uses in Public Zones. 6. 3 .2 The second step, filing of a complete application, was satisfied by the School District filing the required application form and SEPA Checklist. Pursuant to established procedure, fees were assessed and paid. 6.3 . 3 The third step, notice of a public hearing, was satisfied by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, as shown in Section 5. 0 et seq. , supra at 2 and 3 . 6. 3.4 The fourth step, reports being forwarded to the Planning Commission, was satisfied in the form of the DNS, SEPA Checklist, and draft Findings (incorporating reports from City staff) which were forwarded to the Planning Commission on March 4, 1992, prior to the March 11, 1992 public hearing. The Planning Commission also forwarded reports to the City Council prior to the April 6, 1992 City Council public hearing. 6. 3 . 5 The fifth step, the holding of a public hearing, occurred before the Anacortes Planning Commission on March 11, 1992 , and March 25, 1992 pursuant to public notice. The City Council also held a public hearing, on April 6, 1992 . 6. 3. 6 The sixth step, the recommendations of the Planning Commission, was complied with when the Planning Commission made a recommendation on the application to the City Council. A record of this action , was sent to the City Council in the form of Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 11, 1992 and March 25, 1992 . Additionally, the reasons for this action were set-out in a report of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law forwarded by the Planning Commission to the City Council. 5 6 . 3 . 7 The last step, the City Council acting on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, was satisfied when the City Councilapproved the Conditional Use Permit after the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit on April 6, 1992. 7. 0 Anacortes Comprehensive Plan. 7. 1 The City of Anacortes adopted a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (hereinafter "Comprehensive Plan" ) in 1982 . The Comprehensive Plan contains general policies and goals which are to be followed for development in the City. Comprehensive Plan at 6. The Comprehensive Plan contains general overall goals and specific policies for certain types of land. The following portions of the Comprehensive Plan potentially apply to this project. 7.2 "General Goal Al. Create and maintain a healthy, aesthetically pleasing high quality environment that maximizes the opportunity for all citizens to share the social, psychological, physical and economic benefits of Anacortes/Fidalgo Island. " Comprehensive Plan, p. 16. 7. 2 . 1 The School Addition will further this General Goal #1 of the City of Anacortes Comprehensive Plan by increasing recreational opportunities in the Anacortes community and doing so in high quality facilities. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. 1 The requirements of SEPA have been complied with through the DNS and SEPA Checklist consideration of environmental impacts associated with the School Addition and the feasible, reasonable alternatives thereto. 2 . 1 The notice requirements of Zoning Ordinance Section 17. 04. 18 have been satisfied. 3 . 1 The conditions set forth in Zoning Ordinance Section 17. 04. 20.a, Zoning Ordinance Section 17. 04 . 12 .2.d. i and ii, and Zoning Ordinance Section 17. 04. 12 .2 .d.v for issuance of a Conditional Use Permit have all been satisfied by this application. 4. 1 The applicable goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been met by this application. DECISION TO ISSUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Anacortes Planning Director is hereby authorized to issue a Conditional Use Permits to the Anacortes School District for a Sports Complex at the Anacortes High School, subject to the following conditions: 6 1. Temporary construction erosion control measures such as berms, silt fences and matting shall be installed as required by the Director of Engineering and Development Services. 2 . The "Conceptual Mitigation Plan" included as Attachment B to the SEPA Checklist shall be implemented such that: a. the 1.5 acres to be filled shall be replaced by a minimum of 3.25 acres of "rehabilitated wetland area"; b. the asphalt, concrete and other structural materials as well as non-native soils be removed from the area proposed for rehabilitation; c. approximately 3.0 of the 3.25 acres to be rehabilitated will be excavated into a linear pond/channel configuration to provide an intermittent to permanently wet pond area interspersed with linear peninsulas and more rounded islands; d. a meandered biofiltration channel to clear off-site waters prior to their entry into the wetland system shall be installed. 3. All restroom facilities to be built on the proposed facility shall be connected to the City sanitary sewer system. 4. The drainage plan shall be approved by the City Director of Engineering and Development Services. 5 . The Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan included as Attachment C to the SEPA Checklist shall be implemented such that: a. An enhanced buffer be created between the edge of the fill and the edge of the wetland that increases biological diversity and habitat values; b. this buffer will be a forested shrub wetland. 6. A three year monitoring and replacement plan shall be approved by the City Planning Director prior to approval of the final construction drawings. 7. The wetland mitigation area shall be fully constructed 180 days from any construction beginning. 8. The wetland shall be planted pursuant to the wetland mitigation plan 180 days from any construction beginning. 9. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for their review and approval 90 days from construction beginning. 7 10. Prior to the use of the playing fields this drainage plan shall be fully implemented to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Development Services. 11. The parking requirements shall be addressed at the building permit stage for the stadium. 12 . The scale and scope of the School Addition shall not exceed that set forth in the SEPA Checklist. 13 . Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the School Addition must be undertaken within two years after the approval of this permit. Substantial progress towards construction shall include, but not be limited to the letting of bids, making of contracts, purchase of materials involved in development, but shall not include development or uses which are inconsistent with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law or the applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. In determining the running of the two year period hereof, there shall not be included the time during which a development was not actually pursued by construction and the pendency of litigation reasonably related thereto make it reasonable not to so pursue: PROVIDED, that the Planning Commission may, at its discretion, extend the two-year time period for a reasonable time based on factors, including the inability to expeditiously obtain other governmental permits which are required prior to the commencement of construction. 14. If the School Addition has not been completed within five years after the approval of this permit, the Planning Commission shall at the expiration of the five year period review the permit and, upon a showing of good cause, do either of the following: a) extend the permit for one year; of b) terminate the permit, PROVIDED, that the running of the five year period shall not include the time during which a development was not actually pursued by construction and the pendency of litigation reasonably related thereto make it reasonable not to so pursue. These Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were adopted by the Anacortes City Council on April 6, 1992. CITY OF ANACORTES, WASHINGTON By C Aka oyle E. Geer, Mayor ATTES ) George fin; C' Clerk Steve afield, City Attorney 8 F`, Y, C 2 pointed out that the Council had received all application materials and correspondence on this matter together with Planning Commission recommendations and meeting minutes. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval subject to four conditions. The proceedings are on tape and filed at City Hall. Thee applicant, Mrs. Debra Fernando spoke first, explaining that she and her husband would comply with the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission, would not oppose an LID for any future development of 31st Street, would repair any damage to "H" Avenue during construction and would share equally with the other two homeowners using "H' avenue in any maintenance of the road. Mrs. Betty Hicks, 3113 H Avenue, stating that her home was the original residence now being served by the "H" avenue driveway, spoke against approval stating that the access is a replacement driveway only, is too narrow for additional traffic and that the application process be delayed or denied. Mr. George Mehler, 1820 32nd St. , spoke for denial of the application, suggesting the development of 31st as access. Mrs. Kathy Burke, 3102 I Avenue, spoke against approval expressing safety concerns. Mr. Richard Flickinger, 3119 H Avenue, the second resident using the "H" avenue driveway, spoke against approval due to increased traffic hazards. Mr. Flickinger said that he had a petition from local residents. There were no further comments from the audience and the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. On a question from Mrs. Smith, Mr. Steve Mansfield, City Attorney, explained that "H" Avenue is dedicated right of way and as such the owners of a particular parcel of property have a right to use that as access; the issue before Council is whether the owner has a right to build a structure without having access on an improved public street, thereby requiring a conditional use permit. Mr. Pemberton, Director of Engineering Services, explained that the driveway was moved to the "H" avenue right of way during the 32nd Street development project because the new street alignment increased the slope of the old driveway making it unusable. After further questions and discussion, Mrs. Smith, citing safety concerns, moved to deny the conditional use permit. Mr. Lian seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes - Smith, Rock, Parrish, Jackson, Young, Brown, Lian. Motion carried. Public Hearings - Conditional Use Permit (2) - Anacortes School. District Sports Complex and Wetland Encroachment Mayor Geer opened both Public Hearings on two Conditional Use applications submitted by the School District to (1) expand the high school facility (athletic fields) and (2) to encroach on 1.5 acres of wetland to be offset with 3 acres of created wetland area. Mayor Geer again pointed out that the Council had received all application exhibits, minutes and minutes of Planning Commission hearings. Mayor Geer read from a March 27, 1992 memo from the Planning Director which states, in part, "The school district's submission on this wetland mitigation establishes a model for other applicants and one that I expect we will refer to again and again as an example of what can be done with some detailed analysis and thoughtful mitigation". The Planning Commission voted to approve both conditional// use 3 ApgI , L, /992- r applications subject to eleven conditions. The proceedings are • on tape and filed at City Hall. Mrs. Sharon Hill, School Superintendent, reviewed the background work done to develop the proposal; Mrs. Hill pointed out that the proposed project allows the district to move the track facility (already built into the bond issue) at a reduction in costs due to volunteer labor and earth moving. Mrs. Hill further assured the Council that the district would address the drainage issue and that the Planning Commission conditions would be complied with. Mr. Dick Threet, 2801 17th St. , stating that he has previously been before the City to discuss the drainage issue at Volunteer Park. Mr. Threet again discussed geotechnical information, wetlands drainage and the removal of peat. Mr. Ross Barnes, 104 Harbor Lane, stated that the wetland information submitted was insufficient and recommended continuing the hearings until more detailed surveys and technical reports regarding the mitigation area are submitted and can be reviewed by the public. Mr. Gary Wargo of the School District reviewed the Corps Permit progress and reassured the Council that all pertinent Ordinances would be adhered to. Mrs. Hill spoke again, reaffirming the School District's determination to correctly develop this project. There were no further comments and the Mayor declared the Public Hearings closed. Councilmembers discussed the benefits to be derived from the project, but also expressed concern that the construction and wetland development be done correctly. Mrs . Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Jackson, to approved both conditional use applications subject to the eleven conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Vote: Ayes - Rock, Parrish, Jackson, Young, Brown, Lian, Smith. Motion carried. Surplus Property = South of 3911 S Avenue Mr. Jim Pemberton, Director of Engineering Services, presented a request from Mr. Ian Nichol to purchase City property located south of 3911 S Avenue. The City Water Department intends to demolish the abandoned pump station on the property. After discussion, Mr. Jackson moved, seconded by Mr. Lian, to surplus the property and to authorize staff to negotiate a sale price based on an appraisal, with Mr. Ian Nichol. Vote: Ayes - Parrish, Jackson, Young, Brown, Lian, Smith, Rock. Motion carried. Surplus Equipment - Refuse Containers Mr. Dave Ford, Director of Public Works, submitted a list of seventy-six refuse containers surplused and hauled away by Skagit Steel for the years 1990 and 1991. Mrs. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Parrish, to surplus the containers . Vote: Jackson, Young, Brown, Lian, Smith, Rock, Parrish. Motion carried. Mayor's Office Remodel Mr. Jim Pemberton, Director of Engineering Services, presented a request to approve completion of a small works roster contract 4 O. , , •FOR INSPECTIONS CALL QIN OF ANACORTES P I MIT 293-1901 -• BUILDING 'PERMIT 24 Hrs. Notice Regyested Site Address I I ~ .ef i"'del rt'e NAME(OR NAME;OF. .IZ ) T ' ftrr:-tc d.et te�.•. :ac't'roo. Di si PLUMBING }f MAU BVG ADDRESS Na TYPE OF FIXTURE OR ITEM FEE �..`Qi) Ii t..tk,cnue ..treieI. CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Water Closet S rotacot te=_. , Wet '>lC :1 -' .▪ - 1?¢.3 Bathtub NAME Lavatory - Shower ADDRESS Kitchen Sink Dishwasher CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Laundry Tray ' _ Clothes Washer NAME Water Heater f,flLitig Old. i mi.tad Urinal ADDRESS - Drinking Fountain _ 191 I 2 2 tie$ Street Floor Sink or Drain CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Slop Sink o sutlacer tins, WA ')8221 2293-7447 Water Piping STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICNSE NUMBER I- 11•1C 1 U*1 39,1i Os*,8 3S°; ❑ReaidenUl O"Non-Residential } PERMIT S C]tidew El Add 0 Aber ;Repair TOT LFEE S .. Q°Buildiutg ❑Plumbing IL:Mechanical MECIIAN L 0 Sign ❑Demolition C;Other 0 GAS ❑ OIL O SECT. 0 OTHER Legal Description of Property or Tkx Account Nuhber ` Lot Block Na TYPE OF EQUIPMI T FEE 7-.. 1 -18 -o',' . 04:tt,L, Air Cond. Unit S . L Refrigeration Unit- HP Boiler- HP - Forced Air Sy teal- BTU/KW Describe%brk Floor Furnace — lnRtal.l roll trig wire at enti :ante: tc. Wall Hearer fjyml obhy par I, i t19 Unit Heater — Clothes Dryer Occupancy Use Ventilation Fan ❑ Single Family Residence D Multi-Family Residence Range Hood — ❑ Office ❑ Retail ❑Storage ❑church Air Handling Unit- CFM A 0 Restaurant 12Other §ItIt Pre-manufactured Stove or Pireplje - - I NOTICE Gas Piping - _ ' This permit is issued by the Bai►til Official and, title provisions _ '• of the Uniform Sliding Code,shale by limits ,;'. , become null r - and void if the b�ti,;ld`wg or work au by such 1 is not cons- PERMIT S meneed within lj8e-daysfmm the ''Y iss • if the building TOTAI.U7EE $ or work authorized by such permit IS' of . .',,od at any time •after the work is commenced for a pei!ied of ISO ' A • TOTAL FEES VALU*TION FEE By affixing my signature, I hereby certify that I ,ithe owner of the Building I , j C'O.00 $ '7 . € O property for whicb this permit is Wined or am an authorized represen- - tative of the owner. Plan Check -U. 01. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this�tyyppee of work will Plumbing - • be . i -• with whether specified herein or not,including routine calls Mechanical for ', „�`"ins. Sign , ��// � Demolition 0. 04 r? —19—9)-- Energy Surcharge �S .ture'ifi Authorized Agent.ige ) State Surcharge j Street Setback Side Yard Setback Rev 1ti Setback Other rota $ Use Zone Occupancy Group Type or Coast Conditions: . Lot Area Wen Sit Dwelling Thin CI Yes ONo ' Fite Sprinkler Required No.of Stories Bedrooms Occupant toad ❑Yes ❑No A. Size of Bldg. Plans Chocked By: • tR P.s twt psd 4 e$ ak, Sand he to,subject to , aompWm ardkae.al AtORRr$. ' ,J^, : I4'If r, . Permit Issued By P ,1" 4t j cite • 71t0( Bulking Official (Dar)Litwin 'R"Irani a rift , PERMIT i • 0 0 FOR INSPECTIONS CALL: CITY OF ANACORTES Pi EAMIT Air 1831 Si9O1 BUILDING PERMIT 24 Hrs. Notice Requested Site Address 1916YJ Avenue NAME Si NKME OF BUSINESS) PLUMBING Anacortes School Dist 4103 MAILING ADDRESS No. TYPE OF FIXTURE OR,ITEM FEE 2200 M Avenue CITY I TELEPHONE NUMBER 12 Water Closet $ 24.00 Anacortes WA 982211 293-1200 8 Bathtub 16.00 NAME Lavatory Erickson R McGovern 12 Shower 24.00 ADDRESS 1 Kitchen Sink 2.00 130 South 131 Street Dishwasher CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Laundry Tray Tacoma, WA 98444 531-0206 Clothes Washer • NAME Water Heater Beacon Construction 1 Urinal 2.00 i3ADDRESS 1 1 Drinking Fountain22 .00 P.O. Box 5128 Floor Sink or Drain 6.00 CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER 2 Slop Sink 4 .00 o Bellingham, WA 98226 I Water Piping 2.00 STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER - BEACOCE17tNP ❑ Residential I:Mon-Residential PERMIT $ 3.00 ❑N'tw IM Add E$Alter Otepair TOTAL:FEE $ 105.00 ❑%$wilding ESPlumbing 04fechanical MECHANICAL ❑ sir Li Demolition ❑Other CYGAS 0 OIL ❑ ELECT. ❑ OTHER Leg Description of Property or Thx Account Number gg�� gg {{ No. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE t f 2, -148�020-0ot35 Air Cond. Unit $ Refrigeration Unit— HP 2 Boiler— HP 18.00 9 Forced Air System— BTU/KW 81 .00 Describe,865r't Addition Y moderination of 2 Walla HeaterFurerce 19.00 .00 9.(f0 gymnasium per approved plans 4 Unit Heater 3tt.00 Clothes Dryer Occupancy Use 1 1 Ventilation Fan 71 . 5C1 ❑ Single Family Residence 0 Multi-Family Residence Range Hood ❑Office 0 Retail 0 Storage ❑Church Air Handling Unit— • CFM ❑ Restaurant LEI Other .SC h00 i Pre-manufactured Stove or Fireplace NOTICE 14 Gas Piping 1 / .90 This permit is issued by the Building Official and,under the provisions , of the Uniform Building Code,shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not com- PERMIT $ 1 5.04r menced within 180 days from the date of permit issuance,or if the building TOTAL FEE $ 265. 5P or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time - after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. TOTAL FEES VALUATION FEE By affixing my signature, I hereby certify that I am the owner of the Building 2,260,000. $ 6060.00 property for which this permit is issued or am an authorized represen- tative of the owner. Plan Check 3939.0P All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will Plumbing 165.50 ' be lied with whether specified herein or not,including routine calls Mechanical 26 5 ..a�, for ' ' os. Sign Demolition LIS ham, fry - 7^ of/ Energy Surcharge • sigable of 19 or AWMrized (Date) State Surcharge 4 .50 Street Setback t•' Side Yard Setback Bar tad Setback - Other TOTAL $ 10, 374.0 Use Zone r oau moa n oon Type of Coast. Conditions Lot Area V cam Site Dwelling Units ❑Yes d%io Fire Sprinkkn Required Na of Stories Bedrooms Occupant toad ❑Yet ❑No Size of Bldg. 'F Plans Checked By: E F Y illiN : b aDAT a@ole deaertarI .g la berets and to tie ppp evedtpSts and ntloar pertaining thine,subject to compliance with the flints of the CITY OF ANACORTES. ut)/07/91 Permit *lied BY; 1 , _ t (. ( • St, Building Official (Dab) • Edwin F i ani. PERMIT \1•n 88$1 Pn2 MEMORANDUM To: Ed rank, Building Inspector From: (m Pemberton, Dir. of Engr. & Dev. Svcs. Re : V school District Projectb Date: March 25 , 1991 Specific comments or concerns regarding the Anacortes School District' s plans to remodel the highschool, middle school, and Mt. Erie School as it relates to drainage are as follows: High School 1. Does the ground in the track area perk? 2. Will Catch Basin 4-T collect and drain water from the gravel bedding below the perforated pipe or is that water stored? 3 . Will tll'e .pipe between the existing Catch Basin 2 and the existing storm drain manhole in the intersection of 20th street and K Avenue handle the increased runoff? 4 . According to the Engineering Department ' s preliminary calculations, ' the storm drain pipe on 20th Street is at maximum capacity during a 25 year storm event. 5 . Install a' flow restrictor in Catch Basin 20 to limit the total discharge to existing Catch Basin 2 to predevelopment flows and orce overflows to travel nrothwesterly as it currently does. Middle School 1. This past winter a couple of storm events resulted in extensive flooding in the vicinity of 24th & 3 Avenue, 24th & M Avenue and 22nd & M Avenue. While the net increase in surface water runoff of this particular project does not warrant construction of a detention facility, the site does offer possibilities for a regional surface water control facility. The City of Anacortes is currently working with the Department of Ecology on a grant to develop a Storm Water Quality Management Plan for the City. The net result of this planning process may identify such a proposal as an alternative to flooding in the area. 2. The detail of the storm sewer connection at the manhole at 22nd & M Avenue shows a new 10" pipe. The plan view calls for a 12" CPE. 3 . Install solid lids on all catch basins and manholes that are not collecting surface water. ryG U%. t.C. �1-t tvl a Fog Gc7NN�titb6-> bC-' S 5 ^f�= 4 A CUT EX ASPHALT._— ` 0.5.A ; NEGRAVE lBt TU. _ 1 41 SIDEWALK PATCH r 1 WITH NEW ASPHALT. } t _ DRAM 756.1 'I 71 `LOUIti: 2 I _ �. J_H /1 =L _ fnr DDWNS-FO'.YTS__ - 1STh4 I i - i i -1 F't01f�1 Y17L'v.�,n I BSI � y5, 155 . . . f e . fn — - PI X a07 _— . . —_—_�f A° Tf6Nt L-.I i+f'E 'PtDhIZ tE7t? - li 'r 41, P.. 62A i �� 70 P--LAT I ., "/yyy�� fa._ _ . EoS� Nb2 • -i FLOOR LEVEL a rsana• I t ., N. alitSr- fir h h : . I 4- PEW MINN CRAM 1 I `cam i t i eD '1' ' __0— = .. � �� f4" /,+. �i ILx •i BZD �I A.� 0. s _•a . •, firsit �ONB ueAN •0_ A X Y vm 7f-i - '� ne177S2 "FLOW T i•P=EF EJAO�j XTWAEO CONCRETE CURB E n Q .- 6" CHANNEL : "PANTED LWE `` _ _ - y SIONAGE i _ - m///tom//f /i J - - . 27 rl / CB la-7 I\ I ,j NO-rt - t1-210VE P1tO4O5ES::, LB 19-T AND cot.Jr4 ere D P1P1n/€T_ ('SAVE P7.DPDStD a 2O BA`.T 25 CONNECT FOOT1h16 `+te .uJ e DowMSPOL,TS TO ftk&W 0320_ Pt0a1t4 c15ZO DISC ti Z. To 6LinteSG_rL0'`1" 'ro -N0fL714 * -NEN NEST 0 tom, STzeaT � .'� • ? �i1.5 _ g. TOP=154.6 a atC Ca 20 t 'I _ _ . .•. x ' �' a '� C6Z0 .p (1/4 h I H / I Aire I� icir 1 i t tr >• x 'SC ) J ' � � Jos ) - o01* I �` ► ��lir 27 w :�J w '`�3 Lim w 16� AC c w CB 19-T •TOP=a54.7 o ', (EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB ` ` (IE 6"=150.12 `� ; I 1 I ` 6" CHANNELltt so tPAINTEU LINE �� , ; Pnrauie ile&i SIGN AGE /' a %1i,Ifirr .fir ��. _ - =- • \ - __ _ - -- _ _ . - \ , � '=25.5 • I - t 'ZAPS -- N( x ul tom CB 14-T 10P=146.9 x J \ ` '' "--Y` _. 5 111ON"lERJEAL..S "TIES-171::NG E„, PROJECT: Anacortes High School y;;;ON SUI_""CENG . LOCATION: Anacortes trim. _ CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: 1 1...1N1::Hitt 1 lb. 1"'P.. IS"1"1.141.5 IMF": P=*OH..1 REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) TicketNo. 454029 _.--..._......_..._.._.__,.._..,...-.____.__..._....._..._...__..,....._._....._—._......._...._...._..... Truck No. 152 Design Batched Mix6 sk. _.............._,....,...._..__,.-_..,_......_..-................, ._.......... 28 day f'c 4000 Water Cement Slump (in.) 5.0 Fly Ash ASTN C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) 3.2 Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASiN C 138 3 Concrete Temp. 74 Amb. Temp. 62 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete pour included the siab-on-qrade between lines 6 to 7 and A.5 to 8 & D to 0.5 Test cylinders represent concrete placed at line 6 and between A.5 to 8 Inspected by: Don Verrue COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-24-91 Date Received: 7-25-91 Lab No. : 702 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 7-31 3540 28 8-21 28 8-21 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-1-91 _._._...._..-._._..._,............._,..._........................._._..__....,.....,_.. Reviewed by: Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes P.O. Box 309 : Nount Vernon, NA 98273-0309 : (206) 424-7560 PIA-7" E: F2IA6_; -4'•1:.'.: S-1 1:141e a PROJECT: Anacortes High School CONSC1...11.......I....:I.hIC3 ,,. LOCATION: Anacortes INC CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: Erickson & McGovern ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: CONC;:I":A "1-1 _I.1:: Sir t5 FtF-F.a0Fi .1- REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) Ticket No. 453945 _....._.._...._.____....._.._.__ ___.. ______.........._._._ Truck No. 185 Design Batched Mix 28 day f'c 3000 Water Cement Slump (in.) 3.5 Fly Ash ASTM C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 ASTM C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3 Concrete Temp. 74 ...._..____..________..�.-•----_..._.___... Amb. Temp. 71 Weather Sunny, breeze Location of Placement and Notes: Footings between lines 4 and 5 on D.3 AE — gymnasium addition Total yards= 8 1/2 Inspected by: PDM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-22-91 Date Received: 7-23-91 Lab No. : 693 Age i- Tested I Dimensions Area Total Id. Psi Remarks 7 7-29 3080 28 8-19 4140 28 8-19 4280 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-19-91 a____.................__...__..__..___...__..._..._.._____...__.__..._.._..___.._.._.._.._..__. Reviewed by: Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes GC ='''�' x' 7A O.T, Y Y 199 rJ •..i.�ijo.i Gl - P.B. Box 319 : Mount Vernon, WA 9827$-1319 : (216) 424-7561 • rin,T EERA::A1._s "1-E: rfl isiC_v & PROJECT: Anacortes High School CC:)NSI»11....-1-1:.NC3 „ LOCATION: Anacortes INC - CLIENT: Anacortes School District. CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: coNC: REE-1- : "1-1::.S:.-1-1: 144ee RE::Fa O '7" REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) TicketNo. 493958 »....,,..._..-..»_._._.-...__.._._.»...._..,-.,.._._.........._..»_._..»..,.,_.._.-_».........»..._....__...»..,»._...._... Truck No. 140 Design Batched Mix6 sk. _ ............--».,._.._ __ 28 day f'c 4000 Water Cement Slump (in. ) 5.75 Fly Ash ASTN C 113 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) 3.2 Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3 Concrete Temp. 74 Amb. Temp. 70 Weather Clear Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete pour included slab on grade between lines (p to 7 and A to A.5, B to 8.5, D to E. Test cylinders represent concrete placed at line 6 between lines A to A.5 The city building department inspected the reinforcement. Inspected by: D.V. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-23-91 Date Received: 7-24-91 Lab No. : 694 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 7-30 3180 28 8-20 4670 28 8-20 4630 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-20-91 A Reviewed by: �� Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes A,U'U z '1 3 P.B. Box 319 : Mount Vernon, WA 98273-1319 : (216) 424-7561 .TIhri:".'i! 1-1:• r•+• C31 .& PROJECT : Anacortes High School. 4.7 0NS4....1 A...'.Y::r::.NG .. LOCATION: Anacortes "AMC ... CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: Erickson & McGovern ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: .. 4:::;.4:::D Y*•N C W'+l qx:. "'0"1- .-N""X.i. "i:i::.-Y F T REPORT N O. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS Lbs. /cubic yard) Ticket No. 454252 Truck No. 185 Design Batched Mix ....-.._..,._...........--..........._,_...-..,..... . 28 day fie 3000 Water Cement Slump (in. ) 3.5 Fly Ash ASTM C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) 3.6 Coarse Agg. 2 ASTM C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1 . Yield 2. MUM 138 3 Concrete Temp. 74 Amb. Temp. 70 Weather Sunny Location of Placement and Notes: Lobby foundation wail Inspected by: C.K. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-31-91 Date Received: 8-1-91 Lab No. : 718 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 8-7 2050 14 8-14 2720 28 8-28 Hold DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-14-91 Reviewed by: Original Anacortes School District. (`'• r l `" ' Copies City of Anacortes 1991 (`.UU 1 .:V; i P.B. Box 309 : Mount Vernon, WA 98273-0309 : (206) 424-7560 "'N1H ""rA"'N""':EN4Cb PROJECT: Anacortes High School. CONSUL '.'N_.::N: N4O LOCATION: Anacortes CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: C:;ON41;;,'Pfr"TE 1-F "':::i: .IN4,1,31 N"R'N:: IPC3N4'7- REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs. /cubic yard) TicketNo. 454305 _..__...._..._____...._....-.._..__-,_......._.,._...._,._..............................._._......_...... ,.... Truck No. 152 Design Batched Mix 28 day f'c 4000 Water Cement Slump (in.) 6.0 Fly Ash ASTN C 1A3 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. WHIM 138 3. Concrete Temp. 72 _ __. __....__....._..._..,._...__..... _........._....._.. Amb. Temp. 53 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete was pumped into place in slabs in locker room. Inspected by: KK COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 8-2-91 Date Received: 8-5-91 Lab No. : 730 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 8-9 3710 14 8-16 4350 28 8-30 28 8-30 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-19-91 Reviewed by: Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes _....__..._...._......_......_......_.._..... ........._............._...._...._.,_._........_.......................__..__......._.._.... ............._..._....._...._,......._..._.. ......._,......_....._._.._...,......_...._.-_.,„ .�:;... ./ 1991 N.B. Box 319 o Nount Vernon, WA 98273-8319 : (206( 424-7561 M/aa'T E:'i R X A i._S 1"'E: ,iia1"'1:.hl0 SiPROJECT: Anacortes High School LOCATION: Anacortes INCw CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: coNC::nl rE.. -M; .':.:"'r:I:" Nci R EPC314T REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) TicketNo. 453513 _.._.........................................»....._....._...____.__._.....__._._ Truck No. 154 Design Batched Mix4.5 sk. ..__.._..__.._._____.._....._...............__...__.._.__................ 28 day f'c 3000 Water 265 Cement 423 Slump (in.) 3.75 Fly Ash MUM 113 Coarse Agg. 1 1850 Air (%) 3.7 Coarse Agg. 2 MUM 231 Sand 1610 Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. 6 oz. air Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3 ConcreteTemp. 72 _............_»...__._._.__....___...._..._..__..__............._ ....__.._.____.._.._..._.... ...»._...._.... Amb. Temp. 64 Weather Sunny Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete was poured and vibrated in the gymnasium addition footings. Four test cylinders were taken at grid C-7. Inspected by: C.K. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-8-91 Date Received: 7-9-91 Lab No. : 644 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 7-15 2410 14 7-22 3150 28 8-5 hold DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 7-23-91__...........__.__---._.,_._.._.._._.._._...._»_........_...._.__.__.---_..._........_._...----....._.._.. Reviewed by: 2411...It.- Original Anacortes School. District Copies (ill of A,inro4-rc P.O. Boa 319 : Mount Vernon, WA 98213-13/9 : (1/6) /24-756/ W'I n"-F L9 R:L ON 1..-. "J"'IEE.`:x"rxNC:a kae PROJECT: Anacortes High School C:011,41 1.JE., "'9"':J:.NG „. LOCATION: Anacortes CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: c:cMNN.:;.nE::-T-r -E.53-1"''I:.NG NtEAPON: 1r REPORT N0. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs,/cubic yard) Ticket No. 453678 __.....................-._..-............... Truck No. 154 Design Batched Mix _................._._..-._.......................... 28 day f'c 3000 Water Cement Slump (in. ) 7.0 Fly Ash ASTM C 1M3 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) 4.7 Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3. Concrete Temp. 70 Amb. Temp. 68 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete was poured and vibrated into the gymnasium foundation wall. Four test cylinders were taken at grid 6.5 — A. Water reducing agents were added to the mix to allow for a higher slump. Inspected by: C.K. ....._._...........,..._...,_,_...�...,..._....,...__._....._._•...-, .-.._..................__......»._..................._.._..._..,..:.a,..:a.•aa..,zacr..:cr.::s„�:-:x:-:.:.ccc:a ,::.r�sc�ax::.a::::;:caro: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-12-91 Date Received: 7-12-91 Lab No. : 671 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 7-19 1980 14 7-26 28 8-9 (hold) DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 7-23-91 _-.._.._........._.__...----...._.______...,_.....-....,_.,,.__.,_.._.-_•_. _......_..._............._......•,...,...._..___. Reviewed by: Original Anacortes School District Copies IIIrF l-(rvrrerl-ec P.O. Box 3N9 : Mount Vernon, WA 98213-N3N9 : (2N6) 42M-756N N"Nc:c.s"7" :.N:: NN::dx ,"Gig PROJECT: Anacortes High School CONS N....0N..,-I" .N': NK:i:n ,„, LOCATION: Anacortes CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: Erickson k McGovern ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: c N;:)OVt;FtF "1 1- -rI.=s r .1NC N'g:Nx: 1-hN:.:AN::B'11 REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs. /cubicyard) Ticket No. 453945 Truck No. 185 Design Batched Mix 28 day f'c 3000 Water Cement Slump (in.) 3.5 Fly Ash ASTN C 1N3 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 ASTM C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1 . Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3 Concrete Temp. 74 Amb. Temp. 71 Weather Sunny, breeze Location of Placement and Notes: Footings between lines 4 and 5 on D.3 %E - gymnasium addition Total yards= 8 1/2 Inspected by: PDM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-22-91 Date Received: 7-23-91 Lab No. : 693 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 7-29 I 3080 28 8-19 28 8-19 ..-•DISTRIBUTION Date Sent:.. 7-31............_......_..............._................................ ..................._,.....,,..._......_..._..... _......_.... ...,..,._................_..............__._.._._._._........_............ 91...................__..._...................._. Reviewed by° Original Anacortes School District _ Copies City of Anacortes P.O. Box 309 : Mount Vernon, NA 98213-0309 : (206) N20-7560 -N'''' S t J. P* O dN PROJECT: Anacortes High School „„ LOCATION: Anacortes ZINC- CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Deacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: IhN4::Y" E::.""N"'Y:::: 1"a":G1....1:: INVCI Yf0: Y:::n4::PJR 1" REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) TicketNo. 493958 _.... ..._........_.......__..._..___.........___....... Truck No. 140 Design Batched Mix 6 sk. 28 day f'c 4000 Water Cement Slump (in.) 5.75 Fly Ash MUM 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (5) 3.2 Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1 . Yield 2. ASTN C 138 3. Concrete Temp. 74 Amb. Temp. 70 Weather Clear Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete pour included slab on grade between lines y to 7 and A to A.5, d to 8.5, n to E. Test cylinders represent concrete placed at line 6 between lines A to A.5 The city building department inspected the reinforcement. Inspected by: D.V. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTN C 39) Date Cast: 7-23-91 Date Received: 7-24-91 Lab No. : 694 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 7-30 3180 28 8-20 28 8-20 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 7-31-91 _......._............_.............._......._._. Reviewed by I�L ,_ �l .. Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes P.O. Box 309 : Nount Vernon, WA 98273-0309 : )106) 424-7560 PI Al"I= it :x: A 1.... :x N""N CI J~ PROJECT: Anacortes High School CONSLI "1"'a NO ,„, LOCATION: Anacortes INC _. CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: Erickson & McGovern ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: CONC:: RE."T"E= 1 hS"'N""Its'Ci nE.PI'1;xER7t"'N"" REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) TicketNo. 454252 —............_............_......_...,•.....,...._..._.................._,....•--,__.-•,.__-.. ....._..__._....__.._...._._.. Truck No. 185 Design Batched Mix 28 day f'c 3000 Water Cement Slump (in. ) 3.5 Fly Ash ASTN C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) 3.6 Coarse Agg. 2 AST* C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. AST* C 138 3. ConcreteTemp. 74 _._.... _......................-,.__.....-_,_..._..-. Amb. Temp. 70 Weather Sunny Location of Placement and Notes: Lobby foundation wall Inspected by: C.K. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-31-91 Date Received: 8-1-91 Lab No. : 718 Age rested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 8-7 2050 14 8-14 2720 28 8-28 3080 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-29-91 // _. .._....._._............._....._.....................-.-..__.._.,„........_....._................................ Reviewed by: _2141213L Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes P.O. Box 319 : Nount Vernon, NA 98273-0319 : (216) 424-7560 IM TIER JEFhA_3:& IE S-T`1:N C4 66 PROJECT: Anacortes High School C�;C:1thIS 1._1r1:Y4Cw „ LOCATION: Anacortes :N.Nw1Cw CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICA[ION: __ CW CJ6NC', N:tE IF.. 1"M :.;:G"'Y TIT C:w N::tI- IP CT'IR: 1- REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs. cubic yard) TicketNo. 454029 _...__.,.-.,_.............................._..._„_ ._....._....--.-......_..........._...-._............,_....-_...._.......... Truck No. 152 Design Batched Mix 6 sk. 28 day f'c 4000 Water Cement Slump (in. ) 5.0 Fly Ash ASTM C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) 3.2 Coarse Agg. 2 ASTM C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3 ConcreteTemp. 74 ___...,.........._........_...._,.1.-....-_.....-...._......_..._. "_..•--_-..,.........__....._......-......_ Amb. Temp. 62 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete pour included the slab-on-grade between lines 6 to 7 and A.5 to B S D to D.5 Test cylinders represent concrete placed at line 6 and between A.5 to B Inspected by: Don Verrue COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST' (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-24-91 Date Received: 7-25-91 Lab No. : 702 Age Tested Dimensions Area ( Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 7-31 3540 28 8-21 5130 28 8-21 5090 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-27-91 q� Reviewed by: :127244 .cLN'� Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes P.O. 80 319 : Mount Vernon, WA 98273-1319 : (216) 414-7561 t'1ALT-M R.tAL_S -u, s-1"':Jf:w ?.a;. PROJECT: Anacortes High School t:ONW"311.1 L-. . -ING, LOCATION: Anacortes JE NC;: . CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: CONC:1'tN:E FE: _T,.i.-_s-I..:rNCI ,itr .f›Clfrr REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) Ticket No. 454132 Truck No. 182 Design Batched Mix 28 day f'c 3000 Water Cement Slump (in. ) 6.0 Fly Ash ASTN C 1N3 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTN C 138 3 Concrete Temp. 74 _.._..-_._.........,_..._......._........, Amb. Temp. 61 Weather Cloudy .............. Location of Placement and Notes: Foundation walls for girls locker room. Inspected by: D.V. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-26-91 Date Received: 7-29-91 Lab No. : 711 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 8-2 1870 28 8-23 3360 28 8-23 3290 DISTRIBUTION I Date Sent: 8-27-91 _ _.,.,_.-. __...., _._._.._....-_........__._.__ Reviewed by: A. Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes P.B. Box 319 : Mount Vernon, WA 98273-0319 : (216) 424-7560 W1I6...r.LrtJ:.W'1 N.... .".::: 1"M:: sir r N G & PROJECT: Anacortes High School COWV r,U1-.."'M"1:ING „„ LOCATION: Anacortes N::1+S1 ,,. CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: 11.-0N[::].1'i'It- "1"L 1n.It5:iit""M"'_B. 1'"14e R1'=' 11 :"4:n1RT REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) Ticket No. 454306 Truck No. 152 Design Batched Mix _._.._..._..._................................_................-,_......... 28 day f'c 4000 Water Cement Slump (in.) 6.0 Fly Ash ASTM C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 ASTM C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1 . Yield 2. ASTM C 13B 3 Concrete Temp. 72 Amb. Temp, 53 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete was pumped into place in slabs in locker room. Inspected by: KK COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 8-2-91 Date Received: 8-5-91 Lab No. : 730 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 8-9 3710 14 8-16 4350 28 8-30 4920 28 8-30 4950 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-30-91 Reviewed by: a�/' 1- r Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes V.B. Box 309 : Mount Vernon, WA 98273-0309 : (206) 424-7560 P10701-EE:1:: ::1::rn 1.., S Arse +"'1"':::1:_MC:::1 PROJECT: Anacortes High School CONSUL..,._.._: NG , LOCATION: Anacortes _ JT:h#C;:, ,., CLIENT: Anacortes School District. CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: C 014C-RE.. ...N...1:._ ..1...I.- "..'::i..V.::1..NG T.1E.1:'*0IR 1. REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) Ticket No. 454305 Truck No, 152 Design Batched Mix _._»_,»....._,,....._........................... 28 day f'c 4000 Water Cement Slump (in.) 6.0 Fly Ash ASTA C U3 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTN C I38 3. ConcreteTemp. 72 __-,_-..,...._,._,,........____. ..._..»».»......_, ...__._....,._.»__,...,, »,_. ,.. Amb. Temp. 53 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: Concrete was pumped into place in slabs in locker room. Inspected by: KK COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 8-2-91 Date Received: 8-5-91 Lab No. : 730 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 8-9 3710 14 8-16 4350 28 8-30 4920 28 8-30 4950 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 8-30-91 4 / / _,_._.,,-_._.-.._.,.,...-.._......._...._.._._._..._....,._.__.._,-.___»,..-_-...__... Reviewed by: Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes P.O, Box 309 : Mount Vernon, NA 982/3-0319 : (206) 421-7561 ..'N"N:::: SAT IAici^Y SA PROJECT: Anacortes High School a:::AINA:So LAN....."1-3EN"4 to; , LOCATION: Anacortesi :I M'+NO:::: .. CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Beacon Construction ENGINEER: Erickson & McGovern ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: C.:"a:::JY^4 C:q"LN. rYiE "'i Mi'r._ 13 "ra.: 4a:::N Y,^ir FAY T REPORT NO. Supplier CNW BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs. /cubic yard) Ticket No. 454252 Truck No. 185 Design Batched Mix 28 day f'c 3000 Water Cement Slump (in. ) 3.5 Fly Ash ASTM C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) 3.6 Coarse Agg. 2 ASTM C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3 Concrete Temp. 74 Amb. Temp. 70 Weather Sunny Location of Placement and Notes: Lobby foundation wall. �_.__..._�._.. Inspected by: C.K. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 7-31-91 Date Received: 8-1-91 Lab No. : 718 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 8-7 2050 14 8-14 2720 28 8-28 3080 56 9-25 3710 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 9-30-91 /7 // Reviewed by: Original Anacortes School District Copies City of Anacortes _ P.O. Box 30 : Mount Vernon, WA 982134309 : (206) 424-1560 OI O ...q...N:.HR AL V N N 1" 11E 1.iii:F N ::N:"NA G.k & PR h School C:014:.`ii:&N...N Y.....-1-1: 140 ,. LOCATION: Anacortes,�JFI 1l:.YUNC:.: .,. CLIENT: Anacortes School District CONTRACTOR: Lake Samish Masonry ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACT NO. : SPECIFICATION: MC;::0thl4CMY Y2i ""q"'F Y Nii 1: 7"'::N::.Y"gliiu q'aq::::.q q:::NR-'N"' REPORT NO. Supplier Job Mix BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs./cubic yard) Ticket No. Truck No. Design Batched Mix Mortar 28 day tic Water Cement Slump (in. ) Fly Ash ASTN C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 MUM 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pct) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTM C 138 3. Concrete Temp. Amb. Temp. 45 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: North gym wall — top of wall Inspected by: Don Verrue COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 11-1-91 Date Received: 11-4-91 Lab No. : 977 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 11-8 3.14 13000 4140 28 11-29 28 11-29 DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 11-8-91 1� -.-.........................................._............-_...........-.._...-......-_................_..___.._..-.._.....................................-._.-..-..._...... Reviewed by. yam, Original Anacortes School Dist. Copies City of Anacortes—Bldg. Dept. P.O. Box 309 : Nount Vernon, WA 98273-0309 : (206) 424-7560 On d�4i II'ILA: IFq: ::N: ail 'l 'lli:iiS-11- INNS! s. PROJECT: Anacortes High School n::011\11"i::i6 ti II. -II: :.II.', II^dln::h .,„ LOCAL CON: Anacortes, WA is R%4C .. CLJ:EN1 : Anacortes School District_ CONTRACTOR: Lake Samish Masonry ENGINEER: ARCHJ.TRCT: u CONTRACT NO. e SPECIFICATION: a:::::Q:::atl•pha:::: Rflii:? "'"'II:a. 'il"rff: T::;, rX6"dfa,,:Al E0:"tl:::A111: 1" REPORT NO. Supplier Job Mix BATCH WEIGHTS (Lbs. /cubic yard) Ticket No. Truck No. Design Batched Mix Mortar 28 day f' c Water Cement slump ( in. ) Fly Ash ASTN C 143 Coarse Agg. 1 Air (%) Coarse Agg. 2 ASTN C 231 Sand Unit Wt. (pcf) Admixtures 1. Yield 2. ASTN C 138 3 Concrete Temp. .. Amb. Temp. 45 Weather Cloudy Location of Placement and Notes: North gym wail -- top of wal1,_�_._�_____._____ —rt Inspected by: Don Verrue COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESL (ASTM C 39) Date Cast: 11-1-91 Date Received: 11-4-91 Lab No. : 977 Age Tested Dimensions Area Total Ld. Psi Remarks 7 11-8 3.14 ' 13000 4140 28 11-29 19000 6050 28 11-29 18500 5890 I I DISTRIBUTION Date Sent: 12-4-91. Reviewed by: tAJ Original Anacortes School Dist. Copies City of Anacortes-Bidq. Dept. v_ P.O. Box 309 : Mount Vernon, WA 98273-0309 : (206) 424-7660 A7. ,-C;'t1Fr:T /4 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis of the Smiley's Bottom Property Anacortes, Washington for The Anacortes School District and it Kirkbride & Associates 4405 7th Avenue SE, Suite 301 Lacey, WA 98503 by IES Associates 1514 Muirhead Olympia, WA 98502 (206) 943-0127 December 31, 1991 F Table of Contents 1 .0 Introduction 1 Figure 1 - Location Map 3 2 .0 Site Description 4 Figure 2 - Site Map 5 3 . 0 Procedures 6 3.1 Regulatory 6 3.1. 1 Section 404 of The Clean Water Act . 6 3. 1.2 State Environmental Policy Act . . . 8 3.2 Site Evaluation Procedures 9 3.2.1 Pre-Site Evaluation 9 3. 2.2 Preliminary Site Evaluation 10 3.2.3 Detailed Site Evaluation Procedures . 11 4.0 Evaluation Results 14 4.1 Vegetation 14 4. 1. 1 Forest Communities 14 4.1.2 Grass/Open Water Communities 17 Figure 3 - Vegetation Map 20 Table 1 - Partial List of Plants 21 4.2 Soils 23 Figure 4 - Soils Map 24 Figure 5 - Soil Core Location Map 27 4.3 Hydrology 28 Figure 6 - Drainage Map 30 5 .0 Wetlands 31 5. 1 Forested Wetlands 31 5 . 2 Gns a - Figure 7 - Wetland Map 33 5.3 Wetland Values 34 Table 2 - Partial List of Birds 36 Table 3 - Partial List of Mammals 37 5.4 Wetland Classification 38 6.0 Project Impacts 39 6. 1 Future Housing 39 6.2 Soccer/Baseball Fields 41 6.3 Future Softball Fields 41 6.4 Wetland Enhancement 42 6.5 Passive Recreation 45 Bibliography 47 Appendix A - Field Forms 49 i Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 % 1.0 Introduction A detailed site evaluation was conducted of the Smiley' s* Bottom Property in Anacortes, Washington to collect and evaluate data relating to plants and animals, with an emphasis placed on wetlands location, classification and values, both functional and biological. The site, located east of "D" Street, north of Island View Place and west of Anacortes High School, was evaluated to determine the presence or absence of wetlands, and if present, to define and delineate the boundaries and to evaluate and classify the types of wetlands to be found on the site. In addition, a conceptual impacts analysis, based on differing levels of anticipated development was also initiated. Wcr.: was c..::duc:ed per the evaiud::ion raquaremeifls oh: a unified federal agency multi-parameter evaluation procedure Federal Manual for identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, ( 1989), since this is the procedure that is still in effect in the city of Anacortes and Washington Department of Ecology. Work was completed by Rex Van Wormer„ Senior Biologist of IES Associates with assistance from a soils specialist, groundwater hydrologist and botanist to assist in identification of plants, evaluations of the soils and determination of groundwater conditions in relation to the drainage ditches. Site specific wildlife data was obtained through documents and data provided by the Washington 1 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 Department of Wildlife and the Washington State Natural Heritage Program. Field work was conducted in two phases: ( 1 ) a preliminary evaluation of the site for initial consideration by Kirkbride and Associates and the Anacortes School District and ( 2 ) a complete and detailed wetlands evaluation/analysis of the entire site with emphasis on wetlands and wetland or water dependent animals. 2 t SITE DESCRIPTION . •The'School District property, commonly referred to as Smiley's Bottom, is a • • 55-acre site located one block west of the Anacortes High School and less • . , than a half a mile from the downtown area. Figure 1 illustrates the site's location in relation to the surrounding area. . Most of the site is open and relatively level except for the southern portion which is moderately wooded and has a varying slope ranging from 5 to 25%. i- The site is undeveloped but is supporting two softball fields and a general' • purpose field that are, at best, in fair condition. Major access to the site is from the north via H Avenue and from the east via 17th Street. Designated parking at the site is virtually non-existent. S�..c,ge s S lb Si 1 ,_�.� S.. J SO... .. IN" nn 5.., I . ® S,. 'I•• .._ © BE Si. .. . Cap Sam. .�•,41C Y . •• - - .. a Ste: - Baal Baal M/.en I • a - MIMI r _ IS.n Sr aus i:•:::::M] . e lJ 0 U IYIr 51. • Mn Si. 11aHi•• j I44 Sa • . sin... V.e.`o. • w \ _ 1.0S.. / -. i _ Cranaari1 Lake Y Sa SMILEY'S— l.;.s1 I o ).1 �N BUTTON ; ' )s"'s'° : 0 Ise s,. m • • .� 71. s. r • ' ) t U. S al 7�1r,SI. )fr 14...L. • • ,�E • .16 _ Jan < 1a..3. Anaca:es %3 3' ' 3,.,s,. : (ndu Qrial : Pal l„Jn. a 17.. S,. • • _ W \\ 1 < i • •O <3u1. i u1 a 1)uwS 0 )%1.S.. i i i n i • O - ] > s) • • p )Ll St N. IES ASSOCIATES LOCATION MAP SMILEY'S BOTTOM 1514 MUIRHEAD AVE. ANACORTES,WASHINGTON OLYMPIA, WA FIGURE 1 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 2.0 Site Description 1/4 The project sites located east of "D" Street, north of Island View Place and west of Anacortes High School (Figure 2 ) . It consists of a sloping forested hillside and a wet grass meadow with man-made ponds and drainage ditches. The southern third of the site, including all of the slope is vegetated with a mixed deciduous-coniferous forest. The northern two-thirds of the site consists of a reed canarygrass meadow with ponds, drainages and two existing soccer fields. All of the surface water drains from south to north. Water that enters the site from the west and east collect in north-south ditches. During summer months the water becomes trapped in the ponds and ditches. A detailed analysis of the site is included under Section 5 , Evaluation Results. 4 . r-_-.41;fittatTh _iyi ..J _ yrs ii ir.. -II DHA IHSLraI.TC H ii 4111 :171 a 0 ei.W.e.b : cl 0C.j1 \ j: o } 6 •� • \ n •yr v to a 1 • w ICI { al / 1 I l r I ' I \ • \ ;� \\ j ` • ....-`.l 1. 1 Q NOT TO SCALE �r.�.. �1..� �; ��'!. 11 i ANAC?:I HIM)SCHOOL C I. 1:. i ( .;4 ,`. .4\suRq�ce & V1.14$4AAACE-•-�,� i•�.• it ' ' 1 1 ,� ��aw�r ON HILL �'" . I '''l ",...<1.‘"`..,,•,,, •...,,.---...,.;-..,,,:---........,......C... '...:(•• /.../,,::" �,\ _ \ 1 `,^s.` , ; S ,,,g., - • — f •-•.. ❑,C' k 1 . 714,4:6•1 : — °V- , �Qq Gpg.. ' C10 C�d[ LJ. IES Associates `\ smiley's bottom " TI 1514 Muirhead A Olympia, WA 98502 ANACORTES, WASHINGTON n VDATE nn.....,.... (206) 943-0127 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 3.0 Procedures Procedures were divided into ( 1 ) site evaluation and ( 2) regulatory procedures. Regulatory procedures consisted of a review of regulations which will govern the development of this property. These include Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Washington State Environmental Policy Act and the city of Anacortes wetlands and building permits regulations. Site evaluation procedures were divided into three phases: ( 1 ) background data collection and evaluation of information provided by ORB Organization, ( 2 ) pre-site evaluation and letter report preparation for Kirkbride and Associates and (3 ) a formal delineation. 3.1 Regulatory 3 .1 .1 Sectiot 444 of The Clear. Taster Pet The Clean Water Act was enacted by Congress in 1972, to protect and maintain the integrity of aquatic resources including wetlands. Section 404 of the Act " . . . authorizes the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to issue permits for the discharge of dredge to fill material into the Waters of the United States, including wetlands. " (Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, Environmental Laboratory, January 1987) . Wetlands are defined by the US Army Corps of Engineers as; " . . . those areas inundated or saturated by surface or 6 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support and that, under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas" (33 CFR, Parts 320 through 330, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule) . In January, 1972, the Army Corps of Engineers, through its Environmental Laboratory in Vicksburg, Mississippi, published a manual for the implementation of the delineation procedure referred to as a 'multiparameter approach. ' The manual is a technical guideline for wetlands based on the interaction of hydrology, vegetation, and soils which result in the development of characteristics unique to wetlands. The manual defines diagnostic environmental characteristics used in applying the technical guidelines, which are represented by various indicators of these parameters. In March, 1989, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and Soil Conservation Service joined to develop a unified federal agency delineation procedure. This procedure is outlined in the manual, Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands ( 1989 ) . The "manual" states that evidence of a minimum of one positive wetland indicator from each parameter (hydrology, soil and vegetation) must be found in order to make a positive wetland determination. These positive indicators include; (a) prevalent vegetation consists of macrophytes that are 7 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 typically adapted to areas having hydrologic and soil conditions (soils that are classified as hydric) , or possess characteristics associated with reducing soil conditions, (b) the area is inundated either permanently or periodically at mean water depths, or the soil is saturated to the surface during the growing season of the prevalent vegetation and (c) hydric soils, as indicated by the Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. For purposes of satisfying the Unified Federal Agency Procedure, Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands ( 1989 ) , a multiparameter approach, as identified in the Manual, has been followed. 3.1.2 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) The Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) was aSsed Yb? them Le cislatun tz' orcvid? 3 p ccess t: anal77e +t e environmental impacts of development. Information provided during the SEPA process helps agency decision-makers and the general public understand how a project would affect the environment. It is intended to help decision-makers at all levels of state government make better environmental decisions. SEPA is not a permit. It is a process geared to mesh with already existing permits, approvals and/or licenses. First adopted in 1971, SEPA was substantially revised in 1983. 8 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 New implementing rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) , were adopted by Ecology in 1984. Although SEPA has no regulatory or policy provisions directed specifically at wetlands, through the process of identifying environmental impacts, agencies and the public become aware of likely impacts to wetlands and other environmental resources. Agencies or local governmental units may deny permits or other approvals under SEPA if the proposal would be likely to result in significant adverse environmental impacts and if mitigative measures would be insufficient to mitigate the identified impact. SEPA rules place a particular emphasis on the identification of mitigative measures that may be required under SEPA as permit conditions to avoid or reduce environmental impacts to wetlands and other environmental resources. 7 .2 S _r, 7.vai.:.aticn 3.2.1 Pre-Site Evaluation Prior to the initial site visits a series of background documents were reviewed to assist in the analysis of probable wetlands, to determine the various types of vegetative communities and to assist in determining the appropriate evaluation procedure as defined in the "Manual" . Documents reviewed included but was not restricted to: 1. ORB Organization soils and topographic maps. 2. US Fish and Wildlife Service WWI wetlands maps. 9 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 3 . USGS 7. 5 quadrangle topographic maps. 4. DNR 400 scale orthotopo map. 5. Washington Department of Wildlife endangered species data. 6. Washington Natural Heritage maps. 3.2.2 Preliminary Site Evaluation A preliminary site visit was completed on October 31, 1991 to determine if there were wetlands on the site and to evaluate the ORB Organization soils data in relationship to the wetlands evaluation criteria in the "Manual" . The site was walked, beginning at the toe of the steep slope that forms the south boundary of the property, along the west edge to the north and east. Initially, existing drainage ditches were located and walked to determine their effect on natural drainage patterns on the site. Second, the slopes were examined and tested for seepage and stability. This was done based on groundwater, vegetation and tree growth patterns, i.e. , trees on unstable slopes will generally grow in a bowed position to compensate for the lack of soil structure. Wet-tolerant vegetation on perched areas, dark soils with an anaerobic odor (musky small) , or water are indicators of hillside seeps which affects soil stability. After drainage patterns were established, the site was walked to evaluate the general soil moisture conditions based on the dominant tree and groundcover vegetation. Shrub 10 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 vegetation was given less consideration since a number of borderline wetland species also grow in non-wetland conditions under heavy shade in western Washington. Dominant trees, or groups of trees, were mapped on the field maps generated for the site visit. All field notes were recorded on a micro-tape recorder, then transcribed for a permanent record. 3.2.3 Detailed Site Evaluation Procedures The site was evaluated using the procedures outlined in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands ( 1989 ) . The evaluation consisted of a preliminary site evaluation and analysis, with the property owner, to identify the probable or potential presence of wetlands on the site and a formal field survey. The preliminary site visit was also used to establish the appropriate procedure within the wetlands manual for conducting the biological survey and delineation of the wetlands. A vegetative survey was conducted of the entire site using the "Plant Community Assessment Procedure" of the "Routine Onsite Determination Method" to determine plant species present, but not percentage of each species within each plot. During the formal field survey, soil cores were taken at random on an upland area to determine whether the soils were 11 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 characteristic of the Soil Conservation Service ( SCS ) soils classification ( ORB organization maps) of the area and to provide upland background soils characteristics for comparison with soils in areas where the vegetation is transitional between upland and wetland. Soil cores were taken, starting at the edge of transitional areas where facultative wet (FACW) or wetter plants were present and extended to the lowest elevation, i.e. , next to the cut off drainage ditch that starts in the southeast corner of the property and extending to the west to the ball fields and the drainage ditch along the west property line. Cores were extend south and west off the property to evaluate the influence of off-site conditions on site conditions. Soils at the surface, along both sides of the excavated drainage ditch, were examined to determine if there was evidence of hydric plants and/or surface or - �-. t-, .:_,___n- n0 �- ----Wages had effectively altered historic groundwater conditions. Soil core and vegetative data and the vegetation surrounding the soil cores was recorded on "Routine Onsite Determination Method" field data forms included as Appendix B in this report. On December 20, 1991 a series of 24" deep soil core pits were dug and left open for a more detailed analysis of groundwater hydrology in areas with mixed vegetation, "B" horizon hydric soils but no groundwater after 3-4 hours. The 12 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 soil pits were reevaluated on December 30, 1991 to determine if natural groundwater or fluctuating water tables extended water close enough to the surface to create positive hydrology per the "delineation procedures" Once a set of evaluation criteria, differentiating the upland from wetlands, the wetland boundary was delineated using sequentially numbered flags. 13 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 4.0 Evaluation Results Data from the field surveys and from background data defined a a single wetland on the site that starts in the south east portion of the wooded part of the property and extends west onto the grass/emergent marsh/pond area to the ball fields in the northwest portion of the evaluation site and to the west edge of the property (powerline corridor) in the central portion. The wetland extends to the south into the tree/shrub area in its eastern end but not to the west. 4.1 Vegetation Vegetation on the site was divided into two basic communities, ( 1 ) the forested community along the east third and south edge of the west two-thirds of the site and the grass/open water area or. the remainder of the west two-thirds of the property (Figure 3 ) . 4.1.1 Forest Communities Vegetation on the forested portion of the site was variable and ranged from dominant upland (UPL) species to facultative (mid-range) (FAC) species. The upland areas were dominated by big-leaf maple (Acer macrophvllum) that are large, and almost classic in their stature, mixed with Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and red alder (Alnus rubra) . In places, the maple have created a tight canopy that has reduced 14 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 the groundcover to stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and creeping blackberry (Rubus ursinus) . The mix of alder and fir varies depending on the slope, soil depth and ground moisture. In areas where alder is dominant, the shrub cover is a mix of salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis ) with vine maple (Acer circinatum) . However, the groundcover is sword fern ( Polvstichum munitum) , bracken fern ( Pteridium aquilinum) , mahonia (Mahonia ravens ) and creeping blackberry. In areas where the fir is more dominant, vine maple becomes more dominant and the sword fern forms a near blanket cover. Red elderberry becomes more prevalent near the toe of the slope, unless the area is influenced by seeps. These areas have a mixed salmonberry and lady fern (Athyrium £ilix-femina) understory. The area next to "D" Street has a mixed fir, alder and maple cover with a mixed high shrub canopy of osoberry (Osmaronia cerasiformis), salmonberry and vine maple (Acer circinatum) and a sword fern, salal (Gaultheria shallon) and blackberry groundcover. There is an open maple park-like area near the east property line. The south slope is alder and salmonberry at mid-slope (seep area) with the upper slope being alder and maple with a vine maple and sword fern understory. The southwest corner is a mix of vine maple and salmonberry under an alder and western red cedar (Thula plicate) area. The drainage ditch in this area is dry and 15 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 vegetated with upland type plants. Toward the west edge of • the forested boundary, the ditch becomes deeper and the salmonberry becomes more dominant. The limited groundcover is still sword fern. The lower flat along the west edge of the forested portion of the site is a mixed fir, maple and cedar area with vine maple, salmonberry and red elderberry ( Sambucus racemosa) . Sword fern is still prevalent. In the south- central portion of the forested portion of the site, there is a low area that has a hardhack (Spires douglasii ) stand under the alder/cedar canopy. The wooded area along the south portion of the west two- thirds of the site ( Figure 3) consists of a deciduous trees canopy that is dominated by red alder in the east and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) in the west. The trees are relatively even aged, indicating that the area was probably cleared approximately 25 year ago, based on the age of the alder. The understory varied from pea-fruit rose (Rosa pisocarpa) dominance with mixed densities of snowberry ( Svmphoricarpos albus) , red elderberry and ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor)in the west and higher areas to the east . with hardhack, salmonberry, snowberry, red elderberry and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) in lower areas. There is a small area in the approximate center of this area that has an open understory dominated by slough sedge (Carex obnupta) . The remainder of the limited ground cover in this 16 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 area is sword fern, bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) , and creeping blackberry (Rubus ursinus) . 4.1.2 Grass/Open Water Communities Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) is the dominant grass on the eastern half of the grass/open water area with a mixed grass community dominating the northwest corner and a narrow finger of land paralleling the west drainage ditch in this area (Figure 3 ) . Canarygrass extends as a monoculture from the toe of the forested slope to the existing ball fields in the west half of this area. There are a few scattered trees and shrubs near the toe of the slope next to the high school parking lots. A majority of these are red alder, however there are some Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra) and two non-native cedar trees . A narrow row of alder and willow border the drainage ditch that extends from the tree line to the southwest edge of the easternmost ball field. The canarygrass monoculture continues to the north and west along the west side of the ball fields to the existing ponds and drainage ditch. There is a narrow border of pure canarygrass along the east edge of the wooded area along the south property line. In the southwest corner of the grass area there is a scattered stand of young ( 1-5 years old) red alder with a canarygrass understory next to the pond and drainage ditch 17 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 with a mixed buttercup (Ranunculus repens) soft rush ( Juncus effusus) mix near the toe of the forested slope. The mixed grass in the northwest portion of the grass area extends, as a narrow finger, south to the south end of the ponds. It includes the area north of the wooded edge along the west side of the property, the northwest corner from the power line corridor and the drainage ditch to the north property line. North of the powerline road ( 15th Street extended to the east) the grass mix is becoming overgrown with Scot' s broom (Cysticus scoparius) , blackberry and thistle (Cirsium arvense and vulaare) . The dominant species of grasses in this area includes but is not limited to orchard grass (Dactylis olomerata) , sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum) , tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea) , quackgrass (Agropyron repens) , English plantain ( Plantago lanceolate) , clovers ( Trifolium repens and pretense) , cats ear (Hypochaeris alabra) , Colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis), redtop (Aarostis alba ) , blue wild rye (Elymus alauca) and chickweed (Cerastium viscosum) . Scot' s broom, Himalayan and creeping blackberry and the thistles are scattered through this area. Along the north end of the wooded area red alder and quaking aspen shoots are becoming established. North of the powerline road there is a high berm that separates the property from a south to north drainage ditch on the adjacent property to the west. The berm is vegetated with 18 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 , a dense stand of red alder with a dense mixed blackberry and pea-fruit rose understory. Vegetation is recorded on Figure 3 and Table 1. 19 ya ` r, . ^ -1 °^„1•: 1i, >R Yr>4` +*..i'l,�; ,'i-w•� , r W'� �,syr ' } , ' t 1i -*Ott j' ' 1 , 74,}?'r+'1'+" f fO �av^A�1�k? OFQli . ,.', f } } 4• i ° if- (J� t t , '4> ♦' � f rj1Ij,{'1p1C t , ,,r, , , ,.r , 1 i},' :Lit 1110''''I• «oyr,i ,ei , i. 'W�.'''`} .�q �e'tv' > '� "4� ,'f + i' ri, 'lei 7f1'iS1 �> ,fh.gl li',',d,},R'r i1 a +<l • , fi.l; t}',�'; � ', 1 • i% .' .t. i ,d , I)� 'p 4'p .i'): ;)';i , •7i. I:) ,� .0;.1 ,r'i">','f,fit�.r t�>� I•,, s'.�,J• ,1' y , „p' ,1;'.p''ft`. �:;il'f1,i '�S;Y' > • > LLQ f p ,,�+ f ,1'\` a >I, 'r i' + '1> ,• 4ti 4}i' '� , 1i VS4S• 1?)Ii p 1,, t r �,r 7, ;7 , f Cy'4}'7', 'to P ,>,/� 1R'� ,h'r�•1 u 1 •o r /, >• , ,}'! tR, Y n:l Tl 4f 1 f� r >,+. (� -Q • QQ, �:i',< r4 ' 74' d+' `L`y'4.,f �y;;7 ° far �:., II ti .,p' . 0e - 4 n: t'e,f + ,r ir . t'y b�Rcit'l 'Rid?'+`4P1irl.'� !ti t o,.o • ,P,f h.. �, • j,,,.�i r, i}t. ' ,>,',f tt `Y'',',Wk i,'L'd R,N} pODO ,y t ,t I. %cit(4,' '}i}f i• P`;'Rabdi,t?Xi � ^, O r,F ifi> J. '' , 17 , , i r 1,'j`S' �,�niY,S I�y'r,'.',I r,y>,��ir ! \?,\ 4 • • 1 ' r Si { aD)J P�. 1\}•.'r},•;i•#•'` `fi'`1'1,' '; r'ri }.i'..'.i �r r''' ,,,'i't144 l'I ,•.>a 7 i >•ti , 't°`+,y fi+} 'i •', r !' >'rt1 ,....0 .pao .. I�, +rr k', ,tit ' f f, , 1r „ `n, i r�.J :a ',> r e',, ' t t °}• . + ,.pt' t r ,,, + f.,.4 },ii'1.,- • TO SCALE il �. '', ,+-•� , •' ',\ '' �'1;4 *• , ,,,, ` 1' , ; r, >' t n !`C O NOT r 'j 4y ,'^ LIV,••1\� ,' Ol :'�,,,f:: ' 4't"1'" .11F ' > �'�Y>'{rii> r` ','fyi�'1 fl \ry1l ( ., ,'Q'1)\ +'R,��'>i OQb{�46 \ ,`.i'r1' , 1} �' ,la"' '4}Ilr D'it�•S GN �[�t?I�IGF}SCH006 J e�7'h�"4) °9 4s40Yuc+40°0b '0 •, i�7 0 w ..e,C:e,io �/ 1. t o o gTOHtst tpMNthe > a ° >' 7 .,,`ti'—I °6 Ud0Iv141Y Q� 4� )�� a'1 t t\, t to ':.3 V )��J �tw —O_ 4 • �ti .. :1 a,1'U �' •tt� a ❑ ('l • Ei,;. GRASS �� smiley's bottom It VEGETATION MAP IEg Associates 5 j 4 Muirhead A�yACORTES. WASHINGTON 71 W A 0 2 „A„ rn 01YmP1a • 985 oat: iw (206) 043-0127 Table 1 - Partial List of Plants Scientific Name Common Name Type Acer circinatum vine maple FACU Acer macrophyllum big-leaf maple FACU Agropyron repens quackgrass FACU Agropyron smithii western wheatgrass NI Agropyron spicatum wheat grass FACU Agrostis alba redtop FACW Agrostis palustris spreading bentgrass FAC Agrostis tenuis Colonial bentgrass UPL Alisma plantago-aquatica Water-plantain OBL Alnus rubra red alder FAC Alopecurus geniculatus water foxtail FACW Alopecurus pratensis meadow foxtail FACW Almelanchier alnifolia Saskatoon servicebery FACU Antennaria neglecta pussy-toes FACU Anthoxanthum odoratum sweet vernal grass FACU Athyrium filix-femina subarctic lady fern FAC Atropa belladonna deadly nightshade UPL Berberis aquifolia Oregon grape UPL Blechnum spicant deer fern FAC Carex obnupta slough sedge OBL Carex pachystachia thickhead sedge FAC Carex stipata stalk grain sedge OBL Cirsium arvense Canadian thistle FACU Cirsium vulgare bull thistle FACU Cornus sericea red stem dogwood FACW Cornus stolonifera red-osier dogwood FACW Corylus cornuta beaked hazelnut NI Crataegus douglasii black hawthorn FAC Cytisus scoparius Scot' s broom UPL Dactylis glomerata orchard grass FACU Daucus carota Queen Anne' s lace UPL _ Dicentra formosa bleedingheart UPL Dipsacus sylvestris teasel NI Dryopteris austriaca forest fern UPL Echinicola crusgalli barnyard grass FACW Eleocharis palustris creeping spikerush OBL Epilobium augustifolium fireweed FACU Equisetum arvense field horsetail FAC Equisetum fluviatile water horsetail UPL Festuca arundinacea tall fescue FACU Festuca rubra chewing fescue FAC Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash FACW Gaultheria shallon salal UPL Geum macrophyllum large-leaf avens FACW Glyceria occidentalis western manna grass OBL Hedera helix English ivy - Holcus lanatus common velvet grass FAC Holcus mollis velvet grass - 21 Holodiscus discolor ocean spray UPL Hypochaeris glabra cats-ear UPL Ilex aquifolium English holly NI Iris pseudacorus yellow iris FACW Juncus bufonius toad rush FACW Juncus effusus softrush FACW Lemma minor duckweed OBL Lolium perenne perennial ryegrass FACU Lonicera involucrata twinberry FAC Lysichiton americanum yellow skunk-cabbage OBL Mahonia repens mahonia UPL Maianthemum dilatatum false lily-of-the-valley FACU Malus sp. domestic apple - Oplopanax horridus devil' s club FAC Osmaronia cerasiformis osoberry UPL Phalaris arundinacea reed canarygrass FACW Phleum pratense timothy FACU Physocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark FAC Plantago lanceolata English plantain FACU Poa annua annual bluegrass FAC Polypodium glycyrrhiza licorice fern FACU Polystichum munitum sword fern UPL Populus tremuloides quaking aspen FAC Populus trichocarpa black cottonwood FAC Prunus cerasus sour cherry - Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir UPL Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern FACU Ranunculus repens creeping buttercup FACW Rhamnus pershiana cascara NI Ribes lacustre prickly currant FAC Rosa nutkana Nootka rose NI _ Rosa pisocarpa pea-fruit rose FACU Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry NI Rubus lacinatus cut-leaf blackberry FACU Rubus spectabilis salmonberry FAC Rubus ursinus trailing blackberry NI Salix lasiandra Pacific willow FACW Salix stichensis Sitka willow FACW Sambucus racemosa European red elderberry FACU Scirpus acutus hard-stem bulrush OBL Scirpus microcarpus small-fruit bulrush OBL Spirea douglasii hardhack FACW Symphoricarpos albus snowberry FACU Tanacetum vulgare tansy UPL Taraxacum officinale common dandelion FACU Thuja plicata western red cedar FAC Tolmeia menziesii piggy-back plant FAC • Trifolium pratense red clover - FACU Trifolium repens white clover FACU Tsuga heterophylla western hemlock FACU Typha latifolia broad-leaf cattail OBL Urtica dioica stinging nettle FAC 22 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 4.2 Soils The soil report, completed by The ORB Organization, shows five different soil types on the site. There are two classes of Everett soils, based on slope, and there are Lynden soils, that are on the high area to the north and south and along the central portion of the area abutting "D" Street. These are classified as upland soils by SCS. All of the remaining soils are classified as hydric. These include two classes of Norma soils, again based on slope, and two classes of Semiamoo muck. However, the soil cores taken by ORB in the forested area do not conform to the SCS classes of soils in all instances. According to the SCS and ORB maps the south slopes are alderwood gravelly sandy loam giving way to Norma soils on the lower slopes ion the forested area (Figure 4) . The soils in portions of the western wooded area and the grass areas were Semiamoo muck. The remainder of the western wooded area and the northwest finger were Lynden soils. The extreme northwest corner was classified as Norma silt loam. Soils pits 2 and 5 were taken in Norma soils at the lower elevation of the south slope. They were alike, having dark surface soils, however the "B" horizon was predominately a yellow-green sand instead of a sandy loam, which would conform to Norma soils. 23 a- 1 ■ 1 •c 1-1`. tr ,�ia`w t."M�.1`io`.^�.,�'e wY' + VVi,+ . .1", 4�+.�I ,Yj;'•~ 1 (� la-, •�I• _2{ �3I'rb,t r rJ;Y, , , �fty n J • er r..it i:.• .. f.r ....y a - 0 r •t• . ..,r`i,11• /:e::il�iiii •• �y •,' eryt 4:ty VA a '`r�.,`' .a' 1.., 2 sstr„ xaw3 • ` 7 :t ••1 :• '� `� ;rsiY.,.%.2R4,i - • ; °,+k"• sgi el ;th • • + 1 7:::::-.. . .::2::. . .A;; Y''; 3'9r:y>:A �i' '3yet a . • ;_.: .... i...a" it , Ny rYrRir:(a�. f� h.,;v). oci 2 • i .x .1:- ..i ..'..eat;r? e,•. .s9k:s . +s;Rttli•r„ •iit 1, . .. .......1 t.ITA�"ayy,?+. .�'.F�t,Ky�pK`ett .i / '•Y:�3S:44;aif:Y .: ,. r i' owa f f,k "��3\7• y:. Aa1 fY 'c>hi.,d\ 'd y•R A.,t:. �.lY•c>sYY'f,.»;j ^°f':11'i+l .! 3i�>?,i3 { f"!T<ry;r % '{ {at =gyp )-1 $t ,,tIP if..<rttt` ,<: i 'Y°f'fxtyi : +++` 3 !I, fir`: VV • � ``a5¢9.��.�AA..: , t .Er``�R�'katwyk•A� �x` ,o", i f� ��,:•=RT � Yy.i .t 4 '+` jSR ::# 1A,y, .' rN,7 1 2.:A' 3-. ' t: ats. .> .tc44 r .t _Fier 2+ .,� :1ty'ti >y uP: : t ,r' `D:r' Y. :`.R•+X 7.:: N ;,r•. .:SC P+ r{° S;co;�'.�<.,,;:y{r£.e {�ids{'+tlto. ks,. f'kf( , pry • .1............ ;w< l xJ,' .a.,g,ttp4.0 t.'• is tie t8'•; , it s �,i,ra / J oark ...‘:) �2 - 0q1 >i` i ,p{ 2 i ' '4 Vcatv.a.};;i �f�, .rtr •� at r "�' fi. . E:ap ,{. +`k'1.,2Yw;£" ,f 11, r i ,Y : .+try' iir .", r.w:' ��«:y; ru ,R ,.. • r • `+t.s.1•t ....i 1e,'A??,di)4').:':"'Oath' 144•st4a wry,p r i{ t-f.�. ps • ..::atrr t,•?.. 7 rwt:V•:. z,• ��"fi' A. ;,K:r>su;e„t. +5! tid45+!iAy�.,is .At'4y.1. II IR i r.~ •la ta. .'�yaysR,J s .�Kt 4 '. cs;: . 7 Ac,k % i 3,1 : • 4 ,�:a.,Z• A�,.'31 r. '{ t:f,6yf.. I" . 04, 44:fri d'r i.<� 1 cat "*444 `� yl4�i •• i` ` 2r�tWtaa t !..4 1.i«,. �,,rj •lrs 41.1.A I • N �w , 1 fir..41,‘4 '�T r an. grills• tun serfolar. �;� A. er • �� ,t 4.ti i s N. le •A a ,y ., , —�l + • .� ti�jl )T'1� Lsi ^. l 'I n1 nrA- t,it � 1 + +.r 11 2•.• • .ram �� +r �, t.�.� A r�� 11.1"r i IJ rf 2,�•M ,.y Z '1 . s p . .. • 'rd...., I " Ai � •',;I .4 11 M1..iti/' wt Vl i:,i tlr ww•N ::l /'• - \ • ' ........... ...\...,_____....._ 6.4 I E S Associates SOIL MAP 1514 Muirhead Olympia , WA 98502 • ( 206 ) G43-0127 , Figure 4 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 Test pits 3 and 4 were in a Norma area and conformed to the SCS classification, however, the vegetation in the area does not support the inference that all of the area is functioning as a wetland. The area in the vicinity of pit 3 has a dominant upland-facultative upland vegetative community with an upland groundcover. This implies that this portion of the area is not so wet that it would be classified as a wetland. The ditches in this area are not wet, or inorganic, which would be expected if they were draining a significantly wet area. Soil pit 6 is in an extension of this same vegetative community and in an area designated as Norma by SCS; however, the test pit is more consistent with Lynden soils. The upper bench, south of pit 3 and southeast of pit 6, does conform to the Norma soil classification. This is the area where the seeps erupt from the north slope. Pit 7 is typical of Lynden soils. The soils on the forested portion of the site were predominately dark, grayish-brown to black, with significant amounts of organic duff in portions of the area, particularly those areas under the heavy maple/mixed canopy. Surface soils were examined in areas classified as Norma but which were supporting vegetative communities typical of more upland soils. As stated in the hydrology section, the ditches were dry and supporting vegetation in places, indicating that they are not functioning as drainage ditches much of the time. After a short, rainy period, the soils were dry on the surface 25 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 and to a depth of 1 foot, except where there were obvious seeps. Soil cores taken in the northwest half of the western wooded area were consistent with Lynden soils being dark brownish-black in the "A" horizon with the yellow-green sand in the "B" horizon. Soils in the northwest corner had a dark surface layer but the "B" horizon was sand and atypical of Norma soils. All of the ball field south of the high school parking lots are on Muck soils. These soils dominate the lower portion of the grass are east of the west drainage ditch (Figure 5 ) . 26 .4. Lea" i*S- t fl--.0 - 0,..-....:CLEIL.1„9. ‘-) . C2C-j CLL: illS) di r• 47-•°".- M mD $4. [Wf URAIHI(LT•DI.TCH rire '(.... C7 L� p _ a A 11446 en • oN. 3o • u 1 . . \11 '• i % • +! 1I I v i us kJ - .Th.... . . 1 /n r l`.• I J1 - n / • to 1 . -%,b i • 4 I `vi f \ iu / `\, v \ III' I r,,,, ,_ ___- r C.:. .. �` •I \ ..}'. ' • "y� J \ 1 ' tie' I A� . NOT TO SCALE l:_ ---, . }1 I a N. • I��` �\ Clay �I { ANAL T�E IGI�SCHOOL x S. t .� �.� moire A anUA cc q ; . . � C �`U RA ...'�f�i^J Imo/ / i ce.. ��' • ((3-`,,.ur,ie L to • / �� ;, + ,• a r 0 '111A R AAA A-C'•^'-+• •,. .-1. f� 7 j1 • `,- :1 uz OAP ram. )§.L ' 1 • J. . O • C _ r—d --�- �atm,nr�- - ._._� •0` Zie. l • ti . L''UI -1C�Lp l to a G• o 0I ' I E S Associates k‘ smiley's bottom " SOIL CORE LOCATION 1514 Muirhead Olympia, WA 98502 . ANACORTES. WASHINGTON (298) 04C-0127 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 grass/open water area. The west ditch is actually a series of excavated ponds connected by narrow channels. Near the north end of the property the north-south drainage ditch collects all water from the south as well as off-site water from the north. The combined waters flow west to a north-south ditch that parallels the west property line. The large drainage ditch along the west side of the ball fields collects water from the south and the north as well as ground water from the ball field areas. These collect in a north-south ditch at the north end of the fields. This ditch connects to the main north-south ditch. There are two recently dug drainage ditches from residences to the west that have increased the surface water in the southwest corner of the grass area. They are creating surface waters in areas where the vegetation indicates that the area was in a drying mode. The low area defined on the ORB map, near the center of the site, has a dense stand of reed canarygrass surrounding excavated ponds and drainage ditches. Portions of the area are dryer than others having some upland type plants mixed with the canarygrass. 29 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 4.3 Hydrology The drainage map, generated by The ORB Organization, reflects the general flow patterns on the site (Figure 6 ) . There is surface water seep and surface drainage along the south slope, which drain down the surface or erupt at the toe of the steepest portion of the slope. The eastern end of the slope has little drainage and no noticeable seeps. The central portion of the slope, from east to west, has a significant seep that has created unstable conditions across the mid-face of the slope. A second, less defined seep, is located near the west end of the slope. The largest seep and surface water drainage in the southeast corner of the forested portion of the site collects • on a perched bench and does not reach the drainage ditch that separates the forested area from the meadow portion of the property . The directional flow of the drainages in the forested portion of the site is northeasterly connecting to the cutoff ditch near the center of the site ( from east to west) . Water collects in some depressions along the east side of the lower slope in the forested area creating intermittently flooded ponds that are only interconnected during heavy rains or by ground water. . The cut off ditch flows north and west until it connects to the east-west drainage ditches that flow through the 28 -r 0 Ll o/..`Or �r,�., ��' ff L� ' ar hThJ .l y.� W —2,- I � Q 1. _a DwA,„Ati-DIT 1� 1 ...�...�p Kitt 4 - - „ - __Q„........L[i rie-1_ (.(1(.. o LLp \ 0 1 0 ° 1 cs 69 1f , / . • „_Q T ri CI .ON.. �1 . •� u • ` I U 11 1 i / �' it, /� 74. 1 ,3; � �f i1 , 1\I \ i Jk'r l , �\ POND ,. y_,'� eft I [..1 • •i ! .� .OI• L ._ i • 1� Q c ` • NOT TO SCALE !� I \ '\�• ��` ANAC t TA OElIGis SCHOOL •` }J,F " .' .. oar ! 1 1 • \ �•,• . /a., 1. •• .\ ( .`,.(:�``:. .\4 ACt A �U91111.RA ' .rr. '/!'q•,; i-< 'fi 1 N. 5 1 :1 IH, J�LINQF/ ON HILL /'jam • ` `` ;\, \ �`''1... 4 --i f/ jam •~ I yy 11.-= I ___, J I ....grow. HAW AVt' r`� • •��,/ ? 1 . s. -tx-\._ issr 4....ra -.N:r. 'N : O oA O � Cl%� .•�'zTJ lt �, ,_.:...,Ethpcnnig..p-.;„ r.e. :ye—•:cc::• IL- 00 - a �,pp=ie LiCJJPrinC L-C Ail La C" °U`�c` C�fI L Cp gL67,•d.1 coo 0 `O 1 IES Associates r smiley'sbottom " DRAINAGE MAP 1514 Muirhead J Olympia, WA 98502 . ANACORTES. WASHINGTON (206) 943-0127 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 5.0 Wetlands There is one continuous wetland on the property. It starts in the southeast corner of the site as surface seep. The seep settles on a high bench, then flows in a narrow channel until it spreads across the north edge of the forested area. At the boundary between the forested and grass areas the wetlands extend completely across the site from east to west except for a small area in the southeast corner of the grass area (Figure 6) . 5.1 Forested Wetlands Forested wetlands are located in two areas on the site. The largest area is in the south east corner and the bottom of the slope at the interface between the forested area and the open grass area. It is created by hillside seeps that start approximately 100-150 feet north of the top of the slope at the south property line. The wetland is confined to a narrow corridor for a short distance, then it expands to cover a narrow band of alder/salmonberry near the bottom of the slope. The dominant tree cover is red alder with the understory being a mix of salmonberry with small scattered patches of hardhack. . There are intermittent patches of slough sedge in areas with the largest amount in the north central area. There is a small finger of intermittently wet ponds that extend to the west in mid-slope. 31 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 The second forested wetlands are near the south end of the wooded area that borders the west property boundary. These are areas where the muck soils extend to the west property boundary and where drainage has been directed onto the site from neighbors. They are small and do not contribute to intrinsic wetland values on the site. These areas connected to the main wetland area by subsurface intermittent flow. 5.2 Grass Wetlands All of the grass wetlands are reed canarygrass monoculture areas where surface and subsurface waters collect before being drained off site in a series of man made drainage ditches. Portion of the historic wetlands have been cleared of native vegetation but still maintain hydric soils and ground or surface water conditions consistent with surrounding wetlands. The ponds and all drainage ditches are wetlands, including the drainage ditch along the north property boundary. However, in both east to west drainage ditches, one at the north end of the ball fields and the second near the north property boundary, the wetlands are confined to the high water mark. 32 _kirci.M....E5— t ,_, (...‘ti I , , _......,, , ..........., .... ,... \' 1.1.Cr.....CH/ !.•.+ ewe �,.•.�' � 'Ci 1f 0 '‘..7"Th s ..."4-1.11-`" cien f\l':::-. .. \I el I. r w u • ...,„..".. sip 1)\1' \ \ ts • . or .. . ..„.‘ ) c-a.,-;-1-.: •IN-ci,,,,, . . . r \�\�✓j J k\ • %\ \.tom \� 1 i I�7 ,� ,\r\_I,t'.il_rt..ii . 1 I f \ ` NO'C r' \..'rr i_i,5'- !$.,,, „/„.,\r:/ :;�/ i ,, .. `1,,•- � • .'\�,' 11.%��Q. r` -./../l1 t�!\ N, �iu!_'i yr \, 001- • i� � �:i r i�i Li_ -ra,,i/:'`^l{•il''iJ_"iI'r'.l'',,..,. A A E �G155CH \ �• 1- �:.----v ��,,�I• `1\ ,1 "/t•i t `r-i."\ r---,,,t�-•I \ NAC•`1� 0. .fit ' i ,,�P �t�1`ate '.- )7.-f�1'\ ,r`\�\\_ r `Y / _ +..rye,,•. '-_i yjit l_�,' 0 '/ \ '. ' i t • " / .� ••`,.�..\'-•.�� -...,,,.,,. `�` oa �°JrI ".,:,I \rim; 1 „ � '/, I , �, ii 1 . • ,A. ‘...1;0\ • may / r "..... \ \ , •• ....". ....:•*"... pA G T. o �, r ' �w P tf SmileY s b°ttom Pss°dated oa-��S.W ASNnNG�oN IANES514 MW A g8502 pNAC G 0N10p is a, in 1 gA5-pi29 t2p6 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 5 .3 Wetland Values The main value of both the forested and grass/open water wetlands is as biofiltration, nutrient removal, and ground water recharge. The amount of water on the site does not constitute a significant run-off therefore the site does not contribute to flood desynchronization. Water leaving the site has been filtered through vegetation and peat soils, therefore the area does increase water quality. The major function is as a sump where water collects and is retained throughout much of the year. During heavy rains or storm events water is discharged off the site via the man made ditches. The ponds support a variety of waterfowl, wading birds with some limited shorebird activity. The surrounding ' egetation, i.e. dense canarvgrass and steep sided ditches =_nd pond limit their use to the ball fields. Gulls, crows and a variety of other birds, including grazing waterfowl use the short grass ball field areas for feeding and loafing. Small gnawing mammal activity is present in the northwest corner and the drier areas around the ball fields. Canarygrass areas probably support the same species in the dry months. These species, in turn, provide a prey base for hunting raptors that are known to frequent the area. 34 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 The forested areas provide habitat for a variety of typical forest dwelling birds found in urban areas of western Washington. It does not, however, provide habitat for wetland or water dependent forest species. The wooded wetlands provide the same habitat values as the rest of the forested site. The only prominent bird species on the site are piliated woodpeckers in the forested areas and great blue heron in the ponds and ditch bank areas. These are considered prominent because of their state classification. Forest mammals include chickaree, brush rabbits, and black-tailed deer. Partial lists of birds and mammals are included as Tables 2 and 3. • 35 Table 2 - Partial List of Birds Common Name Scientific Name American goldfinch Spinus tristis American widgeon Mareca americana Audubon' s warbler Dendroica auduboni barn owl Tyto alba barn swallow Hirundo rustica belted kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon Bewick' s wren Thryomanes bewickil black-capped chickadee Parus atricapillus bufflehead Bucephala albeola California quail Lophortyx californicus Canada goose Branta canadensis chestnut-backed chickadee Parus rufescens common bushtit Psaltriparus minimus common crow Corvus brachyrhynchos common snipe Capella gallinago downy woodpecker Dendrocopus pubescens fox sparrow Passerella illaca golden crowned kinglet Regulus satrapa golden crowned sparrow Zonotrichia atricapilla • great blue heron Ardea herodias hairy woodpecker Dendrocopus villosus house sparrow Passer domesticus house wren Troglodytes aedon killdeer Charadrius vociferus lesser yellowlegs Totanus flavipes long-billed marsh wren Telmatodytes palustris mallard Anas platyrhynchos orange crowned warbler Vermivora celata Oregon junco Junco oreganus pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus _�i-winged bla-icci_.i Agelaius phoeniceus red-shafted flicker Colaptes cafer ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus Robin Turdus migratorius ruby crowned kinglet Regulus calendula rufous hummingbird Selasphorus rufus rufous-sided towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus savannah sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis snipe Capella gillinago song sparrow Melospiza melodia starling Sturnus vulgaris Steller' s jay Cyanocitta stelleri Varied thrush Ixoreus naevius violet-green swallow Tachycineta thalassina winter wren Troglodytes troglodytes Wood duck Aix sponsa yellow-bellied sapsucker Sphyracipus varius 36 Table 3 - Partial List of Mammals Common Name Scientific Name black-tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus brush rabbit Sylvilagus bachmani bushy-tail wood rat Neotona cinerea chickaree Tamiasciurus douglasi cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus floridensis deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus house mouse Mus musculus long-tailed weasel Mustela frenata opossums Dideiphis marsupialis raccoon Procyon lotor striped skunk Mephitis mephitis Townsend' s vole Microtus townsendi 37 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 5 .4 Wetland Classification The forested area are classified as Palustrine Forested Deciduous Wetlands under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification System "Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States" 1979. The grass areas would be classified as Palustrine Emergent Persistent Wetlands under the same system. The open water areas would be classified as Palustrine Open Water Unconsolidated Bottom Wetlands. 38 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 6.0 Project Impacts Project impacts are based on a conceptual development plan provided by Kirkbride and Associates. The project proposal includes: 1. Future housing on the west portion of the forested slope, 2. Future soccer-baseball field on the east side of the site; south and east of the existing soccer fields, 3. Future softball fields in the northwest corner of the . site, 4. A wetland enhancement study area, and 5. A passive recreation area along the south side of the grass area. 6.1 Future Housing The area proposed for residences consists of a moderately to heavily forested area with the dominant vegetation being red alder, big leaf maple and Douglas fir with a mixed understory dominated by vine maple. The major impacts to this portion of the site are non-wetland related. They consist of loss of upland tree canopy which would reduce small bird 39 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 habitat for a variety of species that are common urban forest dwellers. A small contingent of deer, possibly only one family, chickarees, chipmunks and forest floor rodents such as mice and rats would be displaced due to the removal of forest and understory vegetation. By limiting the number and placement of residences the wetland and seep drainage areas along the eastern portion of the slope could be eliminated or regulated. Development across the entire slope would effect the uppermost end of the wetland on the project site. Technically the drainage seep could be contained or moved since it is limited to a small volume of water in a narrow corridor. The bench area in mid-slope would require removal of unconsolidated material and backfilling to remove the anaerobic soils that have been generated by the long term saturation. Filling of the existing wetland would require oernits from Anacert_es and the Army Corps of Engineers . This could influence the time and costs of development of this portion of the site. With development of the wetland, and appropriate mitigation to maintain the natural drainage patterns and water quality functions of the wetland drainage, the development of this portion of the wetland should have no impacts on water quality or biofiltration. No wetland or water dependent wildlife species would be impacted by modification of this portion of the wetland. 40 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 6.2 Soccer/Baseball Fields The future soccer-baseball field area along the east property boundary is located in an area that is partially graded and degraded by past activities, partially forested upland and partially wetland. The western edge of the project would extend approximately 100 feet, at the maximum, into the highest portion of the reed canarygrass wetland. One side of the proposed track and one corner of the softball field would require filling 1.47 acres of the reed canarygrass wetland (Development Map - attachment 1 ) . All of the fill would be in an area that is maintained by horizontal groundwater percolation created by surface water backup during the winter. Wildlife impacts would be with this portion of the development. Those that do occur are limited to small birds that use the blackberry/shrub area as part of an over-all larger habitat. No wetland or water dependent species would be impacted by the small amount of filling in the reed canarygrass wetland. No endangered, threatened or sensitive wildlife or plants would be impacted with this development. 6.3 Future Softball Fields The proposed softball fields in the northwest corner of the site will impact an area that is overgrown with Scot' s broom and contains no wetlands. Wildlife habitat is 41 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 restricted to small shrub and ground dwelling birds and small • mammals such as mice, voles and possibly cottontail rabbits. Clearing the area would displace most of these species. By retaining the tree line along the west property line drainage ditch a portion of the shrub habitat would be maintained. This would also maintain an existing buffer between the upland area and the drainage ditch and it associated off-site wetlands. 6 .4 Wetland Enhancement Under existing condition the wetland identified as a future nature study area is a reed canarygrass monoculture area with vertical sided man-made drainage ditches and ponds. It is apparent that the intent of the ditches and ponds were to attempt effectively drain the the meadow to create cow pasture or other usable farm functions such as having. The ditches do drain the area, however, elevations within the central core .of the wetland and the deep muck soils trap and absorb water until the peat reaches saturation each fall- winter. The depression continues to hold water by nature of it being the natural collection area for surrounding area surface runoff. The ditches have dropped the surrounding surface water elevation during the dryer parts of the year including the early and late stages of the rainy season. In most instances the water remains high enough to influence the root zone of the vegetation. 42 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 A number of enhancement plans could be generated utilizing a continuation of the grading-pond creation mode. This would eliminate much of the reed canarygrass. However, it would also perpetuate a limited value wetland system. To create a system which would create optimum habitat values for a diverse wetland community and create an outdoor classroom environment would require a multi faceted approach. The major obstacle to creating a viable mixed wildlife habitat in this area is reed canarygrass. Three methods of eliminating or restricting the spread of canarygrass are ( 1 ) excavation to water depths which are incompatible to grass . survival, (2) establishing a dense forested community with little to no ground sunlight and (3) chemical application. Usually the most effective method of initial control is a combination of 1 and 3 with a long range goal of creating a mixed open water forested habitat with a deep water emergent marsh and some shallow water marsh. Once the canary crass is controlled through flooding and chemical application, a mixed sedge/rush /wetland grass community can be maintained with continued spot application of the canarygrass. A mixed wooded wetland adjacent to open water creates a variety of habitat potentials and a variety of outdoor projects for students. In the early stages students can monitor plant predation from small rodents, insects and birds. • Live animal trapping during the growth progression of the trees and shrubs provides insight into the changing animal use, changes in annual plants that adapt to the different 43 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 levels of shade-sunlight and chemical changes in the soil from the plant debris and the nutrient requirements of different plants. Waterfowl, shorebird and other bird use on the ponds, the ball fields and wooded portions of the area could be conducted concurrently with the ecological progression studies. As the trees mature nest boxes for birds and bats and possible platforms for muskrats could be established. Islands in the ponds' would provide nesting habitat for ducks and geese and loafing areas for a variety of other birds and mammals. Nesting structures could be established on the islands or in shallows around the ponds to entice waterfowl to nest on the site and to create a safer environment for young survival. All work within the wetlands would require permits from a variety of different agencies, depending on the final design. Any placement of dredged material back into the wetland would require permits from the Army Corps of Engineers. Wildlife enhancement will require permits from the Washington Department of Wildlife and possibly water quality certification from Department of Ecology. Portions of the enhancement work qualify for matching funds from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Soil Conservation Service. 44 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 Education signing and other forms of assistance in brochure and other written document production is available from U.S. Parks Department and the Forest Service. 6 .5 Passive Recreation Physically there should only be limited impacts to the habitat created by the tree border in this area. Depending on the type of recreation envisioned, there could be conflicts with some of the goals of the wetland study area. The creation of paths, or other structures to provide dry pathways through portions of these areas could effect normal drainage patterns. Elevated walkways and other options are available to eliminate or minimize these potential conflicts. Overall, the most significant impacts to the property would be created in the south end of the site with the construction of residences and the secondary impacts to permanent occupation of areas adjacent to wetlands by people, pets and chemical applications to lawns, etc. that could impact waters in the wetland study area. Destruction of the forested wetland areas would interrupt the natural drainage patterns, however these could be reconstructed in other areas of the site with little to no significant water quality impacts. 45 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 This constitutes the wetland report for the Smiley' s Bottom roperty in Anacortes, Washington by IES Associates. /de R. . Van Wormer Senior Biologist • 46 Bibliography 1 . Cowardin, L.M. , V. Carter, F.C. Golat and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of . the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FWS/OBS-79/31. 2. An Interagency Cooperative Publication: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. , Soil Conservation Service. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, January 1989, Washington D.C. 3. Franklin, J.F. and C.T. Dyrness. 1969 . Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon. 4. Greeson, P.E. , J.R. Clark and J.E. Clark, eds. 1978. Wetland Functions and Values : The State of Our Understanding. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Wetlands, American Water Resources Association. Technical Publication Series TPS 79-2. 5 . Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle. 6 . Soil Survey Staff. 1988. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Cornell University. 7. Reed, P.B. , Jr. 1986. Wetland Plants of the State of Washington. 1986 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication. WELUT-86/W12.47. 8 . Reed, P.H. , Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands : Northwest (Region 9 ) . U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication. WELUT-88 (26.9 ) . 9 . Robbins, C.S. , B. Brunn and H.S. Zim. 1966 . Birds of North America. Golden Press, New York. 10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Tech. Rep. Y-87-1. 47 11 . U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1989. Soil Survey of Skagit County Area, Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 12. U.S.D.A, SCS, 1991, Hydric Soils of the United States. 13 . U.S.D.A. , SCS, Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Survey, Agriculture Handbook No. 436. 14. Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1987. Endangered, Threatened and Sensitive Vascular Plants of Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. 15. Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1989 . Natural Heritage Plan. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. 16 . Williams, R.W. , Laramie, R.M. , Ames, J. J. , A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Vol. 1, Washington Department of Fisheries, Puget Sound Region, 11/75. 48 Wetlands Delineation, Evaluation and General Site Analysis Smiley' s Bottom Property/Anacortes School District December 31, 1991 Appendix A - Field Forms • 49 FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 1 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N - ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) • VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 2.RUBUS URSINUS NI 3.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 4.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 5.CORYLUS CORNUTA NI 6.PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII UPL 7. 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase:TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON - GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1, 0 - 4" Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators:4 - 18", 10YR 6/4 NO MOTTLING. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X ` Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y X N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 20 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y NX Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N 2( Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 2 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : 100' SE OF SP 1 Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 2.TOLMEIA MENZIESII FAC 3.RUBUS URSINUS NI 4.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 5.PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII UPL 6. 7. 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N )( Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is tna sc__ a Histcsc_ . Y N Histic epIpecon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/2, 0 - 18" Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y NX Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 20 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Ls the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y NX Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N 1( Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 3 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : 200' SE OF SP 2. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION 4 Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 2.CAREX TOLEII r- FAC 3.ACER MACROPHYLLUM FACU 4.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 5.PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII UPL 6.TOLMEIA MENZIESII FAC 7. 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N )C Rationale: OPEN PARK. SOILS Series/Phase:TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N son_ mottled': 'i N X Gleyed? 1 N Matrix Color: , 0 - 18" Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N;): Rationale: 18-20" 10YR 3/2 W/5YR 3/6 MOTTLING, NO OXIDIZED ROOT ZONES. HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X `Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil_ saturation: NO TRUE HYDROLOGY AT 20" . I.s the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Pield Znveetigater( o) s VAN WORMER Dates 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 4 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : 100' SE OF SP 3. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 2.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 3.ACER MACROPHYLLUM FACU 4.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 5.TOLMEIA MENZIESII FAC 6. 7. 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/1, 0 - 14" . Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: 14 - 20" , 10YR 3/3 W/NO MOTTLING. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X - Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y X N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 2 inches; List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y X N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y X N Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 5 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : E SIDE OF DRAINAGE WAY. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1. EQUISETUM ARVENSE FAC 2.RUBUS URSINUS NI 3.ACER MACROPHYLLUM FACU 4.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 5.TOLMEIA MENZIESII FAC 6.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 7 .CAREX TOREAII ??? FAC 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/2 Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: NEUTRAL PH Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N % Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 20 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil- saturation: SOILS CONSISTENT TO 20" AT 10YR 3/2 W/NO MOTTLING. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION 'AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N % Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s ) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 6 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : IN ISOLATED DEPRESSION SURROUNDED BY HIGHER GROUND. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N -( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.ACER MACROPHYLLUM FAC 2.THUJA PLICATA FAC 3.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM = UPL 4.DRYOPTERIS AUSTRIACA = UPL 5.CAREX TOREIII = FAC 6.EQUISETUM ARVENSE = FAC 7 .RIBES LACUSTRE = FAC 8.URTICA DIOICA = FAC 9 CERASTIUM SP. = UPL =_ 10. ILEX AQUIFOLIUM = NI Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 TO 3" Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: 3 - 18", 10YR. 3/2 W/NO MOTTLING. 18 - 24" , 10YR 3/3 W/NO MOTTLING. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 24 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: SOILS CONSISTENT TO 20" AT 10YR 3/2 W/NO MOTTLING. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD s-s ase a.ravaovsyevor¶ o 7 U van ananr, n asova• ar airs Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 7 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : TOE OF SOUTH SLOPE AT EDGE OF SEEP LINE. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N -( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 2.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 3.GLYCERIA SP. NI 4.ATHYRIUM FILIX-FEMINA FAC 5.EQUISETUM ARVENSE FAC 6.PTERIDIUM AQUILINUM FACU 7.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 TO 15" Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: 1" SOIL CORE. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y X N Surface water depth: 15" Is the soil saturated? Y N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y X N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y X N Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 8 Detailed Site Description (Optional ) : OUTER EDGE OF SEEP. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.ACER MACROPHYLLUM FACU 2.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 3.RUBUS URSINUS UPL 4.CAREX TOREII FAC 5.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 6.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 7 .CERASTIUM SP. UPL 8.TOLMEIA MENZIESII FAC 9. 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS _Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/2 Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: 1" SOIL CORE. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY , Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 14 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: • Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD riein Invest..gator( s7 : vnn nonnan Date: flfflf7M Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 9 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : W SIDE OF LARGE DRAINAGE. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.URTICA DIOICA = FAC 2.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 3.DRYOPTERIS AUSTRIACA UPL 4.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 5.SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS FACU 6.0SMARONIA CERASIFORMIS UPL 7.RIBES LACUSTRE FAC 8. 9 . 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. % Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/1, 0 - 16" Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: 16 - 24" , 7.5YR 3/4 W/NO MOTTLING. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 14 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil- saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION, AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s ) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 10 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.RUBUS SPECTABILIS = FAC 2.ACER MACROPHYLLUM = FAtu- 3.OSMARONIA CERASIFORMIS o.yl 4.RIBES LACUSTRE FAC 5.URTICA DIOICA FAC 6. 7. 8. 9 . 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. 6 O % Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y )( N Rationale: • SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 5YR 3/2 Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y NX Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 18 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil- saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION, AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 11 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : BOTTOM OF INTERMITTENT DRAINAGE, N OF SP 10. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N ( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.POPULUS TRICHOCARPA FAC 2.MALUS SP. = NI 3.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM = UPL 4.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 5. 6. 7 . 8. 9. 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/1 TO 6" . Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: 6 - 18" , 5YR 3/3. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY , Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y X N Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 10 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y X N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION, AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y X N Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator(s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP 12 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : N OF SP 11. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N < If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.ACER MACROPHYLLUM = FAC 2.DRYOPTERIS AUSTRIACA UPL 3.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM = UPL 4.PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII UPL 5.THUJA PLICATA FAC 6.ALNUS RUBRA 7.RUBUS URSINUS 8. 9 . 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: TOP LAYER: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: B HORIZON: GRAVELLY SAND Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 TO 15" . Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y X N AT THE SURFACE. Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION .AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s ) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP13 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : ALONG NE PROPERTY BOUNDARY. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N '( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.POPULUS TRICHOCARPA FAC 2.TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA FACU 3.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 4.PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII UPL 5.0SMARONIA CERASIFORMIS UPL 6.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 7.ACER CIRCINATUM FACU 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/2 FROM 0 - 2" . Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators:3 - 18", 2.5YR•2/4 COLORATIONS. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: NO HYDROLOGY AT 18" . HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s ) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP14 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N - ( I£ no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.POPULUS TRICHOCARPA FAC 2.TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA FACU 3.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 4.PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII UPL 5.OSMARONIA CERASIFORMIS = UPL 6.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 7.ACER CIRCINATUM = FACU 8.RUBUS URSINUS = UPL 9 TOLMEIA MENZIESII FAC 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/3 TO 18" . Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: NO HYDROLOGY AT 18" . HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X ` Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: -Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator(s) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP15 Detailed Site Description (Optional ) : N OF SP4. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N '( If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.RUBUS SPECTABILIS FAC 2.RUBUS URSINUS UPL 3.SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA FACU 4.SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS FACU 5.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 6.TOLMEIA MENZIESII FAC 7 . 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N)C Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N Is the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/1 TO 18" . Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: NO OXIDIZED ROOT ZONES. Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 20 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD Field Investigator( s ) : VAN WORMER Date: 12/24/91 Project/Site: ST, SMILEY'S BOTTOM State: WA County: ISLAND Applicant/Owner:ANACORTES SCHOOL DIST. Plant Cmnty #/Name: SP16 Detailed Site Description (Optional) : N OF SP4. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Y N (If no, explain) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Y N ( If yes, explain) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1.ALNUS RUBRA FAC 2.RUBUS SPECTABILIS UPL 3.OSMARONIA CERASIFORMIS FACU 4.ACER CIRCINATUM FACU 5.POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM UPL 6.RUBUS URINUS FAC 7. 8. 9 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y N Rationale: SOILS Series/Phase: LOAMY SAND Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric list? Y N Undetermined? Y N Is the soil a Histosol? Y N Histic epipedon present? Y N -s the soil mottled? Y N X Gleyed? Y N Matrix Color: 10YR 3/2 TO 18" . Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Y N Rationale: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Y N X Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Y N X Depth to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 18 inches. List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is. the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y N X Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Y N X Rationale: Conceptual Mitigation Plan for the Proposed Anacortes School District Athletic Complex Smiley's Bottom Property Anacortes, Washington for Anacortes School District c/o K. Frank Kirkbride and Associates 4405 7th Avenue SE, Suite 301 Lacey, WA 98503 by IES Associates 1514 Muirhead Avenue Olympia, WA 98502 (206) 943-0127 February 19, 1992 Conceptual Mitigation Plan Proposed Anacortes School District Athletic Complex February 19 , 1992 satisfy Condition 6, i.e. , "provide non-tidal wetland buffer area of not less than 25 feet between the non-tidal wetland and upland activities, those portions of regulated activities that need not be conducted in the wetland; " . Section 17. 65. 140: The project was modified and reduced to scope as much as possible to limit the fill to the 1.47 acres. Because of the ownership of the property, existing building, topography and the larger, higher value wetland to the north and west, there is no alternative site for the development. Because of set sizes for ball fields, tracks, etc. , the design scope of the project could not be reduced. The plans, as submitted, represent the smallest footprint to accommodate the needs of the Anacortes School District and to satisfy athletic field established size requirements. Section 17. 65. 170: To Compensate for the fill of the 1.47 acres of wetlands, a proposed mitigation plan has been developed. In the initial wetlands delineation report, the mitigation and the component within the mitigation plan were incorporated into the wetlands enhancement/educational program component of the overall development plan for the property. To meet the requirements of the Non-tidal Wetlands Ordinance, the mitigation portion of the proposal has been separated and is enclosed in this document for your review since we understand that this portion of the project cannot stand alone as mitigation for the fill for the ball field or can be held and incorporated in the overall enhancement/educational center plan. 3 Conceptual Mitigation Plan Proposed Anacortes School District Athletic Complex February 19, 1992 The design of this pond would be over excavated to provide shore space for the collection of sediment over a timed period. A drainage area between the west property boundary and the detention area would be modified to create a meandered biofiltration channel to clean off-site waters prior to their entry into the wetland system. It is anticipated that the sediment and other materials which are expected to reach the first stage of the mitigation area for 3 to 4 years after construction, will be trapped in the biofiltration system. Once the plants reach maturity, there would be no further impact to the east end of the mitigation area, thus allowing the pond to stabilize. No planting plan for other portions of the pond is needed because the plant materials will naturally expand into this portion of the mitigation area -once the disturbance is minimized. The 3. 25 acres will be excavated with the west and north slopes being a minimum of 3: 1 with the southwestern corner sloped 6: 1 to accommodate a biofiltration system. The remainder of the area will be integrated with the enhancement/educational program proposed for approximately 25 acres of the overall wetland area. The combination will provide a series of ponds, linear peninsulas, islands, observation towers, shallow water emergent marsh areas, wetland shrub islands consisting of willows that grow in near standing water year-around, and a tree/shrub edge that provides shade and over water habitat and nesting and perch areas for a variety of wetland users or non- wetland dependent wildlife species. A general sketch is provided showing the excavation area, approximate ponds, island and peninsulas configuration, location of 5 l 12th Street -e--To Ferries (i) 2.7 > • Project Site 20,th St FideIgo Bay 22nd St —a... > < l � i . < V I- • > E North -o 29th Street 0 71 2.0 l I O ANACORTES • ,�g(�* c .ru V• t7' cr0'-mac �7�,.,/�.,u; C '�•-+. r - 4J (,'1' C r..� , Qop D"L 00 tS''CD ' L�J701 0 la 0 n r .14 ant n ( c a Ir � M ,� C•� _ C rf_1D l"") J r W ''r-., .._.._ -110''"}� 7" F 77 rift _i_ SAID --a Un41N,5GrotTCN I - L-...�...Q— ._� 2i Y0 `Q ° ` _ b1..0 i /� ° }11b.............„..„............„.......: V In 1 ,jI 1 �o `i i O • r st I Ie /r 1 I t o OI _ �1�: li 11.-y. �� 1�.==;tiff: —\N-o ; I. I' ,.3 "' '�,,•.� ; 1. N G �� NOT TO SCALE - \ �., \ 11 I ANAC rliaF&CHOOL 1 ,rr. N• . `•�\ r`rob 1 (7 \, 'j `,�\ •.� \ter, 0Ar•, r"�', l "4`,, ( .\�Nu* Ace a ttJeauspAeg...-r/+ !� / N. - ti'\ .. c •` \. tiz_� ++ c y•- LT ` , I ti��▪ S:;"`",- -S -1 i ❑,G. :./i1T0111.riIIAVIApE+ -F�' �- n 7.1 '7 11 ` OM 6060161910t ar`^'• j . hi?• 1 • II, ...\ `\-'r-- --. .-7,;,,aws :---::-...-:E....t: - E-1 ° '�s --m C v�1 [] (.1 It . v`DELPgr,r.loW gL,r.Q C1° 0 IES Associates �Asmiley'sbottom " 1., SITE MAP C 1514 Mulrhead C xi Olympia, WA 98502 ANACORTES, WASHINGTON m (2061 043-0127 DATE. Io0AWN 6Y • • SCALE: Horiz. - 1" = 40' • Vert. - 1" = 10' f Covered Grandstand r i- - I Perking -.` i 2 .5 ---- ^„f,., - -r t Drains !/ 1 i . / 1 1 Existing meter/fel to be gratded 2 / 31�, E J j ii i r I r f - Surfaced Track t /� IV k Drains Sports Field ' ill, 2� t t 2% \ 104:5 I- 1 !l o C .��" Drains ) - I ' a --'- �. _i -^�� Compacted till "- --try d 9 lelif� -- i ; . : _ `__ ,. _ ._ -- Edge of wetlands .._ • CROSS SECTION A-A' gpgp 1 c n U Am r : c+p v 7 4ll�'' ,� ��rO � : �O ( Grass lined swale—!/r/ 1• �a. 1'`„ ❑ 17 +J I! Itt� Sediment collection ��` + ° •' • n UE� om .`'�1.� °Q pond 3' deep f JI ° CD - -`tL1l.,rA N N^'xr i 1 outlet -V�FTOI7CH /i • n I. _vim's ! 0 \ A I° h-Islands u ii' ?_ k � 7—Shallow areas \j \ ,�'. Existing drainage fi 'I/ i/ \`� Inlet channel I..mil_,I '. j \�, is ewetlands �' N i , • , I" I ''`1 •• '''(' 'S\ 1 MITIGATION AREA .0 , , v \ ! —. .�� ii 'J ` I•!o o !...„k i•••l \ NI - p ,• NOT TO SCALE r 9TJSCII oul •' `•.N �'JiiRtA ' +r d N **Ia.—. � -' I .,1 �� _ r'•` x \.mil I .. . .. .... ......_.� =��.••-- •' � nt. Ir -A/"'7 C'1'��:J t o 11 ift•• •1 n" -- • 0 11 j 1) o .. o` itialCi gC'IOp °°2, 14 o `u •u 0 m IES Associates " smiley'sbottom „ MITIGATION AREA MAP G 1514 Mulrhead rn m Olympia, WA 90502 . ANACORTES. WASHINGTON N (2001 043-0127 1 BATE ICBAWM BY r_µfii etiC n Post-It"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 of pages . 13 Z3/4 XVI� (Dor q o From Re`.- co.Anrtc["rEFS �S-i.)( ca. L E5) Dept, D tS+ Phone n-f3 _' J It "I V Fax+!20b -2g3` I�-2. .-Fax Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan for the Proposed Anacortes School District Athletic Complex Smiley's Bottom Property Anacortes, Washington for Anacortes School District c/o K. Frank Kirkbride and Associates 4405 7th Avenue SE, Suite 301 Lacey, WA 98503 by r IES Associates 1514 Muirhead Avenue Olympia, WA 98502 (206) 943-0127 February 19, 1992 Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan Proposed Anacortes School District Athletic Complex February 19, 1992 2. 0 Conceptual Planting Plan The tree/shrub mix proposed for the area includes coniferous trees that are wetland in character mixed with deciduous trees and a variety of shrubs. The mix of deciduous trees was selected to create a varying canopy height at maturity and for their varying growth characteristics, with portions of the trees being rapid growing while others are slow growing and have a longer life span. The two species of coniferous trees selected are western red cedar (Thula plicate) and western hemlock (Tsuaa heterophvlla) . The cedar trees would be planted close to the toe of the slope and the more wet tolerant hemlock scattered to create a diversity along the outer edge. The hemlocks and cedars grow into large trees, approximately 60 feet tall with 20 to 30 foot canopies. For this reason, the number of trees are reduced and the spacing enlarged to provide maximum enhanced growth characteristics at maturity. The three deciduous species selected are black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpe) , Oregon ash (Praxinus latifolia) and river-' bank willow (Salix interior) . Black cottonwood and river-bank willow grow rapidly into trees that are 40 to 60 feet tall. The crown growth of the cottonwood varies with density, being taller and narrower when trees are planted closer together, but spread at the top when spaced 30 to 50 feet apart. The river-bank willow grows into a large tree and may, over time, reach over 70 feet tall with a 25 foot canopy. Oregon ash grow slower to a height of 25 to 30 feet and will survive significantly longer periods of time without deterioration than either the willow or the cottonwood. 3 Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan Proposed Anacortes School District Athletic Complex February 19, 1992 seed and fertilizer and left on the site. This creates a low permanent berm in the middle of the planting scheme that provides a water trap on the uphill side to enhance the invasion of wet tolerant species such as rushes and sedges. All non-organic materials would be removed once the grass seed mix has become established, or at the end of the three year monitoring period. A final planting plan would be provided as part as the final construction drawings if the enhancement/mitigation wetland buffer concept is accepted by the City of Anacortes. The plan would include the following: 1. Number of each species of plant 2. Size of each plant species to be used 3. Planting, staking and fertilizing procedures 4. Goals and performance standards 5. Three year monitoring and replacement plan 6. Contingency plan 7. Cost estimate for evaluation and bonding if required B. Monitoring report schedule 5 Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan Proposed Anacortes School District Athletic Complex February 19, 1992 Conceptual Plant List • Common Name Scientific Name Spacing Size Trees: black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 20 Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia 10' river willow Salix interior 20' western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla 15 ' western red ceder Thu,ja plicate 20' Shrubs: heart-leaf willow Salix rigida 15 ' Nootka rose Rosa nutkana 5 ' Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus 10' pea-fruit rose Rosa pisocarpa 5 ' red-osier dogwood Cornus stolonifera 8' Sitka willows Salix stichensis 10' snowberry Symphoricarpos albus 4' • r 7 lr' c c ) • Li +fff \1 t Ch �?►� I ritia 'it Ntij V1/44 (.\ DIVIS \ • b-------....,_. ---- \$. \ st\\. \ 1 t III \�N ."• .,.� 1 �i IN I , \ I \\•, WEj� 92. ! !_ et, d ,l@n 7 t9I ��,,.. I .\ ‘,. \ ,-.. Ede t? �• -o. .\ k, I....... r f1/4 soCCitt + - X ,1 I ...',. , .'Y -Aci,,t, .r \, \__,,,,,a, ......nr.''' IOW I)( I r ! ' JII // ptpN /, r; - •;"r �a i/r ! SG MEND V- - ..... ......M.._ VO ki%,t'At li. ‘ - :r,; yss 11 r "� N E 1a , , tis ' . 31°pL BUFFER E (, 6 ` y r .atZt\ i +J' .rwb t 4+ r ':CI i'1 e:Art MEMORANDUM To: Ian Mu ce, Planning Director From: Got', . Bruchner, P.E. Re : Drai age, Proposed School District Athletic Complex • Date: February 20 , 1992 On February 19 , 1992 I had a conversation with Frank Kirkbride relating to the conceptual design of the drainage system. The amount of new impervious area is a relatively small percent of the total complex area. It consists principally of the covered grandstand, the running track and limited amount of new parking. Mr , Kirkbride discussed his meeting on site with Dick Threet and his concept for using on-site percolation for stormwater disposal. I agree that this is the preferred method and there is a good chance that the concept will be found workable . No detailed soils exploration has been done at this time, so an element of the unknown exists which could change the plan. Working on-site detention into the final plan is the alternate plan, if found necessary. Given the small percentage of new impervious area, that concept is also acceptable. t � _. CRICK EVENSON ENGINEERS, INC. 4905 Pacific Hwy.East,Suite 4 Tacoma,WA 98424 (206)922-0446 December 3, 1990 Mr. Cecil Little Fire Chief City of Anacortes Fire Department 1011 12th St. Anacortes, WA 98221 Anacortes High School Gym Addition Mr. Little: Pursuant to our telephone conversation on November 30, 1990 regarding new fire sprinkler service for the referenced project, please be advised that it is our understanding that the new fire sprinkler service shall be a complete and separate system, not connected to the existing fire sprinkler system in the main building. With this information we shall proceed with our design. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, and please call should you have any questions . Sincerely, CRICK A � � EVENSON ENGINEERS, INC. John Gamache JG/tb 12 :3: 1 RECEIVED DEC 7,1990 BUILDING l3&PT, Ci>=1-1—1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION THEREON ON THE ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND ANACORTES HIGH SCHOOL ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS OF FACT 76 mf 1 .0 General Background 1 . 1 The City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance specifies that public schools are a conditional use in the Public Zone . Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 26 .040 (A) . 1 . 2 On July 27 , 1990 , the Anacortes School District applied for a Conditional Use Permit which would allow for a 13 ,000 square foot addition to the Anacortes High School (hereinafter "the School Addition") , generally located at 20th and J . 1 . 3 The School Addition is to be constructed in an area designated in the City of Anacortes Comprehensive Land Use Plan as Public . 1 . 4 The School Addition is to be constructed in an area designated in the City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance as Public . 1 . 5 The School Addition is to be constructed to meet enrollment growth in the Anacortes School District . 2.0 Description of Facility 2 . 1 The School Addition together with the existing floor plan is attached hereto as Attachment A and is incorporated herein by this reference . 2 . 2 A schematic of Anacortes High School with the proposed addition is attached hereto as Attachment B and is incorporated herein by this reference . 2 . 3 A site plan of Anacortes High School with the proposed addition is attached hereto as Attachment C and is incorporated herein by this reference . 3.0 Consideration of Alternatives 3 . 1 The Anacortes School District explored a number of alternative ways of meeting enrollment growth prior to selecting this alternative . 1 4 .0 State Environmental Protection Act 4 . 1 A SEPA Checklist was submitted on this project on July 23 , 1990 and is attached hereto as Attachment D and is incorporated herein by this reference . 4 . 2 A Determination of Nonsignificance (hereinafter "DNS") was issued by the City Planning Director on this project on August 8 , 1990 . This DNS was issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) and stipulated that comments must be submitted by August 27 , 1990 . 4 . 3 The following comments were received within this DNS comment period : no comments were received. 5.0 Notice 5 . 1 The Anacortes City Zoning Ordinance , contains public notice requirements for Conditional Use Permit Applications . The Ordinance requires the Planning Commission to hold public hearings on Conditional Use Permit Applications , Section 17 . 04 . 12 . 2 . d . ii , with public notice being given as follows : "Except where specified otherwise in the Ordinance Notice of Public Hearing shall be given at least eight days in advance of the hearing by posting copies of the Notice of Hearing at the Anacortes Municipal Building , at the United States Post Office in Anacortes , and , if applicable , on the property proposed to be changed . Notice shall also be published once in the official City newspaper at least six days in advance of the hearing . If the Public Hearing is on a . . . Conditional Use Permit , Notice of Hearing shall be sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property . Expense of such posting and publication shall be borne by the applicant . Where public hearings are scheduled before both Planning Commission and City Council , a period of not less than seven (7 ) days shall elapse between the two hearings . " Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 18 . 5 . 2 On August 9 , 1990, a Notice of Application for the Conditional Use Permit Application and a Notice of Public Hearing before the Anacortes Planning Commission for a hearing on September 5 , 1990, were posted at the Anacortes City Hall and the Anacortes Post Office . The property was posted with both notices on August 9 , 1990 . All of the posting was done at least eight days in advance of the public hearing date . 5 . 3 On August 22 and August 29 , 1990 , the Anacortes American published a copy of each of the notices . This publication took place more than six days in advance of the hearing . 2 5 .4 Because the public hearing involved a Conditional Use Permit , copies of both notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property on August 10 , 1990 . 5 . 5 A Public Hearing was held before the Anacortes Planning Commission on September 5 , 1990 . The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to the City Council based on the Findings and Conclusions as set—out in this Report and subject to the four conditions set—out on page 7 . 5 . 6 After the Planning Commission ' s hearing , the City Council scheduled a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit Application for September 17 , 1990 . 5 . 7 On September 6 , 1990 , a Notice of Application for the School Addition and a Notice of Public Hearing before the Anacortes City Council for a hearing on September 17 , 1990 were posted at the Anacortes City Hall and the Anacortes Post Office . This posting occurred more than eight days before the hearing . 5 . 8 Copies of both notices were posted on the property on September 7 , 1990 , more than eight days before the hearing date . 5 . 9 On September 5 and September 12 , 1990 , the Anacortes American published copies of both notices . The first publication occurred more than six days before the hearing . 5 . 10 Because the public hearing was for a Conditional Use Permit , copies of both notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property on September 6 , 1990 . 5 . 11 A public hearing was held before the Anacortes City Council on September 17 , 1990 , pursuant to the notices . This hearing was more than seven days from the public hearing before the Planning Commission , as required by Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 18 . At the conclusion of the hearing , the Anacortes City Council voted 7 to 0 to approve the Conditional Use Permit subject to the following specific condition: 1) a storm sewer analysis be conducted to the satisfaction of the City Director of Engineering and Development Services and based on the results of this analysis the City Director of Engineering and Development Services may require on—site biofiltration treatment and detention before surface water is released into the City's storm sever system. 6.0 Zoning Ordinance 6 . 1 The City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance specifies that public schools are a conditional use in the Public Zone . Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 26 . 040 (A) . 3 6 . 2 The specific requirements for Conditional Use Permits are as follows : " ii . Certain uses may be allowed in those designated use districts by a conditional use permit granted by the City Council after Planning Commission recommendation provided such use is specified under the Conditional Use subsection of the appropriate use district and is clearly shown by the applicant that it is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood . Prior to granting such a Permit the Commission shall hold a public hearing and prior to approval of such a permit it must be shown that the use will not be a liability to the neighboring uses . The Commission and Council may impose conditions upon a particular use if it is deemed necessary for the protection of the surrounding properties and for the general welfare of the public . iii . Any Conditional Use Permit that is issued , as approved by the Council , shall certify the location, nature , and extent of the use , together with all conditions that are imposed and any other information deemed necessary for the issuance of said permit . A copy of the permit shall be kept on file and reviewed annually by the Administrator , and if at any time it is found that the use no longer complies with the conditions specified therein , the owner shall be declared in violation of this ordinance and shall be subject to its penalties . " Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 12 . 1 . d . ii and iii 6 . 2 . 1 Under Section 17 . 04 . 12 . 2 . d . i1 , a showing that the Conditional Use is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood is required . It has been clearly shown that the School Addition will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood or a liability to the neighboring uses . 6 . 2 . 1 . 1 Surface water run-off will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood with the addition of Condition #1 (the storm sewer requirements described in 5 . 11 supra . ) 6 . 2 . 1 . 2 Additional vehicular and pedestrian traffic will not be detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood with the provision of additional off-street parking as shown on Attachment C . 6 . 2 . 2 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the School Addition Conditional Use Permit Application on September 5 , 1990 and the City Council held a public hearing on September 17 , 1990 . 6 . 2 . 3 In the last portion of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Planning Director is authorized to issue a Conditional Use Permit for the School Addition subject only to the conditions set forth herein . The location , nature , and extent of the use , together with all conditions that are imposed are set forth in 5 . 11 supra and infra at 7 and 8 . Zoning Ordinance Section 4 17 . 04 . 12 . 2 . d . iii is satisfied . 6 . 3 The Zoning Ordinance contains the following considerations that must be reviewed in all Conditional Use Permit Applications : "The following steps are required for consideration of applications for Conditional Use Permit : 1 ) The proposed use must be determined to be one of the uses specified under the Conditional Use subsection of the appropriate use district . 2) The required application form must be completed and fees , as established by this Ordinance , paid . 3) Notice of public hearing shall be given . 4) Reports from City staff shall be requested and forwarded to Planning Commission prior to the public hearing . 5) The public hearing shall be held . 6) The Planning Commission shall record their recommendations , their reasons for recommendation , and any conditions placed on the application. This record to be sent to City Council . 7) The City Council shall , at their discretion , with or without public hearing, act upon the recommendations of the Commission. " Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 12 . 2 . d .v 6 . 3 . 1 The first step , showing the use is allowed as a conditional use , is met as Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 26 . 040 (A) specifically allows public schools as Conditional Uses in Public Zones . 6 . 3 . 2 The second step , filing of a complete application, was satisfied by the School District filing the required application form and SEPA Checklist . Pursuant to established procedure , fees were assessed and paid . 6 . 3 . 3 The third step , notice of a public hearing , was satisfied by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, as shown in Section 5 . 0 et seq., supra at 2 and 3 . 6 . 3 . 4 The fourth step , reports being forwarded to the Planning Commission, was satisfied in the form of the DNS , SEPA Checklist , and draft Findings ( incorporating reports from City staff ) which were forwarded to the Planning Commission on August 28 , 1990 , prior to the September 5 , 1990 public hearing . The Planning Commission also forwarded reports to the City Council prior to the September 17 , 1990 City Council public hearing . 6 . 3 . 5 The fifth step , the holding of a public hearing , occurred 5 before the Anacortes Planning Commission on September 5 , 1990 , pursuant to public notice . The City Council also held a public hearing , on September 17 , 1990 . 6 . 3 . 6 The sixth step , the recommendations of the Planning Commission , was complied with when the Planning Commission made a recommendation on the application to the City Council . A record of this action was sent to the City Council in the form of Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 5 , 1990 . Additionally , the reasons for this action were set—out in a September 5 report of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law forwarded by the Planning Commission to the City Council . 6 . 3 . 7 The last step , the City Council acting on the recommendation of the Planning Commission , was satisfied when the City Council _approved the Conditional Use Permit after the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit on September 17 , 1990 . 7 .0 Anacortes Comprehensive Plan. 7 . 1 The City of Anacortes adopted a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (hereinafter "Comprehensive Plan") in 1982 . The Comprehensive Plan contains gerneral policies and goals which are to be followed for development in the City . Comprehensive Plan at 6 . The Comprehensive Plan contains general overall goals and specific policies for certain types of land . The following portions of the Comprehensive Plan potentially apply to this project . 7 . 2 "General Goal #1 . Create and maintain a healthy , aesthetically pleasing high quality environment that maximizes the opportunity for all citizens to share the social , psychological , physical and economic benefits of Anacortes/Fidalgo Island . " Comprehensive Plan , p . 16 . 7 . 2 . 1 The School Addition will further this General Goal #1 of the City of Anacortes Comprehensive Plan by increasing educational opportunities in the Anacortes community and doing so in high quality facilities . CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1 . 1 The requirements of SEPA have been complied with through the DNS and SEPA Checklist consideration of environmental impacts associated with the School Addition and the feasible , reasonable alternatives thereto . 2 . 1 The notice requirements of Zoning Ordinance Section 17 .04 . 18 have been satisfied . 3 . 1 The conditions set forth in Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 20 . a , 6 Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 12 . 2 . d . i and ii , and Zoning Ordinance Section 17 . 04 . 12 . 2 . d .v for issuance of a Conditional Use Permit have all been satisfied by this application . 4 . 1 The applicable goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been met by this application . DECISION TO ISSUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Anacortes Planning Director is hereby authorized to issue a Conditional Use Permit to the Anacortes School District for a School Addition to the Anacortes High School , subject to the following conditions : 1 . The scale and scope of the School Addition shall not exceed that set forth in the SEPA Checklist and Attachments A, B, and C of these Findings. 2. Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the School Addition must be undertaken within two years after the approval of this permit. Substantial progress towards construction shall include, but not be limited to the letting of bids, making of contracts, purchase of materials involved in development, but shall not include development or uses which are inconsistent with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Lay or the applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. In determining the running of the two year period hereof, there shall not be included the time during which a development vas not actually pursued by construction and the pendency of litigation reasonably related thereto make it reasonable not to so pursue : PROVIDED , that the Planning Commission may , at its discretion, extend the two-year time period for a reasonable time based on factors , including the inability to expeditiously obtain other governmental permits which are required prior to the commencement of construction. 3. If the School Addition has not been completed within five years after the approval of this permit, the Planning Commission shall at the expiration of the five year period review the permit and, upon a showing of good cause, do either of the following: a) extend the permit for one year; of b) terminate the permit, PROVIDED, that the running of the five year period shall not include the time during which a development vas not actually pursued by construction and the pendency of litigation reasonably related thereto make it reasonable not to so pursue. 4 . A storm sewer analysis be conducted to the satisfaction of the City Director of Engineering and Development Services and based on the results of this analysis the City Director of Engineering and Development Services may require on-site biofiltration treatment and detention before surface water is released into the City's storm sewer system. 7 These Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were adopted by the Anacortes City Council on September 17, 1990 CITY OF ANACORTES, WASHINGTON By es Rice, Mayor ATTES c � Geo/rge Rh ai n, Ci y Clerk Steve Mansfie , C ty Attorney v 8 "10 . i 1),A :11\ . . .. MIS Uri st, : f UiI'jffilliñ 11 ftt { I Ito • k\ —a a •.‘ • it CID 1E) On i. . JILLAT • . . I 1 • I-i84a • iN F > coo o cm j lur • • if- 1�I I 1 •!f{�I •, -- \ 1 l ' I 4 0. . 4 . e i --‘ }I. .(, ) 5PED •4 1 \". �` . • . I I ANACONYES HIGH SCHOOL (I '9 6NACO T E nor PLAN SCHEME 11 I J � li 1s) sl 11.E J�-� FRItX Cf*114ff1VFPu .orwar+� --..- --.. 4:1 • ...,..w....,..., .... 1;•,:•,,,..., -------- , i•.,,,,1 •!,•••-•.• ; '-,. •,,..1-‘• ,.-14,'...-,••••,):',..,-•••4- "'x��J* iy'".„ '1-- *.' ' {r+. 1 't F ` t+ 't. '1,�},fir 7- i,e • ;;'T3 'fir*1--t ' , 1 ti 1• .,. , ,p +: r s r- , 1 1`spy^t. _ 1 ; ark' 4r'��' a -3 .ay:. j • t.��+ vy•NRi:l.�i^id' ' �-'r_ ,•t, 'ti�71"•�K=/7?i cz F Z • ( s3 A ':. a 1 �g'` - 46 j -t� w�3..,,n mow.- > 7 ` ,, � j•rr .,,t-•� r" S 3.. ! ',. � �5 `Tx tt:. �,.. �-� • s t _r cy,-,ram 7 4�'z t•t f.t {f:'�s .__I .st ;,. y 4 a .}? } i{.t, ',yt,.-. a .t » 1i.> rt 5 it in "+`S,- 'S .77fi• y_ t K t: 'i'r.:l. ",;sL t v'.. w i \ a y-* ►ifs w '1f'•1',...-;:::h1 ` ?fit" �' .t{.� i1,.:,•, w-..„,= ,. a t [t ' f may^ "a/7R••i ,,,'." i M yW_Y „L 1 y . • yam. �r , 3k �,y"k.r "'(, 3sT�'� • ty 1 1 r ',Alt.t A.li lr��` 1 ryT;t ,a 4::e • ' �4 t"t,^-;„ T .t ., yam- t ;�s' x+��t yi•+ • " A ,..'j!..L•..,y-t,�j at i[ -41 `y' .: -ie., }'►ttiS f yti_,.4. .r• •.e aS a�-2^.ori ; •'=� .t► ! 1 'y3.='4,. �i$ :11,h .•��iv4' v t '7txtrs� sv �i •r 1" i - 1ti••••:4 � _,k .. / ;.r t, �1•,. r t: r 1. • t : : !i S yr �5 v".+t-i as *w • .-rtq""-ass - n i • •l 11l i. ) - .. '\':,• 4,. ,jVt}:n1 ,r.. �•,'a „4t-..'7 Zit''{..i_6+'r- y , 'cA Ott, i' Ut:- + .. y!.y f "'�. +.t w•'4R�.,r,4"S+6 ''-3Fti --4 ,.. ' 'i - '. S •'-t ItaFpt'4. .,, a4ist't.y y. , .va'..! 4'/ 1ftw ;' ° 1 S 'fT t .: f t ta:ij' S .t *a r'y,ii-y; •d .- .., .--t•z,z-4..!-:-‘2.--' .":•••-.:,...„..;.=.7...1--.--.', ; ',. i,'-1...;tr. -- - ;Vi'• 6,1.1r.ZitAlfli;• k•-•:4;.; ,i.t.'•• - %.-,....-4,-4.......,,,,........,:r----- -..,...,,. •• ..,..,,, ... .. e..17.--ii i ii\ .,„,...,..,,t.,,, • sci,... . 7. y +• sy y r �r:. t> i. `� It V.: +t .'NI'r �t4.4 -...* 1:'r�i j' r � .-,t ti i• t: 1 ii'Ta .. 1 i�'r r`+1• i1- le•'+-? r • .k„.t•+ rJ�tt � � k. _ 7t JY� y'Zs- '+q .-;.. mot' rz J it, j3,s R_ — .. �., a' •t,T•;i: kK S'r..�' y'aaa3 '•.rF+ ! 15 t�; r: ' .j0�•t":tP y� 5 t,11‘• Ifr~AtF .ti "G . .,....4„,,...„7,4„..,,,*44 st,,,,,,r,.",::'... .-• --); .- - 1 i:, 'N'.*'•:71.11f , , •'..t•s IT / 1t .+n { i- r s,•i:•�a may• ' f Al 'O� _"t3> 3• +.. h K � r :} r r'"Rx':a j .;a i L A ' �Atl+ ;P/. ��. t* ,�+u ' "�• ref» f sj t r'�.c s s 1 t i�r _ 1 f..s- �{ �q. f/ wqc_s"....�-.!'✓A tl'.? + ' ,, aa.t ..•f Y"�.,yA•tw.` '. • 1E' / t t_ �() 7 {a-tt a,'t r .! -3"r`.`10, i• t,. eF7 y+ •.i .r t } JJTJJT .,.itv!i....olzii , \.;,..v..4„ .,...;, t•..• ., z. C c ' , 1� t s . tx i.t ' „..?„.,A. li--4`.;. Zi+ 1,14 .;.:'��3( >' ? t r,.> t` fit;.w ty �. {' y.; „k t �y_ w{'�'4z''1'�r .F ;W�,7[•a• 43�.d4 4 � �'r r if �.� 4. •�+• • ,ti;,•.tE,r.,/t, 47 1 ..1...' . rY'} ca L. ` ', F Tta}) i�..ke,i,t i • 1t Y ,`t. . '"�,MM. yTY �rY .it �, 'Y... 4. � • 3 .t - ,, 11• '` •'�•S f •py.T.. !• y i g° •r t\ +;_ i s^.a a S• t 14 1 j r ftrr 5r ;if y 1`y• rya .. ,4 i s y ' •1. ? ' -i. ` F St1�t-, tl "y' '4 Al. --;,. • a j 1{ 1jcyzLl • 1^ . f"�Jt'L r i ! G4 ^wt� • + • a� �. 4�Y 1 IT + f � y1 • }. '1.. -� t �'.4. ;; .v. _few".'.' �t i li,t #."k t,, •:1 r` • •�'�:.ii-+(, tart *'• t: .it. •i. "1 1 rlt� 1{�e�y.ti�i t "Ll� x .i / t�i,r�r rd" r t •11}y, 'rt-. 1 t� .!: t( .. �T +` - 1 .sa F. % \ f. III I 1 r I '\ . i 1 i U f Lf I I-I 1_; ,_I-;_1 1 1 { 1 . o1'II Ct GYMNASIUM BALDING HGN SCHOOL 1• h• I;I',:;1 .i 1 I� l a `'1•I I';i ; I• iv i �ll III 11 I.' '1 III'•' lll�i�i��a; III°� I I ''I'll 1 l�I:I _ —_ il� 1 ��." 11 wnwlwo�� 1 llyli 1' I'I' !I I II Ijjll I;I' i 'll •li; li i 11 IJ 4 1 __ I i q, 'Ilik ! 11 li' 1i l'••'ii iII1.1 • •�,;I;A —___' - _ 1E —�I 11 �I I'Ill lli'VIAl'llll �Il�i ' I!� iI1. -T�,f I Iris I•.i ' ;1 '4 III I !I I,i,C it' 11 e� rIII' ,, II 11 — IM ma m I1 _ L�1.1 II IIJq I ,� I i ��I;1t .��li�_ — - - - - -- r <51 III I'III1. 'III III I,IIi Ill: tI111111I 11 . l NI_J • -----------J ' SAOIII♦.OaIAY too—� M WOO MCl/ r. '��`FJ e--....OIY, • 10.1.E rf \\ l /' ®g SITE PLAN •GYMNASIUM AREA A retNn6ur G ttir POl1RD OF 1 D.J:_ISTMENT MINUTES - AUGUST 16 , 1990 RE-ULAF MEETING Meeting called to order by Chairman Bob Ain=_worth at 7: 3:ZFM. Members_ present : Bob Ainsworth , Diane Erholm, Brad Snyder , Rosee,mar- , Yo_ung . George Mehier (tardy) . Staff pre=_err : Edwin Frank. Minutes of r`uoust 2, 1990 meeting wore approved snd pas_>ed (Erholrn/Snyder- ) Windemere Realty Variance (22015h.y1 ine bias) Mr . Frank reviewed this request for a variance in the Sign Ordinance to allow a second free-standing sign at a single building multi-business complex ; the requested sign is X 4 ' . Mr . John Crosser explained that the building , housing a restaurant , has been remodelled with the addition of two business offices (one now occupied by Windemere Realty) . The present free =standing-sign is positioned near the restaurant entrance and is unsatisfactory as a multi -business sign because of its location removed from the new office space. The proposed sign will be placed in front_ of the Realty office with existing planting pr_' . idin,J b.-ch ground for the sign. The Site c:._., i ew Con';T i ttee agreed '. hat the proposed sign placement was appropriate, with the recommendations_ that 1 ) the sign be removed if /when Ninde;mere Realty no longer occupies the office space and 2) the plantings be maintained. A motion cy er,ting the requested `- ariance t- ith conditions of the' Pe`. iew Comr,ittese rccomcrendations was made (f_r `ol,m/'ir.'ung) and passed with all ayes . The Board reasoned that complian. c with the multi-business sign pro'• tsion of the Ordinance creates a hardship for the applicant in properly advertising his business office. Anacoetes School District (High School .: :'th St . °' J Mr. Frank reviewed this request for building height variance from 35 feet to 40 feet to construct a new Hinh Schnc'1 gymnasium as a pert of a Listr-ict wide facility impr-o emr_nt program. Mr . Marc Estvold (project architect ) stated that the added hei0t was nece'as-+ry to prm. ido roof clearance for activities Within the building . He mentioned that pertiens of the existing school building ccr;ple`( ( gyfnaai ; inn snd Performing Arts) now fe; '_eed the 40-foot height ; the new roof will be onsGl •ter;E•_"_ s with the h,rec- n+ r not lines . Mr . Est.vold also regneetcd th -t1 the Board o. tend the 9n--,day permit appl ii_ .,tien period to 36 .i :ya because of the tirce -denar:diin " =Qni tole of the total District i ,T;pr n'rement prc_;rafh. motion r 1 - i worth) to grant the building height `. aria1LL ;� - 1 Ofl was O.c,4B .rCr;Chlf=riA I;'?. - from _ feet to 40 feet and cd tec•dinu the permit application period to ',b`_ days ; motion p-;seed with all -'yes. The Board reasoned that the project benefits the (✓,enmity as a whole mith no impact r',n the r-veigf.( ct-hood. iy nacortesSchool r.l sFri ct (Mt Erie Schnnl 41st_St °, M flve) Mr . Frank reviev4ed thus request for building height ,'ariance fron 1.5 feet to 37 feet to construct a multi -purpose room at the Mt Erie School es part of thc3 District-wide building improvement program. Mr . Eetvnld stated that the added height was needed to provide roof clearance inside the building and also for appearance. He indicated that a 20 ' X :0 ' section surrounding the 10- foot ridge of the proposed roof wall exceed the _.`1-foot height in maintaining a consistent slope with a re- designed roof over the entire building. The new construction at the Mt Erie School will be stopped up to a level above the existing building: the new roof height will actually be 31 feet above this ground level . The height of the e'. i ;tiny sch.,n01 building is appro- imar.ely 22 feat . He again rrqu.-stied an e.•te .•-ion in ' '-le permit application period to _&.S days. There ware no comoentsiobje.ctions from 15 n. arby property owners. fi motion was made (Young/Frholm) to orent the bua1ding height „ariance to 37 feet and to e ' Lend the permit application period to 365 days; motion passed with all ayes. The Board reasoned that the project benefits the total Cmmm pity and has negligible apparent impact on th neighborhood. Board Bu=_l n.oes The Beard adopted a policy to hold the regular Board meeting on the first Thursday of each month; the Chairman may cell a Board meeting on the third Thursday of a -north to consider reque'-ts which require timely action. if Meeting adjourned at : 5FM. Respectfully submitted , Gehl i_hler RECORD OF FINDINGS AND DECISION OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE .AL(4i O/ I Uri, MID APPLICANTIMIJDEMEQ t€t,Tj ADDRESS 1,1.Ot SKVL:M t4*1 • APPLICATION NUMBER Description of application heard (variance, appeal , etc.) VAA.1404Ce - Mttcn- ►us&FSc wants owE Off cmNDiJ6 $t4N -To &tow A cezoNvo Filmy 51)440 510). Date application filed Auturr I. tilt • Date of hearing 4Vt4tth- lGa 1410 • DECISION After review and hearing on the application in accordance with applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance the Board finds that: (findings) LocA—tot or 64I5Tj&6 -577 DtnJ( tlbnl uwsAT tcP4crotY ry sea-ue ks Mu OwMAS,/JB5 514A) AKIO U29 J A 4-Kw:Me R*t- Aititor r 1c 40v&6TISc Mises cWIut fottalY, ' In accordance with above findings the application s gr ed ,ant enied (circle one) . In granting the application the Board prescribes t e following conditions which must be met: — SIGN -m Bt=ILEMoval w/ig4au w wDeauw Q'n ry acMEY oft: CAC Pc.Aanu65 SuµouNAi 1.WtJ Muir t h it'tty MA Mtat& , SECRE RY, BORD OF ADJUSTMENT RECORD OF FINDINGS AND DECISION OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE .4141.07- IL 1 SSO APPLICANT4J&0 3 -Q111, Pjc,Cr ADDRESS 4ic,A Haas. ao'%Ji 4 .) 410E5 APPLICATION NUMBER Description of application heard (variance, appeal , etc.) VAllti uce- 8U(to lni4 +}East Rom 3s( tD 40 Date application filed ,AA ULY It , Ifc 0 Date of hearing ,4r.4on It , ISS0 • DECISION After review and hearing on the application in accordance with applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance the Board finds that: (findings) ?Uwr bEv511, m en7114i htot ammo/wry W iltil Ab miller ON AM4a ki-+4CO2 • In accordance with above findings the application ik rantejdenied (circle one) . In granting the application the Board prescribes the following conditions which must be met: §co Gam tr At/ague& () lto0 0 3 PAYS SECRE`''RY/80 RD 0 ADJUSTMENT RECORD OF FINDINGS AND DECISION OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE 4.-1.twT 161 1510 APPLICANT e (.1Gr L QO ADDRESS CLI6 5o+vot I ( ST f A/ APPLICATION NUMBER Description of application heard (variance, appeal , etc.) Wit 13401116 3S' -Tv 3fl t Date application filed SLY '4 (fy b Date of hearing 4u4UX 16 , DECISION After review and hearing on the application in accordance with applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance the Board finds that: (findings) Dr(,d.1 1- kWri3 a717 p ltte 011440Nny wtl QE L(Gtk t kt/4 &Jf Witter Go) A�40441ra. In accordance with above findings the application ' 'ranted • -nied (circle one) . In granting the application the Board prescribes the raring conditions which must be met: env rr kAbtO PCcD -V 36f ems. SECRE RY, OA OF ADJUSTMENT " FOR INSPECTIONS CALL: CITY OF ANACORTES PERMIT . CI 7931 293-1901 BUILDING PERMIT 24,Hrs. Notice Requested Site Address1916 .t At enue g NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) alnacortes High School 1'istrict PLUMBING I MAILING ADDRESS i 240 Pl Avenue r No. TYPE OF FIXTURE OR ITEM , FEE A CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Water Closet $ $ Ina cortes WA 98221 293-9597 Bathtub NAME Lavatory t Shower ADDRESS Kitchen Sink MDishwasher a CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Laundry Tray Clothes Washer NAME Water Heater Quality Roofing Urinal ADDRESS Drinking Fountain 4033 Divjsion Floor Sink or Drain CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Slop Sink 8BellIngham WA 98226 671-3618 Water Piping STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER ❑ Residential j] Non-Residential PERMIT $ ❑ New ❑Add ❑Alter :El Repair TOTAL FEE $ . .€]Building ❑Plumbing ❑ Mechanical MECHANICAL 0 Sign 0 Demolition ❑ Other 0 GAS 0 OIL 0 ELECT. ❑ OTHER Legal Description of Property or Ihx Account Number No. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT FEE Lot Block of #243501 3 001 003 AirCond. Unit $ Refrigeration Unit— HP Boiler— HP • Forced Air System— BTU/KW Describe Work Floor Furnace "eplpcp high arhnnl rnnf with new Wall Heater . composition shingles Unit Heater _ Clothes Dryer Occupancy Use Ventilation Fan ❑ Single Family Residence 0 Multi-Family Residence Range Hood ❑ Office ❑ Retail ❑Storage ❑ Church Air Handling Unit— CFM ❑ Restaurant y❑ Other i.'agh a. 1.., ,4 Pre-manufactured Stove or Fireplace NOTICE Gas Piping This permit is issued by the Building Official and,under the provisions of the Uniform Building Code,shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not com- PERMIT $ menced within 180 days from the date of permit issuance,or if the building TOTAL FEE $ or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. TOTAL FEES VALUATION FEE By affixing my signature, I hereby certify that I am the owner of the Building 50,000.00 $ 455 00 property for which this permit is issued or am an authorized represen- 5 tative of the owner. Plan Check 0 00 t Allprovisions 8f laws and ordinances Plumbing governing this type of work will Mechanical be complied with whether specified herein or not,including routine calls for inspections. a Sign Demolition Energy Surcharge Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent (Dam) State Surcharge 4 ,50 Street Setback Side Yard Setback Rear laud Setback Other _ TOTAL $ 454 50 t Use zone Occupancy Group Type d coast. Conditions: Lot Area Vacant Site Duelling Units ❑Yes ❑No . Fire Sprinklers Required No.of Stories Bedrooms Occupant Load '.' ❑Yes ❑No Size of Bldg. Plans Checked By: WHEN SIGNED AM)DATED BELOW,TRW IS YOUR PERMIT Permission is hereby given to do the above deetated work acording to the renditions hereon and according to the approved plans and eped&atiooe pertaining therta subject to compliance with the ordisnse of the CITY OF ANACORIFB. Parrott Issued BYE. . A( 6l l s/90 Building Official (Date) f Edwin Frank PERMIT .4,613 7931 Ir — k tea,. • _.._ / LAW OFFICES JOHN T. SLATER 418 Bellingham National Bank Bldg. John T. Slater Bellingham,Washington 98225 J.Timothy Slater (206) 734-5980 December 7 , 1989 Edwin A. Frank P. O. Box 547 Anacortes, Washington 98221 Dear Mr. Frank: I am writing in follow-up to our phone conversation earlier today regarding a law suit which we are defending, the focus of which is one of the exits at the Anacortes Highschool auditorium. Specifically, the plaintiff is apparently alleging that the steps and sidewalk outside the exit are either somehow defective or not in compliance with the City' s building code regulations. As requested, I would appreciate it if sometime within the next few days you would swing by- the auditorium and take a look at the exit. I have contacted the auditorium manager, Bob Knorr, and he is going to be getting in touch with you to set up a mutually convenient time for the two of you to meet at the auditorium. Once you have had an opportunity to look at the exit, I would appreciate it if you could incorporate your findings in a letter to me. As you know, I am particularly interested in knowing whether or not the stairs, sidewalk and curbing outside the exit were in compliance with the City' s building code at the time they were installed. It is my understanding that you plan on speaking with the former Director of Buildings and Codes, Ray Iverson, to confirm that the exit area was in code compliance at the time it was built. Finally, as I mentioned to you, this matter is scheduled as a fourth set in Skagit County Superior Court beginning January 2 , 1990 . Assuming the three cases set in front of us settle or are otherwise disposed of , we will need to be prepared to go to trial at that time. I would therefore appreciate it if you would set January 2nd and 3rd aside on your calendar so that you will be available to testify if need be. Thank you very much for your cooperation and should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, I tt !i J. Timothy Slater JTS :psd / r , B:o,,, £ ow --SE- iEE /LJ¢, � / / 22 / I / , ,- 3) �/ / i--am- 5/AZ •-' eiiin --s._-_ r ,y_ ,/ , 1,/” /.'/424a'46- pi . ,- 4co, ;4/tpl 4..,.,....,",Satt? 3,. ;r.O1• - / OF a At 'ig - 1/4 0 i. 9 1 LINES Ic is 5 • • 4, - ,,,. . . ‘ N.--- , , . . i.it,„ ,._44.,,,, ,, .... i. p ... -•,•, 4 ill/r. `bt �� I YPCOL, �I NO E. pm, Ri. trti6,E Coal. WALL. 1+bo`c400 - 1 e. EI.. 222,06 0" 4 2o r.;' b0' d' .i - # - C- E22-- d" . • coornoN 9- ,4LTMNAT ate IC • it Y Syi4-' :rt:Rt.t •i :A "�_a..f,.'v�• /', �... �; '3;: ,..,:`•'4•.�T^j'4I'(r�;, 'i•,. :if-0",:f.. ,4tr-H4%:. '. •',,r? ,.T;, 1, E.?•" .7C-.1 . ,'s. _ • i.�',� t+ t x 3•T •1-%. i "�:• i•1�+y 3.•• '.Y . ' i. �• a ;• s t°" ;Gyp' j::.r�' ✓ '.t ...; • `y3� st ,%y'iti.-* Fri tip 4 t it t--":'v9. � i• N�,�,t .�r ?,. ,, ,r� . *PI .' • ;, 4. , .ter . 1 *� ',4 ryC�Y� ' r :.i+Ly"i� r." ." .r.. .. �-�' - . l'il L. R l 06,,,,40,,.. a/ .t, Vln 4�' ,l +�.. - _ _ ems„' , ,7 '�1� .t t{J,1/�/t � �.a..4�j� • , j I ' ,g, •-,2Zi '•.'Z22 ill a - _ .a-- .•t • -is , • S:'•F+.i.3.. . > f / �!'7 a. �'�F � . .F, ,mc . . :w: e . , .r. :iii'� i'::5^SSi1.: ' ‘ / / y if . -..! r, s?; ..: 4:4,4p - • • ft • 1 i .. .., b ,op 0: , F-: PlIIIMMIIIM111115 114 , r _ % 4I.se, • S 4-td /4‘) . Ni 1 . t1$,! I � a \! L4 ! ,. � ;.n.( bs / / I --- - - -------- — lY+V' - _ fie" __ pFL ____1.-\---\- 1 \_\a 2___�--�_- - ill ___ _ . .. stitim , \ : II , , , , . , , , , „ , „ , , „ , , „, , , , , , ._,_ ___ , , , , , ; , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . ,, _,,,_,,i___._i „„ , , 1-, ,_,.___I----4i-.---I---7-4- . ----- -_- _ --_-____- __ ____rritaaLWE._ ._&.:Eta_-___---.__- -- Ila ir-7-SThilrilte -----7771._- ___,_-- _____------_, :---------:__i _____________ ___ _1_ _ - - _ _- ti , asb,-.. _____:::_______ ::::::7"--ti < - \; I` __------ - _ p _- -__-- - - - \221,6b 1 1' {zu - - -- --220 - • - /� l XISTING WF�TER METER WELL . PROYIOE DIAMOND VA7TERN STEEL P A T E uNEK 5C�( oN °la $EGE`hEP L'S `�/ I2' Y AcZ % e , :Di- To FALILITATE REAOINA OF _S� 221,66 •— Ma-re.t S, A1uST TO son. .h 22r,5 �L19_1-c+ 1 N W FIN• 4Ir Ao E _% 29.T /. 1 N LT r ',27o,q -.^WHEEL 04A . Id-d' QI Ru �;o 19 1 Fc7 L lag 221.66 e t "PA-6H A5?al 4111V%- . 'xi .,46 .4.- as ajAwria. .I 514 R.: - . Si. • *-- 9 . , . - Alw 7•07,Aft ik is1r - t 9 R• i Nkwil.l PLANTING 2 '�r� PLANfI�I(�, r 2184 C/ ' ::• .. I, G u: Y ' 7f ' dssS � P05tS e1f .h: ;; ;2;28s '' :y u:-:`:: .;; . F.> t<:;: :S 9� :;: " EXSTINGi?F " ; ; : •" .t + TG» •. _ :.Jt"4 : : : � :: i:: � `PAT t 4 T 04 r( a . a . i . :;: :; ; ,X _ x k • SGALE • - _ 1 �' F tiwK bY.14'ING. FENa As( A,-.T TO.REMAIN N I1 A LT E 2 � 1: 0 N. $ T ,_ . DRAWc.N GVNINE T rkVitNA • FE D j H 1 La H _ 3 0-71 .00_L SC'WOoL DISTRICT- t4Q. 1 0 3 DATE , r rnr1uTV' v) ASLJI ►JGTCUJ . _ 7-30-75 emu- �� r D/ 9L \HTE" WALL • m'F 'LI /'c' 11 \. / 1" - , - O." I 2" - - it -- -- p NOTE: ALL NANQF A IL h- I- }'- 1-0 .j. TO 5E NO"( ;71P- ALY N LES 1 - ' 60 1I U> 4 WEEP Johl-13 (,KOJ! 1:- Z - Sr'100TH _ .. PL116, EN7S -I — Zi' 0•P, STEEL -1- Pr,...u61 ENDS i - { (-; Iv2 * 3/4' ST \ IYq„xj/!' ST=E L'-o' C Tn o t I 1 ) c - Tr 4 15m - - - BOTTO M — I/4kx Ii/4, �� STEEL TUE-- IS - E--IY xIV4x 34" 61-o 0,6, N1V, N 5`EGL -11.iE Kv� 6" o.C, 0 : I-..- I _ �. ant If t 2. Def.„..: ,. ., TAIL rLAN l4 • NA\DKAII. ON GU R5 NaNDRAlI Iv, __, I)_, ti CI I." - II-0" 1 Lou 3' ON i-- ' �CX� AGU, i .1 ' - V p ' -ON ^rYlj I' i 1 wa�� i5 CO \iC. 24VE. '`/J "o E NOTE: 9NL, WALK ' i. AI.L. WW9 36---N6H 6 0 5E ALL GLEAX 'w cAL GRAN 545 ;1+ .Y: ' : .v,, rIN, kwv'/000 iN ?ORj Ot Eole9 GEPAR_(ONE SPf.GIE ONLY' - LoNTR. ' OPTION), FENCE =CjAfc ('4sTIR, 6KAPE WE-6 mRN 6EDAK t ESA-WN FIN. - <. 2 Z., ALL FASTENE125, NAILS, 30Lt5, Eft To f5 GALV. , ALUM -01e .-- ,-_ ►'I-ATEI7. CUT- OFF I;NIi'S OF ALL FOLTS, "d-'tom-, .e.. 3. ALL WOOL? MA'T RIALS TO BE STAINED WITH Z 60Ars LYMP16 �-.- O ` C Litt.'-?r ' I 4 frS0 1 OM 1 t Zxd 'X b STAKE 4'-0" CN ( N . pti EE°! A_IT WA�' , !7 _It ; ,l .\ T2 CU�� 0 , 50 P, S E 11/22cI',a„ vp 47,,6, aAfE GIs FIri Nc. GUr<5 ON S;Js c'� ST:?'"; W1Ek% 54cwJN �,)N "i�Q :' w ii 2"0,0, STEEL l<__� t -. ! I. 17-165 -I'i4"X 3/4" sT5 L.- n;r tit LESS ~ TOP t \9 SuowN 0?H \NK -L; ! ON P I I V2„X s/ �„�4>•1 -- f STEEL ` , ;11 — 1 ! , _ Y`; a:>z. I 1 4c- IV4"x!Y,L „fib ' r.,� ."' 'I t is LL Ill, I i G2ou-r �'/'►t�. GKOu'( I t 1 - -TEGUL FAINE2AL. STEEL SL�Ev^ TOO r t I OK EqugL N T< C,uL MIIJiRA D E G4 I� K.' r n - I IQ, GAS GALY t*.fa, 3u ''�;%H' �� j�JAv SLOPE rc EPI7S Y ¢ -1?--- -- STEFL SLEE\/E I- { III -�-- .. ` +' -j S' Sr -5 414kA\\ 2 /L\ L @ 5TE° CUI 5 V2b= ® IV " = SAIL STEM 1/2' _ 11_0" -2°C� 0.0, STEEL PIPE -"- CE uK,N To WA L < — PACE of WALL TOP B ,50-TDM IZ" ii F.a�,TEL Cy.2% SuprOI lr ORACJCET5 �i .,,,,,L._, G 5'-c o,C. Mak. � ', C r\.-f YI.ANi =� WALL ® ?I >I -o - - EXP. AGGAN la • ------- oirLbM F t1.Gb 226.q/ F L{)-.Q Wr 01 yatJv✓N JN r i it P 7 PAN I 'QFh� �� I, 1t • > o e ,. 7 4 1)'6' V.?"<-7' :-,- A \-!'- s 2:--o 0'6. ----- \r,;(t• . _ , . .,--,....4.4.cr.c.o. . 1 i . .- Er vu2T, s — i I �2oUT E?-A� / i' - ' '- M1NECtALHD . r• al G ALY. N C��( In_ ' c L' J' ,�, /� �' '. ; t 1STE�A S S ✓C 4 f� 7 CO, � 6TcrJ 5a3<a �TooL Et76 �� Y�' A D EA a.. v Y.w:. + �1 1,,2. _ , -U 2 p.U. 5T1 EL PIPE 12° �i a" } ,_eY uRN To Wtu. (�✓ `OP ° J0,1 ,J1 �� I+ I i.ZEJ � pnOKT gAU�ETS iN 2.' - ssEL c G or 0.6. MO', �� p_J 75 f b • 4.- �qx /45'zL 1 W \\ r \--------- 1,// ? 1l4 b C.Y_i� --)"-2;' r � 71- 4 — - CONc Or.iE SIPE, .6 571..1oNT GouKTI I -- -- -- ico1 „ i ) -el - ,--- SH _ - - ViA5 b , FIN, G �.' ° 4 < ? a _ _ - ASUNi 3 - •; • .r, - e' - -- AS se K 2 lx /(,'x 12" 4 u LT Tv GONG. Wf�/gC> x4' :r'�I < <.i.' ( <-- SAS5_ .T5 (2) PE2 P(ovicE '11 :•. ` `' • -- — LONG, '/q." LAG BOLTS To 2 F'S it ii w (e, 151-, I• , \ XF Jl LEVaTiON Its : KEEP FACE ' • 4 roe' OF GuRS CLEAN GOvPA QGLi1�rD DETAIL SCALE Iv/ t — 2x4 cEPAA. (TEe`f-v) 9 IL Lei O s p:AN T'G o •.. .. ' 5� �ec-5,4 a r-4,f6�L FORM 6f�, OF v�rzT. 1. , -7yL", cA1 c- • `. KESAW N 6WAK C?.- c,-.Y • it?• Z ' , • WATa�PRooF ARM '' J, I4 {' ' , I ,r 61 * of � nN o 1 4 ' tOMIA & 4- 612_ c.c. kO . KOG r1-ANT6 WiELF_ 0-3" TDP of WAIj Ci N 1c. mgtc fv, 2Z4.a3' © PAVING JOINT C! T ,. . ) -- _t 4 co7.r( 1v? ` 1'_0„ \ �, 1 f * Lit fig„ c;,c v. V -1 CONC. oC ‘ i t7,,Qi:� Ahv-4ALr 1'AVINC, i " cf s. — IJJ 111 Vy' EXY J . & 14' {;1jr4,1• %G ASPHALT JT. ^viT,, q r � s O.G MAX. LuT o x.. 1 to FROM '=race a ioP A. 4 IZ„ o.c L > =- tl s t 3 BARS Tor' f E`i � .1 gOiffoM 1 ,Ili CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG.ZI PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PERMIT ' •' e`'°'6 Telephone 293-1901 2 chSAnacortes,WA Date ' 19 "� PERMISSIONO� IS HEREBY GRj/�NTED TO: j� OWNER ( T i k�'�C+�./r'+�'t - `^ t o3 STREET i ., _•'j (1.M� P4 - a, ADDRESS � � tl�� v.}�Location 'h^ `(�7p R} � where work is to be done " ` CONTRACTOR [. TO ERECT ❑ INST-ALL.❑ OOSSRBEPAIR ❑ IN THE FigiNOWINGMANNER_, C PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT O SUBMITTED WERE ❑ WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR 0 RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: TYPE APPROXIMATE VALUE PERMIT FEES OF WORK State Building Code Surcharge 3 so State Energy Study Surcharge Building 11.00CDD • "" qc C)0 Plumbing and W.S. Mechanical Plan Check Fee TOTAL 7 8_93 rry� LEGAL DESCRIPTION ./.i{350l--3--ocI- DoS (N ` CIT INSPECTOR 1 a . CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. ❑ PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL g PERMIT 581$ Telephone 293-5173 - ANACORTES, WASH. DATE ' -� 196 ' PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTE,D TO;, _ I,. Said , OWNER fk k4Za✓�-l''.I"..t POtt;(.{e�.^(�,',t.,t//l I P 3 STREET ' fir _ _ 6`'l/`�v �7 ' ADDRESS I LOCATION WHERE WORK IS TO BE DONE /y CONTRACTOR 1 7 I t14-^"&A- ,"' TO ERECT 0 INSTALL OR REPAIR 0 IN THE FOLOWING MANNER: if c. PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT Pf SUBMITTED WERE ❑ WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR .14 RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: TYPE APPROXIMATE VALUE PERMIT FEES j OF WORK ISSUING BUILDING GAS PIPING PLUMBING AND W.S. -� SEWER CONNECTION INSP. MECHANICAL '(,j 00 PLAN CHECK FEE n MISC. ,g e /O TOTAL awm7�-sv LEGAL DESRIPTION CITY INSPECTOR r 0 CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. 0 PLUMBING 0 MECHANICAL 0 PERMIT ? =' i. Telimpo T99-3173 r ANIKCORTES, WASH. DATES Uvbr 4 194 s PEBMISSIQN IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: 7 " OWNER L14I4F2 A 7",-- i t,.3.7i.JCc+(. „De ne, C 7 �/ti .c 1 i ADOREss c;(-f .- 4„, e 174 -1,1 ) I LOCATION WHERE WORK IS TO BE DONE k CONTRACTOR E j?.%/r Lea,, t.:;:pair•:/j%fi F TO ERECT 0 INSTALL ❑ OR REPAIR 131. IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: .5 r .<'G-vi --alit 05: ► J I PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE ERE O SUBMITTED WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR 111 RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: APPROXIMATE VALUE TYPE PERMIT FEES '. OF WORK ISSUING jI BUILDING i"T 3,PSici / 3.7. GAS PIPING PLUMBING AND W.S. SEWER CONNECTION INSP. MECHANICAL PLAN CHECK FEE MISC. - 1 TOTAL `II 3 c 2L c.0 :', S `..i I i LEGAL DESCRIPTION ✓4-f _LOCI/— nee:/ —ems 3: ,. I : I /f I rz- p ITY INS E" CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. ❑ PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL cat PERMIT 3740 l ANACORTES, WASH. DATE S L 19 3 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: • { OWNER ,!j i kAteo/�i S r Sit/a'/ Jff3T• STREET ADDRESS / /` ‘ LOCATION WHERE WORK`IS TO BE DONE CONTRACTOR \ J%JT '2 RE t27 (#'Oil TO ERECT ❑ INSTALL .Z. OR REPAIR ❑ IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WEREWNOERTE 4CSUBMITTED � WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR [PC RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: APPROXIMATE VALUE TYPE OF WORK PERMIT FEES ISSUING /4 Cb • BUILDING • GAS PIPING PLUMBING AND W.S. SEWER CONNECTION INSP. • MECHANICAL Leo OW , /;l Oa m , cc { PLAN CHECK FEE MISC. TOTAL �y `7z / (>) in no .IG LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2f ?co/' -4- - 3 t* C / CITY I SPECT 0 CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. ❑ PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL IX PERMIT �j �4 ANACORTES, WASH. /,,7 DATE +? - L/ 19h2"PERMISn { OWNERSI N I. S HERBY �G t�AN .y! t E ICJ STREET ADDRESS i J /k `� �J it•✓v�"'C` LOCATION WHERE WORK IS TO BE DONE CONTRACTORc, . A ((Ler— GA' 6At4 TO ERECT ❑ INSTALL NOR REPAIR ❑ tF[ IN T FOLLOWING NNERi (1 ^ O /!r-, ?co GFth. (LA..( ® Alt /0,000CFA1 PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT WERE ❑ SUBMITTED WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR ie RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: TYPE APPROXIMATE VALUE PERMIT FEES OF WORK ISSUING /0 W BUILDING GAS PIPING PLUMBING AND W.S. SEWER CONNECTION INS�P P. . MECHANICAL L,kaa4J u‘tia_ fJ p 0 U to /?- CO PLAN CHECK FEE • MISC. TOTAL 1000 00_ 2,2. CC) LEGAL DESCRIPTION atil Zl( "OI - 3 - 0 0/ - Dn3 CITYTY INSPF reit CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. EL. PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PERMIT 2250 ANACORTES, WASH. DATE • - - 19 . PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: _ OWNER n,'iSTREET ///f,.e. 16/7y / />l �/C ADDRESS f 1J (, �� LOCATION WHERE WORK IS TO BE DONE CONTRACTOR ' `7 TO ERECT ❑ INSTALL ❑ OR REPAIR a IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: %C4,/2 y G'/!%GC C>k . /Arr/J1 cT A`//1L1'"T LC; 5..5 fir) PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WERE NOT ❑WERE L� SUBMITTED WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR AL Mpt RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: TYPE APPROXIMATE VALUE OF WORK PERMIT FEES ISSUING - BUILDING GAS PIPING - PLUMBING AND W.S. ---- r SEWER CONNECTION INSP. -- I MECHANICAL —.-- I PLAN CHECK FEE � - MISC. --I-- TOTAL I •''��O M = LEGAL DESCRIPTION Apr - y -s • - ! �' c. !, c j • j. . Lt -" . CITY, INSPECTOR-) CITY OF ANACORTES BLDG. $ PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL 0 PERMIT _ Z 8 88�4 ANACORTES, WASH. DATE ' // 194 � PERMISSIQN IS HEREBY ANTW T9:1 r, OWNER Veltkrk.? sotiar. - M 1.{! c) 4 STREET ADDRESS V j,(_ _ c ma LOCATION WHERE WORK IS TO BE DONE CONTRACTOR HeIAMC'Ar A 4-4tE1/4,L ttotAi ^ ^ ' Lam. ("'^C/, AR TO ERECT g INSTALL g. OR. REP; ❑IR f, I HE FO LOWING MANi R; �.1_ ..q- ' .�. . �. I. v r .. �__ L a awn"' • PERMIT EXPt-ES ONE EAR F'0 DATE ISSUED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION WEREWEREC�NOT SUBMITTED WORK TO BE DONE BY OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR L RECEIPT OF FEES IS ACKNOWLEDGED AS FOLLOWS: TYPE APPROXIMATE VALUE OF WORK PERMIT FEES ISSUING BUILDING 5 !(L st.n 0 6 GAS PIPING / PLUMBING AND W.S. SEWER CONNECTION INSP. MECHANICAL PLAN CHECK FEE 1& C' OCR, MISC. ``�� TOTAL 7 SiU WC Or, LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2435 /- 3- Do I- o G % INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. SOILS AND CONCRETE INSPECTION FIELDWORK - LABORATORY 260E PACIFIC AVENUE, OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 (2061 337-4650 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District REPORT NO. 17 PROJECT Anacortes High School r NO. F-D77 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Company CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 06-04-76 INSPECTOR Ivan Stepanek LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Part C - slab in east lecture - #100 LOCATION SAMPLED Upper third of auditorium NO. YARDS PLACED 77 TRUCK SAMPLED 45 TIME SAMPLED 10:30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 6 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4 _ ADMIXTURES POZZ 300 N AMOUNT 3 oz/#100 SLUMP 4 AIR CONTENT CONCRETE TEMP. 60° Sunny AIR TEMP. 65° WEATHER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 62 1906 06-11-76 7 313D 63 1907 07-02-76 78 5110 • 64 1908 07-02-76 28 5040 �-- DISTRIBUTION: 2-copies: Anacortes School District 1-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield, & Frets b"AL 7Esr/to .6 T P1 o CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIAI(206)357-4650 0 r e�9ARboUGTS�N ego CLIENT: Anacortes School District DATE OF INSPECTION 06-04-76 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Addition REPORT NO. 20 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction PROJECT NO. R-027 FORMS INSPECTED YeS REBAR INSPECTED Yes REMARKS: Conforms to plans and specifications METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Pumping METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: Vibration NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED 77 LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Part C - slab in east lecture - #100 CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Cascade Ready Mix DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI. CEMENT 6 sk. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGR. 3/4 SLUMP 4" AIR ---- ADMIXTURES: POZZ 300 N AMOUNT: 3 oz/#100 CONC. TEMP. 60o AIR TEMP. 65° WEATHER Sunny LOCATION SAMPLED: Upper third of auditorium NO. CYLINDERS CAST: 4 TIME SAMPLED 10:30 TRUCK NO. 45 REMARKS: Ivan Stepanek INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINC+TON, INC. SOILS AND CONCRETE INSPECTION FIELDWORK - LABORATORY 2608 PACIFIC AVENUE, ❑LYMPIA, WASHINj3TON 98501 (206) 357-4660 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District REPORT NO. 16 PROJECT Anacortes High School NO E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Sand & Gravel DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 06-02-76 INSPECTOR Ray Rusk LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Area C auditorium - raised seating in northwest corner of building LOCATION SAMPLED Raised seating area-east end of 6th riser NO. YARDS PLACED 64 TRUCK SAMPLED 16 TIME SAMPLED 10: 50 MIX DATA: CEMENT_ 5 i SK. TYPE 1 MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4 ADMIXTURES POZZ 300 N AMOUNT 15 oz p/yd SLUMP 31/2" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 64° WEATHER Mostly Sunny AIR TEMP. 55o COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.'. 58 1897 06-09-76 7 2730 59 1898 06-30-76 28 44i0 60 1899 06-30-76 28 4790 _ DISTRIBUTION: 1-copy: City of Anacortes 2-copies : Anacortes School District 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende , P. E. 1-copy: Prime Construction Co. 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. SOILS AND CONCRETE INSPECTION FIELDWORK - LABORATORY 2609 PACIFIC AVENUE, OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 (206) 357-465❑ FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District DATE OF INSPECTION 05-28-76 PROJECT Anacortes High School REPORT NO. 18 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction PROJECT NO. E-027 Rebar Inspection Inspected rebar on this date in the new auditorium' s raised seating area in the northwest corner of the building. All rebar placed conformed to the plans and specifications for the job. Pouring of concrete in this area is tentatively scheduled for 06-02-76. WEATHER Partly Cloudy 55° INSPECTOR Ray Rusk GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. SOILS AND CONCRETE INSPECTION FIELDWORK - LABORATORY 2608 PACIFIC AVENUE, OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 (206) 357-4650 CONCRETETEST REPORT • CLIENT Anacortes School District REPORT NO. 15 PROJECT Anacortes High School NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Company CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Sand & Gravel DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 05-11-76 INSPECTOR Ivan Stepanek LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Area B foundation walls on Line 3 + 4 and 3 + 8 rooms : Mechanical Trench, student loughe LOCATION SAMPLED Line E + 20 NO. YARDS PLACED 50 TRUCK SAMPLED 47 TIME SAMPLED 1 : 30 MIX DATA: CEMENT SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4 ADMIXTURES POZZ 300 N AMOUNT 3 oz/#100 SLUMP 4" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 60o WEATHER Sunny AIR TEMP. 65° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 55 1716 05-18-76 7 2100 56 1717 06-08-76 - 28 3680 57 1718 06-08-76 28 3540 DISTRIBUTION: 2 copies : Anacortes School District • - 1-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets FT. rty,Ti4' EVERETTI(206)355-5800 F443 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 p m�9QgppV T$Ssor;ti CLIENT: I/V eeo, TT S c-: c771it r < ‘'in, %-, DATE OF INSPECTION ---5-Z- `C PROJECT: 4A.,a, 0e7 /5 /,It/r;;' ,j".,;1eOf-- 4PP;-7/D 415 1-npre P.rT/c,-< `_. REPORT NO. /-5 CONTRACTOR: f;a;r (!e n)-1=7, PROJECTNOE04 7 /' I , , A- t- - L 15 Lc /4L it 0e+ .476 /ALE,,r'z"E.7icc!/� C!_� �r�r- /4'yl'iT t 5ir/12 /4 �' Pe ezvc;t 6 -f) x-/� /�F'i/6/6 De'i>; 0/c' 4aD7%O.w-'i KtirL (71E1 H 'el ), / I Au 5-Li,e-,.He 5 tilf/7cX-?,4lc 4r'.67 4e, er Dice r5 Ci,i;Y-cj l /� / A/ it c'Ai=1"' / C�t.76 b�/L,C', &KA' e 5 i 4 74'7`g 77 0 ee/ ' e , A&c/' of -Tifi- A e_cr;:2) 27,tj WEATHER - z'/:'SN/t/E TEMP. RANGE JG 6 / INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. • CLT EVERETT/(206)355-5800 ❑ oI CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 ❑ VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 ❑ CT5 NN CLIENT: A`,/ f^ORTC SCHOOL- b[ST2(CT DATE OF INSPECTION 6 - S- �C PROJECT: ADD/P0r/S AtCrQ.M rim r/S - A I AhleoWn lc H/G / 5CNcbL REPORT NO. /VS CONTRACTOR: PPI;VE CW4S7-- Cb, PROJECT NO. E- O 2- '7 FORMS INSPECTED YeS REBAR INSPECTED yeS REMARKS: rdLcleov�s -Eo C'vw�s, f Shcc{ METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 44-e1s9rok,/� y METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: Ai ✓ NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: roof-T /GS : O i91R /;g ` —E*/rray °nL/ry S7ORiac 7/A, c 3 f tO ' 7 73 - /U 'fo C- /O ` 0Sr4/r2/✓4Y PR/NCfPAL li7N�E 7/hG 3 f /O' s4 t ( QENCC-C't3o, to b CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Cal Sce ZEE 7ZCAD ✓ /1"y DESIGN STRENGTH v n0 PSI. CEMENT -6-4 k. TYPE / MAX. SIZE AGGR. Vg SLUMP 2 AIR ADMIXTURES: 7)022Oteru 200 AMOUNT: CONC. TEMP. G U AIR TEMP. 5 0 WEATHER O vC 2 Cc s ?- LOCATION SAMPLED: i/`'° 73 NO. CYLINDERS CAST: TIME SAMPLED 7o ` ' TRUCK NO. 5' C REMARKS: rU „itCizrC4 (tvice_c_ I//Gj,--er6,7, c.q ,ritC//' rCaves/C 4ov,r due r0 Ovevi004 OL, o,.{ of (-07i7/P--r/or , l 1/2-1 A( STEP/-{/vet INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. SOILS AND CONCRETE INSPECTION FIELDWORK - LABORATORY 2608 PACIFIC AVENUE, OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 (206) 357-4650 • FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District DATE OF INSPECTION 05-05-76 PROJECT Additions & Alterations - High School REPORT NO. 14A CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Company PROJECT NO. E-027 Inspected roofing in area B between Lines E and F & 3 and 4. Laid paper on plywood and mopped first base ply on top of that. Around building edges 3 ' wide strip of mopped base ply was nailed with 4" nails. Asphalt was fluid with minimum temperature of 350° F on top of roof. WEATHER Sunny-55° INSPECTOR Ivan Stepanek CI , ' 1 c, EVERETT/(206)355-5800 ❑ P c " I o CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIA/(206)3574650 f: m VAPJCOUVERI(206)695-1381 ❑ y �9AR°DUCT CLIENT: gfitire c /2 rf; 'nehicoz ,X )r DATE OF INSPECTION V - 7C PROJECT: 1.-/d' 4 Co- i 3 AZ i 6,1 t'SeWee L 4C/2,C', REPORT NO. 13 iL CONTRACTOR: LA- , ''/ f- C-C 4'5 r• PROJECT NO. `r 2 7 FORMS INSPECTED 7' ' REBAR INSPECTED y ` 5 REMARKS: ( "9 n.' .-c.c',r •-y-f 1 a'.lid5 ( `: d 3 METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: ---(tai(C/ el et r-c- el lc1rl>: c • 4.4x--'/6 2 mac. METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: Ur ti /-' -? 7 'C ': NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED / LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: t5,' /7-2 .z'd - /"S c/o Gt CONCRETE SUPPLIER: 645z'4f - 4t'' ' Pii, DESIGN STRENGTH t3-0'/ c' PSI. / 1• ii CEMENT ,7� sk. TYPE r v MAX. SIZE AGGR. i4' SLUMP S AIR ADMIXTURES: - AMOUNT: e L, CONC. TEMP. ('`/ AIR TEMP. 5� WEATHER (C) CiG /�t>rj S .� LOCATION SAMPLED: 4ec 4 ' [e e 7, �'4 74 2"''t 3. 2- - 6 e'a L°i,L•i: zMil NO. CYLINDERS CAST: J TIME SAMPLED 7• " TRUCK NO. /C REMARr: / //-- ,-, t. - !_ O C,r/d 6' -4) c i ._) F 5 - Qg1' 4 'S7A CA)t -. 3 Z.' 3 (jet /,,'c5 4.9 4 ,e) ._, ' ft 27 i.N 1, S - ,9I!I,r' /J S 7 1.,,' = 3 4 .,5 e%.r0 L„r-c 5. r X 7' , l LX ANSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. SOILS AND CONCRETE INSPECTION FIELDWORK - LABORATORY 2609 PACIFIC AVENUE, OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 99501 (206) 357-4650 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District REPORT NO. 14 PROJECT Additions & Alterations-High School NO E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 05-05-76 INSPECTOR Ivan Stepanek LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT See Concrete Field Inspection Report #14B for detailed description of placement LOCATION SAMPLED Line B NO. YARDS PLACED 8 TRUCK SAMPLED 46 TIME SAMPLED 10:30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 z SIC TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 7/8 ADMIXTURES POZZ 300 N AMOUNT SLUMP 211 AIR CONTENT -"' CONCRETE TEMP. 60 0 WEATHER Overcast AIR TEMP. 50 0 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 52 1680 05-12-76 7 3040 53 1681 06-02-76 28 3710 54 1682 06-02-76 28 4470 DISTRIBUTION: 2-copies: Anacortes School District 1-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets �a40AL Test.14, �s ��co GENERAL TESTING �� Itp , (9 TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION e(4 of Washington, Inc. ooucTs �a 2608 pacific avenue/olympia,Muliington 98,5O1/f206J357..4650 ' CONCRETE TEST REPORT • :LIENT Anacortes School District REPORT NO. 13 'ROJECT Anacortes School Addition NO E-027 :ONTRACTOR Prime Construction • :ONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix FATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 05-04-76 INSPECTOR Ray Rusk OCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT See Concrete Field Inspection Report ib13 for detailed description of placement. OCATION SAMPLED Area B footing station line 3. 2 Grid Line E.4 IO. YARDS PLACED 18 TRUCK SAMPLED 16 TIME SAMPLED 2:00 tlX DATA: EMENT 5 i _SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4 DMIXTURES None AMOUNT LUMP 4" AIR CONTENT ———— CONCRETE TEMP. 64 0 FEATHER Overcast AIR TEMP. 56 0 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 49 1677 05-11-76 7 2580 50 1678 06-01-76 28 4510 51 _ 1679 06-01-76 28 4420 ISTRIBUTION: 2-copies : Anacortes School District • 9.-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfiled & Frets t. (013C" CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORTEVERETT/(206)355-5800 ❑lb, OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 ❑ �, J VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 ❑ e 9Aq�oUi ��Q C ,. fe-C1 0 C-/ /u✓ CI'/7 CLIENT: / C '?7"r L S44o A71E_- S.C//;r.- '. ,C>/ 9'7; DATE OF INSPECTION 2 l0 - Z PROJECT: /1/1',':-// / r '/ i `�.' t!/ ' GL ,iK: - <. NaREPORT N SC� ., CONTRACTOR: u� -j7`/ ^/ r-,;r} r r';14( it /.,,.- ' ) • / PROJECT NO. . FORMS INSPECTED ✓ REBAR INSPECTED `d, "� ";oTN//e 2j� c-/4/oiez. REMARKS: i=r�> ,e., /,r, ,' rAC/ X 672S/C'.Cd'Avrl, r fl S>+ l.,t> Gd 51-00fiEiss G.rct&17EZ. METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: /- 'O'A- ' / • METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION,: Rd 1,,/�2/P.O G- /,= NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED 4 LOCATION OF.-GSICWITETE PLACEMENT/ CM i1i / 3/-- ,V,- at ' / ' / `•�_ _ p"er..w C... l.0 '_'l /� . /aC/- L/ .veS 4.i., 1‘7n//: I, &0 ,52- a t/ - dEIGJ5 .61 CO'er c, ;; /i n r� DESIGN STRENGTH 2O�tr CONCRETE SUPPLIER: o � . •v:-,h! c.�^t.,',e V E L ��, � PSI. CEMENT`'/,,2 sk. TYPE / t MAX. SIZE AGGR. 3 SLUMP / / AIR t.— ADMIXTURES: AMOUNT: CONC. TEMP. — AIR TEMP�5a WEATHER 0.fr'l"/v-! C LOCATION SAMPLED: 2 / Ne- Si -T. 2 i pz.-. J c 8_ ,OQ 15 nit S f� NO. HERS CAST TIME SAMPLED /, A/TRUCK NO. Z 7 REMARKS: C ' Ai, a,e'LDG /ti W ,-,LL S O /y L / 'v' ne --7-7/ ti./ i=S d, 5`9SSA• ,�isFE Now • 2 Z otr A.Sot/,c aav, 7C,c,"; el; 6,z. aG,t 0/ -rs..,c.Z_s v Al Z. / n/LE 48. £ f' ,t�2=T L / r✓it_rs //oi % „c7A-- t NOMJ _€52- /=fdfr. 43•_0/'/f L=/. n'.. ;526, '5'7 ' !rX'/ A•_Sa rrRy Co HT? /•�G70etl S /? LINK' M ASON I2y ` A7, )• U, /y'/` / /---- : /J INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. I GENERAL TESTING��CcT. � EVERETTI(206)355-5600 fi ,, T PI4, =° C l TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIAI(206)357-4650 ✓ Sy t, a"4 of Washington Inc. trident-697-6840 r_� i�oucTS‘`e CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District . REPORT NO. 12 PROJECT Anacortes High School NO E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Company CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 02-10-76 INSPECTOR H. Adams LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENTPads . in area D and north wall east wall area C across from existing building, area A corridor adjoining caf- eteria LOCATION SAMPLED Area D an North Wall NO. YARDS PLACED 35 TRUCK SAMPLED 18-16-15TIMESAMPLED 8 :30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 2 SK. TYPE 1 MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4 ADMIXTURES POZZ AMOUNT SLUMP 43 AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. -iv0 WEATHER Rain AIR TEMP. 41° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 45 EC 1037 02-17-76 7 2690 46 EC 1038 03-09-76 28 5640 47 EC 1039 03-09-76 28 5790 48FC EC 1040 03-26 -76 45 4490 DISTRIBUTION: 2-copies : Anacortes School District #103 • 1-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets �r0p.l TEsr,� Q ,ter, GENERAL TESTING ti f i EVERETT I(206)355-5800 ❑ fI TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 �/ e ° trident-697-6840 ❑ �9,0a 4 of Washington, Inc. °°ours"' CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District . REPORT NO. 12 PROJECT Anacortes High School E-027 NO CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Company CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 02-10-76 INSPECTOR H. Adams LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENTPads in area D and north wall east wall area C across from existing building, area A corridor adjoining caf- eteria LOCATION SAMPLED Area D an North Wall NO. YARDS PLACED 35 TRUCK SAMPLED 18-16-15TIME SAMPLED 8 : 30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 54 SK. TYPE 1 MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4 ADMIXTURES POZZ AMOUNT SLUMP 4- AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 50° WEATHER Rain AIR TEMP. 41 0 • COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 45 EC 1037 02-17-76 7 2690 46 EC 1038 03-09-76 28 5640 47 EC 1039 03-09-76 28 5290 48FC EC 1040 03-09-76 28 DISTRIBUTION: 2-copies : Anacortes School District #103 • 1-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets I I 1 c ,PPL TESr4 o CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIAI(206)355;4:50omF „Q,c, trident-697-6840hq��UCTS`N CLIENT: / /-/7/1 ('G7'/ -t / nC/ if' ? Li r; ( re', DATE OF INSPECTION C)2-/< ; - '/(- PROJECT: / 7 /7 ny1,C.4/- _; - -ell C %1✓ }'1'C/ ✓/ REPORT NO. /2 CONTRACTOR:_ fJ ' /7 c ( " )/: LA N ( r1 -rv- i PROJECT NO. -0.7 FORMS INSPECTED (1-<-,-;- REBAR INSPECTED Cf A ,.- REMARKS: /12-,1`/' t'. METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 2.-(trig _z7 (1, 5 , //t jo/71 </: //' r /?.f 1 i 6- /c; METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: ( ,'-c-/,-, 77TC A ) NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED . ' LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT:00/1'vi, ,J) J /9A I? a Q 0fidit [/f'JrtL Ci jI? (l /l(>:- l t .'(7 1 i" (2 i ( /' - Kh.1 P (7 a (s,:T h ,„ //'r•s ) (i a�/(-,( „i / /.9. (i/i _,,,- "!_ /r'/ CONCRETE SUPPLIER: I "/7:„y' 6''.11 0/ /cYJ=-r2,-4, /77Lw- DESIGN STRENGTH 20C'6l PSI. CEMENT cF�2 sk. TYPE 1 MAX. SIZE AGGR. �'/ SLUMP k7/ AIR ADMIXTURES: --PC.>_22 AMOUNT: CONC. TEMP. .56 G 7 G AIR TEMP. J WEATHER ChJ ' LOCATION SAMPLED: 0A 1',72. 0 /2/1-(t. _%?A A / ) (mac J..17�1 NO. CYLINDERS CAST: A TIME SAMPLED 2'90 TRUCK NO. / /e.;-/c REMARKS: • INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. G�N�Pn� TEyryC -� EVERETTI(206)355-5800 0 .. ❑- : FIELD INSPECTION REPORTOLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 o -5,. :2 VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 ❑ ` G Qa. 5 9pDUCTS\N CLIENT: ' :•: Cr/„AO/ ./Y.:".%Y6 -17/7DATE OF INSPECTION 2- 9�7 - PROJECT: /I/r/?1/ UV/+ CI74/ 1.1 V//G.f, ^" _ _,„,) A „ REPORT NO. V a / CONTRACTOR: L/Z7fi//✓S6 N C J /i9des. PG PROJECT NO. tE or) (.72 . .' '711,77 7V.0 pa-770 nI 0/- l � /—ram L LGuJ / 1,4 -Fre A<'S O LA/ , tr.: FJ...D NI AT /cl r•'S 'EZ. AN-...0 ro -T'{a Ste.Jere- % ,0 cL/t C 7`, - u -' %r 11/44: 6 /-%G 7 A/ itri,c1,` " L. Is,C/ /✓ / ` C',P / n-Cr, /v/ 6 T " fz / 1 - L, G.' //C6 / t / i C G/lam t� .r h jC a /-". /-lc��.zz CL / CZ,f:/1,Z /-rw / /v.S'T/"4-ti / illy' ;// S r,pUc' /-! // / 'OR pes, R/ i,O 'ArL- / ft! C7 a . ` /6 C CJ fior .1=2-0 ‘g SL L 5T,'/0u,C pe72.L Lev a ,425 . /rE/2 /-c, R ni,-1-/1> / /J ro ,vr ter: N✓/7 t- /.7,A) .S (;$.SP6c/17C 1�.-/a /./ C G//r< 4I� ) / Tj�) e cv • BUD f2 c is, N S A// /- 7/J Rea � CoZ .C,&4 c L / " 'A' Co nA7z=,ee 4,,7-7 e AP /tv s,oc r/a n./ y Y 4%.:c At. 7 Fs- cTz ?' / • t--7 -G G a 1-1 WEATHER rS-- /`�'i 5SSitaD /t CO Ci z TEMP. RANGE A £ ' -7-U /-?) D 1Z /C,. .0 $Q-4--jL,-) Ja E in- '/>! /'C_ z5 15,R CGY . G p..c LcS ' t .iN4 /� DE L//o tic J a 4 STc/ 2 7`/�v 70/ _Le /-�AP0.)e,£71 1�14 CA54,A k�'c %- , %-It INSPELJOR C'_F/ . . .7 GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. Off* ppd. TEN, 'A,. EVERETT/(20G)355-5800 0 .` FIELD INSPECTION REPORT i OLYMPIA/(20G)357-4G50 0 S 1 o: VANCOUVER/(203)695-1381 0 Q '.j.air.._� - Q 99DUCTS`NAle ce• CLIENT: A/0 R TA S./U 377 DATE OF INSPECTION 2 ""6c- PROJECT: A/E-l/l-/ Wf/GOO .0/ N1//LLB' ) t S S . REPORT NO. c2 CONTRACTOR: 677 Ai Pt/ S o N( r / -A PROJECT NO. 2-C) 3/ /�� Rif Pf/Atir tjC"i:?S lc C )e" F T .f- 777.S ��2 jE_-c i-.�Jn7b )Ec r 7-E tin ; /IA /LLD G p/ : ' efi ;,4 , /r.` mac% cr fc s CtcipL k 'D i / /rvS 4.e. c. / N C Sc Lf »A! ,/h 1---To P. - W .. Sow 0 t` L-o O e a .7" ^��a :/ 1`) t't/ED. - .M 2 -ro- 76 „Z TL. N/ ; NI is-so !•r g y: w o R t C' n1 c L=GG ED .bue 7� n G(J Tf�- /t4� U G A-? K -LLJ ( L L- �-?L` Z./MiL M b At,, Z- 9- r c L IA//L A,re,t ce .D'=& "7 / 7-'77 t4 GT( - ail ; Srezzc7'_�'7`cEG . C.Urc c c p ouraEI//3 "v/i Air-0 ems: : Sn= G Nl / s C S neu ;-n/ rP z. %TL q S 1--7. `"Cs/ t/fr- ) / H/ . 1 rN1 ryo "'; oc c-As7 /02 Z/ .b.D /.eo N /cs / /`vac' C c ri c E ,f WEATHER �� ! 2 i C� F%c4 `%/. / r✓G"` I"/ , .' - TEMP. RANGE 16.' ti/r 2 C cc s ' S,7G r K Y - 'INSPECTOR' 2` GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. 201>t_ _ .' f`., o CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION ION REPOHT O LYA PiA((2Q6)357-46560 J °,o Y� _ }=`r o VANCOUVER!(206)645-1381 ❑ 90DUCTS CLIENT: Ai f%ter 1 e s Scl ao i P/Sfnet /(3 DATE OF INSPECTION 2-2_ ?-76 PROJECT: 4., 4erfes kec / iCi e0-0, 4))-rrul".ans REPORT NO. / CONTRACTOR: Pr i (Coro*r.,kctew Ca i,, A0,„ „ PROJECT NO. L -C 2-7 FORMS INSPECTED .79 L),11) 7G. RESAR INSPECTED -x Q 'r(-ii . `7& REMARKS: METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: piii11/1 METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: ZR-Ye ri".a J (7 bratic,-.- NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED 'TI' LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: /1/rec, �7 CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Gc sccJ lS c e°Ay /411, ;, DESIGN STRENGTH 3 00 C1 PSI. CEMENT S 2- sk. TYPE MAX. SIZE AGGR. -/4/ SLUMP 91' _AIR__N/fA % ADMIXTURES: 1(102_7oh /'lti 306 /V AMOUNT:_ 9:6 cz.//,1. . 'CONC. TEMP. AIR TEMP. WEATHER LOCATION SAMPLED: NO. CYLINDERS CAST: 9 TIME SAMPLED cRr) TRUCK NO. 'REMARKS: (1i v1/4.cre / � v1cr i t/ A�cJrc ��a S a ti ptcit� ��"/� `5 INSPECTOR a / GENERAL TESTING « TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. cc.PnA-TEsh ay-,,p4,F 4%00 GENERAL TESTING EVERET7l(206)355-5800 I � ° & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIA1(206)357-4650 V- 9 4 of Washington, Inc. trident-697-6840 u oommN CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District . REPORT NO. 11 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions NO E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 01-29-76 INSPECTOR H. Adams LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing walls , Area D LOCATION SAMPLED Same as Above NO. YARDS PLACED 50 TRUCK SAMPLED Unk TIME SAMPLED 8 :30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3 4 ADMIXTURES POZZ 300 N AMOUNT 4.8 oz yd SLUMP 4 AIR CONTENT CONCRETE TEMP. Unk WEATHER unk AIR TEMP. unk COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 41 EC 101 02-05-76 7 2690 42 EC 102 02-26-76 28 5220 43 ' EC 103 02-26-76 28 4510 44 EC 104 02-26-76 28 4850 DISTRIBUTION: 1-copy: Anacortes School District • 1-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende , P. E. 1-copy: Prime Construction Co. 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets e.AI TES 2_1 4 h I =! E-MTTI AL r c rr cr EVERETT/(205)355-5800 ' - ' o Cf lia_rr� I Lantrc—z- LEIIC1..0: oLYM PIA/(206)357-4650 F e, ai WasaanCtantinc. ��CUCT5 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District REPORT NO. 10 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alter. NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 01-16-76 INSPECTOR C. Wells . LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT footings , area D from about lines C to D. Footing walls , area C from about lines D to E and 4 to 4. 5 LOCATION SAMPLED footing walls NO. YARDS PLACED unk TRUCK SAMPLED 15 TIMESAMPLED 9 : 00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES POZZ 300 N AMOUNT 4. 8 oz/yd SLUMP 4 AIR CONTENT CONCRETE TEMP. 52 0 WEATHER Overcast/calm AIR TEMP. 48° CO1 PRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 37 EC 973 01-23-76 7 3160 38 EC 974 ' 02-13-76 28 4850 39 EC 975 02-13-76 28 4880 40 EC 976 02-13-76 28 4460 DISTRIBUTION: 1-copy: Anacortes School District 1-copy: City of Anacortes , c/o Ray Iverson 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy : Bryant , Butterfield & Frets , oAL TFS1/ _ EVERETT/(206)355-5800 ❑ It FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 ❑ s 1/2bDUCTS ‘M CLIENT: Anacortes School District DATEOFINSPECTION 01-16-76 PROJECT: Anacortes High School REPORT NO. 10B CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction PROJECT NO. E-027 Reinforcing steel in the footings area D from about lines C to D; and footing walls , area C from about lines D to E and 4 to 4. 5 was inspected and found to be in compliance with the project plans and specifications . Distribution: 1-copy: Anacortes School District 1-copy: City of Anacortes , c/o Ray Iverson 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant , Butterfield & Frets WEATHER Overcast/calm TEMP. RANGE 48° - 52° C. Wells INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. 4"AL rEsr,26 .r EVERETTI(206)355-5800 ❑ = CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT p1YMPIA I(206)357-4650 ❑ a9 �.` Qw VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 ❑ e lboUCTS`N CLIENT: Anacortes School District DATE OF INSPECTION 01-16-76 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Additions & Alter. REPORT NO. 10A CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. PROJECT NO. E-027 FORMS INSPECTED YeS REBAR INSPECTED Yes REMARKS: None METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Pump METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: Internal Vibration NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED Unk LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: footings , area D from about lines C to D footing walls , area C from about line D to E and 4 to 4. 5 CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Cascade Ready "Mix DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI. CEMENT 52 sk. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGR. 3/4" SLUMP 4" AIR --- ADMIXTURES: POZZ 300 N AMOUNT: 4. 8 oz/yd CONC. TEMP. 52o AIR TEMP. 48o WEATHER Overcast/calm LOCATION SAMPLED: footing walls NO. CYLINDERS CAST: 4 TIME SAMPLED 9: 00 TRUCK NO. 15 REMARKS: Concrete placement was as required by project plans and specifications . Distribution : 1-copy: Anacortes School District 1-copy: City of Anacortes , c/o Ray Iverson 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant , Butterfield & Frets C. Wells INSPECTOR GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. 2EP AL T'^AT�4 z GENERAL R.AL TESTING EVERETT/(206)355-5800 Ln - , � & TIMBER PROIDUCTS INSPECTION OLYM PIA/(206)357-4650 Fq of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 IJ �OOIh_TS�� CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT Anacortes School District REPORT NO. 9 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions NO E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cacade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 12-31-75 INSPECTOR C. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT remainder of footing walls in Area C from E to F and remainder of footing from line D to E LOCATION SAMPLED footing walls at about line C NO. YARDS PLACED 63 TRUCK SAMPLED 18 TIME SAMPLED 9:00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 z SK. TYPE 1 MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES P0zz AMOUNT 4. 8 oz/yd SLUMP 44 AIR CONTENT --- CONCRETE TEMP. 46° WEATHER Clear/Windy AIR TEMP. 32° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 33 01-07-76 7 2480 34 01-28-76 28 4630 35 01-28-76 28 4460 36 01-28-76 28 3710 DISTRIBUTION: 2-copy: Anacortes School District 1-copy: City of Anacortes 1-copy: Kase Vanden Ende , P. E. 1-copy: Prime Construction 1-copy: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets EPA,Test, yc yyzGENERAL TESTINGFVERETTI(2061355-5800 X- {��`tt f� TIRSBER YIROIDUCiT.S INSPECTION O�YMF'lA/(206)'157-4fi.`i0 F " e„ VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 q 4 of Washington, Inc. CONCRETE TEST REPORT 12-22-75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 8 PROJECT Anacortes High School .Additions and A ieratiojis NO E-27 ' CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix _ DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 12-22-75 INSPECTOR C. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Area C, Foundation Wallc LOCATION SAMPLED Near West Side NO. YARDS PLACED TRUCK SAMPLED 23 TIME SAMPLED 9 :00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozzol i th 300 N AMOUNT 4.8 oz. /yd. SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT N/A CONCRETE TEMP. 50° WEATHER Overcast with slight breeze AIR TEMP. 43° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 29 EC-866 12-29-75 7 - 3490 " 30 EC-867 1-19-76 78 _ 5710 31 EC-868 1-19-76 28 5270 32 f.c. EC-869 1 -19-76 28 f.c. 4620 DISTRIBUTION: 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - City of Anacortes , c/o Ray Iverson, Bldg. Inspector 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File a ��4�yPl resT/4, q I:. i GENERAL TESTING E VERETT/(2061355 5800 X R ; Qe� & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSP1 CTION n (Krmv IA/(22061,157 06tHA5 4650 °ao" Ts N5 of Washington, Inc. CONCRETE TEST REPORT 12-22-75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 _ REPORT NO. 8 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions and Alteratifn5__NO E-27 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co,_ CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix 12-22-75 DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED ___ _ _._ C. LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT A_rea- C.,._Foundation_Walls LOCATION SAMPLED Near West Side _ NO. YARDS PLACED TRUCK SAMPLED 23 TIME SAMPLED 9:00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozzol i th 300 N AMOUNT 4.8 oz. /yd. SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT N/A CONCRETE TEMP. 50° WEATHER Overcast with slight hrPe7P AIR TEMP. 43° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 29 EC-866 12-29-75 7 3430 30 EC-867 1-19-16__—_ _ 28 .. 31 EC-868 1-19-76 28 32 f.c. EC-869 1 -19-76 _28_f.c. DISTRIBUTION: 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - City of Anacortes , c/o Ray Iverson , Bldg.=' 'Inspectar I copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File c ' _ Z GENERAL TESTING TING EVERETTI(206)355_ 5800P Qm T CX (1 TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIAI(206)357-4650 Ci tPy90 \NeQ�` of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVERI(206)695.1361 �ucT6 CONCRETE TEST REPORT 11-25-75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 6 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 11-25-75 INSPECTOR Craig Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Area "C" Footings from approximately Line D.5 North LOCATION SAMPLED West Side of Area "C" NO. YARDS PLACED 95 TRUCK SAMPLED 16 TIME SAMPLED 9:00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozzolith 300 N AMOUNT 4.8 oz. per yd. SLUMP 3" AIR CONTENT CONCRETE TEMP. 52" WEATHER Overcast and Calm AIR TEMP. 44° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS ' DESIGN STRENGTH 3QQQ PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 21 EC-739 12-02-75 7 2720 dm 22 EC-740 12-23-75 28 5770 23 EC-741 1::-2 3-75 28 5940 ; 24 EC-742 12-23-75 28 3540 DISTRIBUTION: 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - City of Anacortes C/O Ray Iverson Bldg. Inspector 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co, 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield , & Frets (Architects) 1 copy - File Remarks : Cylinders were tipped over in field on date cast. 9,11.L Test Tr 6 T I Z GENERAL l ry�EST NG EVERETT/(206)355-5800)0 P 0GP TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 LI , 5Q�4 o Washington, Inc. VANCOUVER1(206)695-1381 iboucTs f at + CONCRETE TEST REPORT 11-25-75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 y REPORT NO. 7 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction:,Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 11-25-75 INSPECTOR Craig E. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Area "C" Footings from approximately Line D. 5 North LOCATION SAMPLED North Side of Area "C" NO. YARDS PLACED 95 TRUCK SAMPLED 11 TIME SAMPLED 1 :15 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozzolith 300 N AMOUNT 4. 8 oz. per yd. SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT CONCRETE TEMP, 54°F WEATHER Overcast and breezy AIR TEMP. 45° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. dm 25 EC-743 12-02-75 7 2210 26 EC-744 _ 12-23-75 28 4630 27 EC-745 12-23-75 28 4880 28 F.C. EC-746 12-23-75 28 3730 DISTRIBUTION: 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - City of Anacortes c/o Ray Iverson Bldg. Inspector 1 copy Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield, & Frets (Architects) 1 copy - File rd • GENERAL TESTING EVERETTI(206)355-5800 ❑ lP V TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLVMPIAI(206)357-4650 ❑ � ducts"'Se of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVERI(206)695-1381 ❑ CONCRETE TEST REPORT 11-25-75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 6 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 11-25-75 INSPECTOR Craig Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Area "C" Footings from approximately Line D.5 North LOCATION SAMPLED West Side of Area "C" NO. YARDS PLACED 95 TRUCK SAMPLED 16 TIME SAMPLED 9:00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozzolith 300 N AMOUNT 4.8 oz. per yd. SLUMP 3" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 52° WEATHER Overcast and Calm AIR TEMP. 44° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 21 EC-739 12-02-75 7 2720 dm 22 EC-740 12-23-75 _ 28 23 EC-741 28 24 EC-742 12-23-75 28 DISTRIBUTION : 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - City of Anacortes C/0 Ray Iverson Bldg. Inspector 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co, 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield , & Frets (Architects) 1 copy - File Remarks : Cylinders were tipped over in field on date cast. C T , GENERAL TESTING EVERETT/(206)355-5800 ❑ P 0 0 TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIA!(206)357-4650 ❑ ;Ts ed`° of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVER I(206)695-1381 ❑ °ars�P CONCRETE TEST REPORT 11-25-75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 7 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction iCo. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 11-25-75 INSPECTOR Craig E. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Area "C" Footings from approximately Line D.5 North LOCATION SAMPLED North Side of Area "C" NO. YARDS PLACED 95 TRUCK SAMPLED 11 TIME SAMPLED 1 :15 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4 ADMIXTURES Pozzolith 300 N AMOUNT 4.8 oz. per yd. SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT CONCRETE TEMP. 54°F WEATHER Overcast and breezy AIR TEMP. 45° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 25 EC-743 12-02-75 7 2210 dm 26 EC-744 12-23-75 28 27 EC-745 12-23-75 28 28 F.C. EC-746 12-23-75 28 DISTRIBUTION: 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - City of Anacortes c/o Ray Iverson Bldg. Inspector 1 copy Kase Vanden Ende , P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield, & Frets (Architects) 1 copy - File ��#0.1 rEsp,+O TEVERErr!(2f16)355-5800 0 '` P I o FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLVMPIAI(206)357-4S50 0 VANCOUVERI(206)695.1381 ❑ %OUCTS 4 CLIENT: Anacortes School District #103 DATE OF INSPECTION 11-25-75 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations REPORT NO. 5 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. PROJECT NO. E-027 Reinforcing steel in the footings of Area "C" from approximately line D.5. north was inspected. Numerous locations were1found where the clearance was not,specified. and other lo- cations where the rebar was in contact with the ground. At some corners, corner bars were left out. In other locations , proper laps were not used. Some of these ervors were corrected prior to placement, but for the most part, cor- s rective action took place during concrete placement. Oneman, wtthoccasional worked a ead of the concrete 1 m l ccasi 1 help, hplacement, clearing the steel , removing debris from the bottom of the forms , repositioning steel , adding bars and retying. 4, .4 WEATHER Overcast and Calm • TEMP. RANGE 42° — - } Distribution : 1 copy - Anacortes School District #103 I copy - City of Anacortes ' ,3 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende , P.E. - L Elude; 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield & Frels INSPECTOR 1 copy - File - Craig E. Wells GENERAL TESTING &TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. O�atpPL TEs?41,0 c T ( = CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT EVERETT/(206)355.5600 ❑ OLYM PIA I(206)357-4650 ❑ 1 m ,P °ct VANCOUVER!(206)695-1381 C ROOUCTS Cr CLIENT: Anacortes School District #103 DATE OF INSPECTION 11-25-75 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations REPORT NO. 4 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. PROJECT NO. E-027 FORMS INSPECTED REBAR INSPECTED REMARKS: See Steel Inspection Report • METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Pump . " METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: Internal Vibration NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED 95 LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Footing, Area "C" from approximately Line D.5 North CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Cascade Ready Mix DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI. CEMENT 5 1/2 sk. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGR. 3/4" SLUMP3"04j'AIR --- ADMIXTURES: Pozz AMOUNT: CONC. TEMP. 52°-54AIR TEMP. 44°-45ANEATHER Overcast (Calm at 9:00. breezy at 1 :15) LOCATION SAMPLED: West Side of Area "C" and North Side of Area "C" NO. CYLINDERS CAST: B TIME SAMPLED 9 :00&1 :15 TRUCK NO. 16 and 11 REMARKS: Concrete Placement was in compliance with project.pland.andspecifisatiens. - - ' Distribution : Anacortes School District #103 1 copy . City of Anacortes 1 rn y Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy `• Prime Construction Co. 1 copy Bryant, Butterfield & Frets (Architects) 1 copy INSPECTOR Craig E. Wells !' GENERAL TESTING & IIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. GI MWO I FIELD INSPECTION REPORT EVERETf1(206)357-4850 ❑ g OLYMPIAf206)35 - 650 ❑ VANCOUVER/1206)6954W f i CLIENT: Anacortes School District #103 DATE OF INSPECTION 11-24-75 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations REPORT NO. 4 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. PROJECT NO. E-Q27• Inspected the forms and placement of reinforcing steel footings in area "C" north of Line D.5. There were a" number of discrepancies noted; such ,as missing re-bar, not enough lap on splices , loose soil in Footing Area, lack of clearance on re-bar, re-bar im- properly placed, mud on re-bar and etc. These discrepancies were given to Merle Ray, Contractor's Superintendent & Craig Wells , who will be the inspectors on the project, November 25, 1975. These discrepancies will be corrected prior to placement of concrete. It ,A - .. - 4 WEATHER Cloudy & Calm TEMP. RANGE 40° to 45° n Distribution: 1 copy - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - City of Anacortes - 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. , 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. , Inc. INSPECTOR 1 copy - Bryant Butterfield & Frets (Architects) Thomas C. Nielsen 1 copy - File GENERAL-TESTING S TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. o��p T�l TpstO 6 ' I Z GENERAL TESTING EVERETT/(206)355-5800 X7 p o OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 ❑ & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION \S OO Ne> Of Washington, Ine. VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 ❑ 5` CONCRETE TEST REPORT November 14, 1975 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 5 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade REady Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 14, 1975 INSPECTOR C. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing walls - Area A, A Line to B.4 Line LOCATION SAMPLED About B Line NO. YARDS PLACED 42 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 16 TIME SAMPLED 9:00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1 /2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4. 8 oz./yd. SLUMP 5" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 55° WEATHER Overcast and breezy AIR TEMP. 52° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH PSI CYL NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 17 EC-704 11 /21 /75 7 2723 18 EC-705 12/12/75 28 4070 19 EC-706 12/12/75 28 4160 c0 FC EC-707 12/12/75 28 FC 3520 DISTRIBUTION : 1 copy - Ray Iverson , Bldg. Inspector, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District f103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - bryant , Butterfield & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File CIotAL res7)4, & T CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT EVERETTp2o6)355:5800 ti z OLYMPIAiiro6)357-4650 -IMF- l T f VANCOUVER 11206)695-1381 q 4 �UCTs�N"C I CLIENT: Anacortes School District #103 DATE OF INSPECTION 11-14-75 PROJECT: ' AnaCorte"s Ugh School Additions and Alterations REPORT NO. 3 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. , Inc. PROJECT NO. E-027 FORMS INSPECTED 11-11-75 REBAR INSPECTED 11-11-75 REMARKS: Inspected by Tom Nielsen METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Pump METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: Internal Vibration NO. YARDS CONC:! PLACED 42 1/2 LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT:' Footing Walls - Area A - ' " . from approximately. B.4 Line to Line A CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Cascade Ready Mix DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI. CEMENT 5 1/2sk. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGR. 3/4" SLUMP 5" AIR -- % ADMIXTURES: Pozz AMOUNT: 4.8 oz. per yard CONC. TEMP. 55° AIR TEMP. 52° WEATHER Overcast and breezy LOCATION SAMPLED: Approximately A Line NO. CYLINDERS CAST: 4 TIME SAMPLED 9 :00 TRUCK NO. 16 REMARKS: Concrete Placement was in compliance with project plans and specifications. Distribution: 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - City of Anacortes 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield , & Frets (Architects) 1 copy - File INSPECTOR Craig E. Wells GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. ; foe 6 , GENERAL TESTING EVERETT/(206)355-5800 P 2 & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OIVMPIA/(206)357-4650 ❑ y�° of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 ❑ NO°ucTs d CONCRETE TEST REPORT November 13, 1975 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 4 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 13, 1975 INSPECTOR C. Well s LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing Walls - Area A from B.4 to D LOCATION SAMPLED Westerly North-South Wall at about I inp r NO. YARDS PLACED 112 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 11 TIME SAMPLED 3 :30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1 /2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4. 8 oz. /yd. SLUMP 3 1/2" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 57° WEATHER Overcast with high winds AIR TEMP. 54° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3,000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 13 EC-700 11/20/75 7 2759 14 EC-701 12/11/75 28 4240 15 EC-702 12/11/75 _ 28 4440 16 F. C. EC-703 12/11/75 28 F. C. 3750 DISTRIBUTION : 1 copy - Ray Iverson, Bldg. Inspector, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende , P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield, & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File ��PAL Test of c i -1c 2 GENERAL TESTING EVERETTI(206)355-5800 X7 o P TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION ( )357-4650 0 F �° OLYMPIAI206 VANCOUVERI(206)695-1381 ❑ 9q 4 of Washington, Inc. gooucrs"' CONCRETE TEST REPORT ! November 13. 19 75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 3 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix - DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 13, 1975 INSPECTOR C. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing Walls - Area A from Line B.4 to D LOCATION SAMPLED South wall of lower level NO. YARDS PLACED 112 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 23 TIME SAMPLED 12:30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1 /2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4.8 oz./yd. SLUMP 4 1 /4" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 55° WEATHER Overcast with high winds AIR TEMP. 54° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3 ,f90 PSI CYL. ND. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 9 EC-696 11/20/75 7 2741 10 EC-697 12/11/75 28 4580 11 EC-698 12/11/75 28 4620 12 F. C. EC-698 12/11 /75 28 F. C. 3360 1 DISTRIBUTION: 1 copy - Ray Iverson , Bldg. Inspector, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District 4103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende , P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant , Butterfield , & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File ��4 ,AL TEST C c r Pr of CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OVERPAI(206)355-5800 ET 0 T �u VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 tOUCTs N CLIENT: Anacortes School District #103 DATE OF INSPECTION 11-13-75 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Additions and Alternates REPORT NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. , Inc. PROJECT NO. E-027 FORMS INSPECTED 11-11-75 REBAR INSPECTED 11 -11-75 REMARKS: Inspected by Tom Nielsen METHOD OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Pump METHOD OF CONSOLIDATION: Internal Vibration NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED 112 jj2 LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Footing Walls - Area A From approximately Line B.4 to D CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Cascade Ready Mix DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI. CEMENT 5 1/2 sk. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGR. 3/4" SLUMP * AIR --- % ADMIXTURES: Pozz AMOUNT: 4.8 oz./yd. CONC. TEMP. * AIR TEMP. 55° WEATHER Overcast and high winds LOCATION SAMPLED: NO. CYLINDERS CAST: 12 TIME SAMPLED * TRUCK NO * REMARKS: Concrete Placement was as specified in the project plans and specifications. Note: Three sets of four cylinders each were cast, in accordance with the specification for one set per each fifty cubic yards. See individual concrete tests reports numbers 2.3 and 4 for information on each set. * See concrete test report of information Distribution : 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets , (Architects) I copy - File 1 copy - City of Anacortes INSPECTOR Craig E. Wells GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. *I ?OPAL Tfgr?�C TEVERETT/(206)355-5800 ❑ z FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIAI(206)357-4650 C G° P -. 4 V ANCOUVERI(206)695-1381 B I3 e p 9 ooucrs CLIENT: Anacortes School District #103 DATEOFINSPECTION 11-12-75 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Addition & Alt. REPORT NO. 3 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. , Inc . PROJECT NO. E-027 Re-inspected the forms and placement of reinforcing steel in the Foundation Walls of Building, "A" . Not all of the diecreptancies noted on Field In- spection Report dated 11-11-75, were corrected . Stood-by to assure that the discreptancies were corrected and that the work and placement was IAW Plans and Specifications prior to the concrete placement scheduled for the firsts thing Thursday morning (11-13-75) . Discreptancies that were not cor- rect this date due to lack of time but will be correct prior to concrete placement are as follows: Top #5 bars at the north end of building , mud on rebar and forms need sow dust and dirt wash out . These discreptancies will be checked prior to concrete placement to assure that they are corrected Distribution: 1 copy - Mr. Ray Iverson, Building Inspector 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende , P.E. - 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. , Inc . 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield Frets 1 copy - File WEATHER Cloudy and Windy TEMP. RANGE 45 degrees to 50 degrees. al INSPECTOR Thomas C . Nielsen GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. °‘c,+00.1-TEST,i, cT I Z GENERAL TESTING EVERETT/(206)355-5800 X P ° & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIAI(206)357-4650 �F to VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 9 5Q of Washington, Inc. CONCRETE TEST REPORT November 14, 1975 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 5 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade REady Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 14 . 1975 INSPECTOR C. Wel 1 s 1 LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing walls - Area A, A Line to B.4 Line LOCATION SAMPLED About B Line NO. YARDS PLACED 42 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 15 TIME SAMPLED 9 :00 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1 /2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4. 8 oz./yd. .a SLUMP 5" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 55° WEATHER Overcast and breezy AIR TEMP. 52° - -_- COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH PSI. CYL. NO'. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD.P.S.I. 17 EC-704 11/21/75 , . 7 2723 18 EC-705 12/12/75 28 19 EC-706 12/12/75 28 20 FC EC-707 12/12/75 28 FC DISTRIBUTION: 1 copy - Ray Iverson , Bldg. Inspector, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File et.res7.44, G I = GENERAL TESTING EVERETTI(206)355-5800 'R P ° TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIAI(206)357-4650 ' F T ¢� VANCOUVERI(206)695-1381 ._ 4 Q of Washington, Inc. gODuo.s CONCRETE TEST REPORT November 13, 1975 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 4 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIEFi Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 13 , 1975 INSPECTOR C. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing Walls - Area A from B.4 to D LOCATION SAMPLED Westerly North-South Wall at ahnut I ipe r NO. YARDS PLACED 112 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 11 TIME SAMPLED 3 .30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4.8 oz./yd. -. SLUMP 3 1/2" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 57° WEATHER Overcast with high winds AIR TEMP. 54° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3,000 PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. _ DATE TESTED- - -- --- AGE -tJN1T LOAD P.S.I. 13 EC-700 11/20/75 7 2759 14 EC-701 12/11/75 28 15 EC-702 12/11/75 28 16 F.C. EC-703 12/11/75 28 F.C. DISTRIBUTION: 1 copy - Ray Iverson , Bldg. Inspector, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield, & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File ��e M.Tea?, iO c r = GENERAL TESTING EVERETT/(206)355-58001(E TP o & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 ❑ ��ouCTS \4 of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVERI(206)695-1381 q CONCRETE TEST REPORT November 13, 1975 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 2 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO. E-0r CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 13, 1975 INSPECTOR C WP11c LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing Walls - Area A from Line 8.4 to D LOCATION SAMPLED North Wall NO. YARDS PLACED 112 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 18 TIME SAMPLED 9 .10 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 _SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4 R n7/yri SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. 56° WEATHER Overcast with high winds AIR TEMP. 50° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH Linn PSI CYL, NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. EC-692 11/20/75 7 2688 EC-693 12/11/75 28 4400 7 EC-694 12/11/75 28 4490 2 F.C. EC-695 12/11/75 28 F. C. -- 3680 DISTRIBUTION: 1 copy - Ray Iverson , Bldg. Inspector, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File spaL rest?410 c T P, o GENERAL TESTING EVERETTI(206)355-5800 & OLYMPIAI(206)357-4650 T & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION VANCOUVERI(206)695-1381 `9A yQ� of Washington, Inc. gp1)VcTs\`' CONCRETE TEST REPORT November 13. 1975 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 3 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 13, 1975 INSPECTOR C. Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing Walls - Area A from Line B.4 to D LOCATION SAMPLED South wall of lower level NO. YARDS PLACED 112 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 23 TIME SAMPLED 12:30 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4.8 oz./yd. SLUMP 4 1 /4" AIR CONTENT CONCRETE TEMP. 55a WEATHER Overcast with high winds - AIR TEMP. 54° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH 3.000 PSI CYL. N(7 " LAB. N1O.` DATE-TESTED - •--AGE - -- UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 9 EC-696 11/20/75. 7 2741 10 EC-697 12/11/75 28 11 EC-698 12/11/75 28 12 F.C. EC-698 12/11/75 28 F. C. DISTRIBUTION: 1 copy Ray Iverson, Bldg. Inspector, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy - Bryant , Butterfield , & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File �4fl� resric o< 6 T 1 = GENERAL TESTING EVERETT/(206)355-5800U s P 2 & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION owMPiAi(2os)3s�-as5o mes T Q�4 of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVER/(206)695-1381 �k)DUCTS CONCRETE TEST REPORT November 13 . 1975 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 2 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions & Alterations NO. E7027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Co. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED November 13, 1975 INSPECTOR r WP11c LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footing Walls - Area A from Line B.4 to D LOCATION SAMPLED North Wall NO. YARDS PLACED 112 1/2 TRUCK SAMPLED 18 TIME SAMPLED 9.10 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES Pozz AMOUNT 4 R n7/yri SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT ---- CONCRETE TEMP. SR° WEATHER Overcast with high winds AIR TEMP. 50° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS • • DESIGN STRENGTH 3 min PSI CYL. NO: - LAB. NO. DATE TESTES.. AGE.. _ UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 5 EC-692 • 11/20/75,; 7 2688 6 EC-693 12/11/75 28 7 EC-694 12/11/75 28_ 8 F.C. EC-695 12/11/75 _2R F.C. . DISTRIBUTION: 1 copy Roy Iverson, Bldg. Inspector:,, City of Anacortes 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P.E. 1 copy - Prime Construction Co. 1 copy Bryant, Butterfield & Frets , Architects 1 copy - File gr T EVERETT/(206)355-5800 L. G FIELD INSPECTION REPORT OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 O3 C- VANCOUVERI(206)695-1381 '°gOoucTs �a5 CLIENT: Anacortes School District #103 DATE OFINSPECTION - 11-11.-75 PROJECT: Anacortes High School Addition & Alt . REPORT NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Prime Construction Co. PROJECT NO. E-027 Inspected the forms and placement of reinforcing steel in the Foundation Walls of Building , "A" . Several discreptancies were noted during the in- spection consisting of missing rebar ar the top of the wall , in proper spacing of rebar , dowel coming out of Footings to close to outside edge of concrete , column pads , West side at the S .W. corner , mud on rebar , form needing to be washed . A list of the above discreptancv was given to Merle Ray, Superintendent for Prime Construction Co. and Fred Foust , Architectural Representative , the discreptancies were also pointed out to then on the pro- ject too. Will be back tomorrow to see that the discreptacies were correcte< Distribution: 1 copy - Mr. Ray Iverson , Building Inspector 2 copies - Anacortes School District #103 1 copy - Kase Vanden Ende, P . E . 1 copy - Prime Construction Co ,, Inc .___ _ 1 copy - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets 1 copy - File WEATHER Cloudy and Windy 1 TEMP. RANGE 42 degrees to 45 degrees / r� it. . \. n INSPECTOR Thomas C . Nielsen GENERAL TESTING & TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTON, INC. N: A 71 _ G I z GENERAL TESTING EVERETTI(206)355-5800 a p tQ N TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLYMPIA/(206)357-4650 ❑ , vit._ use of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVER)(206)695-1381 0 "DOUCTS4 CONCRETE TEST REPORT 10-23-75 1`'° CLIENT_ Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 1er - PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Company , CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 10-23-75 INSPECTOR Craig Wells LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footings - Area A 1 LOCATION SAMPLED Footings South Side 1 NO. YARDS PLACED 60 TRUCK SAMPLED 15 TIME SAMPLED 8:15 MIX DATA: c' CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" +;, . ADMIXTURES --- AMOUNT --- p i SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT --- CONCRETE TEMP. 5ra6' WEATHER Partly Cloudy and Calm AIR TEMP. 41° to 48°, . COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS , DESIGN STRENGTH PSI j CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 1 EC-463 10-30-75 7 _ 2812 01 2 EC-464 11-20-75 28 5748 ha 3 EC-465 -.. 11-20-75 28 5748 Y 4 F.C. EC-466 11-20-75 28 4474 DISTRIBUTION: 1 each - Ray Iverson, Bldg. Inspection City ofAnacortes 2 each - Anacortes School District #103 (cc. Gary Nelson and Fred Foust), 1 each - Kase Vanden Ende P.E. 1 each - Prime Construction Company, Inc. 1 each - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets I each - File I 1, ' " t' 4 1tt�, !°y1 'kr'a, +�(f:N a xq� ""i' c),N° - + s 7A:k p r& ,: �.�:�6 �' r* .'i Y, , ` • .vt VN' +°' ' 1 5i^p 'br ' a�' 'a' i ! g -L�„ Y�. 1t r „ � rev ? ' '` EVERETTI(20613 640, C„°t ` c T I CONCRETE.,.FIELD INSPECTION REPORT o�,xns?IAi(20c4)85y"4,E50 Pt; t I VANcouvaF17(2D81 e96;t38t.4,' ;.. °Aoo {e M i • a . i . CLIENT: • Anacorters School District #103 DATE OF INSPECTION 10-23- 75 " PROJECT: , Anacortes iligh School Additions and Alteration$IEPORT NO, ,,,:°' CONTRACTOR: Prime- Construction Co. PROJECT NO. 2-027 ' ' ...W FOAMS INSPECTED .10-22-75,, " REBAR INSPECTED 10-22-75 4, 1 , •' t,, a• I r,RE,MARKS., Corrections' were made as directed METHOD OF QONCRETE",PLAggIIENT: ` Pumped i; METHOO9F,.CQN$OLICIATION1' internal Vibration NO. YARDS CONC. PLACED EO i 1 LOCATION OF CONCRETEEPLACEMENT Footings - Area A 4 , T �w , . Y. "11111 CONCRETE SUPPLIER:' Cascade Ready Mix DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSt17 ., 4 CEMENT 5 '1/2 sk. TYPE I- MAX. SIZE AGGR. 3/4" SLUMP 3 3/4AIR -----To 1 , ADMIXTURES:' • AMOUNT: ii -- ,.. - :: C.ONC TEMP: t..55 ° AIR 'TEMP 41-48 WEATHER Partly Cloudy and Calm ,.,,. • dGG rees, ,, ,.d aeggrees • „ 'I'_ ' •''LOCATION SAMPnJ,', D. "^'"'- Foot inys - South Side .$ • 'N'O,, CYLINDERS AST:':‘ 4 TIME ,SAMPLED 8 :15 TRUCK NO. REMARKS: _ Placement was- in accordance with proiect plans and .n • Y 1 k, i ;-, specifications. li r + 1 T x ' 1 Y JI b � If'C F 1; v u M _ I ,1 ,r1" ?tpnte Y ft Y'� 4'; 1.;,- :' 'r44rWDistribution. G P , r , _ ' . ra ,„ > } 2 '°co �te,s Anacgrtes, School District ` '" 4,:x; 1 cope, !City of Anacortes ,1 P 'k r ^ 1 n:cony' -': prime construction co. + . 1',copy - 'Bryant, Butterfield & Frets, Architects', 1'copy:. r- File ( „v 4, arjM 'i \ d h ..k � - tl {`',l.L''% C_ L\ (k� �1� {At ;' ' M INSPECTOR ; 'y GENERA$ T.ESTII4G & TIMBiR PRODUCTS INSPECTION OF WASHINGTONIF INC 4 : +' } p1 M.regt,iC c ' i = GENERAL TESTING EVERE7TI(208)355-5800 PG L TP..' 2 TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION OLVMPIA/(206)357.4650 I �9�o Ng� of Washington, Inc. VANCOUVER/(2081885-I381 Li oucis CONCRETE TEST REPORT 10-23-75 CLIENT Anacortes School District #103 REPORT NO. 1 PROJECT Anacortes High School Additions and Alterations _ NO. E-027 CONTRACTOR Prime Construction Company CONCRETE SUPPLIER Cascade Ready Mix DATE CONCRETE SAMPLED 10-23-75 INSPECTOR Craig Well s LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT Footings - Area A LOCATION SAMPLED Footings South Side NO. YARDS PLACED 60 TRUCK SAMPLED 15 TIME SAMPLED 8:15 MIX DATA: CEMENT 5 1/2 SK. TYPE I MAX. SIZE AGGREGATE 3/4" ADMIXTURES --- AMOUNT SLUMP 3 3/4" AIR CONTENT --- CONCRETE TEMP. 55° WEATHER Partly Cloudy and Calm AIR TEMP. 41° to 48° COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS DESIGN STRENGTH PSI CYL. NO. LAB. NO. DATE TESTED AGE UNIT LOAD P.S.I. 1 EC-463 10-30-75 7 2812 cW 2 EC-464 11-20-75 28 3 EC-465 11-20-75 28 4 F.C. EC-466 11-20-75 28 DISTRIBUTION: 1 each - Ray Iverson, Bldg. Inspection City ofAnacortes 2 each - Anacortes School District #103 (cc. Gary Nelson and Fred Foust) 1 each - Kase Vanden Ende P.E. 1 each - Prime Construction Company, Inc. 1 each - Bryant, Butterfield & Frets 1 each - File 1 PERMITS ISSUED ADDRESS / 9/.i f /`4 /` Gr SC/WI i TYPE i PERMIT NO . kNSPECT1ONS _, _____ BUILDING W I NM 24/3C PLUMBING ;416 ELECTRICAL nCI7 ° Q7 r � GAS 3/4./ L..9 A 92 • MUM . L..__ _ .__...- SEWER 1111111.11111.11 % 4c ,2„ 2_9— MISCELLANEOUSa ! t 1 t sic' , ; { f q cc'- ./ -7146,) r e' eF u t d ' t y'-, v- n ,273 7 - rY/6J'/ ry L. eieq -� Sidi1- l-c':' (-lc�ta , el-e y-`72 / a r Q 7 GLJQ Teo/ nn L. d J 9 9.. _,!it..,,--- i'(/, 5-in, c.'s,.--;:>...r i, Ore)--o.:.,t., %/I.�4. /?t., 3 y t � l ) J l� 3 3 a9&� <lh / O Irv , s a��,r' /c r: i �s .f-.28=7c - o�� /�ra2% --- 9 7-�cB�c z_ene-lam ;fr3 v- ez.„,-ti-es ,ir. .„ ,.' ; -3ac' - f?ic-t./.�:,‘- -.34 L ...17-7L-jik cCtz�,, f a"ii, /s./ 17 9 1Z3 i 7 rth CODE & ZONING ANALYSIS kv 'Acc E.s Zoning LL-i* -- �m— Zone Public Schools are a conditional use in Public Zone. Conditional Use Permit not required due to lack of major additions of exterior modifications. Attached drawing "CODE.2" indicates exterior roof additions for mechanical penthouses and ha been approved by City Of Anacortes planning director as non significant and not requiring conditional use permit. Minimum lot sizes No limitation. Minimum set back No limitation. Minimum Density No limitation. Minimum land coverage No limitation. Maximum Building Ht. 35' roof additions for mechanical penthouses exceed 35' but have been approved by City Planning director . CEPA checklist, non required for this project according to phone conversation with Don Measamer, 4/22/97. Parking - Per section 17.46 parking, schools are not addressed in the zoning ordinance Spaces Provided - Number of spaces will not be decreased with this project. Landscaping - 5' min. width perimeter landscaping along abutting streets and residential zones. Two additional areas not suitable for parking shall be landscaped. -Each landscape area minimum 25 square feet and include minimum one tree 6' high with 1 1/2" caliper for deciduous and 24" box for coniferous. -Where 3 or more trees are planted, no more than 1/3 shall be deciduous. -Plantings to be drought resistant. 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE Note: There is currently a Two Hour Area Separation wall along the south wall of Brodniak and west walls of the Band & Choral rooms. We have stopped our analysis at these walls and not included their square footages in area calculations. As per discussions with Ed Frank & Don Measamer documented in a letter dated March 19, 1997 we have assumed existing area separation wall are acceptable as shown on existing as built drawings assuming we verify the following: SEPzvtt 7 SUILDING.?fin /. j 1. Openings in the wall do not exceed 25% of the wall area. // 2. Openings in the wall (doors) carry a 1 'Ahour label. 3. Confirm that wall is constructed as shown, ie. two layers GWB each side. 4. Confirm rating goes to bottom of roof sheathing. - For purposes of this code analysis we have divided the Modernization area up into $ areas as follows(see attached drawing "CODE.1"), square footages listed are for dhe floor: Area "A" 5,842 SF area east and north of area separation wall built in 1975, classrooms. Area "B" 7,107 SF Area south of area A and separated with same 1975 separation wall on north and a new wall on the west side, Library & support areas. Area "C" 20,918 SF Balance of modernized area not including Voc. Tech wing, Cafeteria, Student Lounge, Student services Administration and Restrooms. Area "D" 4,307SF Area in north west corner separated from Cafeteria with a new area separation wall, Restrooms and Mechanical spaces. Area "E" 30,392 SF Vocational Wing, separated from main building with an area separation wall constructed in 1975. Occupancy Groups: A2.1 Cafeteria, Student Lounge A2.1 A building or portion of a building having an assembly room with an occupant load of 300 or more without a legitimate stage, including such buildings used for educational purposes and or classed as a Group E or Group B Occupancy. E-1 Classrooms, admin. area, kitchen, restrooms, student services, voc. Tech. & resource center E-1 Any building used for educational purposes though the 12th grade by 50 or more persons for more than 12 hours per week or four hours in any one day. Occupancy Separations - None required between A2.1, & E-1 / table 3-B. 2 hour area separation wall is required between A2-1 & E-1 Type V Non-rated E-1 occupancies adjacent to A2-1 one hour with sprinkler substitution therefore 2 hour separation not required in this case. 7 Construction types: Areas A & B Type V Non-Rated Areas C, D & E Type V 1 hour Rated construction with the sprinkler substitution Area Justifications: Area "A" Occupancy E-1 Allowable Area Type V Non-Rated = 9100 SF Actual Area = 5,842 SF Area "B" Occupancy E-1 Allowable Area Type V Non-Rated = 9100 SF Actual Area = 7,107 SF Area "C" Occupancy E-1 &A2.1 Allowable Area E-1 TV 1 Hr = *23,550 SF Allowable Area A2.1 TV 1 Hr = *15,700 SF *Area "C" allowable area increase, street right of way to south over 60' away to center line and open district property in excess of 60' to west. Area to west able to be counted due to small percentage of adjacency of Voc Tech. Wing as per discussion with Don Measamer. Max. increase allowed = 1.25% /foot > 20' not to exceed 50% = 1.25% X 40' = 150% X 15,700 =,1.376s0'$, 150% X 10,500 = 15,750 Actual Area "C" Ratio = 15,204 SF / *23,550 + 5,777 SF / *15,750 = 1.1 (5 7) 92norno9229o99??????o???o7??9o999oo9?o9779?oo79977999779o79779799o990 Area "D" Occupancy E-1 Allowable Area TV 1 Hr = 15,700 SF Actual Area = 4,161 SF Area "E" Occupancy El Allowable Area Type V Non-Rated = "54,600 SF Actual Area = 30,392 SF **Area "E" allowable increase, separation on 3 sides in excess of 65' = 2.25% /foot >20' = 112% allowable increase 100% max. allowed 9100 SF X 100% increase = 18,200 SF X 3 (sprinkled) = 54,600 SF allowed One hour separation required between Vocational shops and rest of building. Opening and Exterior Wall Protection A2.1 Ext. walls 2 hour <10' 1 hour elsewhere therefore A2.1 exterior walls to be 1 hr No protected openings required. E-1 Ext. walls 1 hour <10', non rated elsewhere - E-1 exterior walls nonrated No protected openings required. Exits from group A2.1, see exiting plan attached "CODE.1" Exits required Group E, see exiting plan attached "CODE.1". -Maximum distance from any point in a room to exit corridor not to exceed 110' when the building is sprinkled. -When fully sprinkled, all portions of building shall not be more than 225' from either an exterior door of horizontal exit measured in the line of travel. -Corridors to be one hour rated with protected openings. RESTROOMS *1997 Uniform Plumbing Code Design to be for most restrictive, a full Brodniak Hall or the balance of the building excluding the gym areas. (Ed Frank 9/18/97) Students = 92,720 SF / 100 SF per student = 927 students Drinking Fountains 1 for first 150 students & 1 per additional 500 students 3 Drinking Fountains Total Required 464 Male students 464 Female students Male = 1 water closet/ 40 students = 12 Male required fixtures may be split '% WC's & ' Urinals = 6 WC's & 6 Urinals Male restrooms require 6 lays Totals Required Male Student Fixtures = 6 water closets, 6 urinals & 6 lays Total Male Fixtures Provided =7 water closets, 7 urinals & 7 lays Female = 1 water closet/30 students = 464 / 30 = 16 WC's Required lays = 1 / 35 students = 9 lays required Totals Required Female Student Fixtures = 16 water closets & 8 lays Total Female Fixtures Provided = 16 water closets & the equivalent of 8 lays Staff Fixtures Staff = 927 / 20= 48 staff = 24 Male & 24 Female 1 to 15 staff= 1 water closet & 1 Lay required Female Staff = 16 to 35 staff = 2 water closets & 1 Lay required Staff Provided = 4 unisex water closets & 4 lays *Note Fixture requirements as per 1997 UBC as provided by City of Anacortes (-26,6) tC/�s) c, (p5;)(- ��41, ;-) 2 r)yG. >' (/a J(72.) its (1 ) C_ 23 ..) ,73 ; ,( f7 )('r7) - co it 0 / l< a S Cg ?CI 1 cl) --9Y-�-B--, moo)rn p 356 o 6,3 y 0 2.-1 "> ( >,"$) (/zs) 07l. 7-3 , 1 , fy27s r -7 - �-7> Vic.7r l 7"7. >/ ! / 5 , U , f 1 I / 0, 7 d- ( -c) (r2z a-) - G37 . 7 cfZ.3 C.5) C/oC s 0 I 7 `I10 - E-/ . lee,t, e A J is---0 / , I i 1 I Vid We/a.- dd- - A rJr, _ T��ai"z - (a) 5' t./z la y��l ( )>( 7cuJ o -tea jta- 7/ C/..k2 /3 za y 4 5; =777 6, q 1S/ C/c--w d��v � 3' z. 5J�? �ce-4- ClA re._-d t A L to Gt°c6 •Ca it S S.a .b C� cc C.e,,oca d/ 4 AZInce 7ypci V A/ ✓Uc Sct.�v ;4C-1cc ecc 4 9` ( _ (/t s) -05'(PS )0 ,c, V R� � � � �s /7 / e / I �� i ! l cio� ! , 6 3 6 `f Z char '6' 19 = 2 7j 0 7YL-k, ,5, 777 75;pcy 5, 7JU ..22/OcY 4: PLAN CHECKING PRODUCT RESEARCH CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION DESIGN CONSULTANT CODE CONSULTANT PRODUCT & MAT'L. EVALUATION ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FIRE PROTECTION AUSTIN K. VAN DUSEN, AIA CONSULTING ARCHITECT 3540 N.E. 165TH ST, SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 1/13166 (206) 363.1045 PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT DATE: September 26, 1975 PLAN CHECK NO. 111-9 JURISDICTION: Anacortes PROJECT: Additions & Alterations, Anacortes STATE: Washington PROJECT ADDRESS: 20th & McKay Streets High School OWNER: Anacortes School Dist. #103 ARCHITECT: Bryant, Butterfield & Frets VALUATION: $3, 120,000.00 ENGINEER: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V 1-Hr. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: C-1 FIRE ZONE: 3 STORIES: Max. 2 OCCUPANT LOAD: LAND USE: FLOOR AREA: PLANS EXAMINERS: AVD, SW, CM, MB ACTUAL: ALLOW: 1973 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE BASIS FOR ALLOWABLE INCREASE: Seismic Zone 3 1. The building should conform to requirements of UBC Section 104(b) . 2. Area "B" and "D" are included as one building for purposes of area computation since there is no area separation wall between them. Since area "E" on the upper area is included in the same computation because of the location of the area separation walls, its area must be counted with "B" and IIDII. This provides an actual total area of 41,371 sq.ft, where the allowable area is 39,235 sq.ft. for an excess area of 2,136 sq.ft. Suggest extending the area separation wall behind the elevator at Column (D1/3) to Column line (4) , and then south to the exterior wall. 3. 2-Hr. area separation walls should comply with Section 505(d) . a) . Walls should extend vertically from the foundation to a point 30" above the roof except under the following conditions: 1. If the roof is of at least 2-Hr. fire-resistive construction. 2. For a 2-Hr. area separation wall if the roof for 5 ft. on each side of the wall is of 1-Hr. fire-resistive construction. b.) Total width of all openings is limited to 25% of the wall length in the story under consideration. c.) All opening should be protected with fire assemblies having a fire- resistive rating of 11-Hrs. d.) Ducts through the area separation walls should be avoided. If allowed, fire dampers on each side of the wall are required. UBC Std. See Mechanical Plan Check attached. Plans Examination Report Plan Check #111-9 Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 2 4. Area separations need not extend to the outer edges of horizontal projecting elements such as balconies, roof overhangs, canopies, architectural pro- jections, etc. , if the exterior wall at the termination of the separation wall and the projecting elements above are of not less than 1-Hr. fire- resistive construction for a width equal to the depth of the projecting elements with openings in this width protected with 3/4-Hr. fire-resistive assemblies. Section 505(d) 2. 5. 2-Hr. fire-resistive area separation walls must comply with a tested and approved method of construction. See Table No. 43-V, Items 27 through 30, or ICB0 Research Recommendation, or approved assemblies listed in Under- writers' Laboratories Manual, or Gypsum Association Design Data Manual. Provide details to this office prior to construction. 6. Area separation walls at points of a building having different heights - a.) May extend only 30" above the lower roof level provided the exterior wall above is of 1-Hr. fire-resistive construction to a height of 10 ft. above the lower roof with openings protected with 3/4-Hr. fire- resistive assemblies. b.) May terminate at the lower roof provided the roof is of at least 1-Hr. fire-resistive construction without openings for width of 10 ft. measured from the wall. Section 505(d) 4. 7. Roof coverings should be fire-retardant. Section 1704. Details or specifications complying with Section 3203(e) should be clarified to indicate that the roof covering must meet this requirement, and that it be delivered to the jobsite in labeled packages. 8. Folding partitions, including "Dual Coil-Wal", should comply with Section 1705(c) 3. Note that there is a minimum Class III flame-spread requirement. 9. Openings in court walls within 10 ft. of property lines should be protected with 3/4-Hr. fire assemblies. Section 803(b) , Table No. 5-A. See Section 4306. 10. Heavy timber construction does not qualify as a fire-resistive construction, nor is it recognized in Type V buildings. Table No. 17-A. In Type V 1-Hr. buildings glued-laminated members must be 1-Hr. protected. 11. Gypsum board or plaster ceilings in conjunction with fire-resistive assemblies should be supported at intervals not exceeding 16". Items 22 through 27, Table No. 43-C. Example - Section (G) , Sheet 18. 12. Fire-resistive systems involving wood trusses should comply with applicable Research Recommendations. Conventional fire-resistive systems using wood joists are not applicable. Reference is made to Research Recommendation No. 1694, Section II, (G) 2 for the Trus-Joist Corporation. Note that all such systems require double gypsum board with resilient channels between. Plans Examination Report Plan Check #111-9 Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 3 13. Exit ways are restricted from passing through hazardous areas enumerated in Section 3317(d) . Exit along Corridor 28-A through Door (10)is judged to violate this provision because of the proximity of the acetal storage area. 14. Exit doors should be openable from the inside without the use of a key, special knowledge, or effort, or a readily visible sign should be posted per requirements of Section 3303(c) EXCEPTION. Note also that surface-mounted flush orsurface bolts are prohibited. Auto- matic flush bolts are allowed on pairs of doors provided the door with the flush bolt has no knobs or surface-mounted hardware and the unlatching of any leaf requires only a single operation. See wire mesh security gate at stairway over Room 72-C. 15. Acoustical ceiling tile cemented to gypsum wallboard is not approved as a rated fire-resistive ceiling, as the cement will fail under fire conditions. If the gypsum wallboard used is rated and is used as part of an approved fire-resistive floor-ceiling assembly, so that the acoustical tile is additional to the requirements the application is acceptable, provided the tile meets the requirements of Section 4204. 16. Drinking fountain to conform to the requirements of Section 1712. 17. Provide evidence that stage ventilators (smoke hatches) meet the require- ments of Section 3901. 18. Interior openings into corridors should be protected as set forth in Section 3304(h) . Self-closing or automatic-closing labeled 20-minute rated door assemblies should be provided. Other openings should be 1/4" thick wired glass set in steel frames. 19. Ensure that the space between wood floor construction and a suspended ceiling below is divided into areas not exceeding 1,000 sq.ft. Section 2517(e) . 20. Attics of combustible material should be divided into areas not exceeding 3,000 sq.ft. Section 3205(b) . 21. Provide continuous Special Inspection for concrete work designed with f'c in excess of 2,000 p.s.i. Written reports by Building Department-approved Special Inspector to be submitted to the Building Department for review and inclusion in permanent job files. Section 305 (a, b) . I', PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 1 P-1 Island sink detail should conform to Section 614, '73 UPC. P-2 (Correction to Detail Sheet M-13) a. Hot water heater temperature-pressure relief valve drain line shall terminate a minimum of 1" above sink rim. Section 601 and Chapter 1, UPC. b. Lavatories set back-to-back or discharging into a common drainage fitting: the dual drainage fitting (cross) shall be an approved back-to-back fixture fitting unless the fitting is a 2" x 11" x 11/4" x 11/4" cross which would require 2" drainage pipe, 11" vent pipe and 1'"trap arms. Section 405(b) , UPC. c. Long turn tee wye drainage fittings shall not be used to receive trap arms as vent pipe opening would then be below the weir of the p-trap of the fixture. (Fixtures other than water closets) . Section 702(d) , UPC. d. All plumbing fixtures shall have a listing in the IAPMO Directory. (At this time Koehler, as specified is not listed) . Section 201, UPC. STRUCTURAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 1 Item S-1 - Sheet S-1 Check new post load = 31.7k (p. 76) at A6/2.7 over the existing wall footing. According to Section 12/S-15, assuming 2 x 2.5 ft. length with 1'-4" width (where 2.5 ft. = the height of the wall footing) bearing pressure = 31.7/5 ft. x 1.33 ft. = 4.77k/sq.ft. which is greater than 4.0k/sq.ft. Item S-2 - Sheet S-2 a. The computation of masonry wall (p. 5 and others) shows using coefficients based on fm = 300 p.s.i. (approximately = 225 x 1.33) and fs = 24,000 p.s.i. (approximately 20,000 x 1.33) . Then the combined axial and bending should be unity (not 1.33) . Moreover, combining wind with dead and live loads is more critical than wind with dead load only. Referring to p. 9, part of the 10" wall on grid (13) should be reinforced with #5 bars at 48" each face. b. The existing stud wall at grid (2.7) and Sections 12/S415 and 13/Sr15. From seismic analysis (p. 141) , this wall will take 311 lbs. per ft. Verify the nailing of the existinj; and/or new 2 x 4 stud wall will have such capacity. 5/8" round kwik-bolts at 6'-0" o.c. is under-estimated. (1250 lbs. /ea. x 1.33/6 ft. = 277 lbs./ft. from ICBO Report #2156) . Item S-3 - Sheet S-3 a. The hoist beam in Auto Shop will take 2000 lbs. (Structural Notes, Sheet S-15) Detail 10/S-18 indicates 1100 lbs. con- centrated load. In trus-joist design (p. 123) shows only uniform load is considered. Verify the adequacy of concentrated load applied to trus-joist. b. Referring to the lateral load analysis (p. 140-141), shear struts have to be provided in order to distribute the whole length of roof diaphragm shear. Please verify. (Example: 27.7k/67 ft. = 413 lbs./ft. This compares to 141 lbs./ft. as shown) . c. Detail 7/S-21, bearing stress = 23,200 sq.ft./6" x 6.75" = 573 p.s.i. which is greater than 385 p.s.i. Item S-4 - Sheet S-6 Specify the mechanical equipment load over the existing Boiler Room. Also verify the existing beam is capable of taking such extra load. STRUCTURAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 2 Item S-5 - Sheet S-7 No seismic analysis for area between grids (D) to (E) and from (4) to (5) . According to Details 16/S-16 and 18/S-16, all seismic loads will be transferred down to one wall (where Detail 18/S-16 shown) . Approximate check; Wd = 75 ft. x 75 ft. x (20 lbs./sq.ft. + 30 lbs./sq.ft. + 30 lbs. /sq.ft.) = 450k Wall = 66 x 24 ft. x 75 ft. = 120k Total Wd = 570k V = . 133 x 570 = 75.8k v = 75.8/2 x 35 ft. = 1083 lbs./ft. This shows that plywood shear wall and anchor bolt spacing are under-estimated. Item S-6 - Sheet S-10 a. The shaded area near grid (5) and calc. p. 52. No rotation of floor diaphragm will be permitted, per UBC Section 2516(b) . Also require that at resist two times the seismic force in shear for shear wall design. b. Check lateral analysis of the area south of grid (E) . Item S-7 - Sheet S-11 a. Use 2 x 4 studs at 24" over TJH or 2 x 6. Please verify. Also from Sections 16/S-19 and 17/S-19, explain how roof diaphragm shear will be transferred to 2 x 4 (or 2 x 6) then to top chord of trus-joist and to shear wall. b. Is 35" TJH specially ordered? No such size in trus-joist manual. Item S-8 - Sheet S-13 Check lateral analysis to north and south direction. Item S-9 - Sheet S-14 (Structural Notes) a. D-2 says "extend all footings a minimum of 1'-6" In Sheet S-5 notes some footings 1'-0" below and Sheet S-7 uses 6" below existing grade. Please verify. b. F. 10 uses 8d at 10" o.c. at intermediate supports (UBC Table #25-J) . c. G. 1. some bolts use A325. Please verify. d. Submit pre-fabricated trussed roof and floor members to Building Department for approval prior to fabrication. STRUCTURAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 3 Item S-10 - Sheet S-16 Verify the adequacy of Section (2) . (The masonry wall does not line up) . Item S-11 - Sheet S-18 a. Section (2) . The 10" cantilever slab moment will be resisted by 8" wall. Please check. b. Section (1) and (2) . Verify the adequacy of the rein- forcement. 3 #8 bars will transfer cantilever moment and shear to supports. c. Section (2) . Check and verify the adequacy of the 8" concrete retaining wall. d. Detail (12) . Check ties for masonry pier as per UBC Section 2418(k) . Item S-12 - Sheet S-19 a. Detail (8) . Beam marks do not comply with plan on Sheet S-13. b. Detail (14) and calc. p. 37. The 1/2" x 6" x 814" plate is under-estimated. (It cracks along diagonal: Assuming arm =1.5", P = 38/4 = 9.5k M = 9.5 x 1.5 = 14.25k inches. S = 14.25/27 = 1/6 x 5 x t-squared or t = sq. root of 0.6334 = .8" which is greater than 1/2"). Item S-13 - Sheet S-20 Detail (9) and calc. p. 138, 139 and 141. 3/4" 0 bolt at 4 ft. is good for 1,463 lbs. v = 469 lbs./ft. x 4 ft. = 1876 lbs. which is greater than 1463 lbs. and v = 393 lbs./ft. x 4 ft. = 1572 lbs. which is greater than 1463 lbs. Please verify. Item S-14 - Sheet S-21 Detail (1) . How will diaphragm shear be transferred through shear wall from roof to wall below? (20d nail has 4" only, 3 - 2x plate is equal to 4.5") . MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 1 NOTE: The correction numbers shown on the plans correspond to the corrections as they are numbered on these correction sheets. M-1 typ. Sheet metal ducts: The gauges provided, construction, joining devices and supports shall be as required per UMC '73 Sections 1001, 1002, 1003 and 1004, Tables 10-A, 10-B and 10-E. All ductwork is presumed to be constructed of sheetmetal unless otherwise noted per the plans and specifications. Non-metallic ducts shall comply with M-3. Provide code references. M-2 typ. The joints and seams of round ducts per UMC '73 Section 1002(c) shall be made substantially air-tight. Slip joints shall have a contact lap of 11/2" minimum and shall be mechanically fastened by sheet metal screws, rivets or equivalent means. Tapes for sealing joints (both screws and tape are required) shall not be more combustible than approved flame-proof fabric. M-3 Ref. Non-metallic ducts shall be Class I labeled and shall conform to UMC Std. 10-1 and the conditions of listing including the joining methods, materials, supports etc. , per Section 1002(b) and Section 1004(b) . M-4 Duct lining shall be labeled Calss I. Duct insulation shall con- form to UMC Std. 10-1 Section 1005 and Table 10-D. M-6 Section 805 light, air and ventilation shall be provided per Section 605, which requires the mechanical ventilating system to supply a minimum of (5) CFM of outside-air with a total air volume circulated of min. (15) CFM per occupant in all portions of the building. The system shall be kept in continuous operation during the time the building is occupied. M-17 Where corridors are required to be of 1-Hr. fire-resistive con- struction per UBC '73 Section 3304(g) all openings in the walls and ceilings shall be protected with approved fire dampers as specified in Sections 3304(h) , 4306(a) , 4306(i) and UBC Std. 43-7. M-18 b. Every duct piercing a fire-resistive ceiling shall be fire-dampered as provided in UBC '73 Sections 4303(g) , 4306(i) 4. , and UBC Std. 43-7. M-19 The fire-resistive integrity of fire-time rated walls shall be maintained. a. Area separation walls shall be fire-dampered where ducts penetrate such walls per UBC '73 Sections 505(d)1, 4306(i) 1 and 4306(b) . c. Fire dampers are required in other fire-time rated walls where duct penetrations terminate in registers or grilles. Labeled fire-dampers (UL or SMACNA) shall be installed directly behind such registers or grilles. MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 2 M-20 The Architect or architect designer and the air-handling systems designer shall show the location of all fire dampers that may be required per UMC '73 Section 302(b) . Each fire damper shall be individually indicated. Notes on plans and reference statements in the specifications will result in a correction marked on the plans for each fire-damper omitted. M-21 Sheetmetal ducts embedded in the concrete floor slab shall be installed per UMC '73 Section 1004. Joints and seams shall be required per Section 1002. Excavation for ducts per UBC ' 73 Section 2903 (see attached drawing) . The Uniform Fire Code states the ICBO Codes are correlated and states, that when the Code does not adequately address a subject, standards provided by nationally recognized authorities may be implemented, i.e. , ASHRAE Guide, see 1973 Systems Handbook, Chap. 12, figure 12. "Spunstrand" non-metallic ducts when provided shall be installed in full compliance with all the requirements of ICBO Report No. 2488. M-22 Provide combustion-air for fuel-burning heating equipment designed and located as required per UMC '73 Chap. 6 provide (2) separate duct for each mechanical room. The same duct shall not serve both the upper and lower openings per Sections 601, 603 and 607. For heating units over 400.0 MBH Sections 607(e) and 607(f) also apply. M-23 The kitchen is existing. This correction is provided to check code compliance with the UMC '73 Section 104 pertaining to existing equipment and the requirement in Section 1109 that a hood shall be installed at or above all food heat-processing equipment in a food establishment. For the purpose of this code a food establishment shall include any building or portion thereof appropriated to the processing of food but shall not include a dwelling unit. Provisions shall be made for air to enter the room in which the hood is located at a rate not less than that at which the room air is exhausted by the hood. The design, construction and installation of kitchen grease hood, and connected ductwork shall comply with all the provisions of UMC '73 Sections 1107, 1108, 1109 and 1110. M-25 Hot water and steam boilers shall be installed in compliance with the UMC '73 Chap. 21. Controls and limit devices shall be installed as further required by Table No. 21-C. MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 3 M-31 A products of combustion detection device, which will detect products of combustion other than heat and which will shut down the equipment shall be placed in the main return air duct on the down-stream side of the filters and located so as to operate in the event of smoke in the air-stream shall be installed in each single system operating in excess of 10,000 CFM. The device shall comply with UBC Std. 43-6 and per UMC Section 1009. M-32 1-Hr. fire-timed rated buildings shall be 1-Hr. fire-resistive construction throughout as required by UBC ' 73 Sections 2001, 2101, 2201 and Table 17-A. Fire-time rated floor-ceiling and roof- ceiling assemblies are rated en toto, plane-to-plane and when either plane is pierced by ducts, the fire integrity of the assembly shall be restored by the installation of labelled fire dampers per Sections 4301, 4302, 4303, 4305 and 4306. Exception: Roof-ceiling systems having a non-combustible roof deck need not be fire-dampered, except where the location of equipment would require openings to be protected per UBC '73 Section 504 and Table 5-A. Provide a 1-Hr. shaft in lieu of a fire-damper at ceiling - for the hood duct. M-34 Vertical openings extending through floors shall be enclosed in a shaft of fire-resistive construction, having the fire-time rating setforth in Table 17-A headed Shaft Enclosures and as additionally setforth in Section 4305 (a) , (b) and (c) . Ducts pentrating the shaft enclosure walls shall be (labelled) fire- dampered at every opening where such walls are pierced per Section 1706(b) and Section 4306. M-35 Indicate the use or occupancy of all rooms or areas in the building on the plans per the UBC '73 Section 301(c) . M-36 Storage rooms and janitor's closets shall be of 1-Hr. fire-time rated construction per UBC '73 Section 802(c) . All openings through the walls, ceilings and floors shall have fire-integrity restored by the installation of approved fire dampers. M-37 Install fire-dampers in all existing duct openings in walls, ceilings and floors except floors over unusable space need not be fire-dampered. The building is Type V 1-Hr. construction and required to be 1-Hr. fire-resistive construction through- out per UMC '73 Sections 102, 103 and 104. See additionally corrections M-18, M-19 and M-32. M-38 Section K, Sheet 19 of the architectural drawings indicates Note that the required 1-Hr. roof-ceiling assembly is provided above the ductwork located over the platform 109-C. No cross-section is provided in the mechanical plans to prove that this, in fact, is the case. Given that this supposition is true, no MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 4 M-38 fire dampers would be required. In a ceiling located below Note this duct system where the branch ducts therefrom penetrate Cont'd the ceiling below. Should this interpretation of the plans prove incorrect, then fire-dampers shall be required per correction M-18(b) . M-39 The following corrections apply to the wood shop dust collecting system per UBC Section 1009 and UBC Std. 10-3: a. Ducts shall maintain 18" minimum clearance from all com- bustible materials and construction. For reduction of the required clearance apply UBC Std. 10-3 Table 10-3B. b. The system shall have electric groundirigfor static electricity per UBC STd. 10-3, Section 10.307. c. Provide an explosion-relief valve per UBC '73 Section 1009. The details of construction are provided by NFPA pamphlet #68. The explosion-relief vent shall be provided with rupture diaphragm fitted with cutters to assist rupture. The relief vent shall lead directly to outside and not deviate more than an angle of 22 degrees from the duct from which it leads and shall contain not less than the cross-sectional area of the duct vented. The discharge relief opening shall be weather-protected per UBC Std. 10-3, Section 10.317. M-40 The spraying application of flammable finishes shall comply with all applicable provisions of the UFC Article #14. Parti- cularly note the following provisions: a. Air filters shall be non-combustible of an approved type per UFC Section 14.204(g) . b. Electric wiring and other sources of ignition shall comply with Section 14.210 UFC. c. Drying apparatus (if provided) shall comply with Section 14.210 of the UFC. M-41 All exterior openings in a boiler room or rooms containing central heating equipment, if located below openings in another story or if less than 10 ft. from other doors and windows of the same building, shall be protected by a fire damper having 45 min. fire rating per UBC '73 Section 808. MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Additions & Alterations, Anacortes High School Page 5 M-42 Rooms containing boilers or central heating plant equipment shall be separated from the rest of the building by a minimum 1-Hr. fire-resistive occupancy separation where the largest piece of equipment within such room exceeds 400.0 MBH input. Duct penetrations through the occupancy separations shall be protected with fire damper assemblies with a 1-Hr. fire-time rating per UBC Section 503(c) 4. Also Sections 808 and UMC Section 704 5. The definition of central heating plant in UMC Section 405 does not clearly state that this require- ment is applicable to only direct-fuel-fire equipment and taken in context makes any heating unit supplying heat to areas other than the room in which it is located by the means of ducts or pipes a central heating plant. See also UMC Section 103. k \ \ \ \ I BASE HID ASPHALT UtMUU'tug NftAS li DO NOT DAMAGE EXISTING ASPHALT. / / / / / ' BID ALTERNATE #A-2 ASPHALT DEMOLITION AREAS. BEGINNING OF CURB 219.00 • • I , 0• - i 1 '^ + * ' 1 /� 22000 k / �,, 40 ' BASE BID DEMOLISH ASPHALT, CURBING, ROCK RETAINING I4 ??/ II/tillk WALL, TREES, BOLLARDS ETC., DO NOT DEMO ROOF, , ROOF DRAINS AND ROOF SUPPORT COLUMNS. k / [ COORDINATE DEMO WITH BUILDING CONTRACTOR /L. . •1L. , , # OS BEGINNING OF CURB // 1, / /. 224 BASE BID j/! 1. DEMOLISH EXISTING CURBING ' { )`'. BASE BID � 7, ►� DEMOLITION , ,r `.w� , LIMIT ® 4 -/ • ,f `� 3/4 • END OF CURB i / / / / / J/ f• END OF CURB o , % , r,/ / / / / / / / .►• -' e. EXIST.CHAIN LINK f / / / j.: / / / / / / %•✓ Y I a FENCE ' ,'/' I /+ #/ / / / / /. / / / / / / / / / \ . y / / / / / ,/ / / / / / / 4. \ BID ALTERNATE /A-2 /{ ��/ / / / / •, /u / / / / / �/I�° I \ DEMOLISH ASPHALT, FENCE, BOLLARDS, ETC.. • :' + ./` / / / / / / / // / 4 j +Al' ° f STOCKPILE WHEEL STOPS AT A LOCATION SPECIFIED BY THE SCHOOL. No, • /// WHEEL STOPS i. ! / / / / / / / /-// ///4• (PIP) I i' / / / / / / / / /+ /!/� BEGINNING OF CURB it , / / / / / / / / / / r °° BID ALTERNATE #A--2 • / / / / / / / •/• ' DEMOLITION LIMIT - / • I / / I S.i• II k / / / / 0e'`/ / / / / / P. a a •j '• ' ' , ' • / Jr, / / / / / / 4/;BUILDING AND RAMP Of * : ' ' �' � " / / / / / / .' 4 f#•TO BE RELOCATED � / / / / / / '��'� � - - -OP- - BY OTHERS- SEE C4 - I • • lI t' - - - - -OP- �-.- ' ♦,1 / / / / / / / / I' / P - I ,,. # / / / / / / / I /r .e '' i/ ih / / / / / / / / . I • ' , il:/ / / / / / / / / , EV - - / / / / „ / / / / / / / / / / / /■ o k / / / / / / / / / /• a -C BjD ALT �'` / / / / / / / / /• I • END OF f URBl I' / / / / / / / / / /. N� \ 4 DEMOLISH ji / / / / / / / / r \ TO NEXT ; ; . , i ', / / / / / / / / ,_ \ I • PASTDRI' k iAA9/ / / / / P / ! 0 \ t• ' / / / / / / / / / ' )• .1 n. \ - •/ / / / / / / / / / ( ♦ ,o \ GAS :/° / / / / / / i'\/ ' A • •. L \ - — , ■D / / / / / / /,/ / 1• J /Sd L • o x ■/ / / / / / / t'/ ' h • � ... . �'30/ f /S(�/ /1 •/ ` /� \ '0 / / /Nc / // _ _-. - -- ♦• • ' ECOLOGY + ./ / / / • w / / • • / / /• /SA "i , GI ./ / / / / / / / /• r / / / / / / r "T BLOCKS \\\\l� a/ / / / / / / / / / ,i / / / / / / '. \ 7 /st :se / — // i / / / , / / / ,A°lipr- J � Wrf /\ ______ I k h . 8" CON c- _IN wC3 --1?*-- -- ti AY' • LOG BORDER 4 0-- OP - OP - OP - - - - - o _ - .- - BID ALTERNATE /IA-2 , _ - — OR & WINDOW SCHEDULE ' '�: s '.."° a r. • DESCRIPTION COMMENTS (1) 3068 x 1-3/4' METAL INSUL DOOR W/16 GA KD HM FRAME SWING: 101 LHR) 31 + & 8" x 34' LITE KIT, ® 40" A,F.F., MAX. U-VALUE 0.60 ---f— ----- / / / , �y I I 41 HINGES L 1 1 P C - a 1 2 x 4 1/2 x B8 x NRP x 26D PAINT:TDCOR & 1/2" iLSTAI8 CORNERS _. __ A _.., .�N S' — 1__. _ ___ ____ ____ __ A___ _b.___- _ , THRESHOLD - PEMCO172A/ / O O SWEEP - PEMCO #315AN , WSTRIP - PEMCO #305AR r • T -4 -1 a u • CLOSER — CORBIN #KP 120 xD SBL—SNB 1 {. ///��I%//�4 1 EXIT DEVICE — CORBIN ;�29—X2P-36—SBL • j/� W\SCHLAGE CYLINDER #20-022C KICK PLATE - 10"x 34" .050 ALUM I ROUGH OPEN'G 37-3/4' x 81 1/4" FINISH: U526D i I I - (2) 5040 VINYL/H-SLIDER W/LOCKS & SCREENS FRONT . .' DUAL GLAZE/ARG/LOW-E/SOLAR GREY RO - 50" x 48" 0 34" AFT1 i "> 1195-104-A WINDOW MAX. U-VALUE TBD NFRC I , 1 4 DE ANALYSIS 1 A SIMPSON #ST21I5 ACROSS TOP OF , THIS STRUCTURE MEETS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS WAC 296-150A (L'BC) G.E. TRUSS )ING TYPE. VN DESIGN LOADS �✓ bD 11 — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ I 2 CLASSRM: 872 sq' ROOF LIVE: 25 psf WIND HORIZONTAL: BO mph F- r.'/PANTS #: 45 FLOOR LIVE: 40 psf (MIN) EXPOSURE: "C" ° I I ; IPANCY: E2 2000 POUND CONCENTRATED SEISMIC ZONE: 3 I ; MINIMUM INSULATION VALUES TO MEET LATEST WASHINGTON ENERGY CODE STANDARDS M I ' CLASSROOM # 101 AS ADOPTED FOR SYSTEMS WITH ELECTRIC RESISTANT HEAT, SEE BUILDING SECTION, I ! ; AZING % ON WALL AREA: TBD%, DOOR MAX U-VALUE: 0.60, GLAZING MAW U-VALUE: 0.40 ?� CoI S BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY HEALTH DEPT.{�SHD 28W, � : I I FRONT (ALL VAPOR BARRIERS MIN OF 1 PERM) 7C- I b , ",N '2 1195-104-8 ) M FINISH SCHEDULE N-WALL E-WALL S-WALL W-WALL CEILING FLOOR TIE DOWN LOCATIONS • UNDER GROUND COMMUNICATIONS & FIRE SERVICE i ! • ): DESCRIPTION TYR 0 ALL CORNERS & MI_ I W/ (2) 1 1/2" CONDUITS TO BELOW FLOOR MAT.IFN. MAT FN. MAT.IFN MAT FN MAT. HT. MAT. BASE CLASSROOM CWB CZ GWB I EZ -CAS L EZ CWB EZ AC 6-0 i/ C RB - I •��',$ CARPET Gw8 - 5/8" GYPSUM WALL BOARD A- +h - • ! '>.'. 4" RUBBER BASE EZ - EVERGREEN EZ WALL I .ACOUSTICAL - 'i'-' - -- - - - - - - - 1 - - 'M- - I - ' WING INDEX L -0_ *SW-2 1 O 1 32' OF 6 FLOOR PLAN, SCHEDULES 7,___ 28'-0" / 4'+0" / OF 6 BUILDING SECTION, DETAILS OF 6 POWER, CEILING & HVAC PLANS, SCHEDULES ' OF 6 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOTES: OF 6 FOUNDATION PLAN, DETAILS 1) DECK & RAMPS - 8Y EVERGREEN OF 6 TYPICAL DECK & RAMP DETAILS 2) PT SKIRTING - BY EVERGREEN . AR WALL SCHEDULE NOTE: STAPLES RE COMMON NAILS. `R°"" I- L.O O R D LA \ 1V . Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" #2: 3/8" INT. CDX W/ 16ga x 1 1/2"LG STPL 0 6" EDGE NAIL, 12• FIELD NAIL. BLOCK ALL EDGES 3 #4: 3/8" INT. CDX W/ 16ga x 1 1/2"LG STPL ® 4" EDGE NAIL, 12" FIELD NAIL. REFS �� MARK REVISION DATE , BLOCK ALL EDGES. 0 , Cas-ra+Et SoQr,TAc. SIIIkir ' ' ..OR SCHEDULE ALL PAINT SHALL $E C: LUMBIA, �� ` \\\(� �- MATCH COLOR LISTED �3 ��,t\U � ►.' ' . INTERIORS EMCO E—Z WALL RAIN GUTTERS /t\'v\ , ?LIBBER BASE : TO MATCH CARPET & DOWNSPOUTS • TBD _ — / \\ ..iii 'ET GOWNS & AIKMAN ��'%//;'' /.f ,' ' L 1 - TBD FIBERGLASS SHINGLE • TBD JOS - --- ---- itEj JG : TBD WINDOW LINERS TBD I 4 OUTSIDE TRIM TBD & TRIM /' /� _ , , 6 FASCIA. DOORS : TBD r' ./ . e„ ,wa-i 1 ( si r,•s-,os. 9R r 4/ ��, - , �at �i _ EVERGREEN r aa2 /'/ �6t345 1164th A1'ay HW /, .,ns-lN-y : , r,ns.,aw 1206) 661-7400 �'i Ax (206) eat-sere j C 1 A l MOBiLE .,�, �,', . 1 IIPMENT o (-)Mk - , � 2 t ` z m ii ��DESCRIPTION C1 • PANY___ _ - corm p - Ilk j Ili in NO. 2893 moor Or atna a cm moot wad cOtaxi or crt om Poet[tQieiwl r.; ' 1lII JOB (1) AMERICAN AIR FILTER AVg4000. 13,300 W, UNIT VENTILATOR W/ BAROMETRIC LOUVER PKG in o AI x•loW t s TO ATTIC, FLOOR MODEL 240 VOLT, 1 PHASE, 1200 CFM, WITH AUTOMATIC 7 DAY ' 2893 1 195 104 A�/B -I r,ne-,oa. j SW en-is... I ,I ' DRAWN w ROH CHECKED 6r rFiERMOSTAT, (UNIT WILL DELIVER 100% OUTDOOR AIR), I T ' ROUGH OPENING: 49" x 11" - -- -' I - - 14 nwaH I fM mM-nH CAD FILEDATE /9s t 2sg3- 1 -0 / (2) 8'z4' WHYTE BOARD W/ CHALK TRAY & MAF RAIL JOB NAME ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT'. •-, I 7r-d I},,< F, a< I,,-, Z'-. 28' 34 32' CLASSROOM • �.;•A R T dW(1) FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET, LARSON OR =. CONTROLS MOUNTED NO HIGHER THAN 54" AFF K VERIFY RO = 10" W x 24 1 2" H, (APPROX 37" AFF DRAMNO / ) 'KEY PLAN FLOOR PLANS; �.•cC�',k? `.,:1{ NTS - Le SCHE=Dl1LES. or - ' r„_.• � + vesswasest . . �\ � . • 32'-0" :j(c+;'t r=. L. FLOOR STRUCTURE 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" • • '. ' ' { SHIM AS NECESSARY L. �' ':,Fii I 8" x 8" x 16" MASONRY BLOCKS � � I I _J JJ L_ J L_ J J • ' :. / 1 I N FRONT ' b II I MOD A t l PRECAST 24" SQUARE I I I I I x 4" DEEP REINFORCED I 1 i'f, i CONCRETE PAD I j'''i' 111. V 18" X24" • fff�� 11 CRAWLSPACE Pip TYPICAL TY"ICAL ACCESS I I OF 3 I OF 2 &:. �J VIAI \ - SUPPORT FOOTING \_ ' ; _ ili_ I1. ` ,/ SCALE: 1"=11-0" N - I _J L J \L— Jr L— J ___L J 1 4 1/2"0 x 16" LONG I \ ,4 I :I h' ... CARRIAGE BOLT THROUGH I I I I — I �4 'dI ' 1,,;;. BOTTOM PLATE AND I I ,a ',:'J'4. I; FLOOR ASSEMBLY i 28 x 32 = 896 SQ. I _ 150 5.97 SQ' x 144 = 859.7 SQ" I al ' ; SHIM AS NECESSARY co I 1 7 — 1 1 5 VENTS SD 58 SO" EAC 1 = 870 SO" I FRONT : _ 1\111 1 r 41, iji r 1 MOD Bai,• 3/16" STEEL TIE—DOWN I I TYPICAL I I µ' ' -- BRACKET AND 1 -1/4" x , t- �1 OF 14 _ _—ff — 1 , ' 035 STEEL TIE DOWN I - I I / \ ige, �� STRAP �JTS 4750 •\._ — I Iirser a _ — II I IF- - - i��- - -LUJ - - [Xl - -k I.I. * _" - �:J . �_ \ r PRECAST 24" SQUARE x 4" DEEP REINFORCED . CONCRETE PAD F O \ DAT ON ' I n \ '., 6" MIN L/� SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" UNDISTURBED SOILS STEEL TIE-DOWN ANCHOR 1' (-2J EXT=RIOR FOOTING (AS REQUIRED BY SOILS) { SCALE: 1"=1 '-0" • MARK REVISION DATE ,;0. ;, A coate.+¢L Sot-rr,K, Aftj4f 1/2"0 x 7-1/2" LONG ,.'a. MACHINE BOLT W/(2) 1/2"0 - — — —_ -- FLAT WASHERS CAA 48" O.C. ? � . • / EVERGREEN Est PRECAST 24" SQUARE 8345 taath Ave. N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 x 4" DEEP REINFORCED 206 861 7400 z CONCRETE PAD MOBILE PR T2 N} D8f-661K 142/9 ssth Ave. tlt : ' COMPANY eAx 6DT859 7755 , 6 JOB NO $/N �1 ' •1 2$93 1195—iO4.105.1o5 .A: I - ' UNDISTURBED SOILS DRAWN BYRDH CMECKE° BY ,, r lif. ND FILE 2893-5-0 DATE 3/8/98 I \T E P I O P FOOTING JOB NMIE ANACORTES SCHOOL 'DIST. ,, ,; SCALE: 1"=1'-0" , 28'x 32' CLASSROOM °`�N7N° FOUNDATION PLAN 5�,' 5.0 T . DETAILS �` 10 7 1I 11.E1!'' ( yy-2 X 6 TOP RAIL (MIN. RAMP/LANDING) , 1X2 BACKING ry ' • - 1 1/2" METAL OR WOOD eew .1I :'', HANDRAIL WITH FULL " CLEAR/7t HANDRAIL OCCURS • ,, . , f`+J RETURN ® ENDS (OPTIONAL CLEAR _ .�. ` ' '~�"'<4 - WHERE (DASHED) < 1 X8 WOOD RISER • I IF SLOPE OF RAMP IS W/ 1 1/2" WOOD ' LESS THAN 1 IN 20) 2x4 INTERMEDIATE RAILS . \ SCREW 12" O.C. '!' ' i't,li: SELF SPACED (START LAYOUT I" 3/4" "TUFf TREAD"/PLYWOOD i`. - I,,, , • FROM LANDING WORK UP) . \ 3x 12 STAIR STRINGER �� ''' I 1 �' BUILDING LINE OR POST °�D 1 4" SPACE MAX. BETWEEN - . , ; AS REQUIRED BY SITE \� 0 li` •- \��\ \ 2x12 TREAD �!� S ft , 3/4" "TUFF TREAD" pp - METAL STAIR NOSING GRAIN L� MN .CONTINUOUS (EDGER 4" X 4" POST 1 1/2"OPROTRUSNFACE AX. { .L � r' M ' (NON SLIP SURFACE) SPACED 0 5'-4" O.C. �_v�'� 2 x 8 TO 4'-0" SPAN Qj -. ' iA if, 'A 1 2 x 10 TO 6'-0" SPAN all SIMPSON TA10 p STAIR ANGLE ' F . BOARD W/ 1/2" X 4" 1 ' GALV LAG BOLTS. ® JOIST HANGER 1 X 4 TRIM U 48" OC I I{ I • I' • 1 2 x 10 TO 6'-0" SPAN L �� ' DIAGONAL 2 X 4 BRACING W/ (2) 1/2 0 11-1/4" _ 11 �4' i X 7" GLAV BOLTS Ils• II \ �, \ .y I I 't 0 POST WHERE BUILDING 2 X 4 SUPPORT- 4�« „ , DOES NOT OCCUR FROM POST BASE �" 11 24" I I � TO UNDER RIM, 1 X 4 TRIM t��t� � ' 2X4 SUPPORT FROM PAD // NAIL TO SIDE OF _ _ _ _ _ POST RIM JOIST II Iyi TO LEDGER WHERE BUILDING ~` _ OCCURS r •CONCRETE PADS CONCRETE PIERS • t" !•�' TiPOST - - - I - ' , �- WHERE BLDG OCCU S • W/POST BASE - \ y �: `L 1 I , DICK/RAMP SECTION ELEVATION TREAD DETAIL -:: I„'.r , B (A) SCALE: 3/4" = 1 '-0" C31) + SCALE: 3/4" = 1 '-0" 0 SCALE: 1 1 /2" = 1 '—O" j u'. lir z __ 5'-0" 2 x 8 JOIST 0 16" O.C. LI PW/ 6' SPAN FLOOR JOISTS 10" Iw / (MIN) 2 x 6 JOIST 0 16" 0.C. PW/ 4' SPAN W/ TAPER CUT --f-- /� I II _GENERAL NOTES I II n v I,(;.,1 I SLOPE 1 17 • I II 414 Ro 1. ALL FASTENERS, HANGERS, AND PLATES SHALL I I I I L - - - - 1!'1;;�e: BE GALVANIZED, HOT DIPPED, STAINLESS STEEL fa ,t I II I I I I I I r io OR EQUAL. Y .y,, Nn I I I II I II !�.'p�O 2. ALL TREATED WOOD USEDOUTDOOR WOOD,IN CONSTRUCTION PRESSURE SHALLTREATED BE , <<"r 1 II III I !� r_.............,.......mimm...r.. ■r_mmilm.■s.......■........■ r, „ 1, „ it „ ill r REDWOOD, OR EQUAL. j Di L 4. WHEN PROVIDED BY OTHERS, ANY DEVIATION FROM THESE PLANS SHALL BE THE RESPON- SIBILITY OF THOSE\ L — — I — — — - %1 EVERGREEN MOBILE OTHERS, AND NOT POST 5. THESE PLANS ARE FOR TYPICAL DECK Qc RAMP /� DIAMOND PLATE CONSTRUCTION, ACTUAL DECK & RAMP DESIGN - _�- _ - 3/16" X 10" X FULL WIDTH MAY VARY DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS. -I W/ FHWS TO PANM r• .Y r STAIR WHERE I _ d • ;•. I I OCCURS (DASHED) I i MARK REVISION DATE `; 1 3ti eb _ .I N ® 5'-4" - 5 -4 COSTnr�ER_ SJBMfT/.. / { �� ") RAMP - LANDING PLAN VIEW L w SCALE: 1 /2" 1 '—•0" ' - - - - - - _ SET THE LAST TWO EVERGREEN ems; e gg345 154th w, N. i;• '-I POSTS IN CONCRETE Redmond. o vy206)-86 6914 i 0 p To �¢_ - - MOBILE, I1 ZIA,Ji� -- - A - - - - - - - - - - - - - -"'�,� ' AI Ile WA^ 9827 HI i.• ,. rig=.cn _ - - - - - - - - PRODUCE 10N1 N.E. ' . '.I 4219 O] -- k 8 854-773S 1, r_$� ..,...., ! COMPANY -855-7�77 N}Ai„<n �`-"-`------- ■ -, ne DR P C CANNOT BE REPRODUCED eDlgUT MRhEK coast*M MICRO Lett t I. \ ----- - - aoe HD. 1` . ' n �� — -- — _ ' 2893 1195-104:105.106 A/9 ' � ' 'I V' 1-: - - _ -- -- - -- - - - Isimk 24" DRAWN BE RtJH CHECKED BP '. H ' 1 J 'I I G �- — -_ __ -- __ — — — — - ...� CAD FlLE , 1 ��. r��l li d�� -rl --- I - illi �, 2893-6-0 °"" 3/8/96 , I Ct .,. I - - Joe t"`"'E ANACORTES SCHOOL DISC. ' I CONCRETE PIERS RIM JOIST TRIM , ' r �� r1 1"'t. 28 x 32' CLASSROOM W/POST BASE RAMP - LANDING ELEVATION - DECK, RAMP, LANDING, �"�` 6,O i .�. 'I, • WRONG " DETAILS AND SECTIONS . °' ' 'I r/'i SCALE: 1/2 - 1 -0' O CO rn ini- t T"'"-P 7 r ------------7:._ CN 0 (+ r CM� r,-) o 0 I r F I I Li(1,--1:,,:..„..„.................... (T �) ULID >c EXISTING DOORS - - CZ , i ____,, 7 \, \ 0 \ 1 v v--- EXI TING CEILING - - - I L'!NE -----terrr -- - -- - _ fir_ _ _ I II = I®} II �— �— = =__. - -_= �1 0 II I CLASSROOM ; II ; CLASSROOM w `s --- 2 X 4 STUD NEW HALLj = HALL AT 16" I 2 X 4 STUDS ', I MI6" 11 I -_J OG. PROVIDE .> R II INSULATION Ni 5/8" I - li I I I I TYPE "X" GWB EA. SIDE I n L HALL TO BE RUN FROM GE INS 4 EXISTING FLUOR. FIXTJRES I T n/ rr REUSE - IV II I -- -_---_ I _ _ a REUSE %4 EXISTING LUOR. FIXTURES Q `) OF CORRIDOR TO SOT. OF } - " EXISTING CEILING AS A SOUND I I _ I - __ -_ L BARRIER BETWEEN CLASSROOMS 2 RUN IN NORTH SOUTH DIRECTION FROM I - j r .(, EXISTING NORTH TO SOUTH WALLS. I N I I - I Ln _J r _ _ _ _ ___- .� W ! RE'USEI4 EXL ISTING FLUOR. FIXTJRES i X ?I SIGN V i SIGN - �J I r uI . [ I O �_ u) REUSE 4 EXISTING =LUOR. FIXTURES /�j - 2 X. b B O LCKING - I iL 0 I-- --- eNd " GEN !BR UNDER 5/8„ TYPE Y kr, ' WALL -- -- II II u p � p 3z � �L X GWB OVER 0 ! z -- Iuu1 - PLYWOOD NEW(WALL U --� r SHEATHING I 1 t-IOVR RA I tD r- r R / REUSE 4 EXISTING FLUOR.. FIXTURES j ! I 5 R x 2 X 6 JOIST I - j II AT b" OG j111 1 II j REUSE�4 EXISTING LUOR. FIXTURES I SEE CORRIDOR • I L5 F I SECTION FOR I CO EL NEW WALL j FRAMING THIS - j L A SIGN j AREA I ` j F / I t i4449hh+dJdi�IcIIIIAiMhiAIIIId�yry�i4$�dQJi�i�di�iIAKI}J��h1A/JA P��t�4UIi4Ti��itY�Tiid AI MNAh ai, II 1 ji �' CONFERENCE I 3' DOOR � , 3'_POOR� I• I i , _ �' PROVIDE 2 X 10 GE JOIST AT I6" I W/ 20 MIN ' I I Hi 20 MIN I NEW WALL I L. SHE. �" i'*'P� I I HOUR RATED --SIGN ..... � ' E. v SHB OG IN NORTH/SOUTH DIRECTION W/ 5/b" RATING I RATING j II GWB ® GEiLINS 1 1/2" GDX ON TOP. _ ^_ I I I - —L/ i rn 1 I 1 r 1 r - j �I Q 1} NEW I LL.` NE OF I L- - o 'I HOURI RATED / HALL ABOVE I ) 1 I I ' j SEE CORRIDOR /� " '� - -- i r----- r I SECTION FOR i 4 ST.'VC 2 X 4 STUDS u, /�-- I I- I FRAMING THIS \ i7i I'' A 7 Ih" O% AT 16" OG �; V / I I AREA \ I Ii 3 NEW FLUOR. FIXTURES -- - - �' TYP. W/O WALL n n= �- I El/ ENERGY EFFICIENT \ I I �- 3 NEW FLUOR. kIXTURES - ABOVE l-, ") BALASTS 1T EXI6TINS DI < � 3' DOOR. I 1^U ENERGY EF�IGIEN I R P. Q � I ; I - BALASTS j �v II 1, • 1 PLATE RAMSET PLR I t RAMSET \ 1 _ L OF TO FLOOR 8 GLUE TO FLOOR n 1 I 1 4.1 1_ i NG FLOOR O 1 Q At- It" NORTH FLOOR PLAN I CORRIPOR HALL SECTION A-A ti ^ SCALE , /a m THIS SHELF HAS NOT .2„h - �/4 " f 11II 0 I ' 2 ' 4 ' 8 ' BEEN DESIGNED FOR OP) I 6" 2 ' ry1 STORAGE S HILL NOT va SUPPORT ANY HEIGHT d \ leanEll SION `� JUL 2 0 19W1 F BUILDING DEPT, i PLOT DATE = 07/20/92 PROJECT DIR. NAME = XXXXXXXX DRAWING NAME -= AMSCA.3-- I -- -- --- --* --- - - 4.-- — - _! � C� - CORRIDOR \ - \ ) ' N.I8 CEILING p G ILL$ -_ P=IRE DAM PEIi gg pp E%HAU 9T C--- r` - --1 19E�,vICE PROP - I trL� 2 tq_,___ ` - --------- --- E 150 CFM\ r t • 1 I, 1:\ 8 EXHAUST I \ ( l _) � SERvICE DROF5 - E EX NAUSTL ' �� 1-150 CFM/ 1 � ' SE Vict .D$OP/ E•150 CFM ', I N ,Xle CEILIN4 I/z'IC-z"12 „ • HI -/ \ GRILLE ._JV-+'_,, TO PANEL P' IMy� ELECTRIC 1 EX15T CEILING * t�M 212,E (APRON, 175 ) I;{ GRILLE, E•750 CTM - ' - ROVI PE A flw 20A• IP J }I� I i4ll() EXHAUST DUCT S CONTRACTOR SHALL t_ 4 Nast'Y AvALABLE SPACE EX1445T FAtaii 6F IA, ROOF OUM.LSO; ELECTRICAL CQlJN�CTION PON Fr MODEL NQ, l �t•180 f hi V Ibis ELT Fr C �,►t,1 F1,1444, i t.V0 Gihr1 C ...3131 S.P, 7�44.f 04 /4 H,R �►q A MorOfdJ f" / e�( coNIJEGr / Lc�Tlu4� t�IRD REE itiJ I�R�+�°R CATEC T �1,16 ouCT UP TO EXHAUST PAW / FOOF Citdl S. 1.. i_C4l / B%NAUST _ ✓%i r 14''d1 g>iHAu�f 5 MICE PIJCT CEILIt41-� / /j - DUC? / — SUPPORT CHAIJNBL STRY �- / I ( �`jam`', �t�T OUCT SEE � I I Pat4 POA SIZINy ;4 , 7 ! E•150 CFki --� o CuAMP� .,:\ /,/ -- " -J I a - / , 1 2• OTi7P, RATE SWITCHES 1 j w/ Pi ,t71 LICaHT NAME "� REA21144 EXHAkir R'AU' NORTH C 4I _;, \ 1 siN\ ill z9' /' 4 EXHAUS? FAA1 EAST • 6 150 C�Nf - 0 DUCT (TYP) - -_ I .'\ EX1:5TII4e WALL. ! T•I:1L�'i 1 / , ! 228E / i CLAMP - o 11 5ECuP,ELY ANCHOR TO j I * 12°QI-- 644b EXHAUST - \ 'C' WALL(TYPICAL) /2�C-3 12 SERVICE DROPS 4l. X / _ %g�(}}.. A ROOF NIOUNTED; E 150 C>�'M --+ �:✓ / / 561C�� L. NO• FMOUNI ! STAINLESS STEEL �` ! 1` SUPPORT CHANNELS tJ CF CAVE CENTRIFUGAL FAN f l✓ / VIlUME PAMPER- - /� 14 Id. Tar. CAp ITY 114C+ RPM, , 1 "� ___ / 1 j /I2 NP MOTORS. W/ CORROSION PSl5ISTAwT E1115T1Np sHE v SHALL // a PROTECTIVE 6O T1Nq BIRO SCREeN MP BE CUT AS PQJ EG -/�i 4Y-. / PROJE T PEiJ/J PREWAORICATE'D RAQP' CURE), I1 TO l$J3TALL DU / CLAMP_—.-- - / / 225E1 ELECTRICAL COJJSC.TION E7fHAU5T INLLI — _____/A. MAUAL MOTOR $TARtEA� AV / 10 __4,--1 / ; /12'0 DUCT UP E- 50 C F M - - - I/ -7 ,I EX!STI►►�,J� UNT 12.� ACE 0 TO EXHAUST FAN — ry" CUT 30° vEN-TILATORS 70 i �.c`COUNTER TOP � � CBtL:- Am4 4CA5EWO — " ' �1 'a I \\ \�� 120 i2` $"Gp EXHAUST ,\\\ ' // , el 0 SERVICE DROPS 5ERvICE DROP FLoaR-1 \�\�\ // TYPICAL EXHAUST SERVICE DROP PARTIAL UPPER LEVEL PLAN --. .. SCALE : 1 /4': 1 '—O' SECTION SCALE . 3/4': 1 '—O' k. ' ME- �' . E nA sift. s issaissitimawar iid A. DRAWING NO. :ANACORTES HIGH .SC.t# . �* -lain it a POOOThrergt ststoot bisf ;. • :. OATS: I 'A• ♦e ,`% L y,S, WN: .-. ,; `, s' D I Ei,N E 10 Y t ' �i E , F i 1.1 E t & 11111 ' tvPi .. CONSULTING ENGINEERS -"wow ' , `CHIEICKEII: . 400 &LOYO *IMO. MEATTLF.WA. p$101 , .4,44�� w: - • arr I r IfC1 1 L , 1-1 I T� Tf�'E T-#t# ELSrM T �2 POW? _ _ k II FINIATIG --� 1 tONe VALVE e e 4eN"w (I COW,) `` • i ��s i corNiNEGT TO E.C15T. . ; , #1 14 Ii I/4 L.INEt FELDW FLOOR — _ ti r ----- _ - _-..�J i f Uf IlOP1 (TYP7 -.. r �' `� 1, \ CQ�L vALve y , — ,i µ - e)ALANG i iCa . ._ �, , Vi�l..1/L c+ C 1N.Vlt I I 46" ..r � 1' I HI / ii i I iI to LY�W N TO i I 1 tNSULATIOW Meo-AN ICAL I r I U1 ,r-.... Rf�OM - P QVIDE r: _ = _�' i I_ PF-1 2 -.� MEAL CCNERJNG , It---, --- `�_/ 0vek Oti R1�ER 7 -- € \` ii �� - _ J �Q, �t � C.Tt�. � ��E�i,,, r r �a ; n i II NO SCd d E : �, � I j 11 !I i _ — _ I , i 1 _ �-` — .r i ;— C , R2UIJ NEAR 1 p' G !� f'. C�CIST, PANEL P — �____ 4} l _- -____ _ wt , !j I Ct''>NT�7L VALVE NIp1J t ,. • l i r l f �� _ [aATE VALVI` FMI RELAY -- fl Ilar • Ii 1 • FINK r —---------i , - r-) 1-._— •II I dir-- ' . , 1 il 1r • �1Eh r EH ii fi , 11) iI i 1 l eAsL.,ANCl►•tca V V j /14 i„I - , fir_ i 4 ------ -•- s^ G ��4° MGIJNT AS NICaN I , I ' Q _FO FLO PeATGR CeT I., AS POrabt PALE NO _ FF-2 __ : "! , : TO SPARE C.s. a l -1FJ1 i.' -, C' - IN PANEL B or c 3 i -- - L� F ND i%ag o C - 1 -iWS-- I4OT WATER SUPPLY ,�_ 4_. _- ----NWR--- Nc7! WINTER RETURN - ::.'. _ _� I q r PiL161 DOWN t r —ts PRP NCa UP ,. EXIST. PANEL 6 + rn,Jii 01 GATE VALVE :C.2 �p_ . . • . . , . , .�__ �..—-1 Dld co,-,-.... VAl-vE �- r- - -rF' . r, ) L J ! t r l i' itg .�- WAY vALve , eAi.AN I NCB VA,L. E It i II UN _ d UER TATs -_.�=' -- - a r — t — — I ._- WNNECT To EXIST. WtsJR MAIN 1 0 FAN AT EXIST, MAIN Q#t&R THRU FLOOR N c eMOVVE extent,* INCH RISER ,' -=- 1 F F N P Fiats! i4tAT�R • i ` pH C. CONVdGTOR iil - 1 — FLOOR PLAN MP",i scar-e�US€' Ir-.13u- ---- : •.. . _ _ /7/ . I Nu \ -, II klA 'LI \\. / - - " 1 r -1 II L__J I .. gli . 1 l ' 1' /1 - ' 1 N - A I . . e R ORA4,WN SHEET - NCI • , ENGINE- . - - EFIMS • ,', . : ffi �jt� F (jai }�� *� iC r�` ,' . TES --* ! �lRf ' , M„ ri i \,(r ".i`.�,..3, s' e y44 • DAIS NO. R�ViSlGNv$ "f- 14.g i„? ' --- -- - ----_ - -- --_ ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS • r= -r 7 T �E 9 _ !MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS - - - -- --- -i =- - 1 - - I I y General General • � 41 1. All work to conform to uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Mechanical 1. Comply with all authorities having jurisdiction and 1981 NEC and OSHA Code • Regulations. f II I i 2. Take out and pay for all permits and fees required. Contractor. Damage: Correct all damage done by this wYtractor. _...._ "� i 3. Coordinate work with that of other trades to ensure proper adequate in- . 3• Drawings are schematic only and not intended to show all details of the work. Verifylocations of all items. Coordinate with Architect and - I -.,2 ! 4. terface of their work with the work of this section. mechanical plans. � l _-JUse sufficient journeyman workmen and competent supervisors in the execu- / , _ Lion of this work to ensure proper and adequate installation throughout. 4• Obtain and pay for all permits. All contractors must be licensed. T' --- " r 5. Provide 6 copies of submittals for all materials before ordering. 5. Keep job clean at all times and clean each equipment item thoroughly at 'r it ;._ ___ 6. Provide one year guarantee on all workmanship and materials. close of job. -/ 7. Provide as built drawings and maintenance manuals. 6. Furnish as-built drawings at close of job. Submit to Engineer. (1! I ! I ;, 8. Demolition: Remove or retoute existing work as noted on the drawings 7. Provide 6 copies of all submittals, 1 ` ! ; .; ! or as required to suit new work. Do all cutting and patching necessary. 8. All exposed conduit shall be run as directed by Engineer. Run tight to building surfaces. Paint exposed conduit. Products , 1. Use all means necessary to protect materials, before, during and after Materials installation and to protect the installed work of other trades. In the 1. Conduit and Tubing: Galvanized steel. Mininsn size 1/2". No flexible / I used; only for final connection to recessed light fixtures and equipment. event of damage, immediately make all repairs and replacements necessary I ' ' to the approval of the Amer and at no additional cost to the Owner. Run conduit concealed where possible. i 2. Heating Water Piping: Schedule 40 black steel with malleable hen 2. Wiring: 600 volt, minimun size #12. Wiring. for controls may be `tt. - - - ( .........4. ... screwed fittings 3. Insulation: Insulate exterior of all new pipingabove grade witF 1" #14.Outlet Wire for incandescent fixtures rated at 150 degree C. gi 3 covers in damplocation as nolted on plans.st mewl with gaske `�# fiberglass pipe insulat:.on with ASJ. Provide plastic covers over insula- 4. is Bryan smoothiine. Verify color. tion at all canners. 5.} 4. Temperature Controls: Provide all components required to have system Disconnect t itches shall be horserawer rated, heavy duty quick Hake, �/ t - - _ +J s. - quick-break. 1 - - --- -- ----1 . �, operate under specified sequence. q y ..»,____ 6. Devices: Switches Bryant 4801-1, 4803-1. Receptacles Bryant 5262 I. 7. All material shall be new and have UL label there labeling service is f ; t} Execution inspect the installed work available. All exluipeemt shall be J.S. asci4. I "="'� II 1 . -Prior to all work of this section, carefully r i of other trades and verify that all such work is complete to the point K;., - - where this installation may commence. Execution t�. �, ,r 2. Heating Piping 4 Equipment: 1. t specified indicates quality. Contractor I ' quipmen pest' qua ty. way submit for approval I; a. Slope all 'piping to drab. Provide. drain fittings at low points. on equal equip t. L� � b. Provide ha ers for all pipe and equipment. Pipe hangers shall be 2. All tacorary siring furnished-by this contractor and removed at couple- .- , i i•'� , threaded rods with split rings. Equipaent hangers shall be threaded tion of Job J i ; f + rods. Barger supports shall be securely fastened to existing strut- 3. The ,installation shall be performed by a licensed electrical contractor ture. in first class workwanlike wanner. The complete system shall be operation- . 1 - c. Test all ripe for leeks at 125 p.s.i. before covering. Fold for 4 al and acceptance by the Owner is a condition of the contract. All work ExISTitJt Cot JVE'RTOR 'bs ;' hours. Repair all leaks and test until watertight, must be coordinated with other trades, to avoid interferences and pevsenve t2r;5ET CONT 5 -�' I ,i-1 T `• r 3. Temperature Controls: head roam. All wank meat' be planned and performed in such a mariner as not q �, a. Provide all conduit, wiring, boxes, etc. , as required to have sys- to interfere with the completion of any other rack. FOP, IGO LW - c • -- terns operate under specified sequence. c-, - -. - - _. --- _ b. Provide wall thermostat with vandal cover to cycle heating valve! c ,, ,, ._ ___ and fan in force flow units. . -- , r CONTROLLE FOR T -f.. _sr _ ' _ . 'I .-- --- --- _ .c , , �LOGKeR Room MX Ca �" - , -C , Cr=- - 1 1 - - - VALV <s IfvD° r r SUPPLY WATER TEMP : - r' ` _ - PJ it EXISTIf•Je PUMPS i • �"�"' NW5' �..-m��Ts ---- -*- , CONNr✓LT Tip UNIT DIMENSION CAP CAINHET WATER TEMP RetslAIRK5 - I EXIST. Ike NO. L R H PfTUN TYPE EWT LWT AJ? JDOtJ PIPE rt, - - - ( SUPPLY uNE air = _ ._ _ - i C- I ?2'I (o n wu gpOp st4WALL.iUW 1(of� 140 E ` ', �#C - +-_ - ,a { _ _. _t C 2 GO" Co" Ito" ' 5 t O0 It 140 T"�L4t•1E - `.�EQ et 40 (00 t C-3 540 Co a i(p" 4400 II Vv0 140 TRAr e - e .1 E3 40 l I i- i Fe i . .a a.:* �' 1 ,... t it. :I *' +s.` NTR. GAP GPM GPM MA�t• l+b�+1Egt'1F.i-1F' MOTOR DATA kt-tlAt�:k•.S 1=--=-��i N0. STUN P,t�. EWT t WT FF- t 48,(Xb ee0 4.4, 4.49 IloO 140 C1414e5P TIZA.SIE -Pat EFLo- r 1- lr.-AC -08 _ PP-Z l5,goo tiro q.84 -7•43 Igo 140 Ca4 NE5P TV.At IE -F0t2Ct FLO- D-1 -6,. AO - 1? .- F,ICTFE PROVIDE COUbLt DEFLECTION DI5.1-1APetfe.. (,PiLLE ON OUTLET OF Fo12CE HZ 1-+EATERS. EX15TIFJ MECHANICAL ROOM PLAN ,CALE • DRAWN 5Y SNEET N4. ANACORTES HIGH SCHOOL. _ ff....____........_l i GYMNAN 'STD t Qi„; ..9N I HS6EA0A0FT. . 1 ,1w - -" 5 IDATE : 4OF DATt 1 NO. REVIetON5 1- 14- a - 14 00 09 ' 1944'a 607. SO ('NCO*-9*fl$ ', *Mttt61141 "MIICTIIMN Zee? SS- 1 ) 40.00iR. ✓ � SMED sWAtt}IOuse III , -otat,'SP1Nt 'top Pf (Exist), CEi►lxtlw�3 c 24/` srui�P7 1 i; x • • . _, t -+ at mart - ► . r•::_ cam•.,. - . -_ . : ' _ ►R►,_uW- r /Airs tore .i.. - y' - '+N` , - 4. :-_-- .,- ,! 'Y y� ,. _•* _ 11 (Pic stiwG) r, .�'' _ tt- '- �Kry - �.` is - i I I _ sit+► -mitts? r Ar - - --- - - . _ . i , ,,,� l - Cte „ ' . i . , _ ______ ._ _ _ . . _ _ --It p :. - • - Moist) . , ' . t li .1 4 !#Y i1?": rilli I fr-V111. ) . - A '' "# ^4Y. yor/77 ..z... .-,- - I' # _ ... - .. _ _ _.__..-+..a-n- , ._ .-s -, -r..._�+-,e.+•r-r__ . . -.. �.` R �`" x k " I AVE," VE M ,.. F 1Q IGA f' Pc I d r n i ' s vac* I97,1rwx �--- 1 '#+E RtNf+ vaa t� { ?� t� a 7, . - 1 Ok • , , ,,...„,,, , _____ _______ rs‘H _.;fir I -fir iptR) ,. .t eyM1` 4 $ A 1. ii: c' } • dl+' .. , i ZExiy11 wd1 , Clxl3Tll.i �i 3 �c 1 r ii1 1rQt�R EiEV. G.E MA11a Dori, GLEN, ?,2404,0 I -_. kl .. , — ! ...:». �....a.,.�,�».—,..,.!..........w.,�1iI _ ••._,�,r 4- , �'� - !{ - ii f I 4,- it .'; : i ilt 1 j I 1 f 1 I I / . ,407, , , 1 42 .1", jA . .... , t i (... I_____ -ir t t _ 4 ,,s/ s1,Y,M,,E��L♦ tswI':v147,y1\ — „ " 11 VET 1446 I I er) I it " J AVE. ;} N $1 a��k #ill I ( ' i � � 1 I x'�_r b PUTV RE- 4.001TION o r -- �\. J To WASH• 5?ATE Ft Key CI `, I , cp _ _ i - • `° 1 k1 1 ' . \\\\\ ',\\\\ 1. 1' GueNnLs I' i iLi_ -- - - +---- j,-.tC ttA N N E I. 7 , I , PROJEC' SITE S i I ; I "4". Ake, w' ! ` 31 } I. x 1 I N G 0'7 is A k 4 I� I t1 V G "I" Av� • ' 1 I I , O V I "brAV 1 r t T L. la I le* CI i o - r-i I•: I ' rL. AV4• Nj I - III (0 r • yr.zi I"Pyr A pia , , �� ,n „ *, Z ! -� I € i l,, i, -0i0r 6 N /{vE,-- i -�.... . . __I, , KJa \ i 0 i • �' ` �:. r19- dnnnneRC,IAL �' aVe; -+ , °� . i _- \\\\ _--'._-_'- -� �/ 1 1 ! .--•-- _j i i R, , fi , 1 • .:.- '-f=F .T,t lr ., , .' ' I /t d w, — f r i I I , Exl sS IN G TRAGK / r f � f — T � .}' I I Jam/ { x f I� t r \ f x if� �� _�-- r * wi$ tI Gi i I- ! , -1 �� ' PI L 2ALGO bAY / tII I — 5taN -LI`�` , C _ z I .1•, -X X X % x x T' „ ..n _ X -% x x _ p .1r� id II IT i • —�_ _ - — _ • _„� Illr U VA . `,- to Mt. VERNOIa, OAK NAR3OR - — d - - — I — „ K AV � „ ' �� V iGINIT `( MAP KI c> WI C ( .'F I i ir Ott j-- �O F l!1 4 ,I— J LtJ s 111.1 - -p[aoPERTY oE5GRIPT ► oN ; PaLOGK 124, 125, I T ,.Y•r� L A N vice, t 4"1. 146, 14 , ISO, 16I AND 15 7- of H E> " GIVE( OF AwAGoRTb3 PLAT " LESS AREA, SNowN • S Co- A L. t• 111 s drpI APO LT AND ALTO QAT1OK' S TO DRAWN SHEET BRyANT • BuTTE,RFIE,LD • FRETS I CHECKED • R C �I I T E C T S AM ACORT E �. A B A n ,��pp��, ` �.y A ` /� .. 117 MEDICAL DENTAL BUILDING EVERETT , WASHINGTON r FOR M4kCOR, Tt ' . SCHOOL. DiSTRIGT NO. tQ.5 DATE � TELEPHONE 2 5 2 - 3 3 0 4 - - - -- rrr is Si ACP R' E%, it AO IT,, . C0101- YY ,3 , W,A,$ $ IN 0TQ N - 4'21"75. •II,LY nut PRINT Inc. ,1-30IN = 3WVN ONIMV60 IHJSHOIH = 3WVN '2310 103rOad L6%L0/SO = 31d0 101d o 0 m 31Y0S Ol ION 8 Z 10 n rri (Nnd A3N) NYld 2O01.1 1SdU n r 03AOW3i1 38 Ol NOIiJna1SNOJ ONIISIX3 �� ",t : 31VOS = nit '"'�J�,j� �}N J � v O - t ' �_------1 � .� NIYW3d Ol NOI1Jna1SNOJ ONI151X3 N` eld �100`13 1J `J� 1e8IJ I V IlU Y d o V I NOItDnalSNOJ M3N n 1.11.11 _. ---'1� � aN3J31 11VM 3N00 • 30N3833N00 .- ' • i I a0013 A `,., Y > ' �: aN003S ® W002i 3WV2f3 II i r ' NOI1f181M1S1a 31V1a3WL131N1 _ W Crl { O3atn03a�' _ . o -i ; NOniiii-3VM 40 31.V1S { + -r I T{ vI 210013 1S2113 W002i = a'3onlsa 1 oavw ' S 3WVdJ NOI1l8RI1Sla NIVW 1 �� i� � "—il SV 'nYM Ho1Yd �° 'rl .1► 1 , ."=1 t f' ,12�1N3 y r—t, r- c i t .F 1 �avaan 3JYians a000 loco p 03H31SI93y Lr e��L1 I H ON15IX3 031Y5(,3a �31Y3013a 8 3HOW3a NIY W 69st , 4 1N30VPOY Hvas O1 - " I " y L' � '8'M OVaX. 3dAl 3B/9t1/M Na0M35YJ a ONI151X3 3AOW3a--� ,.� .._.._. r,^�.-7ri� .,,t- - ----" r °/°„9t - SOt1IS qxZ a000 ONLLSIX3 3+AOW3a -a i-�- -� r !- g - 1 30N3a33N00 1 „, - _ __ _ __ " _ __ .__. - T1YM 9Nt1SIX3 3015 (l) f Ij, ,ENT ;. 4...�.- �'? s,.e- ,ac .. - •.,�-f=--� /M IIYM M3N N91,Y� 8 M 9 .X; 3d1.1 .B/S L/ 1 RTES PERM Sli,, I I �� - i /M /°,BI sanls qxz CITY OF A�AO`I ED P LAIN! S � i� L_ _.�1 _ — d (Awl 31r1vai 0 A P Y 5- tG r; — at `t r 1 �"��9N`' Noltnel?11s1a Ntvw 33 +I PERMIT NO. J ....., a \ r�p� O \ ��VV. teibM 3anln3 oNllslx7 3n)460Morv3a ot !�I I q 1�R t .7 r .' . ""',-0-• 1 f _V^�,�:+' "` n� g - - - - -- - - _ a_O.i 9NINJVB 9xZ 1 i FT ■, ADDRESS: , / � - , I .�I -'� �, (9NI,139 �P SI,VM dA ) v .--- APPROVED BY. _1_..__._.:..,„,- nr rr `t-ecen =,( I I I a'M'9 x 3d l „B}s / TION. OVEt`< y, ,• 3no8tl f = SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPEC NOT 11�ICLUu ��.—. . ,`�Woca 30130 3Nn 3013H Pt/ OR VIOLATION OF CODE IS a i SLY i 4 Z ,t 0 a3A3, /M Al8W3S-Y 0 a I I I / T1 V OS a000 031Ya anOH-3tJ0' � t I f „ � O ,Z/l S-,9 ,.Z/t S'S�Cy ) .1/t f-,Zf N01103S a00aaoo NWnl00 9x9 9NI1SIX3-------,,,� WY38 ZIxZ (f) ON11SIX.3 -{ a /1 sIsr ali - 8x? ONI1Sx3 /'-- © a ,, 081 .8/S ONLLSIx3 V JNOO „zit I ONI151x3 L\ / > ,7t,13 0313 0 Ztit# wooassvlo i ` \ —I 1 7- ID -,— .9 ,b ,Z ,I, 0 C W008 JGW "i SIIMISa . „PL 3-1VOS , 0 „YM ON151X3 j NV-1d 8001d 13A31 ON053� '1V1121Vd z Z 03/MW3a 38 OL /"."-- ONI1133 030N3dSnS 9NIISIX3„, EOZ# 1-11VW 1.`- /°.9l - sous qxz Vo.9t - sofas qxZ-�� --- - ----- Dc>a K z f 'B'M 0 X 3dA1 „9/s ZOZ# H1VW n 03O3Stl8M9r a0BMOY3dA1 /S ,Ii 1 I I.J U U 14 Y 0 0 a iJ RLJ / \ / 71 lf1 .ZZ ONIISIX3-_-4----'-"v ,\ )/°„9q- 5,11'1 N33M138 \‘,.__ ) �2 - �+--ONko0,8 xZ 301A08d r \ � CO ➢ . Cl. _ .r'2,. . n r� n n /�r-1 n rh r-, r, rLa n ry r r r� 1 N3WOM N > <V ) I \ \ `lfl „Ell 9NI1SI%3 0_,q �� rn ! ` "--Tei .8/S onasix3,`-)N00 „Z/t t ONI151X3 M L. 0 1 is" a1aY�y an i � I 1 „008 JOI S3 ONYH a3A31 /M Al8W3SStl w0021 (301) 3NN21.4 o `aooa 031Y8 avow 3No wooals3a NOt1t18R1151a 3IVit13w2l31N1 I i ONI_LS 3 80018800 w W W D0'.q - - C� O �._3jo,91 - SONS qxZ - ---- -- --- - - \ 'A3 / l3 O D { �- 81C9 X 3riA1 „SA ------- 71 \\ / CO < -I I # 18 03"3 �z Tt p NIYW3a 01 9N11130 030N3dSn5 9NI-5IX3 0 v Io rn o td- in cy) i, SPANISH #207 1 Il > CO20/40 ! I Ci Q W x NI a CL -) AREA H ' 1 CODE NOTES: Q o r- i Q Ln co FRENCH pzo6 I SCIENCE LABS Lo REFER TO UBC SEC. 1017.7 FOR EXITING (2) EXITS MAY BE REQUIRED I ea5 p rI r I zo/a2 LEARNING LAB N2O8 CLASSROOM N21p CLASSROOM 4212 REFER TO UBC SEC 305.2.4 (1 HOUR) CONST. MAY BE REQUIRED. �'' 773 SF ' I e81 SF • 902 SF //1 d) O) 120fJ9 20/44 20/45 UBC SEC. 1017.8 STAIRS V N put, F1,4a1 i,,11111d REQUIRED EXIT WIDTH FOR EACH STAIR SHALL BE EQUALLY DIVIDED X Y J i II CAP/ CIY1C 205 j 10�, 95 SF y 40 4 r---, • 0 X 714 Sf BETWEEN SUCH STAIRS r t 20f36. 234 K,3= 709' THE SECOND FLOOR STAIRS NEED NOT BE MODIFIED, (EXISTING CONDITIONS) / DON MEASNER ci +y N STAIRMOTH UBC SEC. 1003 Z N E �'` f• 1' OCCUPANT LOADS OF 501 - 1000 SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN (3) EXITS US HISTORYoa 45 f 121 ta9 # — (3) EXISTING EXITS DOWN FROM SECOND FLOOR. CLASSROOM DRAMA Ise SF eel SF . a� •*s9a SF (2) EXISTING EXITS FROM TECH WING. (1) MORE REQUIRED OR REDUCE OCCUPANT U 2Q/ 8 20/44 20/21 20/49 LOAD BY CREATING EXITS TO EXTERIOR FROM INDIVIDUAL CLASSROOMS. UBC SEC. 1017.5 CORRIDOR WIDTH � AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1003 PLUS 2' 0" , BUT NOT LESS THAN 6' 0" M764 SF03 I k.: — - '_ _".,' 1 .l. UBC SEC. 1017.E EXIT SERVING AUDITORIUMS IN E-1 OCCUPANCY („) �..� zof3s 1a5 _. ` AN EXIT SERVING AN AUDITORIUM & OTHER ROOMS NEED PROVIDE ONLY C/ 309 27 1. 1j `�• ,P two ! GEN SCIENCE LAB i ,11 �' GEN SCIENCE LAB II ' FOR THE CAPACITY OF WHICHEVER REQUIRES THE GREATER WIDTH IF u936 SF 1 ••935 SF' a = 36 1 20/47 II` 20/a7 THE AUDITORIUM IS NOT TO BE USED SIMULTANEOUSLY W/ THE OTHER ROOM 1[1. I;- - --- -' - ❑tI MATH 4202. 4 47 1 1 ART ROOM +! GRAFT FRZR L 731 5F 4 .._. ; TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD FOR SECOND FLOOR = 709• g1 , Toss sF 190 J AREA F -� -+►• " ��_— AREA G 0.L. GREATER THAN 501 THEREFORE (3) EXITS REQUIRED _1 PRINCIPALS OF PHY$IC$/MATH If 20/53 ,I 20/9S 7 n , C q, ! 7� , �, 709 x .3 = 212.77 3 = 70.9" REQUIRED @ EACH EXIT STAIRWAY 1II AUTO/METALS TECHNOLOGY O Y 977 SF, I' I� I� "`^"' .� M g�+DL7 SF 1 t'� a- --1 0 W 3aa9 SF zo/a9 .' 1; 53 THE SECOND FLOOR STAIRS NEED NOT BE MODIFIED, (EXISTING CONDITIONS) / DON MEASMER > > N 5o/ea ! �� L27 1"�� 1, m * NET AREA GIVEN; FIXED CASEWORK SUBTRACTED FROM FLOOR AREA) (f CO Nl_: 1 MA N �201 a9,S ( JI{ r '�'8" 1 ae -{ / al / 758 3F : ; I ADV..SCIENCE LAB AOV SCIENCE LAB, Q p0 °oFF. 71 •.9e7sF �l »1039sF ❑ OCCUPANT LOAD BASED ON USABLE FLOOR SPACE AS APPROVED BY DON MEASMER �yJOIC HLP' ' S 'I JII {J,. 101 SF FABRICATION '49 _, g-$F-� 20/48 �1!1■�y■1! 20/52 iY Q ��, • _.. ` '� s -;.: -SF---_ �+-�.�_, STORAGE 'C.. i , Ij1■, I �. SEMINAR 20 42 LECTURE _ —.�_—_. I' W .y. SEM 843LISSH 1 10•-5" - - — 35' 725 SF - 42 IIl E_.y N W ', DRAFTING ROOM /1 49 � L�L O AREA E 2i�eF ;5 ' , , NWSPPER SECOND FLOOR PLAN Q: :H. 3• •WOMEN DEMO AREA-) p 882 5F COMA SF' ' PLASTIC z0/aa zo/ae, SOCIAL STUDIES 0 5' 30' 60' 90' J t Sv 1t30 SF i1 ( 4a 2Q/33 W k0/23 ,� ME I. FI, v _ _ - 33 _ r-- - PI°"RY Tt ul,_ ! t • OILET OFF] KIT,. ,id. GEN. Q P r I F TT'1,n ' 42„�' a 4 5 4Ita. a2 �" ' ill 0 g�g , SPECIAL EDUCATION' - :, C� 11 k . Y u P �, 77t 5F • • W ,MULTI-PURPOSE CLASSROOM CAREERS CLASSROOM BUSINESS EDUCATION - :, 20/39 ,ea, sF .904 SFrg5e $F AREA D Ill Ld {g 20/84 H H 9 20/45 a 20/48 113 y 44 i 1 _ L PR AREA . 309 ! I� !t11lAN p11 013 �Eq C E14� �192 -__ C 51 OFF' N V I 20/36 1 _STORE] • 300�1F i ai vim; - 1111� - 1 1 PVICE -R NC j - ( 1 STUDENT LOUNGE 2(J - '• ___ _-___ - _ t-- I ,r . -w . . 1 1 • 15 SF . • • 40{' MECHANICAL t— r ___ __ L' fir. ° 1 Z PRINC - '' �1' i 4 ice■ L'. + i 1 I p�ery_ OR1 �1 I� 1 W i '. -11 I, 'I :,I, 11-.I- — ,....2_, J 0 5€C'NC yy;;pp ¢¢�� ,e 1 I 15 EFf L ' C4242 SF 1A -�345 .. _�y \ I ! - i j F i, V/ 1 / 100 �I'TJ➢ 1 f 3� 1 �15f2B3 .i ---- - -I- - - 'll �,..�_ ' " �I 0. PRAC. 102 F AC, III L� I II --1 L� ! � �9 5 72 1390R.F 471 121 F _ 133 $F I 1L" d VAUL �[' 11 •! 1 ,1e01 001 > 10n ,• 100/1 -J ( i --� t _ 1li - '`T-I,RECPT}1 1Z iz_ I. :10 N,$, . II _ _— __ _ GYMNASIUM II :III' l (I �VISITOINS"'T"'- /2 - /i^-- `� ! IILI ,', 1 r(NOT VERIFIED) I' z AREA C rWAI �_61 @� 4 -1 f/�'.-- BAND j / CHORAL/1 0/ 3F \ j If'' I� 4 11 l '�266 t L 'I - �'I 1657 SF - 35 it f W 1.1 gg____ A 8 4 23 20/83 91 ILI ICI '- ji _'1._� ! L 1! r _.___ Q I, 1188 i'- N � 4 1 ,\CALL CNSJ `, FACULTY ROOM RO Ir �' - .4S ,WORK 13 � �L 345 o1 ORK 00/3F �E _. - -_+ �/ h 1 KI�U of . LLJ-_,� !r _ 0 i/) ATTD It ___ .{ - REC -_ -, �' 1 17-Y f UNIFO ____ .. 10011 68 r s" `� \ _1_ -_L.__ _ 5 W PENSION R228 SF En '' ,`;, GNSL __. .-100 $2 t \ ' \\ \ \ >\ ` L __-. L- 1.- _� - -� L F1 CONF. 20/35 STOR L \ ��rrAA" '\ a ' -+ S0 u$ 2 6!1207 S ., r ' \ \ , \\ \\` \?"\ I LW. .,„„1 ._ A ^- _—,__--__.,._....�_.a .n .^__ —.-_... `' W'�f 1 1it °0�217 `,too/l2 { !'' '^-"� \` \ \ \ ", `, ' , I .1 L '\J �L .�. I-- ---------- ------ AREA SEPARATION TOTALS `` t fM,T _ 7 �,, ` I [ J O vn COURT j \� I' �' ' 1 3 100/7 • 2� /\ `• �\� \ ` ` l;o � ` L\ a Y, z COltla7 , ` VA - , \ " � ' Q FIRST FLOOR PLAN ! 2"a°/20_ _ � ' a t 2� , —_ 17Ca"sF1 i9 • �l '�' -�\ + \ \ I H \L , , ( Lrk'rj n.1!-�.�1.�.�.-^.Jl..l AREA A — 5,842 S.F. 1 r' 1-- ; 15/12'5ooit !CAREER CNTRF.1 -p;a�saoora #a SIWIDM • ' 1 [ 1 111 I1 1' `, r I AREA B 1.' 1 w' -7 681 SF .1 091 SF', • 702 SF ' I _ 20/34 -' 20/3520f35 �, PLATFORM I IRAIW 1LEaC 1U1TA '' U `� 3694 SF I t �5b rMED SEATS 426•' LOBBY �� 'VA) AREA B — 7,107 S.F. 10( ' >�.11 5/247 ( i Y �� LIBRARY L� r -__ I I I ! ` AREA C — 20,918 S.F. �S` , , ' —_ ��t l / I * -- a-U"'—T �" "'�'T / u 1I ; )/ j ,'I , :' III 4i ' i, ---:----,- AREA 2 AREA D — 4,307 S.F. oK . . /\Jr, f �r-�1Oo'2�; CLASCRO,OM CLASSROOM I CLASSROOM I /� �i ?� , , � / 7/ i � ''1 :.. If' . , 141 #143 #145 ■ ; , r AREA E — 30,392 S.F. PERooI a r�: e37 SF" 921 SF e01 SF 1 >` .',i: ; ; ; i 1 u 20f42 20/41 I 20/40 I ��p � '''S / i/ i i 7 i �"c ' 4 , '_I 172 ' - -. ES • 7/ , , i . ,, ^^ VJ SECOND FLOOR PLANT 1 1 . ,DRE55� 345 ;-/'% J —u1 7 W AREA F — 4,161 S.F. AREA A F.. . Z AREA G — 6,192 S.F. 0 AREA H — 13,801 S.F. (_) 0 Q — o co Q m titJhiVtu cn czd I SEP z s 17 . 3 C )! EITILPLANSII (BASE BID ALLTRNES) • i SCALE: 30' MI • O P- .Lii 0 15' 30' 60' 90' in C),, o .. _ Z . _ OVERALL FLOOR PLAN (KEY PLAN) w NOT TO SCALE _ LI -- a PLOT DATE = 09/17/97 PROJECT DIR. NAME = HIGHSCHL DRAWING NAME = HIGHEX-1 'ice Ni a, o 1 =I I \ \ cn SPANISH pzm i ° , ( Co Z x.M 4�f_i CICY O--) .+ FRENCH #206 • I I L- LJ a C + ,1 "i e Q in CO in I + BUSINESS#208 11 RESOURCE #210 'I,' CLASSROOM p212 ' 1 1 N) N) '_'�oFFlCE;�; (/ ) N N C WP/CAW #205 Bor �� L Iv . _ 11. 1 m x ,Y CO Q I 6 L- z SCIENCE p209 - a '7E' ' US HISTORY #204 , �}1 , PRINT SHOP p211 = U-- FREEZER r- Ml; i, - -• • �N---1 '- F -. . -- 1-1 I _ ELK • STOR. STOR MATH p2031`Iu WOMEN • '_I- - .. �_xn �� I .- Ii .�D�FIC "-11 I� _- II �� n. ..�� - + 1 PHYSICS /MATH 18 I I. BIOLOGr p214 , U o 1111 - , E��,TII i a t �'I' • m -I 11 T 1 T ❑ 4 STOR ,� r I HYDROI - ' PHONICS i /r rr OFFICE y#� < I1 ¢ MATH N202 i -C� �i -_ - 1 t AUTO / METALS p102 s - ' STOR � _lei Ci ' _ PRINCIPAL OF r�� TECHNOLOGY tOWpOp S --- [9 _P r p STORAGE _ -� �. u�� _m11.. ..1. ___� t s-i-'� - -- ▪ •STOR �. OFFIC _ _ LAB N217 0 FFICE STORAGE STOR JI II. 1T 1T_ _-_ Ir r CHEMISTRY p219 O \l lit < "'' tl• 0 u T CLASSRM�� CLASSRM • TOR STOR I ,TOR. MATT p201 I BIOLOGY#215 S�R / r - _ -I SPRAY - [➢ N a STOR //�' L x WOOD SHOPf p10J + II r 11 WOpp/ - - El ISI i2 Q �. • STOP 5 CRAFTS #104 r✓ ; -'- ___ J Li I N . • ? �A COMPUTER - BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN U o E- _usls cRAFr Jfll •FFICE ° ICE1!� ELEC 1g 1" = 30'-0" o .sam i 1 STORAGE II OFFICE Li. MEN COMPUTER TECH. p110 . f AS- BUILT SECOND FLOOR PLAN O z " , i• 09 __. REACH OLASSRM /tl} S Q III ART p106 1 REACH 'REACH,oFFlCE KIrcHE NORTH OF THIS a ._ �� LINE HAS NOT SCALE: 30' ■ III' I LAB 10FRCE m .. —� �,.. BEEN VERIFIED 0 15' 30' 60' 90' J ".� '. DRESSING a u =�' "jr-1 W s IJ "` 6 'I I" I Y ; I SPECIAL ED u Q I. f1 p II CLASSRM Ni14 - HOME EC #11] 1 SEVANG #115 I 1 C I 1 , �„ 0 9 I. II �I! - 1' r BOILER J 0.' OFFI.CEr ,liNl DIRECTOR - __ �� D TOR —_. 1 , 1 WORK E#' p116_. I 11 W LS1UBEN1L(IJNCE !IF± t � inI Er -- r1--- 0 IN MECHANICAL r �i - _- - - I -.-- -'_ _ -- I �� - KITCHEN 1 PRNCIPAL I < 1 1 gDOD Q -.I:. ■•■ Ira__ — �� -' I '� I I i1 hs L, _y ' n 1 V 1 �- I { I� E31 I CAFETERIA - -- - - - 1 I I . < ---\ � _ 1 _.�. NLT 0 x on - - - - - SiORI P�ACTCE ACTC )STOR PRACTCE ,PRACTCE p PRACTICE t I, --- - -- -_''-- - ----si WO K RM � V r LL �r+J Ad 6 IIVI ! �� 1' 1 O WAI o OFFICE C»ANASUM LEGEND a • H MENC -__ ,I I 1 , {�;V t -� LIP TANG p 9 .___ -- T 1 � ! Q GEN OFFICE 4 Wtl1A JAN SALES _ .r.• li Ts o CHORAL 1 IJNDICATES 2HR WALL IHEA 0 I� �- - I .1 " r �— v 1 -�t-- -- II - I BAND �YO / / r Zg— a �ji r B ORAGEgcouNSE�OR sroR -U' _ _� / Ii . 1 1. , FR •I SECRETARY !Ir 'T. " Ri yppK� OFFICE ROBES 1 1 1 � �" J1 �dFIOEI INSIAUMEN1 _ - -1 ___"-_� �� W r- g� FACULTY • TOR_A 1A 1 , 1-25 YrORk \\ `��- � - .- -_-- Q 1 _ �- __ rs{ - U —1� q 1 � n 1� p 1 T- LL ELEC r-' t 5 -� " al .^. L."JL'.� �.�.Jl JL .,.+ 1 O cn w CIXJFERENCE` COURT 0 1^ \ 1 fiil r§ • Q CONF - _ •._, ,._ m. I 7 ' Er 0 0 CLASSROOM #142r \ �I I. 1 CLASSROOM #144 CLASSROOM 146 \ Z��_y e p 1 � II � I IIII I 0 �` Y- I r N. • 111 Ii 1 III I PLATFORM max LECTURE ] �� LIBRARY I I. -- I- = .yLJ_u. ... _. ..n �.. ... I I H I! I I I 1 p—,y,l LOBBY \I \ O -�---TL I ,lam/ a i N OFFCE 1 0 J ,Y 19 h i,. ~ l\ / I / 1 ' I I a. I _` V latr 11RK RIM - �', .t .-. I' 1CO • _,._ = :=_-_-_ CLASSROOM #141 CLASSROOM #143 i CLASSROOM p145 • PERODICAL '� I, •` . , 4 + _ T r—J I I--- I - -M1J II�AN - I I •e ` I. 1t J 1--1 n DRESS.�L1\ ry J 2 1--,1 NORTH OF THIS _ \ Co LINE HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED `-- --- - W Z ° Q , \ Cr 0 \ \ , U cn cn ASQ)z - BUILT FIRST FLOOR PLAN Z MEQ SCALE: 30' ■ cn 0 15' 30' 60' 90' ♦"'" n • co / CICI I- H CO QCO LAST REMARKS UPDATED 1 4/25/97 i BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 5/5/97 UNIT HEATERS ADDED Z U1" = 30'-0' H i WI CD I o (n 4 PLOT DATE = 08/19/97 PROJECT DIR. NAME = HIGHSCHL DRAWING NAME = AS-BUILT v W 17TH , STRE T ` EOA — v;' _ WA ti —T ,.-./ r .. // \/ METAL GATE / W\ ~ exilD • i k n sr : 1 , - (-) 0 0 . , in/I • 1 T u 1 u _ • eoNc s Ps s,. I '' 1 ffi > > s s s 9, Q \ ' \ \ \ ; 1. • • JUL men � t+ a p' t Q Y � IsLast is !T I D ' IP a sari s. Ar SYa R QJ At., ILE 'a r EY r o o >� b n i J I MIST 311 IT VICINITY MAP I I NOT ,O SCALE • '. . i, o ,, VERTICAL VERTICAL Ely w �,F WOOD FENCE WOOD FENCE :lie , 4 •,� I - PLANTER U�, !• 0 35" DECIDUOUS ' - 337 L F 6" CONC a 94�y� � SANITARY SEWER - CONNECT_ 'I Y.a� ! 3' DECIDULUS TO EXISTING MANHOLE • —4.• PLANTER AREA \ / T .. 1 ' ' - �� •-_ - - ! .✓--CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE 1 r `' _ �� ..- i• - CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE /, i , I SAN.62 \ MpNHOL VEGETATI0N LINEppp (�OOOOO�OO-CSOOOOOOO. OOt� O , RtV=2t7.62 ` EX. SAN. SEWER MANHOLE I 6 CEDAR CLUMP - NFW VEGETATION -BUFFER INV=205 22 6 Gd�+G / 15-0" RIM=t 98 64 TAP INTO XISTING ' • CB POWER AND COMMUNICAT / ION • r 11- 44 DOUGLA> FIR n 3" DECIDU US ' WATER METER BY CITY f w ' 08" 'JWILLOW I POTABLE WATER 42•-0" y! z I ' GRAVEL PATH I - �i,t 28" OOUGLAS FIR 40.-0" `? i r2" PLUM - I w LI • -, , ' I - 1 I i`24" DOUGLA' FIR Mr-.^ a, , '' .::gTq . ,rv ,p.. r-+z,.,s,4 .ti " Y;g', ",.,'SF., .�� .,� ,., =a y, .a;. '',,,, ' - i �! - 'A'A 0-� ' 26" CEDAR 'ROCK PILE f I "` 2a'" DDLIGLAC FIR • i rr�� \ N •• •Y ,4 32i MAPLE *! ! - --�—V LL — L� O 40 Go i/ ,x 2" PLUM /` j j/ O / GRAVEL PLAY AREA PLAY GROUND j CONC. PAE, SCALE IN FEET • W • w ' W W o 0 0 0 o ca o 0 0 0 0 0 NEW LANDSCAPING 3t' DOUGLAS FIR LE N gi ° 'PLUM ABBREVIATIONS Z ? VEGETATION LINE Op, a O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEECM y�:}/(/� q P PTH O �!. 0 SANIT Y SEWIEN QEAN-OUT _ EDGE (ASPHALT 0, /7 {7 . % �OV '' VcL 20 DECIDUOI a GP A ` 0 CATCH I8A51N P - OAS, . BORED i �' c DATE OD�RAL VALVE _ RIGHT-OF-WAY _ o I SPR %/• n �, c a" SPRUCE E---UTiUTY FOIE ANCHOR TYP• - TYPICAL n ', O O OrRT TRACT � SS - SANITARY !EWER UNE USIREET Ud/T ASSEMBLY TY,POLE SD - STORM DRAIN UNE W - WATER LINE } C Q - CLEAN OUT 1 a . *CONIFER TREE PL -PROPERTY OVERHEAD NE : a • 2" SPRUCE OT - OVERHEAD TELEPHONE - • O 4' c; 0 DEgOUWS TREE DI - DUCTILE IRON / J r�*° • oP1 P� 1 1r ® WATERiVALVE MANHOLE AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE . II I TRAP SON a r I I I il r I ` y I< A FIRE H(DRANT C.0 L rr • Bd1ARD ,oy.) ® IW d x _ D o _I Z. Q • W W Y � — Z HALL WAY • t H •,. �. , �...— � 1 ANACORTES HIGH SCHOOL . • i'. za-. i.`• .. ' II + SITE LOCATION . pit- - - " i _ 4 FOR PORTABLE PRE — SCHOOL BUILDING • � * ter" 4 I i' :' J l Z: , I . l 1 , ' ' 1916 J Ave 17th Street Parking Lot AL .' NACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT #103 June 20, 1999 Ian Munce,Planning Director City of Anacortes Box 547 Anacortes,WA 98221 Re: High School Parking Project Dear Ian, This letter is confirmation of a discussion I understand that you and Marty Yates,our Maintenance Supervisor,had last week. This relates to the parking lot plan we have approved and specific trees noted in the plans that we intended to preserve. Our plan originally indicated preserving several large firs if at all possible. Our discussions at planning commission and city council meetings and our pledge to the community was to save whatever trees and vegetation we could in construction of the parking at Anacortes High School. During grubbing and the cut and fill process,it became evident that sloping the area as designed affected tree root structures to the extent that the trees would surely die over time and pose a safety risk to cars and people using the parking facility. You and Marty reviewed this situation on the site last week. This letter confirms that the trees we intended to save in the main parking area have been removed. The district will place new trees in the specific locations from which the trees were removed once the parking lot is completed. I presume the new trees will be planted in the fall since this is the best time to plant new stock. Please call me if you have any questions about this. Thank you. Sincerely Gary Warg Director of Business and Operations CC: Dr.Marrs Marty Yates b cc /Imode CC Clt gra+lvn;,,u cof✓,f UAl GARY WARGO EXECUTIVE ASSOCIATE, BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS 2200 M AVENUE • ANACORTES, WASHINGTON 98221 •TELEPHONE (360) 293-1221 • FAX (360) 293-1222 Anacortes High School Parking Expansion December 1, 1998 Storm Water Improvement Concept Projects SUMMARY Storm Water Evaluation for the Smiley's Bottom Basin The Anacortes School District is aware that increasing site development by Anacortes Parks,the school, and private developers, has an effect on the storm water levels in Smiley's Bottom. These projects include clearing, new development, and paved surfaces for parking. In a concerted effort to help minimize, and possibly reduce the impact on storm water,the school has undertaken a comprehensive study to look at options. During the planning process for parking lot expansion at the Anacortes High School,the school • district has retained the firms of AKI Landscape Architects and Fakkema & Kingma Engineers to evaluate the existing hydrology of the Smiley's Bottom basin, including the proposed parking lot site and the surrounding properties. The District has instructed the design team to study the following: 1) Evaluate all sources of storm water in and around Smiley's Bottom area and the proposed parking lot facility. This "basin study" identifies the amounts and directions of storm water coming into the low areas. Several theoretical storm "events" were evaluated. 2) Survey and evaluate the existing storm water infrastructure (pipes and inlets) in the Smiley's Bottom vicinity to determine its capacity to handle the existing and anticipated storm water. The City and community in general have known for many years that the Smiley's Bottom area drains slowly. This hydrologic condition supports a natural wetland system of important value, but also hinders the use of recreation facilities and private property. 3) Develop possible projects that could be implemented to either minimize the impact of any increased storm water due to new projects, or potentially reduce the amount of ambient storm water events in the basin, without detrimental affects on the surrounding wetland systems. Results of the Study The study determined the specific areas contributing to Smiley's Bottom depression. A major source of storm water is contributed from areas to the south and west. Storm water is also contributed from smaller areas on the north and east sides, such as portions of the High School property and proposed parking lot expansion area. The basin area is generally hydraulically connected. This means that water coming into one part of the basin from any given source contributes to the overall water levels in other parts. The outlet from Smiley's Bottom consists of a 30 inch storm drain which drains to the west and eventually into Fidalgo Bay. An evaluation of this system was performed to determine it's capability and limitations to handle the anticipated storm water volumes. The engineers determined that one crucial segment of the system, downstream of Smiley's Bottom is limiting the overall capacity of the pipe to handle larger storm events. As a result, during peak storm events, water"backs up" prior to the outlet point on the west edge of Summary I Page Two Volunteer Park, preventing higher flows from entering the drain pipe. Improvements to this downstream section of drain pipe would increase storm flow out of Smiley's Bottom. A drainage Master Plan was developed in 1995 by MCI Landscape Architects to improve the drainability of Volunteer Park sports fields. Over recent years the Anacortes Parks and Recreation Department, as well as several community volunteer organizations and individuals,have implemented much of this system. This system has the capacity to be utilized, in conjunction with other proposed improvements, to help maintain maximum storm water conveyance out of Smiley's Bottom. Another possible improvement would involve isolating portions of the lower basin immediately around the sports fields and properties east of Volunteer Park. This would allow storm water to flow or be pumped out faster from some areas without adding to others. Proposed Storm Water Improvement Concepts Several options were discussed during the study. All concepts were addressed with the following goals in mind: • Large storm water events should be conveyed off-site faster than existing conditions, • Storm water generated from improvements at the High School should be conveyed as much as possible into the main portion of Smiley's rather than to the properties directly north of the school, • Methods to remove storm water should utilize as much existing infrastructure as possible, • Improvements should reduce sedimentation of both infrastructure and wetland areas, • New system improvements could be phased in over time, accommodating increased volumes at a future date. The following is a summarized description of several proposed storm water improvement projects that are considered the most viable solutions meeting these goals. Downstream Outfall Pipe Improvements A short (fifty foot) section of existing drain pipe west of Smiley's Bottom, and it's connection to an existing manhole structure,will be modified to increase the slope in the drain. This will significantly increase the capacity of the outfall drain. High School Parking Lot Project Storm water will be collected from proposed pavement areas associated with the new parking facility north of the High School. This storm water will be conveyed in drain pipes to the west and then north. The advantage of this is to minimize immediate runoff from the parking lots onto the private properties to the north of the new facility. Sedimentation and erosion control measures will be implemented during and following the construction of the parking lot. A significant amount of clearing is proposed, however, clearing limits will be accurately staked to retain the maximum amount of existing vegetation. Selected individual trees will be saved and protected within the new parking areas. Storm water will then be routed to a newly created detention pond/wet pond. This wet pond will provide necessary "pre treatment" and act as a sediment trap upstream of the main Smiley's Bottom wetland areas and other stormwater pipes and ditches. t • Summary Page Three A back flow device (one way gate) will be placed between the new storm water pipe from the parking lot and the wetland areas to the north. This will assist in preventing storm water levels increasing in the wetland areas to the north, but will not deter the free movement of storm water out of these areas. The new wet pond will be hydraulically connected via drain pipe to a new pump chamber structure located near an existing drain and electrical power source. This pump chamber,by necessity will be lower than the existing outfall, thereby necessitating a pump system. Storm Water Lift Station Pumps The pump chamber or "lift station" will be designed to accommodate the installation of a duplex pump assembly. These pumps will be designed to come on as water levels rise during storm events. The storm water would be routed through a new pressurized pipe to the existing outfall structure at the west side of Smiley's Bottom. Connecting this pressurized pipe at the drain will also require another one way gate device, so that the increased flow does not back up into the gravity drain system under the Daniels/Volunteer Park playing fields. The dual pumps at the lift station may be installed modularly (one at a time). With the installation of one pump the 3 year 24 hour storm event will be accommodated without increasing long term background water levels in the basin. Later on, dual pumps will provide the same rate of discharge while allowing a back-up pump in standby, or allow both pumps to run, accommodating up to the 10 year 24 hour storm event. The lift station will also help to remove storm water from the existing underground drains, without affecting the water levels in the main wetland area of Smiley's Bottom. An existing weir outlet presently acts as a water level managing device for this area, maintaining a"maximum" high water level. ri ,Zq `i City of Anacortes Summary of Applicable Fees Due Prior to SW4)) Building Permit Issuance (Excluding Building Permit Fees), Name of Applicant/Project: Vim \ )1Ju4ca�cLk- Site Location: vq vex, r cu Lis ( nVJ S\ , 9 c 0 \ *) • Date of Application: Place a Check Mark Below Next to Item that is Applicable Op, Sanitary Sewer GFC $ Ingo Storm Water GFC $ yes y%'.L 0 1v 1i et` a`\ 9 Engineering Plan Review/Public WorksL " $ NA Impact Fees/Road $ Impact Fees/Fire $ N Impact Fees/Parks $ Total Fees &Charges Due $ G'Q.GJ\✓!% peJJW, , 5- e Ce.>ew yos) `l , Comments & Conditions: Q�� A SLcO �= pL ac gee . 0g' � l Building Department Memo To: Dave Lervik(( From: Don Measai�l' Date: 10/12/99 Re: High School Parking Lot—1916 J Avenue The Anacortes School Districts proposed parking lot extension beyond the existing 17th Street parking lot is listed on the plans as 52,475 square foot of impervious area. Please confirm the following storm water general facilities fee per City Ordinance No. 2419. Total impervious area 52,475 square feet=2,000=26.23 x$1,126.00= $29,534.98. General facilities fee for storm water$29,534.98. Dave Lervik, City Engineer Date • Page 1 t •{zYo.. ) • XklegfOr FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION THEREON ON ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT'S CONDITIONAL USE P ., Final FINDINGS OF FACT 1.0 General Background 1.1 The City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance specifies that Schools are allowed in the R 3 zone by Conditional Use Permit. Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17.34.040 (A). 1.2 Application was made on April 19, 1999 for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 100-125-space parking lot for the Anacortes High School. This improvement project has a construction area of 3.2 acres with vehicle access from 17'1 Street and "K" Avenue. The application is Exhibit 1. 1.3 The project site is in an area designated in the City of Anacortes Comprehensive Land Use Plan asR3. 1.4 The project site is in an area designated in the City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance as R 3. 2.0 Description of Facility 2.1 The project site plan drawing is attached hereto as Attachment A to Exhibit I. 2.2 The surrounding zoning is R3 to the north and to the east and Public to the south and west. 3.0 Consideration of Alternatives 3.1 The applicant considered and rejected alternative parking lot layout. 4.0 State Environmental Policy Act 4.1 A Declaration of Nonsignificance (hereinafter "DNS") was issued by the City of Anacortes, the SEPA lead agency on May 28, 1999. (Exhibit 2 including attachments) 4.1.1 Attachments include: Attachment A to Exhibit 2: Parking Lot Survey Attachment B to Exhibit 2: Wetland Boundary Summary—AKI Landscape Architects Attachment C to Exhibit 2: Landscape Plan —AKI Landscape Architects Attachment D to Exhibit 2: Natural Resource Assessment Attachment E to Exhibit 2: Drainage Report— Fakkema and Kingman, Inc. Attachment F to Exhibit 2: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment— Nowicki &Associates Attachment G to Exhibit 2: Drawing —Clearing Limits 4.2 , This lead agency detern( d that this proposal does not have flrobable significant adverse impact on the environment. Accordingly, an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 4.3 The DNS was made available for public comment on May 28, 1999, and mailed on June 1, 1999 to the following agencies and individuals with a deadline for public comment of June 17, 1999: State Department of Ecology. 4.4 The DNS was published in the Anacortes American on June 2, 1999, again with a deadline for public Comment of June 17, 1999. 4.5 No letters of comment were received in response to the DNS. Staff comments were received and are incorporated into these Findings. 5.0 Notice 5.1 The Anacortes City Zoning Ordinance, contains public notice requirements for Conditional Use Permit Applications. The Ordinance requires the Planning Commission to hold public hearings on Conditional Use Permit Applications, Section 17.10.090 B(1), with public notice being given as follows: "Except where specified otherwise in the Ordinance Notice of Public Hearing shall be given at least fifteen days in advance of the hearing by posting copies of the Notice of Hearing at the Anacortes Municipal Building, at the United States Post Office in Anacortes, and, if applicable, on the property proposed to be changed. Notice shall also be published once in the official City newspaper at least fifteen days in advance of the hearing. For all Public Hearings Notice of Hearing shall be sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Expense of such posting and publication shall be borne by the applicant." Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17.62.010 5.2 On June 1, 1999, a Notice of Application, a Determination of Completeness and a Notice of Open Record Public Hearing before the Anacortes Planning Commission for a hearing on June 23, 1999 were posted at the Anacortes City Hall and the Anacortes Post Office. All of the posting was done at least fifteen days in advance of the public hearing date. 5.3 On June 2, 1999, the Anacortes American published a copy of each of the notices. This publication took place more than fifteen days in advance of the hearing. 5.4 Because the public hearing involved a Conditional Use Permit, copies of both notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property on June 1, 1999. 5.4.1 Two letters of comment were received in response to this Notice: Exhibit 3: June 18, 1999 letter from Kris Hansen Exhibit 4: June 20, 1999 letter and photographs from City Councilmember Jeanne Robinette 5.4.2 Written staff comments were received and incorporated into these Findings as follows: The application was received on April 19, 1999 and distributed to City staff on April 19, 1999 requesting that the Planning Department be notified of any additional information needed to Anacortes High School Parking Lot 2 , evaluate the applicatiorn Information was requested regng parking lighting and fire/emergency access. The applicant responded with a May 20, 1999 letter (Exhibit 5). The application was determined to be complete and the applicant notified. Proposed conditions 1-4, and 9 are standard conditions. It is noted that additional issues will be addressed in City staffs review of the Building, and Fill and Grade Permit Applications that will follow on from approval, if granted, of this application. 5.5 An Open Record Public Hearing was held before the Anacortes Planning Commission on June 23, 1999. At that meeting testimony was taken from both the applicant and neighbors. 5.5.1 One new exhibit was presented during the June 23, 1999 Open Record Public Hearing: Exhibit 6: June 23, 1999 project summary and outline of goals from Gary Wargo, Anacortes School District 5.6 The June 23, 1999 meeting was continued to July 14, 1999 with a combined Planning Commission /City Council site visit to be held on July 8, 1999. All exhibits together videos of the June 23, 1999 meeting were forwarded to the City Council for review and comment prior to the July 14, 1999 continued meeting. One City Council letter of response was received (Exhibit 12). On July 14, 1999 the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Request to the City Council based on the Findings and Conclusions as set-out in this Report and subject to the conditions set-out on pages 8 and 9. The Planning Commission minutes are Exhibits 7 and 8 and the transcripts of these meetings are Exhibits 9 and 10. 5.6.1 One new exhibits was presented during the July 14, 1999 continued Open Record Public Hearing: _. Exhibit 11: July 9, 1999 letter from Fakkema and Kingma in response to Exhibit 12. 5.6.2 No appeals were filed. 5.7 A public meeting was held before the Anacortes City Council on August 16, 1999, (continued from July 19, 1999) pursuant to the notices. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Anacortes City Council voted to approve the Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions set-out on pages 8 and 9. 6.0 Zoning Ordinance 6.1 The City of Anacortes Zoning Ordinance specifies that Schools are a conditional use in the R 3 zones. Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17.34.040. (A) 6.2 The Zoning Ordinance contains the following procedure for all Conditional Use Permit Applications: "The following steps are required for consideration of applications for Conditional Use Permit: 1) The proposed use must be determined to be one of the uses specified under the Conditional Use subsection of the appropriate use district. If the proposed use is not listed, but is in the opinion of the Administrator clearly similar to uses listed, and is otherwise in conformance with requirements of this section, the Administrator shall accept the application and forward it to the Planning Commission with his recommendation relative to appropriateness of similarity of proposed use. Anacortes High School Parking Lot 3 2) The required application form must be completed and tees, as established by this Ordinance, paid. 3) Notice of public hearing shall be given. 4) Reports from City staff shall be requested and forwarded to Planning Commission prior to the public hearing. 5) An open record public hearing shall be held. 6) 1fhe Planning Commission shall record their recommendation, their reasons for their recommendation, and any conditions recommended to be placed on the application. 1 7) Any aggrieved party shall have five working days from date of the decision to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council. The appeal shall be in writing and is to be filed with the City Clerk. After considering the record and any appeal, the City Council shall decide on the permit application. 8) If an appeal is filed by an aggrieved party, this appeal shall be a closed record appeal to the City Council who shall decide the matter. 9) For every project permit application there shall be no more than one open record hearing before the Planning Commission and one closed record appeal. - Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17.10.100 E 6.2.1 The first step, showing the use is allowed as a conditional use, is met as Zoning Ordinance Section 17.34.040 specifically allows Schools as a Conditional Use in the R 3 Zone. 6.2.2 The second step, filing of a complete application, was satisfied by the applicant filing the required information (Exhibit I). Pursuant to established procedure, fees were assessed and paid. 6.2.3 The third step, notice of a public hearing, was satisfied by the Planning Commission as shown in Section 5.0. 6.2.4 The fourth step, reports being forwarded to the Planning Commission, was satisfied in the form of the application and site plan and all attachments, which were forwarded to the Planning Commission on June 16, 1999, prior to the June 23, 1999 public hearing. The Planning Commission also forwarded reports to the City Council prior to the August 16, 1999 City Council public meeting. 6.2.5 The fifth step, the holding of a public hearing, occurred before the Anacortes Planning Commission on June 23, 1999 and continued to July 14, 1999 pursuant to public notice. The City Council also held a public meeting on August 16, 1999. 6.2.6 The sixth step, the recommendations of the Planning Commission, was complied with when the Planning Commission made a recommendation on the application to the City Council. A record of this action was sent to the City Council in the form of Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 23, 1999 and July 14, 1999 together with a transcript of these meetings. Additionally, the reasons for this action were set-out in a report of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law forwarded by the Planning Commission to the City Council. 6.2.7 The last step, the City Council acting on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, was satisfied when the City Council approved the Conditional Use Permit after the public meeting on the Conditional Use Permit on August 16, 1998. Anacortes High School Parking Lot 4 6.3 The specific requirement'r Conditional Use Permits are as follows: B1. Certain uses may be allowed in those designated use districts by a conditional use permit granted by the City Council after Planning Commission recommendation provided such use is specified under the conditional use subsection of the appropriate use district and is clearly shown to the City by the applicant that it is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. Prior to granting such a permit the Commission shall hold a public hearing. Prior to approval by the City Council of such a permit, it must be shown that the use will not be a liability to the neighboring uses. 62. A conditional use permit shall be granted by the City only if the applicant demonstrates that: 1. The conditional use is designed in a manner which is compatible with the character and appearance of the existing, or proposed, development in the vicinity of the subject property. 2. The location, size and height of buildings, structures, walls and fences, and screening vegetation for the conditional use shall not hinder neighborhood circulation or discourage the permitted development or use of neighboring properties. 3. The conditional use is designed in a manner that is compatible with the physical characteristics of the subject property. 4. Requested modifications to standards are limited to those which will mitigate impacts in a manner equal to or greater than the standards of this title, • I 5. • The conditional use is not in conflict with the health and safety of our community, 6. The conditional use is such that pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the use will not be hazardous or conflict with existing and anticipated traffic in the neighborhood, 7. The conditional use will be supported by adequate public facilities or services and will not adversely affect public services to the surrounding area or conditions can be established to mitigate adverse impacts on such facilities, and 8. The conditional use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. B3 The Planning Commission, or Council after an appeal, may impose conditions upon a particular use if it is deemed necessary for the protection of the surrounding properties and for the general welfare of the public. If conditional use applications for certain uses occur with unusual frequency the Commission shall review those portions of this Ordinance relating to that use and if necessary recommend amendments to this Ordinance. C. Any Conditional Use Permit that is issued, as approved by the Council, shall certify the location, nature, and extent of the use, together with all conditions that are imposed and any other information deemed necessary for the issuance of said permit. A copy of the permit shall be kept on file and reviewed annually by the Administrator, and if at any time it is found that the use no longer complies with the conditions specified therein, the owner shall be declared iri violation of this ordinance and shall be subject to its penalties." Anacortes Zoning Ordinance Section 17.10.100 Anacortes High School Parking Lot 5 6.3.1 Under Section 17.1u.100 B1., a showing that the Conditional Use is not detrimental to the • surrounding neighborhood is required. This has been shown. 6.3.1.1 The proposal to locate a parking lot on the subject property in a residential setting is needed to support traffic from high school students and from community events held at the high school in the vicinity and as conditioned will be compatible with such development. 6.3.1.2 Access is available at 17th Street and "J"Avenue. 6.3.1.3 This proposal will provide sufficient off-street parking to support existing traffic volume and as landscaped will be compatible with the physical characteristics of the subject property. 6.3.1.4 No modifications to standards have been requested. 6.3.1.5 For the reasons detailed above in 6.3.1.2 and 6.3.1.3 the proposal is not in conflict with the health and safety of the community. 6.3.1.6 Project traffic issues have been adequately addressed as detailed in 6.3.1.2 and 6.3.1.3. 6.3.1.7 Public facilities will be enhanced by this project. 6.3.1.8 The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the reasons detailed below. , 7.0 Anacortes Comprehensive Plan. 7.1 The applicable goals and policies of the City of Anacortes Comprehensive Land Use Plan have been met by this application as conditioned below. The Comprehensive Plan contains general overall goals and specific policies for certain types of land. The following portions of the Comprehensive Plan potentially apply to this project. 7.2 "General Goal#1. Create and maintain a healthy, aesthetically pleasing high quality environment that maximizes the opportunity for all citizens to share the social, psychological, physical and economic benefits of Anacortes/Fidalgo Island." Comprehensive Plan, p. 8. 7.2.1 The project will further this General Goal #1 of the City of Anacortes Comprehensive Plan by providing parking for a necessary public facility. 7.3 "General Goal #20. Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. 7.3.1 This project will ensure that this goal is met. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1.1 The requirements of SEPA have been complied with. Anacortes High School Parking Lot 6 • 2.1, The notice requirements njoning Ordinance Section 17.62.010 if> been satisfied. 3.1 The conditions set forth in Zoning Ordinance Section 17.10.100 and 17.64.010 for issuance of a Conditional Use Permit have all been satisfied by this application. 4.1 The applicable goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been met by this application. 5.1 RCW36.70C (Judicial Review of Land use Decisions) states that an appeal of the City Council decision to Superior Court "is timely if it is filed and served on all parties...within twenty-one days of the issuance of the land-use decision."' RCW36.70C.040. The City mails a written decision to the applicant, and appellant (if any), after the City Council has adopted its Findings of Fact; this typically occurs two weeks after the City Councit's oral decision by motion. In this situation issuance is defined as three days after mailing the written decision. The date of mailing will be inserted by the City Planning Department on the final page of this document. DECISION TO ISSUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Anacortes Planning Director is hereby authorized to issue a Conditional Use Permit to the Anacortes School District for the High School Parking Lot at 17r' Street and "J"Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. The scale and scope of the project shall not exceed that set forth in these Findings, Attachment A, and conditions; this permit does not waive or alter any requirements of city code unless specifically addressed herein. 2. Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the project must be undertaken within two years after the approval„of this permit. Substantial progress towards construction shall include, but not be limited to the letting of bids, making of contracts, purchase of materials involved in development, but shall not include development or uses which are inconsistent with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law or the applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. In determining the running of the two year period hereof, there shall not be included the time during which a development was not actually pursued by construction and the pendency of litigation reasonably related thereto make it reasonable not to so pursue: PROVIDED, that the Planning Commission may, at its discretion, extend the two-year time period for a reasonable time based on factors, including the inability to expeditiously obtain other governmental permits which are required prior to the commencement of construction. 3. If the project has not been completed within five years after the approval of this permit, the Planning Commission shall at the expiration of the five year period review the permit and, upon a showing of good cause, do either of the following: a) extend the permit for one year; or b) terminate the permit, PROVIDED, that the running of the five year period shall not include the time during which a development was not actually pursued by construction and the pendency of litigation reasonably related thereto make it reasonable not to so pursue. 4. A building permit shall be secured from the City of Anacortes prior to any construction activity authorized by this permit being begun. 5. The project shall comply with the City of Anacortes construction standards as required by the City Director of Public Works for water, sewer, street access and storm drainage. Anacortes High School Parking Lot 7 • These requirements inco)e storm drainage improvements irCie vicinity of 11" and "B" • Avenue, including modification of manhole and lowering of outfall line to increase outfall capacity of stormdrain, as described in Fakkema and Kingma, Inc. March 1999'and July 29, 1999. 6. This project is subject to applicable water, sewer, and stormwater general facility and hookup fees and transportation, fire, school, and park impact fees. These fees are payable at levels in effect at the time of building permit issuance and may differ from those fee levels currently in effect. 7. Prior to clearing or fill and grade beginning, both a large parcel stormwater plan and a water quality control plan, as spelled out in the City's Storm Drainage Ordinance # 2441, shall be prepared by the applicant, approved by the City Department of Public Works, and implemented. The water quality control plan shall address permanent best management practices to be incorporated in the project to control pollution of stormwater runoff after construction and/or land clearing activities are completed. All off-site stormwater improvements shall be made before construction or vegetation removal begins. 8. Hooded, low intensity lighting shall be installed to shade the light from adjacent residences. A demonstration light fixture shall be tested on site, comments accepted by the City Building inspector, and final approval contingent upon his approval under the terms of this condition. 9. The parking lot shall be constructed to ADA standards. 10. If practicable, an "emergency only" access driveway shall be provided to the lower parking lot; this driveway shall meet the specifications established by the City Building and Fire Departments. These Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were adopted by the Anacortes City Council on • CITY OF ANACORTES,�] ES, WASHINGTON By /mil, 4ltw, J -t H. Dean Maxwell, M yor fiaer ' ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: i r k Stev ansfield, City Attorney "This written decision was' mailed to the applicant and appellants (if any) on Q'- 2 2--41 . Kathy e, L d! se Permit Manager" Anacortes High School Parking Lot 8 • • I / .I, P 'T•COF M K*FIR O t-tN ANNE AVDDITnON y w w ! y I w ATTACHMENT A TO EXHIBIT 1 I r - so' e �• 1�, w ibelsbw y y Iw J u iai Mileri 'G•�� .ues 1 I _ ' ` s y �.` r .V JJ w No "tt�' `L i .v 1 } tu«r w r WM Nett m.ROM • :6Ernn1 uxE \ / —`� _ I • \ , n+a.,s I w �►' y MET ARE., Cl? p Jtle WM MOM -� p Ile MIME MK I ( ' - AP N MKItlDOIL L4K IM NW Y, .� w I j `� \ I- F-VNIY Pat MOM rAW mut_ I y y N AT OF OS'OF A AC`�RTES �,�1 ' I a KICK Sig / a 1m� y 1 Y w• I / / 0 Mom�wortre MC Sy/A.• 7D I /FD / 1 /ye' - / / / > b916AIi .(• y y y _ an1uA�xw.iMA ( — / _ 16t:OH • 1 In 1\ r • w I� ns» . w �, .1si.1e V I' I J. ,I }.` ..r'� t` gril, ! km�1'o.s9 O CD i W * / IV - ..• / ✓ • A� f'JDINV.INN - 16d1 -At. :Nv. WT g . 16e.1 w w \i A r� by E = % — — 4_-- ��! p I ' 1 , , 1. \tl V 169 7-5 Q � - . y \ , • 'a— /--- : .„• a.,t.6�r� 11/` 111 P1 d N idled al , all inie nit at Tnanc4,u+E - IV ttweSim wMt rw004 m� ; e90 / / 1 �� `r ��//* /II N. W `i .y MA*\ " lN��'� -� j , 3j � � �O E _ � iar fit . �� .A�f .-z� n�'� �_— ��ft rtiet cam , ,,,., ..... „ "- :4," _..........pori <r- I/CE2 nri"--j-- I Art. or , ..v.,- ,,,,:rbso 001-0....pino - o. notiostess,t , ..... in i vote 4 I rY/ � 1y w • .'"'"Pries ♦ 1 �2.14;: aI/'� /IH I/AIM A1� 4►4 d 9 ♦ �.iiA >,.i`- -0i oI� �5 1 ' r�—r� �rli�I1��,rY// �f� �i� �r maw' �`�,��►. - .�� s�� Elnfa�arraewas $ 1 I r i ay ,9. ..�3...y.a . . I 4, +-i. 'r,-��P __ *h. . .•- ri � yw. +..arse ^lei -�i! ra..✓if I�1�1sy/' �.Or lli -t1�. a' -s��■%-IIt ifr7%W �I ; .�� IaS.�l r � _ 1 �11 � . 1 n- 1(1�1 now 7�.�ip� � fi a ors s:cc ii � ink.,)�_��/� i�1i .ak e—s- � r'�a1Oc_ icalip'cai-•iQl R'iV w/t/I�rjlHi� ` - YLt....aria��.s wri ' : �C�� '� ► � �/J�] Ex a 1�/`/�/�///%�i/I�%�iI E////��tiii! ; i.)�. eF IMan*�. 3, � ..1 I r, swrt w�ae�e Ee [p VW creA /fy... ., i -�_ WV.N. . IE 3169.)a WE WN,,,, . :W iP II q M14 'f ��Itivi�`.�L��ari�ti� ��►.Tl�J�� e/Ly�l\(bOGb ro �F .5 II a ,c0. k � � ,r9eAp_ks„a•r------„r_-----". trraitrAa..... ��. -Ilia �s �►' ./, I. .;9. �I Asovedgezegnmr«afc {icewEo°mf' 16% e�� 1 oe PRMi.10.0. 9121 1p \ • � ` - 1) MINX NflI OOMPtEiE 5/n'MO Mn 9>2u12UMp ! . .C.Y p - S b W \\ •` ` 24VAX ACME f%ISiMG PG6f - 0 G ' y, • ,,l 11t s &tA& • 9 . .. i r/6 I i4vC . k 0 k / ' 1,.' '•777.'. '.1. ' ,v• 7".".7.-", la <1,1111 . . r \ t----1 11 1 437 k.•_sT, , ..., -;.! . • r---1 \ , I I 1 • '1 \ fl I : o 1 1 5 : 4 .'3 11 i _ v . ! t7 1, • k' Ill LF.S2F.BL1 • i 2 1 / 1 ) + 11.1101.11 lUIVACIL 1004A00 ,\ ............ I NI-1\ ,521.1•1 ; 7,I,• "L" AMNION MONNANT PIP PON FetINN \ \ ' .SETATIIIN UNE : \ 4. 1 Z7/ i I .1/ . , \I/ WET AREA \1, _ ....= ----.... i I -1---- ------ ' .,:__L...„)- :.,- ------- I ---.._. \‘1, .- \ -I/ \ EIRIP, ' / ____,_____ j / • IIPTIA NMI ,C:t nix IMPAIR PI ONXINIPCNAL NNI.K I --------- I ' •,..77'...\. ',1.' c ,4--- e •• , - ) 4---kniUTY KM APOCOI, 4 . --\17 i '1/ / \k ,i . •-.„. -.-- I --. ... 1 I p--):(mew uorr AMPLY I \._,/ .I,S2 5, I ...,,, ------ MINK 3N31 I i \I, \I, RtA T OF Cr* CF A A CtR TEc / • . . . --.,: ,,-,••-- ---• I --211 7,7- ---- 1 Z. ODIONIC PM / • i '--, ,..,•t' • . . . . .." .'. • '''-' . -,.. // . . . I • =ROC PIDESTAL C CLECIPC WM I I ' \ It• I -•'AA._ - , fr Z i >C3 I \I, 4L \// 162.sc . \1, \1/ / / / . --1-' I .- . . .,-,.. .. . •- I / - - ,...,, _-) • ''' ' '', :•.• ,„ 4/-7/ / til I c i -A 0 occmats nu own no a . , \ * I ,:• • - OWNEATED WI'4 1 Zer Zi4j4°,-••••SYSTEA. BELLINGHAM NA. / CI MI\ z _ . 1g f- ,if: • iir".\ i 7/___Z___1 ......."' c - I 11' ..1,/ 5.230 , \fr 4/ ? --4, --.---_.-_,' - \i/ \t/ .15.2I5 2 i 2 / s, I 0 •••• '.. I c?--;_'.\, PPM' . _1:.:-./I i =.,* - - _---- ----'<7 \ . / , - .. 2'---"-----C-'-- - TY . // _ 11.• EX C0 ..1 .400. /Rik' = i70 27 1.4 i'ioiNv '4 N . 168.1 ;.--------4 ,Ns., C"..•T = 1681 --I El i ..., I I .'0441 ' . , ,.- -..,...,r.... -.-_,- .-.-..- ..,7.. .... __._.• '. .,. , . , ,...1'' , i 9.:E „qui v, \ . A Ti- E (1,7:'-' : -- _,- b€LEA .. •------,--:::- ---; „.-- 7 ----.„-- .-------_---,-',--,-,------,:--r---- \ . , ,. /„. _.„--_ -•- vi . y-' ...., + ‘e, ,_.. ATil...t-ev7rst,---...------_____ _ ,2-2 , a- Ciaik l• 1 ‘.1,- -m------ --%' ••••„,, . ! .1/ `ii \ ,, .1 ,....X.- .-- .--'"-- . --`. ..--:------•-•-•, "=2P6r2o; "".. - .....:........ ....-.7:. .„. „..____..----__.__,_.--"--• ../,z / al cutyarr 4.7VI- ... / .1/.-r-', yr ---` • H--r...1:3:-".7-7..." ----„. .,,a . ., \ ..,,,• ... ..., 4...), , , .._,.;.. ,....- . wt-rt-wo Eauncy4 / I ,' • Will ei5 tD X.IV DYNZ I I \ . 1 50. WETLAND = • UN( .....• . .• 1111110 .oree, vNIPP _•••00:0 •‘1,-/Pf- .0.1111 ' ----1...,-----J__.---- ,1, ,, _ 3Rbk,2 \) ,--lAr\ maw Cf 1.111~Ku 111CMOOM ittinitt LANE_ ar0i9m....... s-1/ / . \ / / 1-,' 410#116'. ..re•*WO.it ''..1111.P.b .-4116 100 161;111:111r111: AIV.170111111111111111111 . r • (, 1,41,14,,--_______ -......• ' il 1 \ 1 ... e 1 1.tv,klar ' , -IA 4f0050.117-- ----;mit 10 it. iiii/IF .,„,,,Ok,,,- 07-•-.., ... ---;_____...-- - _ ,,,, I l iii71----,II __ f i i / ,-.7.-,• 11111k0r1„,pra: s, r, ;..g..... _,,••----4Niridp, ,giphg ,1 tom— ... ....-• 140-04e-: ,--s.r.,••• ____---2.----iw---,.....4.--ii, -.0.: _-_.' _—.......: AM" 1 iii0--'1,01011ACCe-- ---...).,11t. -:•-tt-iigie-ls-:-•,----„...----.41011"-110P- - /// / / r " -------) I it k < 6.44., ,...„.. • %,4, ...,.. ! nwppre-------- . , 111 1 otos..-......-.....-__,-,..,...,,,,,,..gwei---- -T imicako,„..... , 40,, / `•'4' , 1 _ 11110- - ,---- ..- •,,.. _,..- ,-- iii.-- .„.•is_. 1i._..- ,..t,„,...-,.....4kgit_i'. .• '... /. I U (°`25"jr '''' ' ; 1 .i. • ryprl cA. •.."...7- _ ,. 111PP ... . ,......- "" ....liaiii9 --1,....... ....:------ __ itigiaw--,1111=--,-1... -_---:!.-,1- sw,../_di: , -• ... i \ z —"-k. • .,, -401.100V11110W'_,..igil.411 oWlih.lilli".- - 01131 ". /// 1.101 101111111Tri-. ./"'f- DWIarler.‘"-":"Lt Sr611 4111I II% 3, ....4 4/P it.v. p voiliod,„ v-,01\.0.4A.., ..... i i _ ,„,.., to. -4Hl".P",g•ro-- -i'rit'.7-*-,N,e-e_,....-•----r"__-*r•:------'%''-_::..-.----'7'('___---:-_ t • r-• • _., / ...„----sEr Arno :nth* ' . /*/ / 4040 p'..• - -0/0/0011 • , 'kali man' "''-- -- -/. .. io_1 ir i„ \ : '‘'03> ysLA-i izo..,•*, .1 ----;.------=->-.- ,----------- -___ "" i i ti 0'4t1 '•:.•.. arf.- ..- „,g,e0;„,0,0,1•;i4.„,,....• - 1,_____-_-.0.„-- .:::„._,_-_x.------.. -. i .. -• •YID '" . _:•,--. :,, -------- . ___,.k.....--- ,--____xdfilrakeift, 111 tyji ,.„ .. or %%pia --• y • ..,• •_,I• lip.„4-1101 . ' __=,1112...... ---.5-;-_....- ,-.-.'..=.- •V-;Ii;"*".r.'-.- y• '::.,'.--... '' '' Dr1---\ \ ...,3,0., 4/ 'Ale, - -low disms-vaira ..--- - op"1 VIW I 'Inc.• ••0, --T0- .if- - *...0-1-,--z----_---------__:-.---..:,-2:•.....----;--.7---.,94.,•40•• • . yi, ......ef--/- Imr7..70/..111111=.1, -- Aillarrog s 1,10,. -• Ali Of{ilior_,. . . lip .,I,,„47111111i...........:___, _.,...__.._.„,... .._ .. -. ., ,. .............„..... 0. ie. ..,,._ .1,. r,.,. __,.. . . _clin-...-,02..74Urri, ‘0111141.1 ....dijoi.digrA Al 4.,,,t 1._ !Was: .,. m.'_.400,.... ---- -•.-- -0.,,,, __—_,--14( • ENVRE9CITAL.BLOCKS \\ S 4 _, .••,''iiiir' 41., .......-- -- ___,.......,r,...._ ,_____........„,,,,.„,...._.... ...-:--._-—_-_...1- ---:.L .....-•:-.-TeT.I.r..'.. . 4 1 6.. • .-'' "0-er' JooPiso.jr. 4,•......-A'pl i''' ringM IP„Air/--7- 0OPP-- , ----- --- ----------,4iffire-amilaltat' ac...........-.„--,--,_,. . •-•-• -,-,111MIImmal EOODOO.00 I; - 11....t.44,4P-4-33,11)-1,--1"...U,Dja Ad A 4 Aitaffil mile,ii"..o 47 virairtorintwatimp-MOM 1,• me iiirir I _4. co.c.cum 5saysszf_____va~-7--4, -,.::.-ir-t---- -- -:------ -"-___ -1-.......vm___Nam-_ __-•,•-_ , --"'"---------.:___-- -- - -..... ----r7........F....--.........--________....,----,......,-;•--..-.e..,-,..4)ATaL. .,,;,..„,-.....:,,,,.........„...„...... , , iliami.;•„50 ....m...immoratimuarliwaslier..........„!:op com. .Re Z.- -. .---............mosimmitlilll--. 4 ' • •.1 0 Oz- kik Qa./...ks )1111.1.: 111 '')' ! //.4P: DfARCNINTAL DLIXXS I 1 ri*".mAirmw4-11 .41,,,,r- itrifi IF' I 7.‘=:‘,ir41111744 Ilir AM F I!MI MP illaMEMilanagral ptr. .DO ____ EX CEI 4.---- riNtelffilir ADVIIFW111115%"=1;;Wan.kligi."."1"..1 1 p C7C+ i I .‘41 I a ,:;7 r/.0.110• 44 0'41 111A raragernirarrfrifidliil4 00g .. • PV muaiwil .. .• . ••• F It .. 1 \.,. / irint.,It c ,•k(tH-.00Milr. .- ..... _ _ .: >I 1 VI . . , . /))). Ftke:N/ •, •, 1 1.4° 7.- 0 110ITH (!) 00 90 , 7\ I • 0• ....e. ...... 4.4...jmuri... iimmor---'—'.1#01110"N. 1..1. / REMOVEREAINPLE TZEES rE Ex .... ,, r-_:.>\( '411r .01 E) I .fottrirvirligru-L 74 /-3'' c? ' _ -, , ,_ , . , . • .4„, ' Age * -- , 1.c 4 \ ' \._ms-rxis,ct•ito-cur 24wice V — mooc isasgTALLposr•comcwaE s/w wo Awes 6'1'UtYthAZH 1;(31 , sAocur Afro ROANE EX. =NC IN CCRINCi. INSTALL NEW CONC.S/W I 6-D. GONER NO0000.00 E00000.00 • Co,:y.' i vati Lull e.:_t)rie eime, !I tA5‘. tit 1 illt4toof. 704SICET0:230te0C 9723 L I t 1 /7n6v'�v ; 1 A -- : ,S\i/ Iii _, 7 / ____-- Q \+0 ______ K //71 z .,....: / • \ /- r- WETLAND-SETBACK.LINES �, ii Vig in j , L�> I WETl�X(JD BOUNDARY DELINEATED BY �� • •\ II AO(/�1-�FRR SYSTEMS, BEWNCHAM, WA. / oI \ // / 110 165 F- C , i \ / ./ // cr) /. \./ \.// ( '- ) \l/ -.V i .....H/ I _,-- / / STEEL GATE _________--4 -y--)214, I• !lisilrilivjoiticir 0 ((' 1 c _ \ �, l•. (z. ' / ' c /�/ �--- EXISTING VF6P1ITION -� = /= �� '.. \._ / / P,�/� EMERGEN�"�EH / 1---ii t • \ \ / - - ! - �` --' •`V�/ — A ;G� i/. /��. 15 16th AVENUE c' ` i 1 - z c _ 1,_. Q ! / ;, ��' ��-- Apb,,a6,, EATS SIN A71 �/ � j .", ,,,c,„ \ A / ; I I 1 c. \\ :,1 \I / N.L -.1 / , IEWE$TCD BC 7ARY'DELINEA710N Assopm JJ /// / en k' ✓ -� f%T '.' � ` ..:.v.3 • � � " . %i / �D !f i JANUARY 19: ;' - �--_ _____L\ / ,A` / - % __ - ;_ � -„'� -�`- � � , � 1 ROC •' : _ -a( .7 tc)H:4 41C 50' WETIAN' ;ET�ACK LINE . L %- %ii -:_ /_. _.mac', / \ �/ yI : / . i / Q L.a Y�`� n 5 L._, , IN I \/ / i/ %:=i%; / a�Irz it '�. ah f�i ,v STAIk �- �' (GCS Z , , , 3 . ,__ _, _ ______T_ l / /' / =i !� xq, �✓ �` i f / A i WEE' ��.''�"' p/ `^�- ..,_,.. it. 1 C 1. 1. !- ._ __-_- ) .........., /,,,• / { �.•� �„/'� 1 �� --j� /� � �`sT,,.. ! / / � -t`f�:profj •'�^ i\ - /' ' r /-i'-- {,.J.., ______ __ __ __ _ . . . „..... . „,. .2,.• ____ _ _ _ , 7 ' :1:ce S'' i \ _. /// itite-ellr � � r" •,' tE:184:::: , „fjEj79S6.3 _ III / �\ ,/ 'L.= : N. -_. - y/ ��:.- � j N23713,32 . _ "" �� .V�'� � ; =-.__�'-�-- _�:_ -7"-- _ gip., 'sO. • ; • � z , ,, ,�"� Vie ---- ": '" II: l' f , '�._---'�� ," .�_ '�, ( ;.STING EGt,l.4ilpN / i - �..� ��' \ _. �" iv/ j N�' ` �i�i► .�-.� - ao%,.:.= - ,yam � 'Y - c "tr".-TIH' D�',,.� �� .r Se , -- i 8 TRAJr~ SEE �� i -� -'- �M1 _- / i - / DSCAPE PLAN i @ }` (� ! ^ 1, J/ ✓' / % ear*" �' is -' -� �' //�� j �// �iG� ! ¢ $ T R I 1 / j /�/ T w / `/ : .� y _ s..- • Iii,��/ /' %_ !r—/-- S .. 5 P W In `'t. ,. y -�y�G v ©� QEF. S 0 MWATER PLAN FOR, I ` I i 1 ! i -- ?4 FfR i � �_ _ —'" ►�• .L EA S.E ' :,�� :4 f I\ i Gam-/ p G2ADING OF TRE4TMENT� SWALE ��i' / �� / /� /j7 t7ff' = i='=ji / / / ,X / 185 /R t.: /l f / �s �1PD Af9ING klkl�T _�_ ' - 8 �i. FALL do- NCE /.k _: , ),:r5„,.. * : g _ : 7 , .I TT l / A `� _ ��,y��S. ti f \ '" ��% \ �% , ,• r �� -� n'a. BEGET N n ��L \ / i / \"'� ,#••�-aZ.Yy�..• . ."� -_,---- — _ - 24 P _ ► _� •• - �' !may �, ' • ,-r'' !�. % .I - ._ /jam �I-,./.wry �p/� (✓'- O L / �,��..��.��--� --- "-_ _. ._/ ( Y' •�� END _ -/' . Y::/ Y / , -: ---i-' '• . ...••• - y��: �-'_ 1 1�j / /d7 V / r ALL Ri OCY� TE ,}. - r- � : . / N?3 :•:2� �' `eyi R 7--- ' ) --- / .,d 1 /' F OM }T1H QQNT r a�.rT =_. „ _ = wT a' 1 T ,� '. _FIk. /1gfJR i I_, "-# 'ram _'"ice-•• '41:4 SLOPE Tie ARE* V' 1 \ = TO AVOID = 3J ' T/ / f�--# /N.1' �. R4 ` _j �'�-."' -- " �+ ^�.• t A TREE �/ I "' I ti j, , _�- ,•� - -•f �•- / ; ,- �) . E • ;-- \ /" . _ �,•♦ "�`" 'tea' \ / / /�� i '\X - % 1 I/ / \ �i ..��i. ,• i . " ��t,l �'�Y� STE�S 4Y15TET ..,r'E3f?AtLS �� j ��li n�^ G / \ • �. 4l I /',_ _ �// BOJli31DE5/ 1 S rr w''ri' \ „,,, ,,__,___ ,.,_�. _� "' '` - .-- �.1--' ' • `.` .; . ram-- .� �._-- � - ,_ — ., �� / /�,��`",��k�\`� .c . :ft, rite ...,_ ss-.7 , , 4 = - t� I T "f / 3�0 7„ . I/ '„'• II • ` - EX9 vEGEZA oN i _ 2055 c r MART COIVC.C/G i ______ .____. 1 17685.5 I� I I'OS i _ r h k23639.6 1 / ( / / I.II iQllllli = -7 2K_ jam- ' �D ,� 1 / "., .,__, 18f77.2 r N2 j • �'E ;-, -- 7 i. ; •I F. -- ` , . P// f/""��-��[ / { N 1MSTitt1 GONG • W DUD. CURB DO MDT RREAfOVE _ -_,___. ____ __ „/ 0-7619.0,9,....---% • ! i - Ir J I WALL _ _ r r• L 361 .4 �,. ALL B' EXfD.�'� CURB g • / 'j/' / % INSTALL CONC. WALK FjX. ASI A t ... f T i N - i/ '' / /' F/l E f l QUj Tij; R� - .1 r� HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINT / ! / / . leD Do G PARKfNc - END I, DI/. / ,/ NFAI_E Tr:A I j — }----- / Nb NEW ASPHALT THIS AREA CEERI 1 NE iNTERSEC710N \ \ / / / ,, a"DI g w �„DI iV -- II IN---V. Z_ NY3607.11 E18157.81 �' . ./ . E STARP CONGC G / / i „l' /. r / , di, �a�� i N23607.i / 7th AVENUE _„---j , .-- ... . \ , \ , ,- ,, , ui 7-----i_ ,-,t-, ,• / / ,• N2J / INSTALL PARKING LOTPPOLLE\UG Or T \ . 7 /' A / I (N2357. El + / ., . Ill 1 i _ . �_ � � . . m F/` . ,..c, ,/ ,/ INSTALL STEEL GATE / / .A /�(/y. j ` s =- - ...., ID i N / \ �� / b �, ritA --- -_ 3 �I�� -. SAWCUT AND REMOVE' EX. CONC HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINT ( A i � CENTER OF TRACK RADIUS \�\ �� i o, '�� / N23478.96 El7492.47 \ \ \- �_j w / elet_ � - f SIDEWALK 16'DfA (1YP EA SIDE Q/ INSTALL CURA-. 24 N7DE i E.X. PARKING t ('� 07 SIDEWALK CORNER. INSTALL NE1V CONC. a J ` J CENTER N23577.7 E18124.0 , / / \ \ / EX. �J /1 / !I/' INSTALL NEW CONCRETE SA AND RAMPS // a d �` \ REMOVE EXISTING POST ? . • / LEGEND \ , /: v, / c� ABBREVIATIONS ANACORTES HIGH SCHOOL (GYM) "" L_ s 14^T ALUMINUM SURFACE MONUMENT EOA EDGE OF ASPHALT cJ . :,..... sT ALUMINUM MONUMENT WITH IRON It ROW RIGHT-OF-WAY /�� \\ll 1 "-, ' TYP. - TYPICAL 1i'",/<•//2 "%r %":22 '/.'i�:i } \ ' :' i CATCH BASIN SD ._ STORM DRAIN LINE ((. ' �, ` (� 2' CLASS B OR G ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ' AVEMEM \ c3, , ,� INSTALL ROCKERY BEHIND FH AS NEEDED '`:.:• •• 3 DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP CO iE COMPACTED «. .. ;::ii, CULVERT W - WATER UNE I'.c • { "� 6 ST FA WATER METER DI - DUCTILE IRON 6' COMPACTED BASE COURSE > C.O. CLEAN OUT GENERAL NOTES: S' "`" p ,,,,,sTlf OP OVERHEAD POWER COMPACTED SUBGRADE •+ ? , L1 FIRE HYDRANT I. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROLS FOR PROJECT STAKING SHALL BE SET USING SAME DATUM USED FOR CONTOUR , • • c - `T I� GATE/GENERAL VALVE SURVEY BY FAKKEMA & KINGMA ENGINEERS. HORIZONTAL CONTROL REFERENCE POINT SHALL BE INTERSECTION OF /7TH AND J c r� .... : ' _, ST J STREET AT ENTRANCE TO HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT, SEE PLAN FOR COORDINATES. ASPHALT SECTION FOR PARKING AREAS 7 a,, E UTILITY POLE ANCHOR -d ST 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR SITE LIGHTING WITH LOCAL UTILITY AND THE PROJECT ENGINEER. Si T yT UTILITY POLE •ALL PROPOSED ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION SHALL MEET APPROPRIATE N.E.C. AND LOCAL CODES. S ' I ST G S,RE tT LIGHT ASSEMBLY SEC 24 TWP ')N , R 1 E W, W.M. ° s' ( St o TRAFFIC SIGN lEc) s GENERIC SIGN SURVEY INFORMATION P 7ED BY ;; - q ` ST 5; c o ST ST ; TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FAKKEMA & NGMA, INC. . , DATUM: VERTICAL NGVD 192, :.STMENT �� ' :6 }, 26 ST Y BLOW OFF 29• ST :9 5T ELECTRIC METER OF EAC ON 24 ANC ' 9ET 4 ' _ O E / / WIS, ( ST SPOT ELEVATION A BEARING OF N68' W SECTION 24 AS TSHOWN ON 1 S-TRA DNIC DRAWING OF THE ID zQ m £ PEDESTRIAN LIGHT ASSEMBLY CITY MAP ADJUSTMF aVEY THE CITY OF ANACORTES 0 UU , 5�-.----.-_---� SHEET: 1.1 vl .lI'; Iv1AF ""r s`0j` DATED 10-25 1995 PROJ. NO.: 923 .IMI F CHRIS\\D:\ACAD14\DWG\N►MR799\97231ayoutgrading DWG: I ' I ' , I I 4 I ' I 1 • / / _ s r �__ - -1 f 7 ' = N a ' <._*J-- / i i '''-, \ c ' I .L. 4 ' , , / -).../ ,./ \ (9% __ ___ / NG Cy ``� i ,�, �_ 1 / ` \�� \ IT / i W 0 3 V ', :„._,..-- -_._ _ -, ......\\ 41(::::::- ---. \`, / . 50GRADE ACCESS ROAD 70--- 2, % GRAIN INTO SS ROG DITCH NEND SWALE 23979.69 i , �' \ J / / / / AT J STREET--- E 1741i.BB I i / \ ---MATCH LVERI i \. 3 I / /i 165AT EX. C149 58' `\,/ \ j7- ,h, �, �, / -� '"/ , ____------/// i ciD I \ i 'N cp ''J ` / / // // ' /� / I T + u962.65 ED/ATE POiNT` i 1 / - " - ' / #' T (n INSET E +93.iJ \ 11 j i �� [r \/ �, L / EhISTING 'v aT10N i +. - En • 3C-)/1 i + IN R�fED1ATE POINT / - /�/ � / / --- �� • £ �:o 1 . / - _ f,.�_J,.l �''�'��jF \15 16th AVENUE �j jita -- �\ I / I / / ) / �. \ \ TINS kETEY0.tI0Ju '' ' �P ' -c gkl Fii / j 30'FiR, i =:_�"`i' �, y/ / Q 1 -N,,..,\ I} 1 I 2 • 1`~�Th. �i� 47---- los°4�YX��L •1�-- ��' .' • • i\ 41 o, N.r< : .4. 79: '' I 0�3Cb RD N / \ *-- - //7 7_ . �( ySh roe 'Ar ,.ACCESS ------ _____________i___HH.„-->„--/ \sl, \sk...__________74,r-n."7,774--- i.- / -- ----- /_„,---. it 1 is, 'CI-Tr. _if.x._-----7-1:-.-1:- 7::: ., .,-,--- ----751.EDAfii ‘,‘e• -..--:-I-Nrir ___/",_ . ;21110.1114001rariere - - 5 -,. 4 W„.. 1 \ j - f , // / / J, _ Cl. 30 / g•F ` 5;.J0 j''r�Ii / /� • - i LE ' � ^/ /�U /�� W c• STO ,, ER T•; TMENT SWALE �- / qqJr. -_ -� ` - I'' 195 '� SEE SE ON 1 + / `4sw - \ � iIi�� / / �i, •! I �/ I 43 A A iot _ �� ,, ' . ,,,�„ .,,,,,�e% jiv .� .mac ,,�_ �__ `.1' i ` WINE, VE i N ,.> T-c / ..,,i�ry!�• I - / .- eJi* - . \. ' ''' ------ - - ger, 7' ' ) CC INSTALL RIF AT OUTLET - ''- i ` i % / jam% �� !�►li. \ A• A $ E1 i / n YLK;FIf P. '• INV. 152.82 - / / �� ",��rn'� �� '� ��i� / r' • 17B ►' J p S BOTTOM OF DiTCH (BY aTER � / / i - ' �> r • f684' ^`O i "'_ / /' n ' // `yam ///may • - _ DAGHT PAS _ ., . P,';:ii, 2� f 1- `y N2 723.5 l j , 3 r ��,, f1 )}7380. 0.7 / -' "-- 1 r- A ,1r! "/: + rTNG JEGET N 4� �:/ i CD f /. / ' // -- ---"F � ,. 'sue: 15040: -" . -� " ' / ,, 4,. . CB (-TYPE 1:=''�`-.ice" - .,0 \ �� '. �Si / . 195 0 N 0 �T �_-_ a. qZ X1368SS�4 F1775 ��"� � r e•• i ✓ ��" } \ ,/ ; I f : �rT . �. , RIM" 18 ' �/ ,i : " -i - // D PVC Pert' ? , / /,. �`• I • D 8 /P}1C 4.14411114 / "�" -,- !��-S- '"I`` , 740freAt1 r - ` �ll INV. 153.1 p / s'°Or l :_;_ +F `" • /� 3 ---.H.\\ a INSTALL ACP ROLLED 22.SEL i 'I x C �8 - '- 9 °• � �i -� J� ..' • _ 5. - ' 4� -------- Zly : CURB BELOW CB / �' ' 1 i �y 6 539.7 �' - 101 or illy ,_. ___ �� '/ fire -__ 3_ CB 6 11P 1 - - Y..aAr J -/--- INlVy�rIN 2 - ' _ a -- --- - '_ �` N23657.2 E 1735A.6 S OD;4U ~`- I 671.4 E176d , ' 1-'A" f_ ' - f .. ��,; _ REM 15 .2 t }5' L vvy.B'OUT /59,4 / M 175. ` ` / i ExIS>N E� ON � '� _ ~_� ; \ . \_.„ 'NV INV.153.2 \ / V / 58.E 173. / i i!1'��I1ii�� -/ s ✓ �:�� i� /�`'"" `� i < ,<__ ,! / ) :I tlAt % _ //'/ �1,- - lealag,alai J H __ asen''./111/ ' I i 11:, / ' - J � J \•••••••••••••••1\ L,„ I EX. CURB / ' T j i %/ / I.f - p:,` �r , f 7`,i' , " 4.5' 4L / / \ k. ASI A i �" s> // INK 87 :' ....�...r.. , I: �� / / / / /' / \� t � *,Di iN 4DRAiN F } sir cti - �/ SURFACED 7 / TRACy �, i % a"DI /7 _ ' � ..) / 17th AVENUE / ,, \ :SIG G A / N /\A\ • -E. , r , / ` �r' = ri N .. \ cum 1/1 D Rti�G cV^!b,n no/r , C) $r r - _ -- "". _..-- • ,\C /// / . . cc \ \, \ . lkK ((/ - --. \4.,,,CC( \ \ / r 'II:- - .711 :X. NARKING .)/:) ,\I 0 , ,/ / area \ 1 Ez f.H� "� / ea 0_ Z .. LEGEND \ / / ,\ , \ - l�' %� ANACORTES HIGH SCHOOL (GYM) g L A�BREVIA110NS c_, rill I 1' Si INSTALL SEDIMENTATION PROTECTION AT - z S4,5T ALUMINUM SURFACE MONUMENT EOA - EDGE OF ASPHALT CATCHBASiN DURING CONSTRUCTION , 4,.. i ,,._,.,,--,,,_ * A iS sr ALUMINUM MONUMENT MTH IRON RE ^,N ROW RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERCEPT EXIST DRAIN AND CONNECT NEW IX GRADE IX. GRADE TYP. - TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TO CB,/3 1 t. ' ,t 5T CATCH BASIN SD _. STORM DRAIN UNE -J n�M f I i �;;��,', 17 sl -- � CULVERT W - WATER LINE r. y. / 3:t SIDES 3:i SiDES C�:o?6; ` -- - e s, Eli WATER METER DI DUCTILE IRON A, k OBSERVE 1 nax r�'. . z;<FiY 9 WETLAND EDGE r1 O C.O. CLEAN OUT ��F e• ^ ',�Y,v OBSERVE FLAGGED O F 14 ., 0 FIRE HYDRANT OP - OVERHEAD POWER : ^° ` + �;` �.. d GENERAL NOTES: D �� THiS SIDE ��O Il GATE/GENERAL VALVE st f. HORIXOSING AND VERnCAL CONTROLS FOR STAKING-OUT STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION SHALL STORM WATER TREATMENT SWALE4( f k .:1 Es C UTILITY POLE ANCHOR BE Sf7 USING SAME DATUM USED FOR CONTOUR SURVEY BY FAKKEMA KINGMA ETNGINEERS. T? j` sr r UTILITY POLE HORIZONTAL CONTROL REFERENCE PO1KT SHALL BE INTERSECTION OF 17TIi AND J STREET AT SECTION A-A ENTRANCE TD HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT, SEE PLAN FOR COORDINATES. j ,fits I 4 ST C STREET LIGHT ASSEMBLY 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE STORMWATER O( ALL AT PROPOSED SWALE (sounmeEST C. , �� 5'+ E - TRAFFIC SIGN CORNER OF PROJECT STET) WITH CONCURRENT WORK BY OTHERS. STORM1YATER TREATMENT SWALE SEC 2 4, TWP 3,�f J , R 1 E W, W. M• 4 I z5.5T 5 GENERIC SIGN (BY OTHERS) MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO STORM WATER PIPING FOR THIS PROJECT ../-.SE 27 sr fr �^ rd TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 3. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS: 0.52,475 S.F. STORMWATER TREATMENT AND STORAGE FAKKEMA & KINGMA, INC. ' REQUIREMENTS PER ANACORTES CODE ARE ADDRESSED UNDER CONCURRENT PROJECT (SMILEY'S' '" = 3D ' :e :T 28 ST I BLOW of-F BOTTOM STORM WATER DITCH AND DOWN-STREAM IMPROVEMENTS) BY OTHERS, SEE FAKKEMA do DATUM: VERTICAL NGVD 1929 ADJUSTMENT 29 Sr 29 s; ELECTRIC METER KINGMA ENGINEER'S PLANS FOR STORM WATER CALCULATIONS. A ARiNG OF Ner3Y05"W EIE THE SE CORNER 10 20 '' / I i 1 5 pF CJON 24 AND THE SOUTH 1/44 CORNER of SEcnON _ •�� ,a 5, SPOT ELEVATION 24 rain SIiOWN THE GPS--TRAVO.D E DRAWING OFT „y `v' I., I•� 1 1�i i-' N�'' " '.^�'- PEDESTRIAN LIGHT ASSEMBLY DATED 10-25AP �99$� SUR�A'Y Of THE CITY OF ANACORTES 0 30 80 90 SHEET: 1.2 • PROJ. NO,: 923 CHAYS\\D:\ACAD14\DWG\NIMIT799\9723etormwater DWG: , • II _.__..__. • b.�. -1 - tir -1 liel' j w • ill .I` -1 , r r _L .. .r A _ 1 �. `. _. J __. �► Ir - I. { . . . ,�„ `' �/ i f I Q VIp Y III = 7 it, , ; . G .,, ...„. a a �_ cc,��, T // r : ; / LLI wWeke / WtW• �r �� / ' d ! .1 " ED PRIOR TO CLEARING OR GRAD/ .7 - _ v z7 '� �/ \i/ \t/ \V W I " / ACTIVMEs. AND APPROVED Br PUBLIC • S / •\c° I r PLACE STRAW SILT CHEC CC C f / I 16 ~ DAM AT END 0101WALEN -- N 1 , ! - o HYD/tOSEED swALE B0 ANO I I /� Q' SIDE SLOPES WITH • a EROSION CONTROL MIXTURE I , / / r / �/ 1 / -INSTALL �SJO LF. ABRK FETWCE QO ' 1 �C1, 0 I PER CITY OFF rRT� EM s. /. /r • f / f / ///- �� INSETI , 1 xI I ' /. / _______PER 1 _ \ y' W j �' / LXIStING ATiON INST.ALL-FIL-TER -FABRIC AND S?RAW BALL, / �- ' \ ` 5IliNST IL W �V, _W . . \ W , // '/ / �:.�'� \ I ALLCHECK ALVIM SIORAfwA, r TREATMENT SIYALE AND ASSOCIATED MOW v , tigr: Mir � ONTROL ELSURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO , I � �� TIN AM. � , AlA7 PAVEMENT IF NEEDED dgk 4 . • , q, \,/ r—\ :2.. .......,,A ... I .r, STRU( 10N O`FI S,TORMWATER PIPING. 30'FIR / J ' ' \/ ‘\ \i/ \ >./77 , - It° .. . . • • -.7r-24C ....----- - - lel . . L. 7 irri.L-i -- irS0.11441 1.00011101110 OMIS";.' ---- k pote.• ...----- , - 0 i$44....11.6H-„N ' --.00etiroy"----: le; , ,, "7- - - _____..----/-7/ 1 - - \ 'yUTE FTBER NEWTO SU nri-000 .0000,____.-- W/TH r F� � ...... ...... s BE -� ��" �� •�/ .....� o / ACE-AIUTH p" srEeT srAPLEs. SEE LA/�5 + `.'� �t goP �/ / P PLAN FOR COMPLWE REVEGETATION. 15'OEN;: 16 r ,� . ' 1 pu. lP 4,. , , ix . u CC I TH TME'I GW ER�C ING FIR PATH -� roisolli FIELD : . ram, 0 ,.....„_ , R. . . ,__ _______ cs, , v SIULH BE KEPT 1O JO W MAX., r 8I� Kt SHALL BE REMOVE. IN57 f� �--- i / �'I��;II�'DA i �, �� :II 1 O LOOSE SAW JPE PROTECTION AS N�� r i • , • , ,.•.. _ , p� 1 ry tfr tip itit , \ 4001001Wiletr- IS-- --- ---.. •,, lr Q/••-,,,,, _� \I/ EXISTING VEG // / �T "Ik - _ _/� ,!""r'. `%,�/� \% I/' / /� _ Z _ CD g PUCE STRAW LE SILT CHECK - '"/" ��%' /"�� fl 18� i DAM AT PIPE' rFALL j�/I •fL•�? 3�' � % i oilliater X Pig y \ �, - griWilainli CDt�tED w . . I �(7h .A. / .% '" .` �� / / WITH ': ��, �, 1 • /''r - C? 7 :::. 1 / - + : /�'/ ' E 1r h S. SEE IAND 1,_ 22`R /ii �� = .�i, _P1J�flaGl V fj !� I�LEE ._REVE noN. 1/ _ �_ _ _ LLB 18' /id I 3' °'" '� / id \ . lib , :w.�---- =- __- .,,,--„ Air:_ .� 14.0091.„ Pos -act ��27-2 ` _ % _ XISTtNG VEGFTyIIG��_ j p W - • Cj EARL �� Pr _ �_ ,yr O �� '1 /� '� � .�� r " -'BS R� I' ..Sfi'CON 440N/s�lw eNLE f �/ 1► I .. 1 W_---, irassi,,, sR T c tarty .r Ll )00011,00404;11:1 �� , -„s j -7---- --r ' eE:oW TCH BASIN400. �� 0004 �� 4 !,�' I— & . ----: "'"--- . I ' A troll -0, , -=----r-r-, . . - --- _ - O VEG ON tis/ ii1101 -. .' ,.. ,a._, , , r /4-' �' V ir /�ll ;,, % :Ilii�ilgN j�� _ � �._• '`L '� A_ -� -- Ais ,, , I i 1 iiil po IOW • %�l r 1 ,.r_.._..�. �'� �'� . .I� -� � I i I : i : :i „ , I' EX. CURB - EX. RET.WALI It t- = Y ■ i ; O / / -1 AX, ASP �$0) i / , { �c __ - - a4. • ° /�� A , ,y p w`o. :"DI ` b / SURFACED TRACK \ , 1, { 1 ; "pl Q '�I III :" G`DI 1. ___ , , i . i ; 1 1 , i II pr All" J10 I 5 1i&N , . V . gerli iltr,..rass /7-- , i STALL J J T I E ,tfri 941$111Pr/-- f , l� '�., _ _:1"------"e` ---:_--=..-- , 4re 410 \.. ti 1 \ &cc / ,--- -•• 011,,t (d6.ebi C--\ A11/40 111511,114 -- ' O. ' / Oil 0 4 o ::,• \ \ ,.- -- -- \ ___ ..•\ 0 ...___. ( ( LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS ��©.1©©�ST ALUMINUM SURFACE MONUMENT EOA - EDGE OF ASPHALT , ®91191t31111M,T ALUMINUM MONUMENT WITH IRON REBAF ROW - RIGHT-OF-WAY ++ { TYP. TYPICAL INSTALL gcTER FABRIC AND STRAW RAZE , '''' ,,■...�r Ti CATCH BASIN SD - STORM DRAIN UNE SEDIMENT TRAPS AT ALL CATCH BASINS �?, ....E r < CULVERT W - WATER UNE DURING CONSTRUCTION, UNTIL PAVING. I ��e Si w WATER METER a - DUCTILE IRON E C.O. - CLEAN OUT n 8 HIGH SCHOCt 1111111111111111111 .4 OP - OVERHEAD POWER .■■-W ST M. GAT HYDRANT P4 GATE/GENERAL VALVE J,trte '� iiiiir sT �,-UTnLRY POLE ANCHOR • s ,t U U POLE -a?. � Y�( STRttT LK#iT ASSEMBLY t d jilt; Ili= -4> TRAFFlC SIGN i• � SEC 24, TWP 35N, R1 EW, W. M . • M- ® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL I BLOW OFF 1" = 30 ' FAKKEMA & KINGMA, INC. - '" ELECTRIC METER DATUM: VERTICAL NGVD 1929 ADJUSTMENT 10 y s: H' SPOT ELEVATION A NG OF NBB'32•D5'�Y_BETWEEN RIC,SE 0 nirrept�30, . . 60- - go SHEET: 1.3 3o ST M22 �attxx�i / urn JINNI-I 1 MAP tit I r( Sr Alf )( PEDESTRIAN UGHT ASSEMBLY I A$ OWN40N DjFI,E ES-TRAVO,OW DRAWING OF 7� , TY MAP ADJUSTMtnT SURVEY OF TNT. CITY OF ANAL PROD. NO.: 9723 DATED 10-25-1995. CNR/S\\D:\ACADJ4\DWG\MIM299\9723ervstmfCrmtrot DWG: d r•a t t ,.' , '1! I .. • ` �.r.• Gt I . 4, `, • 1 T• T��a. N g a MS PLANT SPECIFICATIONS: � or- 0 0 NC �N 1 LEGEND • < ' KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMA,ON NAME SIZE/SPACING • L �,�� I w^ a• 2CA W aE PASSED TrrteoucH- ---- - {• + AWMNUM SURFACE MONUMENT •:' j `' TREES Atlas- �., -,- 1/2' BUCK HOSE AROUND PLANT SPACING AS PER PLAN ^4� ,,, . I 3 I AWMINUM MONUMENT WMTM IRON REBAR z mo Ti 12 CELTIS OCC(DENTALJS HACKE ERRY 2" CALIPER B&B C R CONT. TRUNk wlsT uNnL ncHr eft 2 - re2' WOOD TREE T2 16 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUG(AS FIR 5-6' HT B&B STAKES STAIN W/ til BARK MULCH CATCH BASIN �i Ili a • T3 9 THUJA PUCATA Wts IE RN RED CEDAR 3-4' H7 B&B '° _ OLYMPIc NO 711 PRIOR ) c CULVERT v APPROVED BACKFILL MI% S' 2" MULCH R, BASIN 2` DEPTH MINIMUM f Gl W Y r ,REFER TO SPECS) '}.+r._:.�� TO WATER RETENTION ;I' ,n T4 17 TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA WESTERN HEMLOCK 5-6' HT B&B - -=~i Y x SHRUBS - - -MULCH s wATEa aETENroN aa BASIN-SHRUB h (X,ND. REFER TO SPECS 2 + al WATER METER ' d G Q U CVR AREAS ONLY FOR ADJACENT MULCH ",, SI 70 EUONYMUS ALATA DWARF BURNING BUSH BdcB OR CONT. 24 ' MIN. HT. PEEL BURLAP BACK FROM TOP + PTH sal MIX sy I i I f� HYDRANT' + r 1/2 OF ROOT BALL AFTER PLACING -' (SEE SPECS) :'1 j; COMPACTA :,„ TREE IN PLANTING, HOLE REMOVE APPROVED BACKER!. MIX F. REMOVE BURLAP } '• ••h, FIBERClAS: OP TREATED BURLAP (REFER TO SPECS) . FROM TOP 2/3 OF EXISTING GRADE • ,I r I t1 1 14 GATE/(:ENERAL VALVE j • S2 27 RIBIES SANGUINEUM RED F LOWERING CURRANT B&B OR CONT. 24 ' HT. MIN. L coMP ETELr, RWTBNy ; Ili tll:l' S3 300 ROSA MULTIFLORA JAPAN:SE WILD ROSE 12 -18 HT. CONT 0 30 O.C. ,O� DRNE STAKES A MN ?r ; E --UT1uTY POLE ANCHOR "}6 51 , OF 12" INTO UNDISTURBED , I I UTNTY POIE V GROUNOCOVER . REMOVE TREATED OR SYNTHETIC -_6 -a( GROUNDCOI/ER INSTALLATION ' 4� Cl• 4286 HYPERICUM CALYCINUM ST. JC HNSWORT 4` CONT. 0 30° C C. TREE PLANTING DETAIL BURLAP COMPLETELY. 1B• MOWN*, CIRCLE NO SOU c} - ( STREET UGHT ASSEMBLY PLANTING PITS SHALL BEAM!^,fMUM , GRASS MIX - EROSION CONTROL of TMCE THE ROOTBALL WIDTH AND + o TWICE THE ROOTBALL DEPTH / I F C 4 TRAFFIC SON 1 - AGROSTIS ALGA REDTCR 25X *IL : .n TRAFFIC DACTYLIS GLOMERATA ORCHE ROGRASS 25.% 100 LBS/ _i 0 FESTUCA RUBRA RED f ESCUE 25% ACRE TREE PLANTING DUke.. _ . �+ ' TELEPFIONE PEDESTAL 0 } LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM ANNUAL RYEGRASS 25% � CONSTRUCTION NOTES: h�'4. : c,,,, -, • i p mow OFF Cn w?.+.+•y 11 S 1 I ELECTRlc METER ii.- . 1. THIS PLANTING PLAN IS INTENDED TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS FOR REVEGETATION WATERING BASIN BERM c ^'' — 2' MULCH • I`:c'' SPOT E(EVA11ON W OF AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUC IION. FERTILIZER TABLETS, I �-. Ts ' I fl DECIDUOUS TREE I--- 2. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATIDD, FOR PROJECT IT al ,_ Iit�s11 (1 r 6" DEPTH ! `� REFERENCE ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. }-WAY SOIL Mix- — PEEL euRup BACK FROM 70P CONIFER TREE d < WATER h TAMP TO 1. ' I - I t 2 OF ROOT BALL AFTER PLACING 3. REGRADED AREAS SHALL BE STABWZED PITH JUTE FIBER �SIj PINNED TO THE SLOPE REMOVE AR POCKETS p �y a 1 SHRUB w Pow / I C-) N I I¢ii� � .3f Ir�� FIBERGLASS OR TREATED BURLAP / 1 e , LOG L - AND PLANTED AS SHOWN. Intl - I .. COMPLETELY. I ¢gr1 j 4. ALL. PROPOSED PLANTING AREAS SHALL I'ECEIVE 2" DEPTH QF MEDIUM-FINE BAR : MULCH. - NOTES• Cgl r3$ PLANTING DETAIL PUNTING PIT SMALL BE A MINIMUM OF / ..- TWICE THE ROOT BALL WIDTH AND / �..� / / / K� _ _ NOT 1G SCAI(_ TWICE THE ROOT BALL DEPTH �i.`^"✓/ lJy/ i } / %ft _ / / OC] • NOTE: ADJUST GROUNDCOVER : PACING �'G SI KEY TO PLANT SPECIFICATIONS A6 RIQUIRED TO ACCOM )DATE / Q ;- '' Ff �/ 3 • COMPLETE COVERAGE TO LIMIT N / '�''� "" /, 00 QUANTITY IN GROUPING OF CLEARING LINE. \ / _� / ) )�` I \ /' /' • li ` C • ! 1?O t'',, It.; • I F,r, ` y \ \ i ,,,, -• 'I „ : ,- . , \ . . „.„ ! . 11 g ; _,_. EMF_RGENCY VEHICLE;_ "'. } _ • ._ .. , , ...• WN ACCESS LANE�� a i• j/ N/ / I � EXISTING .. (1 Gs G�i ] , �.� �� T4 �7 ' - N Ai w , EXISTlNC�, �j(15 N = 12 PLASTIC • v 30"�7R° 9 0"FIR >�. R1w' ' CULVERT ' I --- NI,L \i/ \L 1 ,1„ ' ,I,' \ \ / 77 l 2 ■ 153 � f'' l r ' -;_,wr'. iii�f f ,`y 4'S .s,e.`"°s="...fa: Y+ ._:,� ) � qQ ` . • j LX , I \ ♦ \ /''` ,y 71//i t� 1 -. :-�""� \ ® • t i try. • ./ i- V /-,l-FV i \i, i ' _�__ .� / ' W Y /��yyyy •_ '^'fin , . _ _ - , , t ir.t.: . 60 ,.., .� '".� 1 �� . / X/ j gtt'11 4t ~. ., , , a. . T2 S2 `\/ v0t �1�/ ® 5 a VEGFTI1 TIQN LINE . R� Ib/ • ,� 7 ` = 19d L �/ .j \ [,. !"\\ i EXI5.04 IG • 4 �♦ q�N �� 4 �. > \ ONSTRUCVON 1�+. Air �1 \ • •. f 4 s +I. ��► j ff f ! i t ' ;'. 195 4 / / EXJS'7) �' ♦•J 1 f si ill{//:, ( /'z I r r, 'E I I ' // I �/- �/, uMIT LINE ..i ,:R , �, 1 30"FlR`�l`k •! 4'/1ir 6a ; > �, ,, ,�tyr�ix , I I + I .' ALT.\ 1/4, • - ' • raiewo :••• ••'"''" i • * •••••- \• Ott • / ler ; . .1:,,,,, ....'li • • a (> / / ,j. • ' rI 1 •'�? ',� I t y'-- ,J 1. ° •/�/ 'i1M"�' r I r�/ li T. ;:s ; ' _ EXISTING / / ` i� w :.��': i A., i /i / ;/ 0p. , --_. .. 24*FIR i'M / , , ;. - ` �� ` ExlsnN �' r © ��/ ' ii > V f �! ' ,; 2 t. w 0" l�l 1OD CHIP / , ` ^'�fV ' \1{B r , ; ��3 / /r a �i�-` �� CONSTRUCf1O x1� • ' WALKAs G PAIN . ? EXISTING 4 4 < LIMIT UN�� i , �� 22"fiR �, rF I// r ^"""' '.` .I• _� O • ,•• j." r ,' 9 / f. A 1, ilio t( h� �� r TING i �" ISO �- T2 d S1 ` ' cLr o //' ' y , l..-- �- "� -'_.1i,G .- CEDA' ,f. `� I olinr-` � .5 1 V ® �.'� © ` rn� f .✓ ,q� ♦ ' 9, )i lI I ' . t/ t'y 64L L p r . NI . Y , ' .:.L. .--ter. . .r : ,.,,.,_. .. . . rL ' ' J .rVir ' _ ��,,.�'�•� ® t ,'' _ - V i- O s'. _ T. IGT PORTABLE ,.A� NG ��,,,/ , y A1:1 \" • - 0;i? r'a - ��,�--`-' '" ,c , ti METAL SHED / D� r�ir';''i1.'� is " ® `�� :�� ' �t OQ • + - P' l / /' . r , /�', —.w I(" W,w ® ' �tticl -..---2-- h y / l i ♦ •, _ , r Q� t Sr t ♦ `�1. t TL - ' I • -/ a�y�_,\ - /111t��' '-6'nC'a T3 i © ® \ 9\ t ,' l �)N (fj .- , O O,I q ,? _) g�/ _ - i P.� Wa /.< , G' � - _ w� '�'` .� , `\lall - `t ) ' _ .��f(.K//� !:/.� ��yrA�lY y - , r1 r HQ">- � ' ' "' }} }r)�Ir. f -'rY.a' `Mkli'��? �' J / ,'/ ,1, 10 Y4-'„ W t 40 t /� 1 \ } E ,�,yr ' / t `��j�A'n� �� _.��" `� _ / '/ f j '\ t r " _ . . ?:. .� r •'t ' /•' t' - _ .-.t . . . ,, _a _ E i�� • - - I' / 'z _ .,I- .- I.r EXl �� i `-�_�.�.-� .✓'' '. 1 O iLJVJAta 11 \INIIIIIIIIIIIIIM _ I • i ITxr �,O } • �T s, 1 155 - --..; ' = w� ler Y .., � a'' CONC. CURB w / — rt Lie1fr. ��TiOrC ONC. CURB ill - A , / \L \- ENVIROMENTAL BLOT r,S t S( � w.. } " ;I I 71 • I - v ik E 'DI W " EXISTING FENCE ate, a s77 ---- DI W 8"DI •W --- i si .........t. 111) ' ' ' i' t .t- ' -74?;dr' V'VC - .-- ./. - i- . co / Ell) • alit Aar ak. .dix. I 1 I hh ( .�� t I I E a !GATE + b --NW , . - .-/-tti: Th --__ ....," . _. _ Nip &idea". 7 4. ‘. al / , a , . -iVioll \C./ 1011110211 : ct , ' . A-2; .'1"r0 ' W , , , . . , .. le „....,...... r = SO •:. ; - o .77 \ ,,, ; 1 , ' { ,'; • ,: -' t:11 Itisir...4 4 0. - � - , a es•vQvOv pQ (Thoo O Lf'y NC ;� o z 10 ZO A+/ O a rP o I - / I ;;� ,/: ,' 60 90 //: /P \ . .. , . Ex. F 'r' ,'',if/ l`i 'l Q SEC 24 TWP 35N, R1EW W.M. "` ' s'.�� — \ -- �_.- 7� �' Ir!iti � � r 1 SHEET: 1.4 p �. _ 1ty,1t1,1 11 ,kc • • PROD. NO.: 9723• 1 J •, CHRTS\\D:\A6A014\DWG\NIMITZ99`972 $on scope DWG: It -CC Y. C?4 City of Anacortes Permit#: BLD-2004-9320 904 6th Street Issue date: 01/14/2004 `40+ Ar ' L. P.O.Box 547 Expire date: 01/13/2005 .iV? `C1y Anacortes, WA 98221-0547 '�"� W/- (360) 293-1901 I Job Address: C916 J AVE 3 Permit Type: Commercial Building Permit ANACORTES WA 98221 Project: APN: Remarks: Installation of a press box&support structure per drawings between the high school and the fire lane on the east side of the high school. Owner: CANACORTES SCHOOLS Contractor: Address: 2200 M AVE Address: ANACORTES WA 98221 Phone: 293-1221 Phone: License#: General Information: Fees: Building Valuation 50000 Plan Review Fee 338.00 Building Permit Fee 520.00 State Building Code Fee 4.50 Total Calculated: 862.50 Deposits/Receipts: 0.00 Total Due:o 862.50 , O -X- f _EiE N tV .„ * * —1 0 V if O 1 CO cc, 44 -x- CO CO ._ 1 -4E if 0 0 I— (D it- if CO CD £ CA .. -x- ..- I at- , X- U co if -X- 5 4A )--I 4A if 44 N "* i-+ -X- 0 -X- if n c o .* a -* o -x- *- V N if Q -- ?F L if o 4f- N CO -* CCS -* O ^if if +� 0 if c -* O N cs r -if LL i 11 iE o OS if D .* V 3 -1(- -* ,i C if -X- CO if II II I O -- if it- C II - y+ if O N 44 *_ S W -X- Q-X- .1— if- a I— if- m if 44 t0 ^ it- = if if if . o N42 V) z ist � -x- 2 O -fix- a) a U' O)3 if Iw y -x- Q CO if if Cll, fY .0 .. -* LL Q O -* Z Y cn -x- 4f i iE -* 6 CD 1+ -x- -x- CU .Y 114 ti-� Cl" if I— -x- 44 if a O . y. '* .. -. .. -X- -x- S. I— m oz\ CC r f1 N O v#— - -4 I- ++ w Qi a) of w m a) — T s a) * a -X- O 4- fY -x- 4_, O if 44 O U) .Z - "* O a) -x- E E I if -4- I— CC U CO CC 2 t THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR i NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. - ^ 1 N UR F OWN AUTHORIZED AGENT ISSUED BY t r e. , ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT i 2200 M Avenue Anacortes WA 98221 Phone: (360)293-1200 Fax: (360)293-1222 http://www.asd103.org January 13, 2004 Don Measamer, Senior Plans Examiner Anacortes Planning& Community Development Dept. City of Anacortes PO Box 547 Anacortes, WA 98221 RE: Press Box at Anacortes High School Dear Mr. Measamer, The following is an itemized response to your letter dated December 15 regarding the plan review of the proposed press box to be located at War Memorial Field next to Anacortes High School. 1. Site plan as requested is attached. 2. The press box as proposed is intended to serve the district needs until a comprehensive project at War Memorial Field is undertaken. The school board has authorized the formation of a long range educational and facilities committee charged with developing long-term recommendations for the Board. The Board is scheduled to receive the committee recommendations in May, 2004. It is probable that improvements to War Memorial Field will be a topic during that process. Ultimately, comprehensive improvements to War Memorial Field will need to come as the result of a bond passage. i 3. The District will comply with requirements regarding the inspection of on-site welds. An I acceptable special inspection agency, licensed as required,will be identified prior to arrival of the support structure from Outdoor Aluminum. 4. Roof drainage will flow to splash blocks then be diverted east toward the football field 1 and associated catch basins. I look forward to receiving a building permit and moving this project ahead. Please contact me if you need additional information. Thank you for your assistance with this important community project. Sincerely, 0y1. ynca D rector of Personnel &Operations II A Lighthouse for Public It in Our Community: Ensuring No Child Is Lost Creating Lifelong Learners"inspiring High Achievement Nurturing Responsible Citizenship 4.4 INA 4. 1 2 ... W V : I , . ____ _ gra'Air- r- _ _ __ , flñ G9 `�, dt I Jim , , •1100 S , L ... I 1 DOOR SCHEDULE CODE ANALYSIS -MARK S . OFVRIPTION COMMENTS 11455311iCME MEETS W6n001011stuPeeRS AN 3'-0`x bb'METAL b5IL pOORR IV EXl JOR / 24'd r P00 HV`IItT 4 STATE SaD LAM IRSbNI bl I FA [PM JAMB ROi 346'x Bl-V{' • MLPHS T}8 Vi Nt M` N LOADS -If651 LEVER I/4'1-`Et SWIS.101-RJR 10 &ADMS AREA.1114' H1 sq It - R 5112E M`ALES.SOME TH0.p OLOPMY.r soar 0 Hw IOTA MOULT U.ao i •OF OCCUPNTISt 1 orcapz'' CPRWINDOW SCHEDULE SO'IAL1O SOIL DORM 3 FLOOR LIVE' MARK OTT. DESCRIPTION COMMENTS � a COI LOAD OF NOTES PI 11N 40'1114LLIPS sp30 HORIZONTAL PD.12140' 1O1 IMBWOL%MEETS OR FYtEEDS ME MOVE RBOROBUSL O 3 MATE MALT(SLIDER. U651 SMELL HMG BOTTOM OF ROUGH 0 I NM tafl*IT MBE WIILN FLR LIE I W 0K LABELED Arm I Ivro l 9G !➢1'iW. OP MO R 34' PEAT INDIAN OAK LINER l CABS& I 2.FRCHO OLKM4 f OP 64U,O MAX HVAG EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE I - 0 3 SEE woos TS 4112 SMO S 3OI FOREOV mx NOT MARK OTT DESCRIPTION COMMENTS M-I M-I CD H- 2 MI6I206.150012 FAN FORGED `ER H'H2IS,TICALLV SBA RECESSED HALL(EATER W KIHS 40-22 T5TAT 0)FER HEATER 9 - MISC. SCHEDULES -- F - --__F- fI 1 MARK CRY. DESCRIPTION COMMENTS - O cI CD 9 O 1 1 M-I mix Fr HIDE OPEN RAM COMER TOP W Of M - 9 v O IIC1.E31MLVEH PRdROM£IS I T'i' TR IR' r l'-01f2' • FLOOR PLAN Scale,V4,F-0' I v 111* h 4° IA pw'� k v REP A 3 4 k 'a' Vet( NOTES goesethom I.110.5 PLAN IS IN (CE FPOI 'E VIM MAC A-40-2400 RESTROOM FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT SHE 2.AIL BEY&WL1LIT FREE BOLL EE MILT M ACCORDANCE M S W2-D-biICO �L1 SCHEDULE C FOR&WRER FREE ALl.F55. FINISH/DOLOR SCHEDULE 3.NONE.ALL STAIRS.RAMPS..V10M6.MO HANDRAILS TO BE 9FRIID ADO IN5TMIID 0191E BT OTTERS TFLfla OTERNISE SP OOFIED) 4.NOTE.All BMRCMBITM.COOR0.5 AND DI'RSEFR5 SHALL SE TOWN REACH 91RFAGE MANIFACTOR COLOR RANGE OF 5E01011 I1042-4 NO NOT LESS IWAI 36'AV. YMHH6i WAN 0N IBf64E RFR3.V tC/P/MILPIi%G ENVELOPE VCT V ENE 11tFQ' W I BPLDRN HEATED TV MORE RESISTANCE PEAT 1.AL PROMS 1MO TO MINIMIZE514A MsR I F,(MLKW.6��,OR DRAWING INDEX MTEIOR HAUS '.YE'WY4'B STIAIYT(AEAM O'EEC131{Jl 4 MJ.VMtlRBPRRBIOSEDBEAHAAMMOF 5MR 013 141C01 TRENTON MOD IMpAH OAK 4 BJILDM3 AYA0435 LE AS' IYKT5 OR FLB1M5514LL BE`FA,FD./NT eFo OD DOOMS TU1.E MD bA42NFD TO LIMIT AIR'FAkSTP(MEG ISMS) 00 COVER MET-SGBJRfS-NOTES STRUCTURAL 10 FLOOR PAR 9006EXTERIOR PX'.RS M 332 2XEALBS SHALL 00C(311c4NF.FS 52)N)IA FILLERM3) 20 DAWNS SECTION . Fp PETAL 5MES ISO 2,4PEKIs 510 APO`T TOWERI:(D SRAM AT EI4H SIDE 30 LI6NIILK/PONERCLN FLAN FASCIA FETAL PIES ISO H N114 LAP MICE 11J TOWER 4A DROWN ELEVATIONS Rµ IEVAMA¢ 1E0 3.MI11Iia ON SHORT Of TOP PLATE 4b'(B)16l NAILS FOR LOl5 HALLS; (AL bE 1 SHORT MISSAST15 51 500 PLAN-VETOES ROOFM6 pJRAMH MITE 4.ALL HM41bAW FALIN&NEOT GALL®6R MPLANS`_HMG BE PER 41iIBLiI-&I NAILINS GAF 'HARK MOM Me ANACORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT PATE' A Dal DBATTK a�o2 /29 SI OY KEY POLY N 8 VD I, INC.. �""'E& < 24' MOD. PRESS BOX W/SKID 51.09O3-IO6 MARYSVILLE,WA 95211 FLR PLAN - SCHEDULES - NOTES (36O)653-5190 MET TITLE Ham' 36454-0 (3W)659-1135 FAX. SIP RAN NO. 1R5 CRAM V1FDVrBR@FLPIC.®H11YLf IIENUTBIClM91i OF YIARET'EH+�IW. • /J /� / /;, i / / `4 0„ a lk 4P, 0 ),AS S\-‘QER 48 S�\DER 4a \` ,\a "ke S\\DER oie \ 48"7A SV,g-R MI .NI GA ORP RAIL AA -IP SA Y WXERA.Mw' ' RXM TO)TO MATTA'.IOIrx' . YEW 0T04 •24-04.GOITGOITER OR y F /^1 13.00405 ROOFlGEILING A55EMBLYnER rAdE rc.1B+-n I \ S7 9 S __ _- _ .WLAl!Rr1B+R2AIEROOFR0KTNPASIH[o0A55c NO ROM Y15T Yd10• _ 1 - — 1111= RAM9RIXFINy FN-W IMViRE 514£1 w V51r I -15/3D 0 0 9fn1MIG Ul IO-LOX fl.TM'.O l`..ff NML Ni SC EPME1 IYIfLR•2r oG M1 I� EOM OP5O09 . a2N*(TR AT; I2OL.SMBE RM.RIR£O OLT'M (SCREEN VSTAWNS cs • -R-300 Mt122)53*0A11R.F,vm Benet JNS» WORE%RATIO& 17 1 I I PERM MAX.VAPOR DAMPER NORSPY OPE X ere TO1 BrO AND9Tilnr•5 A TO IMTGR VENT ROT45 IIII. .. M ItM I/2' MR -\ 2-AQ£ VIEW A-A - , i- SCALE; 1/2" = 1'-0' I tic-1 Ic ( ,( /( ,(i( (-2 �( if f 'Q _.,- 40 EAVE VENT DETAIL I—EXT.PULLAVJBE YnERGAFLEW3NO1 SLµE I'•I'9' -y5'ONO.MN481 TlP MO+Br NO MKW IV NAL;AMPS) SATT - M FIBERGLASS•94A1101 BAITS RR -1180I VAPOR mom us-$EVP MI IY -2 X S 5TO GRAVE 5ROS IV OG w SRYAE MROM MO _- 00P£TOP RATE.r4M.M LAP JgMR, -UT COX 02110017(9601M16) ,W 'tI = 26 GA SXMB LW 3651 5 R( MILANO PAW ®.SIOI150Y 61 ✓AICALF i N N INT.HALL ASSEPeLY -SAY AWL MOPPED f*15 PIVIOL PRAPPEO . ' 21 n • AMTOS•PN&564E r Wee e C _ -N,SIVO BRAVE 4 IIt?OL.IV51145LE MRQI NO MOLENE TOP PLATE..PIP MO UP JOINTS -ve-\AWLMOPPED 603 w RPM MINREO o BATTENS•PARS.5E4445 T 000005 4 yP PA 1VGNRE B0.1 .- .--- II6X 131 HIDE RNL FLOOR 1155EMBLYPezGAFILEIP36051— -BY VGT I -3,B-PLYWOOD MCERLAT 1BB .3M-r15 Il AIKR TY=YB EA woe © FOR VAPOR BNW&R 14X'PERM © WALL TO SKID CONNECTION 0 -z s xm BEES B L%nO4RAMING w .R.30 MLAm FONT RSTAIIGT11g0 TOOT TO SGNE 1'=Ib' 26 GA OF BB ROGR -M5A OF SIEB.CA3 0.09RE ! \ -/ - R _ i - A / N. _i eBIILDIN6 SECTION Sc•t V2'•T-d MNV. WORM y,�-II- N INC. ANAGORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT PATE aroio3 _� aSTa�'eRIT� 14219 SMOKEY POINT BLVD. JOB RR*8'% 24' MOD. PRESS 80X W/SKID sic 0903-106 CRAM IRE .kE MARYSVILLE,HA 98211 BUILDING SECTION - DETAILS FtE z-0 (360)653-5190 51gL ME - STD PLAT;ro. (360)659-1135 FAX. TRswRS w (MOT PE paces,NEW RE N^RB'cQPNR RNTRF'E*51600I It .-. 26 C6A 4'Y 5•FNtf FL65lMNS 26 6A 4•4 5.RAKE PLASM*'F.W LINE 5P 56 M511X LQOER 26 6A SPAN LINE 36 STEEL PARR'CIII- // SPAN urEY56 aul5lce CC 26 6A SPAN LINE%SaffL PAN35 _ _ _ LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT END ELEVATION 26 6A 44 5•RA11 FLA9INS 26 SA 4'm 5•RAKE P ASIIIG ELECTRICAL(QIFfTPI t 266A.`FAN IJlE 565a�PANELS I'I' 266A YIN LIIf%51SM PROIKM HALL OLYE1SF SASS BY PM L11EY%cursive LR56i YAN LI1YY36 Q11`}°E GC' OTHERS przcasEp.Hox ATE 1'RAN6t PPW . ll RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION $EEL SKID REAR END ELEVATION VHIRIG PEQXPED• p'K 24 RJ aya,64. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS .45NINOPRL,„IDE°• (16)VENT NOTCHES•6 aq„ SwbN4•.I'O• N"" REVISION °'° WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. TES SCHOOL DISTRICT °Are 9flL03 A �T01H15'°'^TAL aexne b9NNE 8'x 24' MOD. PRESS BOX VI/SKID sow 0903-106 14219 SMOKEY POINT BLVD MARYSVILLE,HA 98211 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS °P""I°� '� I (360)653-5190 gEET.me Fa 3'4-O ' (360) 659-1135 FAX. Nrs BPN,116 CNx0113E%n ew HMI ne NaneltaxNNra NNW EVEASPEOI Nu STD PLAN NO, J I NOTES • ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS , • y.0 4'FY#YBR SRP LAIR MIME(.Td 1.ALLMJHTINS WEIRS ARE INCHES CRN[FIW51 ROGR TO CENTER OF DEVICE- owe., I .1R MOT CALEB OT53Y5F NOTED • -rocs,0)FI011245 �� -buAST NNMIETC I TX5 DAWN&NE EEW MEETS PALE RFBIBrt5 OF TIE 2000 1CC E)i91 IAYPAPMNO RUYunG 2 6 TO BE AIRED IN MC/FLEX/CO C IT %T91by f.W£[HR WHIT Fl%IIpE.a WWIN 3.lYPILPL YORE S . -lR6r M R.5TNOND IS.VP-q{W 'AOLP-qOW -W+HL TNPSI REISTNIT • M AMP-q2W SS AMP-tBw -(d11RG..ROTOr81 4 SERNCE ENTRANCE-BY OTHERS SMl'LHW[T T . RATE Ma* s.SAIL RECEPTACLE TO RETAILED IS'APE rO CENTER OF -HTNL MODEL MSTiNOJ RECEPTACLE.UNLESS oiiens E SPECIFIED. 6.55010 MOLT CIRCUIT PROTECTOR REWIRED FOR ALL RECEPTACLES ,1a LIR.F%TEL!* STA W COJHi RAIE IN YET ARE%ASP IN USE COVERS*HERE REWIRED) TI -W.LB.H9L STNOFW 7 CONDUCTORSNO CONDUITS SHALL QE SIZED/NO INSTALLED iO -M6.ROM IB•N£NNOJ COMPLY NIN THE 2001 NEC 1, OO ADM HALL W BLA NK NK W COVER 3/, a ® I FOR Rm�E 1eaAOHE LIE I,LOOM CONTROLS NNLED PROVIDED FOR EACH SEPARATE AREA READILY ELECTRICAL 051RI91fIR PA/EL ACCE`}&E AT'INC POINT OF FNRf£VT.LCNIR0.5JWL�LAFAB£TF - RB. MFR. l RD NEWS CfF ALL LYNIS KININ THE SPACE 4EEC 591) 2.14MMP4 LENTINS ROVER PUT MAY T£COIRROLLED FROM A 51145.E 94TCN OR CLNIROL SHALL NOT MEW A 20 AMPERE CIRCUIT LOADED TO CM.CAPACITY. r-n9� J1-LOCFOR FUTURE 516NLI6M.RS FLUB IT A MASS SITCN IWrEE INSTALLED.PROVIDED IENVIDUAL e910E5 RETAIN � I- I+R -VESt AT PROOFCEXTERIOR DOORS IT HEIR MOTOR hew 15133) , -pO)� N -MEATIER LOVER 5 ALL LI6M5MIWN DAY WIRED ZQU yyLL E PROVIDED MIRI IICBECEP �1//�` ' �F CONTROLS SEPARATE rnw THE EB@N.LIENRN6 ARYL I5B3) Lf'NA ® I mania PATLEIR`FACES ENCLOSED BY YAWLS AND CORTNNR82 OR FE/ER LIGR FoniRE.DO HOT REQUIRE SEPARATE SYPTCIWB. 4 EXTERIOR 11H1IL5 NOT INTENDED FOR 2414C USE SHALL BE 6 NIROLLED BY A CC sadaCRRbC E 4-EEC1 3570g FI� - MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SC I.INIG CONTROL SYSTEMS MALL OETESTED TOBl5FE MAT coma CEVY$, -HEATER:FAG N215 FM FORCED CO'FCWMS EWIRE?.N SYSTEMS ARE CALIBRATED,AOJBTED.MO QERAIE -SF5C'comm.N YWL IN ACC RDNY£HEM APPROVED RAM AND`H'.CFICAIIQB.A CQWRFE 1y..y1 Il`I -SRD CONTP0..CONSTANT SPED REPORT OF TEST FRCCFAWS AM PSELIS SHALL SE FILED SITN TIE MEP. LIGHTING/POWER/ITII }6 P Y'..1E -ELECTRICAL.IIOEO1.13Obm CLN155KW01 REPORT SMALL COMPLY NTH/EEC 14164210FL41414..1, / OWER/ MEGI 1 PLAN 2 ALL EQUIPMENT JALL HAVE ID AM PREVENTIVE 'v !I/JNIBWICE I6TRICNM9 WISED TO GEtS.REWIRED ACT Yabt /We1'O• ILYI SRNL OE STATED oN READILY ACCESSIBLE Wg E S.REEL 114E ONE UNE DIAGRAM WERE/RAM S D REF F24 1Ma4w • aO NIP - 51NSLE RASE ANN EENBt I-IN'ERS OR IP CTHHN LED BC \ / / 9 Pwl SO 5 _ I WTARNPYNW ewMOOD N Mr CO MOW TO(RAILER FRAME MD COLD RATER PIPE o O6TQER9BIRTA grog WHITLEI' E1/ERGREEN INC. ANAGORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE �� JC 14211 SMOKEY POINT BLVD. BNLAIE 8 X 24 MOD. PRESS BOX NVSKID sw o9os-106 MARYSVILLE,WA 90211 ELEGT/MEGH/HVAG PLAN - SCHED DRAM Dr. -It _ (360)653-5190 MeT TITLE FM 3645-3.O (360) 659-1135 FAX. TM EMRE CANNOT H REPRDOKED NNW IC rmnal OMEra MMNM MENEM Mu STD RAN NM x• 26 GA 4'x 5'RAKE FLASHING 26 GA 4k 5'RAKE MSJNN6 NEMEINNNIIMMIIMMEMIIIIIIMIll SPAN LINE Sr 36 OUTSIDE CORNER 26 GA SPAN LINE 36 SUE&PAIEL' �� SPAN LINE SP 36 OUTSIDE CO -HI I 3660.SPPN LINE%SIEFL PANELS1. ]I4iIIiI _ _ II I LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT END ELEVATION 26 GA Yx Y RAKE FLASHING 26 50.4'x 5'RAKE FLASHING HfL1RIGAL CONELTd 26 GA s/41 LINE 36 STEEL PAI✓8_i 26 GA SPAN LINE 36 STEEL PP18.` ST.B BROKE HALL LILY BCE BYI SPAN LINE 5P 36 OUTSIDE CCp1ER SPAN LINE GP 36 OUTSIDE CC 0%325 I RECESSED VEAIIEt PROOF I.", WhREUN HEABOVE CGOVER PLATE FO, RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION G'®' ID REAR END ELEVATION VENTING REQUIRED. 9'X2 IO,aP .64s EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ;^R NOTCHES Stale.I/4'•1'b' / x """ REVISIONOde WHITLEY EVERGREEN INC. ANAGORTES SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE v7v� 0 C6fa'E'�'"^� a+am, -KB MK S'x 24' MOD. PRESS BOX IN/ SKID 5N.0103-106 14211 SMOKEY POINT BLVD.MARYSVILLE,HA 9H211 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS _ DRAM BY (360)653-5190 se 111E FILE. 36c5-4—O (360)659-1135 FAX. mf DRAINS GINONBE arm law SC WIEN OMEN!CF e.,N,4el STD PLAN SO /� i 0 aacii1„0oiwe11a1_a7_,_ 0-1a.1- LL0*1- Stt laaat-- Wilialolrn:ac o Zo'.0,GoCpictvpttd ai1\ b�Lpb� Vi rr.,ig,Stlt1 I ' ay0r' ' mod. \' -''..-ccW'O-aSic0\c.t-1O0.4 1-;9 4 e1t*0140 oraiSyo41r oft"sI416az'‘#4i ? 9pk€0b0 1.7 w, 1 � C, d l.- Alirrr.-------t-----%X------r- 10:, i- 1� I \ sk 4, id d1.1 V4"' '/'/ .i , 11111 . ‘ � \-111 I .11 I I iiii.I I I 1.1. 1.II.,fr x We.cr--a a 1°.11.11.0-x1 ri4 I I I a I I IIII.0-x Sri''�'�, s \ . , t o- o-F „w / l Y 0. 4-10 2'-5" 2i" 2 " v. TYP shy r IPflh]L I. 26602—D TYP Of r1-4 P— (2 TOTAL) OER 71NE O.C. Fl%NRE BUILD WELDOUT 011gadg®ffa.o.Box pis `' ��• /�.,)�O GENEVA, ALABAMA 36340 Q�n n f f f RS n1 334-694-2296 la LI L1tlLi L1 `W' L1LI IJ r �0 •.oe REVISIONS BY OA1E REO'D: 1 N a o MI : B6CA z ! � !(]! 1 ` 10/15/03 it. rr r u 'k�r -1' ` . OR�N GES cm MArL: STEEL. o ; 90_. _ i�:i WGT: �ye pY aa D £ Na GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION Fq $� ANA ORTES TAB UM 26602-B6 STAIR BEAM • ICI MEMORIAL STADIUM PRESS BOX PROJECT ANACORTES,WASHINGTON STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PRESS BOX STEEL UNDERSTRUCTURE DESIGN LOADS LIVE LOAD 100 PSF ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS WIND DESIGN VELOCITY 100 MPH SEISMIC ZONE 3 DESIGN REFERENCES: AISC LRFD 3RD EDITION ACI 318 1997 UNIFORM BLDG. CODE NFPA 102 1995 CODE PERFORMED FOR OUTDOOR ALUMINUM GENEVA,AL. BY / RICHARD BARRIOS,P.E. '� 22as e - CIF eisTo. 0 Cl�.:. Ss/%NAIEN •_ to-31" ?7 ' EXPIRES12/19/04 1 RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 10212 WORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 sr BY /co DATE D-31'"°3 SUBJECT Press Box Understructure-Anacortes, WA. SHEET 1 OF__ CHKD BY___ DATE Steel Frame Design- JOB NO. 03549 GIVEN: Steel frame undersiructure for a stadium press box support to be A572 steel(Fy=50 ksi) Structural design loads are as follows: Dead Load(box)- 40 psf Floor Live load- 100 psf Roof Load -20 psf Wind load velocity- 70 mph All connections are to be made with 5/8" diam.A325 bolts. REQ'D: Design framing members to support the given loads. SOLUTION: 8' 6 6 12'-0" Fig ' • 8'-0-7 Step 1 -Determine Design Loads using LRFD Loading Combinations: 1.2D+ 1.6L+0.5Lr(roof) 1.2D+ L6Wind+ 1.OLL 0.9D- 1.6W RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. . 10212�/W�ORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY 46 DATE /o-3l-03j SUBJECT Press Box Understructure-Anacortes, WA. SHEET 2 OF CHKD BY_ DATE Steel Frame Design- Joe NO. 03549 Load Determination Con't Wind Load- Using UBC 1997 Code Method 2 Wind Velocity 100 mph @ 15 ft in height, Exp. C; p=gCeCgl where q=25.6 psf Ce= 1.19 (exp C) Cq= 1.3 (horz); -0.7 (vertical) I = 1.0 Wind Design Pressure, p=25.6 psf(1.19)(1.3)(l.0)= 39.60 psf Seismic Loading : (From 1997 UBC) Design Base Shear, V=3.Ca Wp Zone- 3 Rw 1= 1.0 (Tb116-K) Rw=5.6 Ca= 0.36 (Tbl 16-Q) Soil profile=SD (16-J) V=3(0.36)(1.0) Wp = 0.193Wp 5.6 Press Box Dead Load: Wp=40 psf. Seismic Base Shear Load =0.193(40 psf)=7.68 psf <Wind Load=39.60 psf Seismic Loading is not critical in the design. ' II RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. • , 10212 WORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY 45 DATE I0-31-a3 SUBJECT Press Box Undersiructure-Anacortes, WA. SKEET 3 CHKD BY DATE Steel Frame Design- JOB NO. 03549 Press box steel floor beam: Floor beams are spaced at 6'-0"on center. - Dead Load: 40 psf Factored Loads 1.2DL = 1.2(40 psf)=48.0 psf 1.6LL(floor)= 1.6(100 psf)= 160.0 psf 0.5Lr(roof)=0.5(20 psf)= 10.0 psf Uniform load on floor beam,w=(48 psf+ 160 psf)(6.0')= 1248 lb/ft= 1.25 k/ft f l 1 ! '1 11 n A RL= RR=5.0kips 8' +Mux= 10.0 ft-k Using a W8x10(CR 50) ObMp=33.0 ft-k Lp=3.10' 4bMr= 23.4.2 ft-k Lr=7.80' Assuming full lateral support: •bMn=tiibMp>+Mux o.k. Press Box Floor Beam W8x10 (OR 501 li RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 10212 WORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY /CI7 DATE to 3ts3 SUBJECT Press Box Understructure-Anacortes, WA. SHEET 4 OF CHKD BY DATE Steel Frame Design- JOB No. 03549 Support Beam Design P=Skips P/2 PP P P P/2 6' tA 18' B A 6' Determine reactions: ISu RA=RB= 5(5 k)l2= 12.5 kips Vu, k f ■z.5 k ■ o +1Y1ux= 15.0 ft-k; -Mux= 15.0 ft-k • z-Sic ■ Beam selection: Try W 12x26 (GR 50): Mu, ft-k '4ibMp= 140 ft-k;Lp=5.3';BF=4.64 k 156 k 4bMr= 100 ft-k; Lr= 13.8' 4bMnx=Cb[ObMp- BF(Lb-Lp)] = 1.0[140 k-ft-4.64 k(6.0'-5.3')]= 136.75 ft-k •bMnx> Mux = 15.0 ft-k o.k Support Beam W12x26 (GR 50) RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. . 10212 WWOORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 ' • BY L DATE r3310o3 SUBJECT Press Box Understruct re-Anacortes, WA SHEET 3- OF_,�_ CHKD BY DATE Steel Frame Design- JOB NO. 03549 Column Design Interior column design Pu= 12.5 kips ;Lc= 12' Try HSS 5x5x3/16" From AISC(LRFD)For axial loading, tbcPn=95 kips with KL= 12'-0" Column HSS 5x5x316" Base Plate Design : Using a'A"x 13"x 13" plate Pu= 12.5 kips determine thickness: Design bearing strength, 4 cPp,Pp= 0.85fc'Ap=0.85(3.0 ksi)(169 in)=430.95 kips tpcPp= 0.60(430.95 kips)=258.57 kips>'Pu= 12.5 k o. k. tp=m[ (2Pu)l0.9FyBN]to or tp=n[(2Pu)/0.9FyBN]'rz n=N -bf = 4.0" m= N-d = 4.0" 2 2 tp=0.27" '/a"x 13"x13"base plate is adequate RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. • 102122W�ORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 //� BY "mil DATE /15-31'49 SUBJECT Press Box Understructure-Anacortes, WA. sHEm.4 oF_ CHKD BY__ DATE Steel Frame Design- JOB NO. 03549 Connection Design (WL 1)Pr=39.6 pst(8')= 316.80 lb/ft 1 8' <--Pr l) � t Press box to floor beam connection T I Press box is stitch welded to floor beams with 3/16"fillet welds Force per beam, F.= 1.6 316.80 Ib/ft 6' =3042 lb ( )( ) 1901 lb 4.0' EML=0 =-3042 Ib(4.0') - VR(8') VR= 15211b4, I HL-* t Vi, Ha-*4' VR HL=HR=30421b/2= 1521 lb -+ I 8' Using 3/16"ER60 electrode 2"long at 12"on center Length of weld for each floor beam=2"/ft(6')= 12" of weld Weld capacity R. = (0.60)(60 ksi)(0.707X3/16")=4.77 kips/in _ ila=0.75 L= 12" mRn=0.75(4.77 k/in)(12")=42.96 kips > 1.52 kips :. 3/16"fillet weld is adequate RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 10212 WORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY /`'L�3 DATE ! '�l-v3 SUBJECT Press Box Understruchue-Anacortes, WA. 7 SHEET` OF CHKD BY DATE Steel Frame Design - JOB NO. 03549 Connection Design II Floor beam to support beam connection: Each end of floor beam is connected to the support beam with(4)5/8"0 A307 bolts Puv= 1.52 kips Puh= 1.52 kips I For 5/8"0 A307 bolt, Ag=0.31 in"2; I 4)Vn =4wFuAg=0.75(24 ksix0.31 in)=5.58 bps $Pn=4tFuAg=0.75(45 ksi)(0.31 in2)= 10.46 kips For Shear: Vu =(1.52 k)(l/4) = 0.38 ksi < 4)Vn = 5.58 kips o.k. For Tension Pu= (1.52 kips)(1/4) =0.38 kips < en = 10.46 kips o.k. :. 5/8"6 A307 bolts are adequate Support beam to column , Vertical force Puv= 1.52 k(5 stringers)1/2= 3.80 kips t nr Horizontal force Puh= 1.52 k(5 stringers)1/2= 3.80 kips- using(4)5/8"6 A307 bolts For Shear: Vu =(3.08 k)(1/4) = 0.77 kips < 4)Vn = 5.58 kips o.k. For Tension Pu= (3.08 kips)(1/4) =0.77 kips < 4)Pn = 10.46 kips o.k. :. 5/8"6 A307 bolts are adequate for connection RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. • 10212//W/fORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY It DATEtb-3/S, SUBJECT Press Box Understructure-Anacortes, WA. SHEET_ OF CHKD BY DATE Steel Frame Design - Joe No, 03549 Lateral Bracing Design 8' E Ph 7/8"m rod 12'-0" L2-I/2x2x3/16" 18'-0" 8-0" Bracing 1 to press box Ph 1= 1.6(318.601b/ft)(24')1/2=6117 1b=6.12 k i brace member length= 14.42' Ptu= 6.12 k(14.42'/8')= 11.03 kips Bracing member is L2-1/2x2x3/16"A36 with(2) 5/8"$bolts in one line: An=0,809 in2-0.37 in2=0.439 in2 Allowable tensile force=4tFuU= 0.75(58 ksi)(0.75)(0.439 in2)= 14.32 kips >Ptu o.k. L2-1/2x2x3/16"is adequate Column Anchorage: Using four each 3/4"4,A307 bolts shear WL 1= 6.12 k/4= 1.53 kips—0.WL 1= [6.12 k(12'/8')]/4 =2.30 kips t Concrete resistance for shear: •Vn=$1/2PpAc= 0.6(1/2)(2.55 ksiX12")(0.875")=8.03 ldps (12"embedment) bolts: $Vn= 18.0 ksi(0.60 in2)=7.70 kips >Vu=0.37 k o. k. (ITn=32.62 ksi(0.60 in2)= 14.42 kips>Tu=0.93 k o. k. 7/8"4, anchor bolts are adequate. RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 10212 WORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY IA DATE/0'3['Q3 SUBJECT Press Box Understructur'e-Anacortes, WA q SHEET! Of CHKD BY____ DATE Steel Frame Design- JOB NO. 03549 Lateral Bracing Design Can't Bracing parallel to press box Ph= 1.6(36.9 psf (8')(8')=3779 lb= 3.78 ki Brace length=21.63' Force in brace member, Ptu=3.78 k(21.63'/18')= 4.54 kips Bracing member is 7/8"4 A36 : An=0.60 in2 Allowable tensile force=rptFt= (33 ksi)(0.60 in2)= 19.80 kips >Ptu o.k. :. 7/8" cP rod is adequate • • • RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 10212 WORTHINGTONPPLANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY �� N DATE -3/-t3 SUBJECT Press Box UndeislNcture-Anacortes, WA SHEET LO OF CHKD BY DATE Steel Frame Design- JOB NO. 03549 Stair Design Dead Load: 6 psf Live Load= 100 psf Factored Loads 1.2DL = 1.2(6 psf)= 7.2 psf I 1.6LL(floor)= 1.6(100 psf)= 160.0 psf Stringers to be C8x11.5 (Gr36) Uniform load on stair stringer beams,w=(7.2 psf+ 160 psf)(2.5')=418 lb/ft= 0.418 klft II 12' 12' For simplicity assume equal spans of 12'-0" RA= RB = 0.375(0.418 k/ft)(12')= 1.88 kips Rc= 1.25(0.418 k/ft)(12')=6.27 kips +Mux=0.418 k/ft(12')2(1/8) = 7.50 ft-k Using a C8x11.5 (GR 36) ¢bMp=0.9(36 ksi)(9.63 in3)(1/12")= 26.0 ft-k C8x11.5 is adequate as stringer Column Check Ps=6.27 k(2)= 12.54 kips Lc' = 7' Using a HSS 5x5x3/16" (DP„= 113 kips @ KL=7' > P„ o.k. Stair support column HSS 5x5x3/16"is adequate RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. - 10212�/WJ ORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY /44 DATE ID-3/-=-3 SUBJECT Press Box Undeistiuchue-Anacortes, WA. SHEET If of_,_ CHKD BY DATE Foundation Design- JOB NO. 03549 Given: Spread footings to support bleachers. Footing consist of 24"$pier bearing on pad. Soil Properties- soil bearing capacity: qa=2000 psf; ym= 115 lb/ft^3 Concrete properties-fc'=3000 psi; fy=60 hi. Footing depth to be a minimum of 36" below ground surface. Req'd: Design the foundations to support bleacher service leads adequately. Solution: Row A Design Loads: (DL+LL) Py= 12.5 k(0.85)= 10.63 k 4-(sht 3) Wind Load 1 Pz = 6.12 k(1/1.6)=3.83 kips F (sht 8) Wind Load 1 Pz =3.83 k(12/8)=5.75 kips j (sht 8) (WL 1) Mx Pz • d=3.83k(3.5')= 13.40fb.k For DL+LL+WL : Using a combined footing 3'-6"x 10'-0"x 1'-0" Fig wt=6.75 Ups For Dead+Live Service Loads: bearing pressure, qn= 2(10.63)k =0.71 ksf<2.0 ksf o.k 3' x10' chk foundation for overturning with DL+ WL. Use a S.F. = 1.5 Mo.t.=13.40 ft-k(1.5)=20.10 ft-k Resisting Forces: conc. 6.75 k soil 6.6 k press box DL 4.25 k total 17.60 k I resisting moment,Mr= 17.6 k(5')=88.0 ft-k >Mo.t. =20.10 ft k o.k. RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 10212 WORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY /5 DATE I0-3/-0)) SUBJECT Press Box Understructure-Anacortes, WA. $HEFT lz OF CHKO BY DATE Foundation Design- JOB No. 03549 Check thickness in shear Check foundation for two-way shear under a tributary section of combined footing Factoring Loads: Ultimate Load=0.75(1.4DL+ 1.7LL+ 1.7 W ind) DL=0.4(10.63 k)= 4.25k x 1.4 = 5.95k LL =0.6(10.63k)=(6.38k+ 5.75k) x1.7 = 20.62k total 26.57 k x 0.75= 19.93 k • Net Factored soil pressure, qn=P/A = 19.93 k = 1.14 ksf 3.5'x 5' I I Concrete and steel data(strength design) ` t capacity reduction factors: $=0.9(flexure) ; 0.85 (shear) 4.31'7 1'-8" / with fc' =3000 psi: vc=4$1fc' = 186.2 psi(2 way-punching shear) 2'-0"—/ fy=60,000 psi For a 12"thick pad: d= 12"- 3"-0.375"=8.625" 21" chk 2-way shear at de : average qn on cdef = 1.14 ksfx(29.62"+42")x 1.67' = 5.68 kips=Vu 3'-6" (2)12" 1 vu= 5,680lb = 26.75 psi< 186.20 psi o.k. • 5'-0" / :.12"thickness is adequate • RICHARD BARRIOS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 10212//W//)�ORTHINGTON LANE, PROSPECT, KENTUCKY 40059 (502)412-2199 BY K.G6 DATE /P`3/-th l SUBJECT Press Box Understructure-Anacor tcs, WA. SHEET 13 OF CHKD BY DATE Foundation Design- JOB NO. 03549 it Reinforcing Steel Req'd (at column face): Design for pmin= As = 0.002bd As=0.002(12")(8.625")=0.207 in2 per ft. Use#5 bars @ 12"o/c which provides 0.31 in2 per ft. Pedestal Reinforcing: Min As=0.005Ag= 0.005(254.5 in^2)= 1.27 in2 use(4) #5 bars with#3 stirrups @ 12"on center As= 1.27 in2 Typical Footing 3'-6"x lD+'-t"x with#5 bars(cry, 12"o/c E.W. \ ./4. v <TYP /3/id V $ , �F W A 11 'Q.� OilPy, TYP>3nd V Vie V < I A�Uc QFG/uT g.t* EXPIRES 12/19/64 ! , 5° in 26602-D A- 1°0 WEEP 26602-D 26602-D A- nd TYP A_ /10LE iihilri � Ade � _ S. �' tn 26602-D 26602-D / `� 1 ° jit CENTER ON TUBE 26602-0 CENTER ON TUBE y 51° 26fi02-D P- • TO BE DETERMINED - OPER1WME O.C. FIXTURE , , BUILD HELUOUT OPER THE U.C. �O DO aI IS O OOCf P.O. BOX I18 REOD: 1 l.�Damocma� GENEVA,3 A6A4-22 36340 334-664-Z296 CUT MK: CICA SCALE 3/4°=1'-0° REVISIONS BY DATE MATT: STEEL PUNCH DATE 10/14/03 WGT: GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION DEBURR OWN L15 law 70ll MEMORIAL STADIUM NO. MATERIAL USAGE ANACORTES, WA COLUMN 26602-Cl 5° TO BE DETERMINED 5• 26602—DA 26602—D 26602—D 26602—D Si" p_ P— CENTER ON TUBE T NS CENTER ON TUBE _ LEDI — —" ne v 26602-0 — 0 WEEP is 26602—D A— HOLE � " A— 26602—D `yam >3hf V TYP/a/16'V J/IB•V <T1P _. , 28415 `„ PCa "��Ojz-zrarrlHl.ti, .. - .�..s�7 il Iql Il �>J/t6•V III I •i/4. V <TYP OPER TIME O.C. FlXNRE BUILD {�� I� WEWOUT OPER TIME O.C. 74...4: OaLS� OOO 1� PO BO% 116REO'D: 1CUT 19a�oUa� GENEVA, ALABAMA 36340 d 3J4-fi84-2296 MK: C2CASCA E REVISIONS BY DATE MAIL STEEL PUNCR DATE 10/14/03 ET: DR'N a5 'c o OEBURR GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION AP'`D 1111.1 MEMORIAL STADIUM NC. MATERIAL USAGE ANACORTES, WA Z6VOL-CZ COLUMN TYP> <TYP - TYP>Jnr v J/1C v J/16'v l 'oifr''. "2i '15.?; ?¼# + + „. to 1, I 643 I tQ '' �Qt.,F6#!c f5`" /��' 2. I EXPIRES 12/19/o 4 5" 5" 26602-D A- 26602-D 26602-D 1"0 WEEP 1. A-______..---OJnr v <rap p— HOLE ma l� it- 26602-0 26602-0 / P 26602-D P- 1 " 13" CENTER ON TUBE T- CENTER ON TUBE —1..- 5 " 266P 2-D 4 TO BE DETERMINED OPER TIME O,C. FIXTURE BUILD 1 y� WELDOUT REOD: 1 OPER ME O aISC. O O©C� AO BOX 18 CENEVA, ALABAMA36340 MK: C3CA cur CQraa 'runt 334-6H4-2296 MAT'L: STEEL SCALE 3/4"=1.-O0 RENSIONS BY DATE WGT: # PUNCH DATE 10/14/03 GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION DEBURR URN GE5 IcKD AP'VO Mil MEMORIAL STADIUM NO MATERIAL USAGE ANACORTES, WA 26602—C3 COLUMN t 5° TO BE DETERMINED - 5" 266A 2—D 26602-0 26602-0 26602-0 51� P- T- P- d —te • r ' CENTER ON TUBE N. CENTER ON TUBE ' �!� tn 1°0 WEEP is 6602-D�q'Ay v <TYP 26602 D - HOLE �l� 1 eimi P— /C V TYP>7A8'v + # 4 p d TYP>iAe T'P>W V MC <TYP 0 28475 Z� Q 9ve. o'f FGISTE`L' 4.44/ f'SS/ONALe"jj EXPRES 12/19/04 OPER nME O.C. FIXTURE BUILD NELOOUT REO D: 1 OPER nME a.c W I . 0 n[lnJ]�d (QOTT��11� P a. BOX nfi MK: C4CA CUT Qk� L rirr UJL 3 GENE VA, ALARAM2 36340 � 334-684-Z296 - MAT'L' STEEL SCALE 3/4"=1'_O• REVISIONS BY DATE WGT: # PUNCH DATE 10/14/03 GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION DEBURR URN as (cKO AP'VO "Tl MEMORIAL STADIUM NO. MATERIAL USAGE ANACORTES, WA 26602—C4 COLUMN II 1 Y Rt 5 )ks. O l ,. � , I r 10 5" la 1 '3 �yFS9ONALe \. 266 - L - IIII A- 5° 1"0 WEEP �, HOIE .'•� � �� /� — - „ ail is 26602-D i$° �a T- 26602-D ---- l'i "--------------—-—- P- TO BE DETERMINED OPER iME Q.C. Fl%TURE BUILD WEIDOUI i OPER TIME Q.C. /� O /BOO Ai f+�- fOQ�I fOQ1 fI�(f1 P.O. BO% 118 REQ'D: 1 1�W 0 U CENE334 684A22966340 CUT MK: CSCA SCALE "— 0 " REVISIONS BY DATE 3/4 -1 -0 MAT L STEEL PUNCH DATE 10/14/03 WGT: DR'N Lcg IORD DEBURR GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION AP D BTU MEMORIAL STADIUM NO. MATERIAL USAGE ANACORTES, WA COLUMN 26602-C'S . 241-8" - NO0'"—MID N 1"VCO0 CEO NW LC) N Y] 1 1 1 1 1 1 . ^CVO tal yip In0^ m N N • S .. 4♦ • K]IOp 21'-4" i &co 1)...... 3I-4° I 1 MK: ( —2/" -•--22" 1 ., 2 „ .m— TYP>ane' 21" -.�-- q9p 9� . 415 it I I I I I I I I \ 1 1 �,c�,, GIS EPE' vy�• ti) Ifi /l I \ \ I I EXPIRES 12/19/ Oi, 26602-0 T/anr>2-4 P- ..r A1.-.d. o0 I 1 N N o iv i+1 f N'7103 OPER ONE O.C. , II FIXTURE BUILD {�� I'r� PELDOUT REQ'D: 2 OPER ME p.C. `= �� Oa SL O� O� AO BOX 115 MK: B1CA 0 c GENE 334 684-22Dfi634O MAT : W 12x26 (BEAM) CUT QDa[r1oCn�aLuP SCALE 3/8"=1I-0" REVISIONS BY DATE 1 TYPE: STEEL PUNCH DATE 10/15/03 HOLES: 3/4" 0 DRN C5 'cKD DEBURR WGT: # AP'VD GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION D MEMORIAL STADIUM ND. MATERIAL USAGE 6 ANACORTES, WA 2602-81 HORIZONTAL / / , pt C. q f, 1 'I 4,46 i fit® ; c i TO 12.:4A 24'-6i° -0 SS t� ti� =� �ItO =-i.r " I. jc.`cG.STSFs„�.. .0`4', 41.1- IT CO i0 N N EXPIRES 12/19/0 4 _ lye N I OPER NE D.C. FIXTURE 1 BUILD RE0'D: 1 wELDDur MK: B2CA MAT'L: W 8x10 (BEAM) 0 C0 (aR('or©o©CD IT P.O. BOX ne TYPE: STEEL l[la�onam GENE33, ALABAMA36340 � 334-684-2296 - HOLES: 3/4° 0 UNLESS NOTED SCALE 3/8°=1'-0° REN51ONS BY GATE WGT: , DATE 10/15/03 GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION OWN Cog ICA AP'w WILE MEMORIAL STADIUM NO. ANACORTES, WA 26602-B2 PRESSBOX CAP BEAM ,. / O / /24'-6i° A-4. IP .-,� c' aF wAs i At @it to co :r �F i0 i0 N N ;q 514' ,. i , 6ST,y+ Al / 1 1 i:. 1 t 71 MK: \ / \ / \ / �� I 9 1a4+n I+ A- ECG/ -act r .<','''' -' �471; ',�ce.gs/ONALE� -, ' ' I 1 EXPIRES 12/19/04 I OPER TIME D.C. FIXTURE BUILD REO'D: 1 NELDOU1 MK: B3CA MATL W 8x10 (BEAM) e, ©wad 0o p BOX lie GENEVA,OA ABAMA 36340 I TYPE: STEEL o 1=1MOTIoITOaBTI 334-684-2296 - HOLES: 3/4° 0 SCALE 3/8°-1'-0° REVISIONS BY DATE WCT: # DAM 10/15/03 GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION URN a ICRD AP VD ilThE MEMORIAL STADIUM NO. ANACORTES, WA 26602—B3 PRESSBOX CAP BEAM et 7'-6 ^ OVERALL LENGTH • qLs). - s-6 LL�� i 'X O g16 �4°, At / I '...1"--.... 1 1 I \/, in"— oIl VAZeen,`c TEms e _ tf Zc SSJOPJALE : x r 1 EXPIRES 12/1910 t ,T f N 3/16'V <TY / Tr>y e'>2-4 P 26602-D 26602-D P- 26602-D A- 2 TOTAL W- 4 TOTAL j _ 4- $ OPER TIME O.G. FUTURE BUILD 2EIDOUT Op �J� OO� P.O BOX 116 . M 4 «_ %� GENEV A684-2A 66340 MK: B4CA �e ��]��[�[U�[ L( 334-684-2296 MAIL: STEEL SCALE IREVISIONS BY DATE WOT: # DATE 10/15/03 GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION ION a ICKD APV 111 MEMORIAL STADIUM NO. ° ANACORTES, WA 26602-84 PRESSBOX BEAM + + + e- c + + _ — 7'-6i' OVERALL LENGTH \e„ — ,,,1.0 ';',g ,, 6., 777 GGG d -i-,....e,.._ . I I 1.q„P 9.,-,.-0 1r F'�1 x Ty CY 1 11f�.Y�iC! jx y�E-- 1' A B �y d 'F / 'p .7 204i5 (,p j.w... 41- f if ( I \ //11\\ I t EXPIRES 12/19/O`( T1P 26602—D T P>wir>2-4 26602—D / am V ` P— 26602—D A— 2 TOTAL W- 3 TOTAL �- 4 + OPER TIME O.C. MIRE BUILD NELDOUT REO'D: 1 eQ CD[U]RQo Qo CENEVA, A P.C. Bax I e MK: BSCA O LABAMA 3fi340 GQtanlinaccon 374-684-2296 MAIL: STEEL SCALE Ix_I,—Dx TENSIONS BY DATE WGT: # DATE 10/15/03 GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION DR'N c5 ICU ' AP'VD DT`s MEMORIAL STADIUM NO ANACORTES, WA 26602-85 PRESSBOX BEAM / ?/h ✓ A vF 20 TREADS 0 11' = 18'-4" 5'-0' ADJ. ELBOW 90' ELBOW 5" i ELBOW `''I lir F 5• 'I '♦ i 36' ALUMINIZED 4'-0' 11'-10' 13'-9' I 9'-0' 9'-0'— I 24'8 CCNC PIER `i _I I CHAIN LINK FENCE _ (LANDING PERIMETER) REBAR CAGE s= j3 19 13' x 13' 9p' - SroE-OUTLET v I ELBOW —_—_—_—___—_—_—_—_—_ r--�--, lei ADJ. ELBOW m 1 i — — — — — — — — — 0 " .VS 2x6 MU REWARD 0 5'-0" •, II EIEV 0 1 1 I o ' , C8x11.5 1 + I �I I 1 ,O V 1 ---j --' I gI I In (4) 7/p• x 1*-6' HEADED BOLTS `glas4 ÷ _L_ 4:H .._ 0 05)19 i __ ht I TO B 1 r+ NED lb Cr Airs* -�-- i f BACK OF BLEACHER 11 11 SEE FOUND. PLAN ` 0N® BENCH MARK: 100.00' GRADE 0 CENTER OF FRONT ; i "' — 111 `— BACK LINE OF BLEACHER RNISHED GRADE — FOUNDATION PLAN c ~ TIES o 4• FOR TOP �Ml3xio (s) #s vERncusPrillisms- ', TI#N o 1'-0• o.c. 1 M 3/16 = 1 -0 ' YNTH 12• LEG I ) CO ' a +-t-t 0 1g I I I ` lt- PAE Alormin. b ADJ. ELEIOW 1 a —J— —L —a- • To-4- 90' ELBOW I3'-6• x 10'-0' x 1'-O' PRESSBOX COMBINED FTG. FlTTNIG � 1n /5's 0 12' EACH WAY 3'-6' x 10'-0' x 1'-0' STAIR FOOTING i3AE ' — PL 3/4'x 13'x 1'-1' 15's 0 12' EACH WAY A ELBOW _ lr(4) 7/8'0 ANCHORS SS1CA B3CA W8x10 Q,TO BE DETERMINED, �� i TO DETERMINED ga Ti 1 , ,, 5 � a e CONCRETE FOOTING I ED i ib c B,GA _ M12x26 C3CA O 3/4' = 1'-0' zs b b 1" 12'-4' 10'-9• 1 i 1/2• x 4.1/4' C8x11.5 0 0 0 0 0 70 13/4 WEDGE ANCHOR SS2CA I g W12x26 I SECTION : 82CA W8x10 1/2" = 1'-0• N 17 FRONT L ; I : I,ah;t. 6' z 6' W.W.F. FRAMING PLAN — 1 it. w 1.4 3000 PSI CON(REIE 3/16' = 1'-O' -,,E----t—C a_ —r2-7--—4,7t. -7-::: .c a • ']1 . lo i " ' : 7-10"— ` P (2) GALVANIZED 8• M I IOW HEX FAITS It 8'-0• x 24'-0' RESSBOX BUILDINGCD L 3'x 3•x 1/4• WILEG CONCRETE PAD — (BY ITIEY MFG.)) CUPPED TO SL 1 1• = 1'-0' 0 /411 4 s-0• VIEW 4:). . 11 ii I ie STAIRS UP_ 8'-D' x 24'-0' >yrr vt It _ r 1• . I I I I + - PRES58OX BUILDINGI tt (� I (BY WHIIL�Y MEG.) 1N8x10 9 I ar' '''''''---'•-•-'---.., , WI2x26 W12x26 LC 3CUPPED TO/SLOPE LEG \ \ �� 0�p1V %�� 4100 0 FRONT • , ♦ (2 GALVANIZED \ , FLOOR PLAN H VY HEX NUTS ;,-wM � b sT s_ta� 1... BACK OF BLEACHERmonsinno \ _Tr— i VIEW 1' = 1'-0' ® -} GALVANIZED STEEL ; . UNDERSTRUCTURE R0/ E. . to e2 CO q;4cwAg4 ti / LL.�. x a'>, X ti" `'�. VIEW D 9��9F�; EF, ��Q, x ��5/OP ylEr�\ Z� Inn PL 3/4•x 13•x 1'-1' N.T.S. 41, Cp g Ik (4) 7/81 ANCHORS 1 EXPIRES 12/19/ oq PL 3/4"x 13"x 1'-1' ♦ DESIGN ENGINEER (4) 7/8'8 ANCHORS ' RICHARD BARRIOS - 502-412-2199 Outdoor Pm 1>e la MAIM 311340 MMAARK UGH — 33TDOOR 3;684-22T9 MANAGER \J� Aluminum r Mg NOTED Maas sr GTE 6'-0'— THIS MATERIAL IS OWNED BY AND IS THE SOLE AND EXCU15VE MI 09/25/03 REVISED STAIR DIRECTION AND GRADE CES 10/15/03 0 0 SECTION 0PROPERTY OF THE OUTDOOR ALUMINUM COMPANY NC.. AND IS MIL 1Wm r' ® SUPPLIED TO THE: OWNER ON A CONFIDENTIAL BASS, SOLELY a I/2. ,= -p FOR USE IN CONVECTION WITH THE PROJECT USED AT RIGHT. me on FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS NE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE MEMORIAL STADIUM OR OTHER DIS'0311GN OF THESE DOCUMENTS WITHOUT THE ANACORTES WA 26602—El EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF NE OUTDOOR AUH9NUM COMPANY. PRESSBOX UNDERS1RUCTURE • • 4 itIllik I C •1 ► / 7( - 4=1-_' ' I ,/ L �rtNpD I / • G I In I L� in . M I J / ' Q lit W 0 a 1 / 1 E. \ \ F / _ ► t \/ • \ 1 ry \ CO n cG / 9 �— rl\� J \i� /iec2 ® II © ZZ O O 7 /7 \ 6 / F 6 U / / _ K / 1. // ►. \ • riC ��[---J((( W , r g \\ \ : V ^� N / _ / YL N M \ V� K 3 3 W ZCD N ir,N.N.,, rt © N 4_,/7// 47,/ ,,,,,// ....5 .crt..c-o...•. 1\0._\\ \,_ \, ,, \, ,A , / y �M �_ `2 \ `i / /' / 'k. •c, \ k \ \ \ ' - . Z i 1:11:lii -0 N \ \ 1 \• M (... .. o 17 N Yc X X X X X X X X X X x X X \\ ^ R, rypp • SF-: \ `,rt M N 3 W ��c \ \\ In 1n — Z \ ' T i I i N x x x x x x x x x x x x x x \ © 'rlfrin rPly` _ � \ . \`• EXPIRES 12/19/0q� , O O / � . — —� - . m >c >[ x x x )t x m x Yc x X fc x x ' .11111111‘ _ OPER TIME 0C. GPM TIME QC >c x x x x1 x >c x x x x x x x Cr Cr FIXTURE 4* FIXT URE Oc4 M in c0 c- - - ^ N POtn cocD 1 • BUILD M . BUM •Z l Y€iDGJT *EJDoJ1 �OEIEIll IOO�IOOII1Di P.O. BOX 118 0�e�0 OO OO p P.O. BOX 118 Lr.10W o ll El O LI LI W Ll ll Ll 334-8844-22 36340 ((( %%� E7E�1�1 E�EpE1E717�I Q�l'Al IJ LI LI 11 LI UIXILI L111 (FNEVA, ALABAMA 38340 � lfli 334-684-2296 SCALE 3/4•=1'-D• REVISIONS BY DAIS SCALE 3/4•=1'-0• REVISIONS BY DATE - DATE 10/15/03 DALE 10/15/03 OWN as IC/0 - DR'N a ICKD AP'w AP'w 'MEEMEMORIAL STADIUM NO. lRE MEMORIAL STADIUM -ND ANACORTES, WA 26602—SS2 ANACORIES, WA 26602—SS1 STAIR STRINGER STAIR STRINGER